Author Topic: U.S. Politics  (Read 645312 times)

0 Members and 77 Guests are viewing this topic.

casman02

  • Chad Pennington
  • ******
  • Posts: 2499
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1140 on: March 12, 2016, 10:17:52 AM »
Phil Mattingly ‏@Phil_Mattingly  25m25 minutes ago
Introducing Donald Trump: former Ohio State great/New York Jets All-Pro Center Nick Mangold

Ignatius J Reilly

  • Guest
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1141 on: March 12, 2016, 10:24:42 AM »
I'm not too surprised.  He stumped for Romney in 2012.

Jumbo

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 6742
  • Loggase forever
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1142 on: March 29, 2016, 08:46:50 AM »
CA raising minimum wage to $15/hr by 2022. Which is dumb.

Johnny English

  • Administrator
  • Don Maynard
  • *****
  • Posts: 35864
  • Effort. Technique. Violence.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1143 on: March 29, 2016, 08:52:54 AM »
CA raising minimum wage to $15/hr by 2022. Which is dumb.

Why? Every time implementation of or an increase to the minimum wage is proposed there are apocalyptic predictions, and every time they prove to be completely false. What makes this different?
A cross-dressing limey poofter

Jumbo

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 6742
  • Loggase forever
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1144 on: March 29, 2016, 08:56:24 AM »
Why? Every time implementation of or an increase to the minimum wage is proposed there are apocalyptic predictions, and every time they prove to be completely false. What makes this different?

It's not an apocalyptic prediction, it'll just end up hurting small businesses and the void left from that will be taken over by the bigger businesses, e.g. Wal-Mart, who ironically the people who campaign for this type of thing rally against.

Minimum wage increase drive low skilled workers out of the workforce too since it makes it much harder for them to compete against those who already made $15/hr. There's a reason that socialist havens in Scandinavia have had their workers' unions rally against minimum wage laws (and they still don't have them), and that's because it hurts workers.

MBGreen

  • Indian Death Lock
  • Administrator
  • Curtis Martin
  • *****
  • Posts: 45760
  • Chest hair for miles and miles.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1145 on: March 29, 2016, 08:59:08 AM »
CA raising minimum wage to $15/hr by 2022. Which is dumb.

My first part time job when i was high school paid minimum wage...it was $5.25/hr.  This was back in 1994.

In American funds, that would've been 30 cents.
Quote from: bojanglesman
"Hello good sir GM, may we pretty please have your throwaway centers and gords please??!?  I'll suck yo'dick!"

Johnny English

  • Administrator
  • Don Maynard
  • *****
  • Posts: 35864
  • Effort. Technique. Violence.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1146 on: March 29, 2016, 09:02:45 AM »
It's not an apocalyptic prediction, it'll just end up hurting small businesses and the void left from that will be taken over by the bigger businesses, e.g. Wal-Mart, who ironically the people who campaign for this type of thing rally against.

Minimum wage increase drive low skilled workers out of the workforce too since it makes it much harder for them to compete against those who already made $15/hr. There's a reason that socialist havens in Scandinavia have had their workers' unions rally against minimum wage laws (and they still don't have them), and that's because it hurts workers.

Same old tired argument. There's literally no good data to support that (and the right wing attacks on Seattle have already been disproven as being based on bad/selective data, so don't bother with that one). In principle there might even be some truth to it, but unfortunately the right wing in general have cried wolf so many times now on minimum wage and been wrong EVERY SINGLE TIME, so I'm not inclined to give the rhetoric a fair listen any more.

Let's see what happens over the next couple of years in Seattle before we form any kind of actual firm opinion on whether it's a good idea or not for California to aim for a target six years away.
A cross-dressing limey poofter

Jumbo

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 6742
  • Loggase forever
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1147 on: March 29, 2016, 09:04:12 AM »
Same old tired argument. There's literally no good data to support that (and the right wing attacks on Seattle have already been disproven as being based on bad/selective data, so don't bother with that one). In principle there might even be some truth to it, but unfortunately the right wing in general have cried wolf so many times now on minimum wage and been wrong EVERY SINGLE TIME, so I'm not inclined to give the rhetoric a fair listen any more.

Let's see what happens over the next couple of years in Seattle before we form any kind of actual firm opinion on whether it's a good idea or not for California to aim for a target six years away.

Sorry, I forgot right wing argument = bad argument

Johnny English

  • Administrator
  • Don Maynard
  • *****
  • Posts: 35864
  • Effort. Technique. Violence.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1148 on: March 29, 2016, 09:07:39 AM »
Sorry, I forgot right wing argument = bad argument

No, that's not what I said. I even accepted that there might be some truth to it. What I said is that the argument has been made, and been proven incorrect, a lot of times already. Of course there's an upper limit for a minimum wage past which point the benefits are outweighed by negative impacts, but given we haven't yet reached that point despite every single implementation of MW being greeted with howls of terror about the impending financial apocalypse coming from the right, the argument has less weight through its dilution.

This is what happens when we allow politicians to rule through rhetoric rather than reason. If the right wing wants its arguments to be listened to it needs to stop making spurious ones based on ideology rather than facts.
A cross-dressing limey poofter

Jumbo

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 6742
  • Loggase forever
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1149 on: March 29, 2016, 09:14:34 AM »
No, that's not what I said. I even accepted that there might be some truth to it. What I said is that the argument has been made, and been proven incorrect, a lot of times already. Of course there's an upper limit for a minimum wage past which point the benefits are outweighed by negative impacts, but given we haven't yet reached that point despite every single implementation of MW being greeted with howls of terror about the impending financial apocalypse coming from the right, the argument has less weight through its dilution.

This is what happens when we allow politicians to rule through rhetoric rather than reason. If the right wing wants its arguments to be listened to it needs to stop making spurious ones based on ideology rather than facts.

I'm not arguing that a moderate increase in the minimum wage can never help. Rather (and I probably should have phrased this better) such a drastic increase in a very populous and large state will likely hurt, even if it raises over a 5-year period

Tommy

  • Mark Gastineau
  • *********
  • Posts: 15164
  • I don't get it
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1150 on: March 29, 2016, 09:19:47 AM »

No, that's not what I said. I even accepted that there might be some truth to it. What I said is that the argument has been made, and been proven incorrect, a lot of times already. Of course there's an upper limit for a minimum wage past which point the benefits are outweighed by negative impacts, but given we haven't yet reached that point despite every single implementation of MW being greeted with howls of terror about the impending financial apocalypse coming from the right, the argument has less weight through its dilution.

This is what happens when we allow politicians to rule through rhetoric rather than reason. If the right wing wants its arguments to be listened to it needs to stop making spurious ones based on ideology rather than facts.

Can you provide examples of where it has been proven incorrect?
"Wrong!"

Johnny English

  • Administrator
  • Don Maynard
  • *****
  • Posts: 35864
  • Effort. Technique. Violence.
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1151 on: March 29, 2016, 09:34:19 AM »
Can you provide examples of where it has been proven incorrect?

Yes. The implementation of the minimum wage in the UK by the Blair government in 1999. The Conservative Party mounted a heavy and sustained campaign to tell the populace how terrible it would be, how it was a death knell for business small and large alike, and how it would lead to increased unemployment as employers were saddled with unmanageable wage bills. You know, the usual anti-MW argument.

Between 1997 and 2010, the UK's GDP per capita outperformed any other country in the G6 annd unemployment levels remained at unprecedented low levels.

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/uk-growth-and-productivity-1997-to-2008/

http://www.statista.com/statistics/279898/unemployment-rate-in-the-united-kingdom-uk/
A cross-dressing limey poofter

Fenwyr

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 5611
  • He's the greatest
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1152 on: March 29, 2016, 09:52:14 AM »
Can you provide examples of where it has been proven incorrect?

This is the Glen Beck argument.  Can you prove to me that Wendy doesn't hate the Smurfs?

The burden of proof should always be on the prosecution.

Tommy

  • Mark Gastineau
  • *********
  • Posts: 15164
  • I don't get it
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1153 on: March 29, 2016, 09:53:00 AM »

Yes. The implementation of the minimum wage in the UK by the Blair government in 1999. The Conservative Party mounted a heavy and sustained campaign to tell the populace how terrible it would be, how it was a death knell for business small and large alike, and how it would lead to increased unemployment as employers were saddled with unmanageable wage bills. You know, the usual anti-MW argument.

Between 1997 and 2010, the UK's GDP per capita outperformed any other country in the G6 annd unemployment levels remained at unprecedented low levels.

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/uk-growth-and-productivity-1997-to-2008/

http://www.statista.com/statistics/279898/unemployment-rate-in-the-united-kingdom-uk/

I ask for an example, and you provide me with one from a completely different country.
"Wrong!"

Tommy

  • Mark Gastineau
  • *********
  • Posts: 15164
  • I don't get it
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #1154 on: March 29, 2016, 09:53:28 AM »

This is the Glen Beck argument.  Can you prove to me that Wendy doesn't hate the Smurfs?

The burden of proof should always be on the prosecution.

So just do it and hope for the best?
"Wrong!"

Tags: