Author Topic: U.S. Politics  (Read 644989 times)

0 Members and 65 Guests are viewing this topic.

Badger

  • Global Moderator
  • Joe Namath
  • *****
  • Posts: 51862
  • The only one who's not a piece of excrement

Johnny English

  • Administrator
  • Don Maynard
  • *****
  • Posts: 35864
  • Effort. Technique. Violence.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8311 on: February 15, 2023, 04:40:06 PM »
Party of small gov't

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/02/seven-states-push-to-require-id-for-watching-porn-online/

Party of building databases on middle aged men and their proclivities while the underagers they purport to be protecting all fire up a VPN and carry on as they were, Legislation invented by people who don't understand the first thing about the technologies they're trying to legislate.
A cross-dressing limey poofter

mj2sexay

  • Jorkin My Peanits
  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 5341
  • ze/zerrrrr
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8312 on: February 15, 2023, 05:22:13 PM »

bojanglesman

  • Don Maynard
  • *************
  • Posts: 38883
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8313 on: February 15, 2023, 06:19:14 PM »
Party of small gov't

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/02/seven-states-push-to-require-id-for-watching-porn-online/
Hopefully it's still OK for a teenager to see an obscure, wavy titty on scrambled Cinemax because your parents didn't pay for that channel.  Just the way God intended for kids to learn about hooters.

Johnny English

  • Administrator
  • Don Maynard
  • *****
  • Posts: 35864
  • Effort. Technique. Violence.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8314 on: February 15, 2023, 06:35:02 PM »
https://twitter.com/RepErinHealy/status/1625219121687437312?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

You might think this is satire, but of course it isn't.
No, because of course she's correct. Unless you actually believe that a child in a household with two same sex parents is less safe. Do you believe that?
A cross-dressing limey poofter

delavan

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 6465
  • JO Pictionary Champion 2022

mj2sexay

  • Jorkin My Peanits
  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 5341
  • ze/zerrrrr
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8316 on: February 15, 2023, 10:16:45 PM »
No, because of course she's correct. Unless you actually believe that a child in a household with two same sex parents is less safe. Do you believe that?

Are you saying that in a same sex or alternative couple, there can't be an identifiable mommy and daddy?

Children with two parents in the home unquestionably fair better, this is pretty settled social science, not the kind of excrement spewed by grifters like, say, Ibram Kendi to make a quick buck.

It's an absurd assertion, made even more ridiculous by the offering that such rhetoric is in any way extreme or unAmerican and she's getting rightly excrement on for it.


delavan

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 6465
  • JO Pictionary Champion 2022
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8317 on: February 16, 2023, 12:00:05 AM »
Are you saying that in a same sex or alternative couple, there can't be an identifiable mommy and daddy?

Children with two parents in the home unquestionably fair better, this is pretty settled social science, not the kind of excrement spewed by grifters like, say, Ibram Kendi to make a quick buck.

It's an absurd assertion, made even more ridiculous by the offering that such rhetoric is in any way extreme or unAmerican and she's getting rightly excrement on for it.
Terms such as ‘mother’ and ‘father’ are harmful and should be replaced along with ‘male’ and ‘female’ and replaced with ‘egg producer’ and ‘sperm producer’ so get in step eggproducerfucker

https://keprtv.com/amp/news/nation-world/egg-donor-instead-of-mother-academics-claim-harmful-terms-need-to-be-replaced-eeb-language-project-mother-father-male-female-man-woman

https://twitter.com/Dr_AlexM/status/1622649081083625472




Johnny English

  • Administrator
  • Don Maynard
  • *****
  • Posts: 35864
  • Effort. Technique. Violence.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8318 on: February 16, 2023, 07:40:56 AM »
Are you saying that in a same sex or alternative couple, there can't be an identifiable mommy and daddy?

In my experience there generally isn't, same sex couples don't feel the need to adopt hetero norms in order to be good parents.

Quote
Children with two parents in the home unquestionably fair better, this is pretty settled social science, not the kind of excrement spewed by grifters like, say, Ibram Kendi to make a quick buck.

It is, although you have to look at why that is. A massive factor is that a single parent generally has a lower income than a married couple, which means they live in a worse area, which means they don't get access to the better schools - the issue is one of social and demographic disparity at least as much as it is of an individual's ability to be a good parent. But I don't think that that is really the point of the statement she's railing about, which very specifically references "a married mom and dad".

Quote
It's an absurd assertion, made even more ridiculous by the offering that such rhetoric is in any way extreme or unAmerican and she's getting rightly excrement on for it.

It is extreme, because as I've already pointed out the suggestion that a married mom and mom or an unmarried mom and dad somehow create a less safe environment for a child is freaking ludicrous. It's dangerous, because it foments and supports bigotry and prejudice. Sadly I fear that you might be correct that it isn't un-American to do that, but it should be.
A cross-dressing limey poofter

ons

  • Chad Pennington
  • ******
  • Posts: 2798
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8319 on: February 16, 2023, 12:23:05 PM »
If two parents are safer than one parent, three parents are safer than two parents. Ban non-polyamorous relationships for the safety of our children.

delavan

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 6465
  • JO Pictionary Champion 2022
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8320 on: February 16, 2023, 12:31:06 PM »
….it takes a village….


Johnny English

  • Administrator
  • Don Maynard
  • *****
  • Posts: 35864
  • Effort. Technique. Violence.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8321 on: February 16, 2023, 12:42:40 PM »
….it takes a village….



.... to create an idiot?
A cross-dressing limey poofter

bojanglesman

  • Don Maynard
  • *************
  • Posts: 38883
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8322 on: February 16, 2023, 12:55:01 PM »
If two parents are safer than one parent, three parents are safer than two parents. Ban non-polyamorous relationships for the safety of our children.

Require there to be at least 2 guys in the marriage and you'll end that pretty quickly.  Lots of guys like the idea of multiple wives (read: sex with multiple women) until there's another dude around.

delavan

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 6465
  • JO Pictionary Champion 2022
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8323 on: February 16, 2023, 03:38:31 PM »
If two parents are safer than one parent, three parents are safer than two parents. Ban non-polyamorous relationships for the safety of our children.
….it takes a village….



.... to create an idiot?
I’m not sure what’s the problem here but the “takes a village” crack was an obvious and facetious continuation of ons’s post, i.e. if two’s better than one and a three’s better than two…and so on…. capiche?


mj2sexay

  • Jorkin My Peanits
  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 5341
  • ze/zerrrrr
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8324 on: February 16, 2023, 03:44:17 PM »
It is extreme, because as I've already pointed out the suggestion that a married mom and mom or an unmarried mom and dad somehow create a less safe environment for a child is freaking ludicrous. It's dangerous, because it foments and supports bigotry and prejudice. Sadly I fear that you might be correct that it isn't un-American to do that, but it should be.

It's not freaking ludicrous, its in line with the vast majority of studies done on the subject.

With respect to those who get divorced because it's such an individualized determination and there's obvious merit towards getting out due to the damage of a horrible, toxic marriage outweighing the benefits of staying with someone "for the children", it does make it incumbent on said divorcee to expend that much more effort. And unfortunately, at least in my very very (thankfully) brief foray into matrimonial law, the children are largely ignored if not malignantly used as pawns in said situations.

If two parents are safer than one parent, three parents are safer than two parents. Ban non-polyamorous relationships for the safety of our children.

Lol.


Tags: