U.S. Politics

[Miamipuck]

This part isn’t important as how they’re treated by club owners and bookers and TV execs.

Read this. Laurie is one of the funniest people working in comedy.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/11/10/opinion/sunday/louis-ck-harassment.html

(Yes I love trashing Haberman a few posts ago and still linking to the NYT)

I know, I read the first part of it. It's not just comedy and it's a shame. Thankfully in this era, men that do that excrement are finally starting to pay the price. I saw it first hand in the financial industry. excrement I have good friends (gals) that I protected from that excrement and will be my friends until the day I die.

[Badger]

Nathan J. Robinson did a good piece on Wolf's set and the reaction to it.

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/04/what-being-politically-incorrect-actually-looks-like

[JFIF]

I like Nathan J Robinson a lot. Current Affairs is a legit publication. He torched Jordan Peterson in a thorough and intellectually sound manner

[Badger]

Look at these little babies.

http://thehill.com/homenews/media/385636-the-hill-to-end-attendance-at-white-house-correspondents-dinner-without-major

[Johnny English]

There is still a lot of thinking on the right that if big corporations are happy, they’re going to take the money they’re saving and reinvest it in American workers. In fact they bought back shares, a few gave out bonuses; there’s no evidence whatsoever that the money’s been massively poured back into the American worker.

Quote from well known libtard commie Marco Rubio in pinko leftist rag The Economist.

[AlioTheFool]

Quote from well known libtard commie Marco Rubio in pinko leftist rag The Economist.

My twitter feed blew up about this. Part of me is like "Good! I'm glad someone is finally growing a backbone in that party" and part of me is like "Motherfuckers! We all knew this excrement was going to happen, and you did too, and you did it any damn way!"

[mj2sexay]

I like Nathan J Robinson a lot. Current Affairs is a legit publication. He torched Jordan Peterson in a thorough and intellectually sound manner

What.

I read that article. On top of completely misinterpreting and taking excerpts of the book out of context, it was the usual denial of basic societal and biological norms that the side of science has come to adopt.

FFS, This place never fails to come off like the derriere end of r/pol.

I don’t have the energy (on here) to express how chickenly excrement coward most of the press and mainstream media are. Michelle Wolf absolutely killed at the WHCD and nearly everyone of these snakely opportunists tried to manipulate the content of her jokes. It is an insane logical position to normalize a fascist and the ones who pedal lies on her behalf and then say Wolf’s set was mean spirited

Maggie Haberman is a very bad person

Ah, I see you're part of the "EVERYONE I DON'T LIKE IS A FASCIST" crowd. Not sure if that's as hilarious as the idea that the mainstream press somehow carries water for Trump. Hilarious! Carry on.

[Badger]

Clean your room mj

[ons]

FFS, This place never fails to come off like the derriere end of r/pol.

r/iamverysmart

[JFIF]

Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson flunkies are some of the saddest people on earth. I guess the only thing worse is Ben Shapiro flunkies.

They are a stupid person’s idea of a smart person. Their positions are either so convoluted that there’s no salient point, or they’re so rudimentary that every 10 year old knows it already. Dumb people aren’t able to sift through their boring prose to see that they’re full of excrement and in the case of the former 2, just entirely repackaging old Jungun or Eastern philosophies.

It only took 2 lines for MJ to come with the cliche “out of context” these charlatans use to be evasive about the shaky status of their fundamental ideas. It’s like waving a sign, “I don’t know what the freak I’m talking about so I need a pseudointellectual to simplify life in a box for me”

[mj2sexay]

When you’re such a regressive lady garden you even have a problem with SAM HARRIS. Wow.

Anyway, you think we’re under the throes  of fascism, so I’ll go ahead and place the same value on any insult you want to lob at me as I would a Browning Nagle rookie card. But tell me this my intellectual savior, if Pedersons positions are so convoluted or rudimentary, (a contradiction in itself) why the need to misrepresent them, and mask your idiocy with nothing but insults?

Believe me, you’re nowhere near as intelligent as you think you are.

[JFIF]

When you’re such a regressive lady garden you even have a problem with SAM HARRIS. Wow.

Anyway, you think we’re under the throes  of fascism, so I’ll go ahead and place the same value on any insult you want to lob at me as I would a Browning Nagle rookie card. But tell me this my intellectual savior, if Pedersons positions are so convoluted or rudimentary, (a contradiction in itself) why the need to misrepresent them, and mask your idiocy with nothing but insults?

Believe me, you’re nowhere near as intelligent as you think you are.

Ok Donny, nice projection here. Maybe see a therapist?  Not Jordan Peterson.

[Johnny English]

When you’re such a regressive lady garden you even have a problem with SAM HARRIS. Wow.

Sam Harris is a smart guy with some bad ideas. Jordan Peterson is a cynic who has done a great job of monetising the role of being the respectable face of angry neckbeards. I'm not sure I'd necessarily equate the two completely, but I can understand why people have issues with them both. I certainly do, but I'd be happy to sit and talk with Harris; Peterson, not so much.

[Badger]

Ever relevant

[JFIF]

Perfect