The minority isn't correct unless it becomes apparent we'd have been better off NOT getting Rodgers. And that seems like a hard conclusion to draw based on this year's on-field product.
They were better off taking a swing at Rodgers than signing Derek Carr.
It's difficult to look at what we got this season and still say it was the better option, given that Rodgers was the reason we hired Hackett, signed Boyle, Turner, Lazard, and Cobb, are short a second round pick in this year's draft, and are going into next season with a 40 yo QB coming off of a major leg injury.
Signing Carr would have cost us less in every aspect. The gamble isn't worth it just because you took the excrement. Shitting the bed is not better than not shitting the bed.