U.S. Politics

[Fenwyr]

Huh?

The ads.  Might just be a tapatalk thing.

[SixFeetDeep]

The ads.  Might just be a tapatalk thing.

Huh?

[bojanglesman]

The ads.  Might just be a tapatalk thing.

I can yes. I'd? American eleventeen will been sand.

[MBGreen]

I can yes. I'd? American eleventeen will been sand.

[SixFeetDeep]

Should be Klecko for accuracy. I remember hearing that speech live and being like “holy excrement this guy is as drunk as I am! Wait, no he’s actually drunker and possibility on some pills as well.”

[Johnny English]

LOL.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/11/21/net-neutrality-rules-face-demise-fcc-vote-coming-next-month/880061001/

You just keep on making America great again, one Verizon at a time.

[AlioTheFool]

LOL.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/11/21/net-neutrality-rules-face-demise-fcc-vote-coming-next-month/880061001/

You just keep on making America great again, one Verizon at a time.

Ajit Pai is a queynte. I hate that dude almost as much as the President.

[ukilledkenny]

The only way it's gonna make enough people mad is if they start trying to make people pay extra for Netflix and online games.

[Badger]

I'll never understand the amount of sheer dumbfuckery it takes for a regular Joe to be against net neutrality. It should be overwhelmingly obvious where your interests lie as a consumer but apparently all it takes is some snake saying "net neutrality is Obamacare for the internet" for these retards to fall in line.

[reuben]

I hope my new internet bundle comes with jetoffensive but if it's between that and my scheisse porn sites then I must bid you fine gents adieu. 

[Johnny English]

I'll never understand the amount of sheer dumbfuckery it takes for a regular Joe to be against net neutrality. It should be overwhelmingly obvious where your interests lie as a consumer but apparently all it takes is some snake saying "net neutrality is Obamacare for the internet" for these retards to fall in line.

There are apparently a significant number of people who currently consider "not a Democrat" to be more important than "probably a pedophile", so it's no surprise that something like net neutrality is an easy partisan decision for them.

[ukilledkenny]

I'll never understand the amount of sheer dumbfuckery it takes for a regular Joe to be against net neutrality. It should be overwhelmingly obvious where your interests lie as a consumer but apparently all it takes is some snake saying "net neutrality is Obamacare for the internet" for these retards to fall in line.

The same reason when they are talking about guns the government should leave people alone but then are 100% enthusiastically against legal pot.

[Badger]

But it should very obviously not be a partisan issue... I can rationalize why someone would vote for Trump, but not why someone who's at least modestly educated could be against NN.

[bojanglesman]

I'm sure the majority of people don't know or care to know what net neutrality even is.  The rest of the people think getting rid of it is a bad idea or are directly related to the decision making process (lobbyists, lawmakers).

Just to be the devil's advocate, could there be any positives that come from getting rid of it?  Obviously there would be plenty of negatives but ignore those for a minute.  Admittedly I'm no expert on the topic, but could it spur along faster developments in technology/infrastructure?

[SixFeetDeep]

But it should very obviously not be a partisan issue... I can rationalize why someone would vote for Trump, but not why someone who's at least modestly educated could be against NN.

Who exactly is for net nuetrality besides these giant corporations and politicians that will profit from it?