Oh?ffensive Line

[bojanglesman]

Its odd and a bit concerning, considering the bulk of Bowles' coaching experience came from coaching the secondary.

In the end, Bowles can't go out there and play.

[dcm1602]

There's certainly been a lot of communication issues between the safeties and cornerbacks.

I think that's one of the biggest problems

[MBGreen]

In the end, Bowles can't go out there and play.

Racist

[Derek Smalls]

There's certainly been a lot of communication issues between the safeties and cornerbacks.

I think that's one of the biggest problems

Take away 4 big plays, and this team has been dominant thus far.
- 2 of the plays were mental/physical mistakes (Jalin Marshall fumble and Goodwin's TD over Revis)
- 2 of the plays were communication mistakes (Salas/Green TDs)

[Miamipuck]

Take away 4 big plays, and this team has been dominant thus far.
- 2 of the plays were mental/physical mistakes (Jalin Marshall fumble and Goodwin's TD over Revis)
- 2 of the plays were communication mistakes (Salas/Green TDs)

If they can fix the brain farts and say," this team will be really good, ".

I think that's an understatement.

[Coach K]

Pass blocking is way better than I thought it'd be . Then again we've only faced  interior rush teams so far .

Run blocking is ok , a lot of these plays are great timing on calls by Gailey n Forte running detained though

Mangold replacement needs to be found.  Didn't Wesley Johnson step in for Carp

OR was it Dozier?

Either way Clady has been solid but we will see if he can even finish the season

In an ideal world Clady /Winters/Carpenter warrant keeping as we retool C and OT for depth .

[Badger]

I used the search function to look for a thread about the offensive line. I found one. I posted in it. Why do you care?

Because this is an entirely new discussion and deserves a new thread.

[Johnny English]

Because this is an entirely new discussion and deserves a new thread.

It's a discussion about the offensive line in a thread about the offensive line.

[Badger]

It's a discussion about the offensive line in a thread about the offensive line.

By that logic we should just have one Jets thread.

[MBGreen]

By that logic we should just have one Jets thread.

#BringBackTheNYJetsTweetsthread

[Johnny English]

By that logic we should just have one Jets thread.

No, we have Jets forum. Inside that forum are threads. They relate to specific topics. One of those is the offensive line.

I don't really care if you want to have a 2016 OL thread, feel free to split it out if you want. I just don't understand why it bothers you.

[Badger]

No, we have Jets forum. Inside that forum are threads. They relate to specific topics. One of those is the offensive line.

I don't really care if you want to have a 2016 OL thread, feel free to split it out if you want. I just don't understand why it bothers you.

There's a spectrum; on one end would be a dcmesque poster starting a new thread every day about any thought that leaks out of his brain. On the other end there is bumping a thread that hasn't been touched in three years to have a completely different conversation than the existing posts in it.

I think it's really fair to say that good forum-keeping would encourage something in between those two extremes. We don't want clutter but we don't want to lump multiple independent topics from different seasons into one thread because they share a very general theme.

The primary reason I'm bothered is that Tapatalk makes splitting threads more difficult than it was in a browser, and since last year I've had way less time to spend on the forum and almost all of it has been on Tapatalk. And it took more effort on your part to do the less preferable thing and shoehorn a new conversation into a three year old thread.

The scenario where I'm completely fine with bumping old threads is to highlight a post that demonstrates you were right and/or someone else was wrong about something.

[Johnny English]

There's a spectrum; on one end would be a dcmesque poster starting a new thread every day about any thought that leaks out of his brain. On the other end there is bumping a thread that hasn't been touched in three years to have a completely different conversation than the existing posts in it.

I think it's really fair to say that good forum-keeping would encourage something in between those two extremes. We don't want clutter but we don't want to lump multiple independent topics from different seasons into one thread because they share a very general theme.

The primary reason I'm bothered is that Tapatalk makes splitting threads more difficult than it was in a browser, and since last year I've had way less time to spend on the forum and almost all of it has been on Tapatalk. And it took more effort on your part to do the less preferable thing and shoehorn a new conversation into a three year old thread.

The scenario where I'm completely fine with bumping old threads is to highlight a post that demonstrates you were right and/or someone else was wrong about something.

OK. Tapatalk is a thing I use if I want to have a quick look at the board at the gym or in bed, but the vast majority of the time I access the board from my PC. If it's an issue for Tapatalk users then I get it.

Again, though, it took no effort. I realise that forum users generally don't like to use the search function (not just this forum, it's a general behaviour) but it was literally zero effort to click Search, type "Offensive Line" and respond to the thread entitled "Offensive Line". It's generally considered forum etiquette to do exactly that.

[Badger]

OK. Tapatalk is a thing I use if I want to have a quick look at the board at the gym or in bed, but the vast majority of the time I access the board from my PC. If it's an issue for Tapatalk users then I get it.

Again, though, it took no effort. I realise that forum users generally don't like to use the search function (not just this forum, it's a general behaviour) but it was literally zero effort to click Search, type "Offensive Line" and respond to the thread entitled "Offensive Line". It's generally considered forum etiquette to do exactly that.

I just explained why it's poor forum etiquette, but if you don't care, OK.

[Pope]

Can you guys move these posts into a separate thread called 'Forum Etiquette'