I have been saying this stuff for years. There's no possible way they can accurately grade performances because they do not know the plays, the assignments, or the game.
And the speed that they produce their results just doesn't make sense. Like, how many people do you need watching each film to produce legit, comprehensive reports in 3 days? Especially when they say that everything is "triple checked by the experts on staff."
A single play in a single game takes how long to break down? Let's do some unnecessary math.
You have 22 players, each being evaluated on every snap, so that means you have to watch each guy probably what, three times minimum? Let's say two guys in the room, one O and one D, so 33 views per play. BUT, before one could even do that he needs to get the offensive and defensive formations, the coverage, stunts, the blocking scheme, the routes, and the players on the field. To get all of that we're probably talking watching the plays an additional 4 or so times if you have multiple people in the room. So we're now looking at a very conservative estimate of 35 views per snap. Factor in that each offense runs an average of about 65 plays per game, times two teams, and we need 4550 views per game. Not a bad day's work, especially when each play probably takes about seven seconds, so each game takes about nine hours to review for two people (factoring in a short pee break).
GTFO with all of that.
