Nah, that's awesome. Home games belong to home fans. I'm totally supportive of doing what it takes to make sure your arena is filled with your own fans.
"That's awesome" is a pov that's either valid or not depending on one's viewpoint. Prefacing it with the negative article "nah" is another story altogether. First off it imposes a conclusion which has not been earned and while that admittedly reads as 'small potato semantics' on my part (wink) the Canes' restrictive ticket policy is just that: small potatoes.
Further, the site of the game(s) in question is over 500 hundred miles from New York City, a huge proximity advantage for these incestuous incels that you choose to champion. Additionally, you are rewarding an undeserving fanbase, a fanbase that carries with them the potential to withholding full support for their local charges - just imagine that in say, Toronto. Moreover, that you aggressively support excluding (banishing) hockey fans on a conditional basis should give any fair-minded person pause and in doing so you give clear, distinct witness to an off-putting provincialism and along with it ironically, an elitist mindset. I doubt you'd carry such an exclusionary, restrictive mindset into the voting rights arena. Rethink your position; you're better than this....
ah, I think I know the real source of your vexation.....wink..smirk......
