Which is technically correct, but makes me absolutely no wiser. You must be in tech support.
Wikipedia tells me that survival rates for Hodgkin's are pretty good as long as there aren't too many complicating factors.
Hodgkins is drastically better to have than non.
There's a ton of differences which won't mean excrement to most people (because it's all scientificy excrement).
But for the sake of simplicity all you need to know is that Hodgkins is much more predictable (where in your body it's going to go next) and non Hodgkins is more of a crap shoot.
So the outcomes, treatment and quality of life is much better with Hodgkins. Not to mention the survival rate is quite a bit better, plus non Hodgkins killed freaking spartacus