We literally had the Senate building rushed by angry activists to prevent a confirmation of a supreme court justice on the basis of the flimsiest of accusations. What's the difference?
This is "whataboutism" and only works to deflect the argument.
It's not a bullshit argument LMAO, our intelligence agencies literally have incentive to declare it an insurrection and couldn't do it.
Again, this is semantics, if you don't like the technical definition as "insurrection" that's fine. The violent protest that was organized, fueled, and supported by the far right. That's a lot of words but at least I didn't say "insurrection."
Undermining democracy is utterly meaningless when the people launching that accusation have no issue with a house minority leader who literally denied the results of a freely held election.
We're back to whataboutism. They did a bad thing so our bad thing isn't nearly as bad!