Author Topic: Three safety defense  (Read 3592 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bojanglesman

  • Don Maynard
  • *************
  • Posts: 38883
Three safety defense
« on: July 31, 2014, 02:27:55 PM »

Andrew Ryan

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 9306
Re: Three safety defense
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2014, 02:39:47 PM »
Newest Ryan invention: the Troika Defense

bojanglesman

  • Don Maynard
  • *************
  • Posts: 38883
Re: Three safety defense
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2014, 02:43:48 PM »
Newest Ryan invention: the Troika Defense

1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 defense.  All in a straight line behind each other running towards the line at the snap, splitting off at the last second into random directions.

Heismanberg

  • Global Moderator
  • Curtis Martin
  • *****
  • Posts: 48949
  • SAUCE
Re: Three safety defense
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2014, 05:23:08 PM »
4-2-5 or 3-3-5 will work with the players we have on the roster.
He shook my hand breed tub and walked away

dcm1602

  • SUH DUDE
  • Blubbering Pussy
  • Mark Gastineau
  • *
  • Posts: 19533
Re: Three safety defense
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2014, 06:01:24 PM »
4-2-5 or 3-3-5 will work with the players we have on the roster.
I'd be a little concerned with our safeties running a 3-3-5

Pryor certainly fits the bill, but I'm not convinced any of the other safeties are athletic enough

Maybe Antonio Allen tho?

Heismanberg

  • Global Moderator
  • Curtis Martin
  • *****
  • Posts: 48949
  • SAUCE
Re: Three safety defense
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2014, 06:05:50 PM »
Pryor certainly fits the bill, but I'm not convinced any of the other safeties are athletic enough

Athletic enough for what?

Two will most likely have run responsibility and curl/flat coverage.  The other will probably have to help over the top. 
He shook my hand breed tub and walked away

dcm1602

  • SUH DUDE
  • Blubbering Pussy
  • Mark Gastineau
  • *
  • Posts: 19533
Re: Three safety defense
« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2014, 06:11:47 PM »
Athletic enough for what?

Two will most likely have run responsibility and curl/flat coverage.  The other will probably have to help over the top.
Need a safety that can take on lead blockers, yet still keep up with quick running backs (Sproles, bush etc)  in the flat.

And then other safeties who are solid in coverage

Pryor is probably more than capable, but if he's the only guy capable then it makes his duties more predictable



Heismanberg

  • Global Moderator
  • Curtis Martin
  • *****
  • Posts: 48949
  • SAUCE
Re: Three safety defense
« Reply #7 on: July 31, 2014, 06:15:57 PM »
Need a safety that can take on lead blockers, yet still keep up with quick running backs (Sproles, bush etc)  in the flat.

On a screen pass?  Because if our Spur or Rover safety is getting blocked down field before the ball is thrown, then that's going to get flagged.

I'm more much concerned with defending the wheel than swing/flare out of the backfield. 

Quote
Pryor is probably more than capable, but if he's the only guy capable then it makes his duties more predictable

Dawan Landry and Antonio Allen are more than capable of playing in the box.
He shook my hand breed tub and walked away

Andrew Ryan

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 9306
Re: Three safety defense
« Reply #8 on: July 31, 2014, 09:09:38 PM »
The most important question is who's going to be our centerfielder? All of our guys are decent in run support, but covering downfield? That's still to be determined...

JFIF

  • Shaun Ellis
  • *******
  • Posts: 5867
  • Head Bent over, Raised Up Posterior
Re: Three safety defense
« Reply #9 on: August 01, 2014, 06:31:51 PM »
1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 defense.  All in a straight line behind each other running towards the line at the snap, splitting off at the last second into random directions.

this is the future

dcm1602

  • SUH DUDE
  • Blubbering Pussy
  • Mark Gastineau
  • *
  • Posts: 19533
Re: Three safety defense
« Reply #10 on: August 01, 2014, 06:40:06 PM »
The most important question is who's going to be our centerfielder? All of our guys are decent in run support, but covering downfield? That's still to be determined...
If Pryor can't cover he's a horrible draft pick

reuben

  • Al Toon
  • ********
  • Posts: 10163
  • Hello, my name is Reuben.
Re: Three safety defense
« Reply #11 on: August 02, 2014, 02:44:33 PM »
1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 defense.  All in a straight line behind each other running towards the line at the snap, splitting off at the last second into random directions.

This made me laugh.

Tags: saints