There are a few things completely wrong with this thread.
The big reason this story broke nationally isn't because an innocent unarmed man was shot. It broke because in the wake of protests in response to that incident, the police force used excessive measures against clearly innocent people and even went so far as to ignore the Constitution of the United States regarding freedom of the press.
I argue all the time that freedom of the press is abused by entities like sports media and TMZ. In this case, this was a true violation of reporters' right to report on the news.
As for the idea of riots and looting, so far, that's been disputed by the people of the area. Given that last night, in the wake of the highway patrol taking over the oversight of the situation from the St Louis police force, there wasn't a single arrest I find it hard to blindly accept the word of the police regarding violence.
There are multiple eyewitnesses to the original incident who have yet to have been spoken to by investigators. Whether Brown is guilty of a previous crime or not, he was killed in front of witnesses. We're not talking about poor police work here, we're talking about willful ignorance of evidence.
This is on top of the fact that anyone with any sanity should be able to admit that the use of a substance which is internationally banned from war, yet not against domestic targets (tear gas) is absolutely over the top here. Not that rubber bullets spraying innocent people isn't as well.
But the cherry on top is the fact that a local police force in the United States of America not only has access to, but actively used, a tank built specifically to withstand the effects of landmines. On an American street.
What exactly does a local police department need better tactical gear than our troops on the ground in Afghanistan for?