« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 28

Author Topic: JO Mock Discussion  (Read 53004 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

hawk

  • Blubbering Pussy
  • Chad Pennington
  • *
  • Posts: 3691
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #120 on: February 10, 2014, 09:08:37 PM »
I really wanted Greg Robinson until some poopchute took him.  Watkins, Gordon, Cameron with no one to throw to them.  Hmmmm!
Logged

Laxin

  • Chad Pennington
  • ******
  • Posts: 4348
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #121 on: February 10, 2014, 09:08:45 PM »
Watkins, Gordon and Cameron? Doesnt seem fair to me
Logged

Jumbo

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 6742
  • Loggase forever
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #122 on: February 10, 2014, 09:09:06 PM »
Quote from: hawk on February 10, 2014, 09:08:37 PM
I really wanted Greg Robinson until some poopchute took him.  Watkins, Gordon, Cameron with no one to throw to them.  Hmmmm!

But Hoyer!
Logged

hawk

  • Blubbering Pussy
  • Chad Pennington
  • *
  • Posts: 3691
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #123 on: February 10, 2014, 09:09:52 PM »
Quote from: Jumbo on February 10, 2014, 09:09:06 PM
But Hoyer!

I don't think even Weeden could freak that up.
Logged

Cane

  • Chad Pennington
  • ******
  • Posts: 3147
  • 26
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #124 on: February 10, 2014, 09:18:09 PM »
Holy Moses, if the Texans take Robinson #1 they should fold as a franchise. Drafting a raw tackle prospect to open a draft with a crater at QB? I could never defend it. 


Logged

Heismanberg

  • Global Moderator
  • Curtis Martin
  • *****
  • Posts: 48960
  • SAUCE
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #125 on: February 10, 2014, 09:20:34 PM »
Quote from: Cane on February 10, 2014, 09:18:09 PM
Holy Moses, if the Texans take Robinson #1 they should fold as a franchise. Drafting a raw tackle prospect to open a draft with a crater at QB? I could never defend it. 

Do you and Jumbo sleep with a picture of Teddy Bridgewater between you?

Robinson is the best run blocking tackle in over a decade, with enough athleticism to become an incredible pass protector too. 
Logged
Quote from: Tommy on July 11, 2015, 03:18:14 AM
He shook my hand breed tub and walked away

Pope

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 7616
  • I am the Pope and this is my church
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #126 on: February 10, 2014, 09:22:00 PM »
Niggas gettin salty
Logged

Heismanberg

  • Global Moderator
  • Curtis Martin
  • *****
  • Posts: 48960
  • SAUCE
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #127 on: February 10, 2014, 09:39:30 PM »
Really good pick with Jake Matthews
Logged
Quote from: Tommy on July 11, 2015, 03:18:14 AM
He shook my hand breed tub and walked away

MBGreen

  • Indian Death Lock
  • Administrator
  • Curtis Martin
  • *****
  • Posts: 45772
  • Chest hair for miles and miles.
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #128 on: February 10, 2014, 09:40:13 PM »
yeah...good pick for the Raiders.  I thought Matthews would drop a little further.
Logged
Quote from: bojanglesman
"Hello good sir GM, may we pretty please have your throwaway centers and gords please??!?  I'll suck yo'dick!"

hawk

  • Blubbering Pussy
  • Chad Pennington
  • *
  • Posts: 3691
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #129 on: February 10, 2014, 09:40:49 PM »
Brazzen pick for the Raiders.  I will never criticize a "sure thing" offensive lineman, but I wasn't expecting it. 
Logged

ons

  • Chad Pennington
  • ******
  • Posts: 2798
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #130 on: February 10, 2014, 09:42:23 PM »
Quote from: Heismanberg on February 10, 2014, 09:39:30 PM
Really good pick with Jake Matthews

Was hoping Clowney or Watkins would be there at 5, Raiders are in dire need of playmakers. But the offensive line was in shambles during long stretches in 2013, and since Veldheer's a free agent, Matthews may need to immediately start at LT. Even if Veldheer is kept, Matthews can slot in as a starter at RT and allow for some real long term stability.
Logged

hawk

  • Blubbering Pussy
  • Chad Pennington
  • *
  • Posts: 3691
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #131 on: February 10, 2014, 09:44:11 PM »
Quote from: ons on February 10, 2014, 09:42:23 PM
Was hoping Clowney or Watkins would be there at 5, Raiders are in dire need of playmakers. But the offensive line was in shambles during long stretches in 2013, and since Veldheer's a free agent, Matthews may need to immediately start at LT. Even if Veldheer is kept, Matthews can slot in as a starter at RT and allow for some real long term stability.

I would assume that the Raiders will back the truck up to ensure they keep Veldheer.  That have a excrement ton of money, and can't afford to lose him.  However, I like the pick. 
Logged

Ignatius J Reilly

  • Guest
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #132 on: February 10, 2014, 09:53:59 PM »
Watkins pick surprises me.
Logged

Heismanberg

  • Global Moderator
  • Curtis Martin
  • *****
  • Posts: 48960
  • SAUCE
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #133 on: February 10, 2014, 10:11:18 PM »
gat dayum, Sir
Logged
Quote from: Tommy on July 11, 2015, 03:18:14 AM
He shook my hand breed tub and walked away

Sir

  • Laveranues Coles
  • ****
  • Posts: 416
Re: JO Mock Discussion
« Reply #134 on: February 10, 2014, 10:28:09 PM »
Pick will be in shortly.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 28
« previous next »
Tags: