Pick One

[bojanglesman]

BTW, I'd rather go with tiny funbags than big saggy boobs.

[Coach K]

I lucked out with a few who were the perfect mix of both though. You feel like a cartoon with your headspinning cause you feel obligated to play with both. Best problem ever to have.


Funniest part is chicks with big funbags rarely get a guy who knows how to treat em.

Few stacked chicks i got with melt when you manhandled them cause I have the big hands to give them full attention rofl

[Coach K]

BTW, I'd rather go with tiny funbags than big saggy boobs.

Yeah few prime chicks I went to HS with, time is not kind to all of them rofl. Gravity sucks, thanks slot Clooney/Bullock



The worst is small saggy funbags, I mean it's like a cruel joke

[Johnny English]

IM a sucker for a pretty face, the rest is all.gravy unless there's an area that's completely messed up.

This. You can change the shape and size of funbags and derriere through exercise, diet and surgery, but ugly is ugly - and that's the bit you're going to see the most of.

[Ignatius J Reilly]

It's funbags by a mile.  Nothing can compensate for ugly or tiny funbags, at least not long term.

It's a narrow range of funbags that stay nice long term.

[Ignatius J Reilly]

IM a sucker for a pretty face, the rest is all.gravy unless there's an area that's completely messed up.

Yes.  I don't know about just gravy, because I care about the other excrement, but face is easily the most important.  I don't want to bang a butter face.

[ScotlandJet]

Yes.  I don't know about just gravy, because I care about the other excrement, but face is easily the most important.  I don't want to bang a butter face.

I don't know what a butter face is.

This is a totally stupid poll: you can't have a poll of this magnitude without having a leg option.

I didn't vote.

[Badger]

I don't know what a butter face is.

This is a totally stupid poll: you can't have a poll of this magnitude without having a leg option.

I didn't vote.

It's when everything on a woman is attractive "but her face."

[NDMick]

derriere.

It's all about the shelf, and how she maintains her shelf.

Of course, she can't be a horse or a rat. She has to be human.

[ScotlandJet]

It's when everything on a woman is attractive "but her face."

Thanks for that. In that case I have screwed a few butter faces in my time when I was younger and drunk!

I'm still not voting- no leg option.

[bojanglesman]

I judge women solely based on their wrists.

[ons]

Face, then funbags. And legs are more important than just derriere.

Also, size of funbags hardly matters, its all about the shape/proportionality and lack of sag.

I judge women solely based on their wrists.

Finger length proportionality is where it's at.

[bojanglesman]

I think women should be born with funbags on their shoulders so by the the they are in their 40s they have sagged into place

[Pope]

Vagina musk

[Fenwyr]

It's a narrow range of funbags that stay nice long term.

It's called not having kids in most cases.  And if they are in the C range (aka perfection) invest in good sports bras.  I never complain when my wife wants to drop $40 on a sports bra every few months.  That's an investment for my future right there.

Face is certainly important, but when you get to falling in love and stuff you can ignore minor issues there.

Legs and derriere...  Well I've always liked shorter girls.  My wife always wears heels when we go out as I'm a foot taller.  If they work out the heels will put average derriere and legs in a good light.  I find neither important when fun time starts though.

With that said, cankles would be a deal breaker.