Author Topic: U.S. Politics  (Read 645394 times)

0 Members and 65 Guests are viewing this topic.

Badger

  • Global Moderator
  • Joe Namath
  • *****
  • Posts: 51862
  • The only one who's not a piece of excrement
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8160 on: January 10, 2023, 04:11:21 PM »

steves850

  • Chad Pennington
  • ******
  • Posts: 2425
    • SteveFlix
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8161 on: January 10, 2023, 04:16:05 PM »
Tom Brady kisses his kids like that kid from Glee who hung himself last week.

Johnny English

  • Administrator
  • Don Maynard
  • *****
  • Posts: 35864
  • Effort. Technique. Violence.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8162 on: January 10, 2023, 04:56:49 PM »
FROM MY COLD, DEAD, OVEN MITTS

https://twitter.com/RonnyJacksonTX/status/1612839703018934274?s=19

In fairness, the idea of banning gas stoves is objectively stupid.
A cross-dressing limey poofter

delavan

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 6465
  • JO Pictionary Champion 2022
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8163 on: January 10, 2023, 05:49:30 PM »

Johnny English

  • Administrator
  • Don Maynard
  • *****
  • Posts: 35864
  • Effort. Technique. Violence.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8164 on: January 10, 2023, 05:53:04 PM »
https://twitter.com/TrivWorks/status/1612563861668007936

A deranged ex Crossfit instructor and a pathological liar. They're not sending their best, are they?
A cross-dressing limey poofter

delavan

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 6465
  • JO Pictionary Champion 2022
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8165 on: January 10, 2023, 05:59:53 PM »

Badger

  • Global Moderator
  • Joe Namath
  • *****
  • Posts: 51862
  • The only one who's not a piece of excrement
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8166 on: January 11, 2023, 07:40:18 AM »
https://trac.syr.edu/reports/706/
And do you think the IRS independently decided to do this because they're eeeeevil or because the wealthy have too much control over the government?

MBGreen

  • Indian Death Lock
  • Administrator
  • Curtis Martin
  • *****
  • Posts: 45760
  • Chest hair for miles and miles.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8167 on: January 11, 2023, 07:41:43 AM »
And do you think the IRS independently decided to do this because they're eeeeevil or because the wealthy have too much control over the government?

yes
Quote from: bojanglesman
"Hello good sir GM, may we pretty please have your throwaway centers and gords please??!?  I'll suck yo'dick!"

steves850

  • Chad Pennington
  • ******
  • Posts: 2425
    • SteveFlix
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8168 on: January 11, 2023, 11:11:15 AM »
In fairness, the idea of banning gas stoves is objectively stupid.

They're not trying to ban gas stoves, they're offering incentives to replace them with electric ranges.
Tom Brady kisses his kids like that kid from Glee who hung himself last week.

CatoTheElder

  • Mark Gastineau
  • *********
  • Posts: 18689
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8169 on: January 11, 2023, 11:12:59 AM »
They're not trying to ban gas stoves, they're offering incentives to replace them with electric ranges.

WH: We’ll give you tax breaks and vouchers to change.

Lunatics: They’re trying to take away my freedom.

Note: I decided against multiple condos when I was searching specifically so I could get a gas range.
Quote
The New Jersey Devil keeps knocking over my trashcans at night and taking out credit cards in my name.

Johnny English

  • Administrator
  • Don Maynard
  • *****
  • Posts: 35864
  • Effort. Technique. Violence.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8170 on: January 11, 2023, 11:33:28 AM »
They're not trying to ban gas stoves, they're offering incentives to replace them with electric ranges.

Then this guy needs to be a bit smarter with his language.

Quote
“This is a hidden hazard,” Mr. Trumka said an interview with Bloomberg on Monday. “Any option is on the table. Products that can’t be made safe can be banned.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/11/climate/gas-stoves-biden-administration.html

My point stands - the idea is stupid and someone in his position raising it as a possibility is also stupid.
A cross-dressing limey poofter

CatoTheElder

  • Mark Gastineau
  • *********
  • Posts: 18689
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8171 on: January 11, 2023, 11:39:12 AM »
Then this guy needs to be a bit smarter with his language.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/11/climate/gas-stoves-biden-administration.html

My point stands - the idea is stupid and someone in his position raising it as a possibility is also stupid.

Yeah, every heat source in a house is a potential hazard. That's really not a great argument.
Quote
The New Jersey Devil keeps knocking over my trashcans at night and taking out credit cards in my name.

bojanglesman

  • Don Maynard
  • *************
  • Posts: 38883
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8172 on: January 11, 2023, 11:52:47 AM »
I guess the issue is the lack of venting.  To my knowledge, I believe other natural gas products have included venting of the fumes.  I know my furnace and gas logs vent it out automatically.  With a stove, you have to actively turn on the vent above.

I don't know enough about the research yet.

I will say cooking with gas is soooo much better.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2023, 11:57:15 AM by bojanglesman »

Johnny English

  • Administrator
  • Don Maynard
  • *****
  • Posts: 35864
  • Effort. Technique. Violence.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8173 on: January 11, 2023, 12:19:39 PM »
I guess the issue is the lack of venting.  To my knowledge, I believe other natural gas products have included venting of the fumes.  I know my furnace and gas logs vent it out automatically.  With a stove, you have to actively turn on the vent above.

I don't know enough about the research yet.

I will say cooking with gas is soooo much better.


It has been code since forever to install a hood vent over a gas stove. "But people might not use it so we should consider restricting use of gas stoves" is no different to "people might not use seatbelts so we should consider not letting them drive cars".
A cross-dressing limey poofter

delavan

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 6465
  • JO Pictionary Champion 2022
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #8174 on: January 11, 2023, 12:30:02 PM »
And do you think the IRS independently decided to do this because they're eeeeevil or because the wealthy have too much control over the government?
Lois…what about Lois?  Looking at whom she and her IRS operatives specifically targeted was not based on ‘wealth’ but more their political POV and moreover that she had to resort to pleading the 5th like some underworld thug (this the head of a government agency mind you) is beyond the pale and by any objective standard should give pause….pretty chilling…
Quote from: MBGreen
yes
a r b y ‘ s    go eat


In other news: hey George ’the embelisher’ Santos you lying sack of shlt, it’s pretty freaking sad when your own party—and in your own backyard no less—refuses to recognize you (calling you “a fraud”) and instead is calling for your immediate resignation.  Maybe read the tea leaves Pinocchio….

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/01/11/politics/george-santos-nassau-county-resign/index.html
« Last Edit: January 11, 2023, 12:31:56 PM by delavan »

Tags: