Jet Offensive

Other Stuff => The Pats-Hater Parking Lot => Topic started by: Johnny English on December 13, 2013, 02:55:14 PM

Title: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 13, 2013, 02:55:14 PM
We should probably just have one thread given the regularity with which it happens.

In today's fun and games, a gunman has opened fire in a high school in Colorado, 10 miles from Columbine. There were reports of injuries, currently it looks like the shooter is injured and the school is being evacuated.

Update: shooter is dead from a self-inflicted injury. Was a student.

Further update: one student seriously injured with a gunshot wound, another not so serious. Shooter was apparently after a specific teacher.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 13, 2013, 02:59:45 PM
Remember when kids only used slingshots and threw rocks?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 13, 2013, 03:00:18 PM
http://www.9news.com/rss/article/368628/222/2-injured-in-shooting-at-Arapahoe-High-School
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 13, 2013, 03:03:13 PM
Remember when kids only used slingshots and threw rocks?

Hey man no lets pick on the fat kid any longer, the fat kid just may have a collection of assault rifles.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 13, 2013, 03:07:26 PM
Remember when kids only used slingshots and threw rocks?

No, and neither do you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States#History
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 13, 2013, 03:17:37 PM
No, and neither do you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States#History

I don't see any Canadian entries in there......so, I do.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 13, 2013, 03:25:27 PM
I don't see any Canadian entries in there......so, I do.

The last school shooting in Canada was 1999. Prior to that it was 1975. I'm presuming that the reason for so few school shootings in Canada is because we have all those armed teachers acting as a deterrent.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 13, 2013, 03:31:20 PM
The last school shooting in Canada was 1999. Prior to that it was 1975. I'm presuming that the reason for so few school shootings in Canada is because we have all those armed teachers acting as a deterrent.

Well it's certainly not gun ownership:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 13, 2013, 03:51:25 PM
I don't see any Canadian entries in there......so, I do.

You didn't say anything about Canadian kids.

But since you asked: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:School_killings_in_Canada
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 13, 2013, 03:56:27 PM
You didn't say anything about Canadian kids.

But since you asked: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:School_killings_in_Canada

I'm not buying it
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 13, 2013, 04:00:55 PM
I'm not buying it

Maybe you should avoid shooting threads, you're bad at them (http://www.jetoffensive.com/index.php?topic=153.msg5849#msg5849).
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 13, 2013, 04:02:44 PM
Maybe you should avoid shooting threads, you're bad at them.

Nah..I'll continue the status quo.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on December 13, 2013, 04:03:48 PM
Well it's certainly not gun ownership:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country

1/3rd the rate of the US.

I'd like to see the distribution of the type of firearms and the purposes.

Quite a bit of hunting grounds in Canada. I imagine a lot of hunting rifles and shotguns
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 13, 2013, 04:06:22 PM
Well it's certainly not gun ownership:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country

Actually, that's a really skewed way of using the statistic. Private ownership of firearms in metropolitan areas is virtually non-existent - the vast majority of firearms in Canada are owned by people who live in rural areas, and the vast majority of those firearms are rifles and shotguns because bears and moose and excrement.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on December 13, 2013, 04:08:08 PM
Actually, that's a really skewed way of using the statistic. Private ownership of firearms in metropolitan areas is virtually non-existent - the vast majority of firearms in Canada are owned by people who live in rural areas, and the vast majority of those firearms are rifles and shotguns because bears and moose and excrement.

That was exactly my suspicion
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 13, 2013, 04:18:44 PM
Nah..I'll continue the status quo.

(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.es/archive/1/1c/20130725212311!Shitposting.gif)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 13, 2013, 04:24:33 PM
Tomorrow is the one-year anniversary of Sandy Hook, btw.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 13, 2013, 07:51:21 PM
(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.es/archive/1/1c/20130725212311!Shitposting.gif)

you really do love it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 13, 2013, 07:58:27 PM
Update on the victims:

Quote
One student, a 15-year-old girl, was reported in critical condition and undergoing surgery. The other student was released from the hospital Friday evening.

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_24718883/reports-shots-fired-at-arapahoe-high-school
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 17, 2013, 05:07:42 PM
CNN reporting an active shooter currently on the third floor of the Renown Medical Center in Reno. Casualties reported.

Edit: Fox reporting two dead including the shooter, and four injured.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on January 15, 2014, 11:06:10 PM
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/exclusive-lanza-twisted-call-radio-station-article-1.1580984

Apparently he posted on this forum: http://www.shockedbeyondbelief.com/discuss/index.php
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 09, 2014, 04:02:28 PM
These two look like a pair of winners.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/two-cops-three-others-killed-las-vegas-shooting-spree-n125766
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 09, 2014, 04:03:49 PM
Whatever happened to that retard shooting cops in New Brunswick? 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 09, 2014, 04:05:48 PM
Whatever happened to that retard shooting cops in New Brunswick? 

Sounds like he was arrested the other day.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on June 10, 2014, 11:56:55 AM
Another school shooting today (Portland). The gunman is dead according to the sheriff's department.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 10, 2014, 12:50:42 PM
Another school shooting today (Portland). The gunman is dead according to the sheriff's department.

Does 2 people dead count as a mass shooting? I think not!  Totally inappropriate for this thread.

/bad joke
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 24, 2014, 02:09:33 PM
http://6abc.com/news/shooting-reported-at-high-school-north-of-seattle/364512/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on October 24, 2014, 04:56:58 PM
Not really a "mass" shooting, but at least this one has a happy ending.

http://www.counton2.com/story/26851008/1-dead-after-nc-grandfather-fires-back-at-trio-in-attempted-rape-of-teen-granddaughter-sheriff-says

3 scumbags break into a house robbing a family and trying to rape a guys granddaughter. He kills one of them, and the other 2 had to be airlifted for emergency surgery.

Hopefully the other 2 join their friend
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 20, 2014, 09:40:35 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/11/20/report-shooting-at-fsu/

3 wounded, gunman killed by police
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on November 20, 2014, 09:54:13 AM
What happened to whn thse dudes would just off thmselvs?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: klaximilian on November 20, 2014, 10:22:00 AM
What happened to whn thse dudes would just off thmselvs?

Ah, the good ol' days.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on November 20, 2014, 10:36:20 AM
What happened to whn thse dudes would just off thmselvs?

Or their parents and siblings and then themselves. I am in favor of getting the genes out of the pool.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 20, 2014, 12:24:22 PM
What if only one person gets shot, but he's morbidly obese.  Is it still a mass shooting?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on November 20, 2014, 12:27:00 PM
What if only one person gets shot, but he's morbidly obese.  Is it still a mass shooting?

PWWWCCCHHHHH!!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 20, 2014, 12:30:51 PM
PWWWCCCHHHHH!!
SHOT TO THA HEAAAART!!!!!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on November 20, 2014, 01:00:31 PM
SHOT TO THA HEAAAART!!!!!

You guys love your hair bands,
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on November 20, 2014, 01:33:42 PM
What happened to whn thse dudes would just off thmselvs?

What happened to your Es?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 17, 2015, 10:35:53 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/06/17/charleston-south-carolina-shooting/28902017/

freak whoever did this. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 17, 2015, 11:20:42 PM
South Carolina Senator Clementa Pinckney is one of the victims.  He was the minister at the church.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on June 18, 2015, 08:25:49 AM
Shots were fired at a church in Memphis this morning

http://www.wmcactionnews5.com/story/29350533/shots-fired-into-church-on-pendleton-street
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 18, 2015, 08:59:42 AM
Quote
BN) U.S. Opens Hate-Crime Probe of Black Church Killing of 9 Pe
ople

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

BFW 06/18 04:51 *CHARLESTON POLICE SAY 9 DEAD IN CHURCH SHOOTING


+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

U.S. Opens Hate-Crime Probe of Black Church Killing of 9 People
2015-06-18 13:26:03.913 GMT


By Michael C. Bender
     (Bloomberg) -- The fatal shooting by a white gunman of nine
people in a historic black church in Charleston, South Carolina,
will be investigated as a possible hate crime by federal
authorities.
     The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, the FBI and
the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of South Carolina
said Thursday they are probing the shooting at Emanuel AME
Church. Federal agencies are cooperating with the state’s
investigation, according to a Justice Department statement.
     The suspect was attending a meeting in the church for
almost an hour before he killed nine people and injured at least
one other in an incident that both the mayor and police chief
said was a hate crime. Police were still searching Thursday
morning for the suspect, who they described as a male between 21
and 24 years old.
     Police Chief Greg Mullen said three men and six women were
killed Wednesday night, and there were three survivors inside
the church. He declined to identify victims or survivors or the
type of gun used while speaking to reporters at a news
conference.
     “No one in this community will ever forget this night,”
Mullen said.
     The church’s pastor, Clementa Pinckney, a South Carolina
state senator, was among those killed, Reverend Al Sharpton said
in a post on his Twitter feed.
     Mayor Joseph Riley Jr. described the shootings as “an
unfathomable and unspeakable act” committed by someone with a
“deranged mind.”
     “We’re committed to finding this horrible scoundrel,”
Riley said.

                      ‘Extremely Dangerous’

     Mullen said police received a call about the shooting at
9:05 p.m., and officers found eight people dead when they
arrived. One person who was taken to the Medical University of
South Carolina later died, he said.
     Mullen described the shooter as having sandy-blond hair and
being “extremely dangerous.” A post on the police department’s
Twitter feed described the suspect as having a slender build and
wearing a gray sweatshirt and Timberland boots.
     The suspect was in the church attending a meeting for
almost an hour before the shooting, Mullen said. Police don’t
know if anyone was targeted “other than the church itself,” he
said.
     “This is a tragedy that no community should have to
experience,” he said. “It is unfathomable that somebody in
today’s society would walk into a church when people are having
a prayer meeting and take their lives. And I can assure you that
we’re going to do everything in our power to find this
individual, lock him up, to make sure that he does not hurt
anyone else.”

                         Governor Haley

     South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, a Republican, asked
for prayers for the families affected by the shooting.
Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush canceled a campaign
event in the city scheduled for Thursday morning.
     “While we do not yet know all of the details, we do know
that we’ll never understand what motivates anyone to enter one
of our places of worship and take the life of another,” Haley
said in a statement.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on June 18, 2015, 09:52:01 AM
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/06/17/charleston-south-carolina-shooting/28902017/

freak whoever did this. 

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHyaYZ5WUAA19NI.jpg)


Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 18, 2015, 11:04:18 AM
They caught him.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 18, 2015, 11:24:06 AM
I'm not sure where to put this one, but given that it left three dead and was a hate crime, this seems an appropriate place.  The young man in question was the cousin of my neighbors growing up, a Syrian family that still lives next door to my parents.  Their kids, a girl now in law school and a boy now in medical school with the US Army, lost their cousin and just this week lost their mom to cancer.  One of the greatest families I know absolutely torn up, and this article happened to come out today.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/06/22/the-story-of-a-hate-crime
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Murrell2878 on June 18, 2015, 11:41:42 AM
excrement is just getting worse at this point.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 18, 2015, 11:51:50 AM
Awful tragedy, but sucks we're going to hear nothing but "it's open season on black people" crap. Twitter is already raging.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 18, 2015, 11:52:33 AM
Awful tragedy, but sucks we're going to hear nothing but "it's open season on black people" crap. Twitter is already raging.

Sucks we're then going to hear nothing but "enough with the race crap".
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on June 18, 2015, 12:07:30 PM
Sucks we're then going to hear nothing but "enough with the race crap".

The one thing I've been seeing on Twitter today that I'm really starting to come around to is the idea of treating these "hate crimes" as domestic terrorism. If the same thing happened in a Muslim country, even if it were Muslims killing Muslims, we'd label it terrorism. So why is it any different here?

Start sending trash like this to Gitmo and stop allowing people to handwave off things as simple racism.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 18, 2015, 12:12:52 PM
I have no idea what should be done.
How do you punish someone who doesn't care and is willing to die?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 18, 2015, 12:23:31 PM

I have no idea what should be done.
How do you punish someone who doesn't care and is willing to die?

There's a big difference between being willing to die and being willing to suffer.  This guy may want to die but he doesn't want to go into a prison after shooting up a church.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 18, 2015, 12:43:25 PM

The one thing I've been seeing on Twitter today that I'm really starting to come around to is the idea of treating these "hate crimes" as domestic terrorism. If the same thing happened in a Muslim country, even if it were Muslims killing Muslims, we'd label it terrorism. So why is it any different here?

Start sending trash like this to Gitmo and stop allowing people to handwave off things as simple racism.

But surely you can see the difference between organized terrorism and random acts of violence. By calling this "domestic terrorism" you're implying that there's an ideology around this guy shooting innocent people. Even Domestic Terrorism according is define by acts intended to coerce a civilian population, influence policy by intimidation, or affect the conduct of a govt, etc.

Some crazy kid going on a shooting spree doesn't fit. And calling it "white terrorism" or some excrement is just going to make excrement a lot worse.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on June 18, 2015, 01:06:38 PM
But surely you can see the difference between organized terrorism and random acts of violence. By calling this "domestic terrorism" you're implying that there's an ideology around this guy shooting innocent people. Even Domestic Terrorism according is define by acts intended to coerce a civilian population, influence policy by intimidation, or affect the conduct of a govt, etc.

Some crazy kid going on a shooting spree doesn't fit. And calling it "white terrorism" or some excrement is just going to make excrement a lot worse.

While I often write in definite terms (a side-effect of my schooling) I know no answer is ever clear-cut.

Is this not ideological though? Obviously we need to hear more of the story, but a white dude shot up a bunch of black people in a church. He had a confederate flag on his license plate (saw the image on Twitter earlier). Alone those aren't screaming "terrorism" but that storyline will become more clear during evidence gathering going forward.

The big thing is, the answer can not continue to be things like "Let's not bring up that race crap" or "It's just a mentally ill person in a senseless act of violence" or "Let's not bring gun control into the conversation about a tragic situation."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 18, 2015, 02:06:11 PM
Quote
"I have to do it," Roof apparently explained to his victims, all of whom were black. "You rape our women and you're taking over our country, and you have to go."

There are 19 hate groups currently operating in South Carolina, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). One of those groups is a part of the Nation of Islam, and another solely focuses on discrimination against LGBT individuals. The rest, however, are either chapters of the Ku Klux Klan or white nationalist, anti-immigration, neo-Nazi, and neo-Confederate sympathizers. None of these groups have claimed affiliation with Roof as of yet—though Roof has been photographed wearing a jacket adorned with the flags of Apartheid-era South Africa and Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), suggesting, at least, that he may have held some pretty traditional racist views.

http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/what-white-supremacists-are-saying-online-about-the-south-carolina-church-shooting-618?utm_soruce=vicefbca

No ideology there. Just one crazy kid, that's all. Really nothing, to be honest. Move along now, nothing to see.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 18, 2015, 02:32:35 PM
I think this was planned out and the target was Clementa Pinckney.  If he wanted to just kill a bunch of black people, he would've walked into that church a few hours earlier when it was packed with hundreds of people.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 18, 2015, 02:35:27 PM
If walking into a church and shooting 10 people because of their race isn't an act of terror to you, then you need to reevaluate your life.

This kid said he was there to "kill black people"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 18, 2015, 02:43:30 PM
Quote
An undated Facebook photograph of Roof shows him wearing a jacket with two patches. One is a pre-apartheid-era flag of South Africa, and the other is the flag for Rhodesia, the previously white-ruled country now called Zimbabwe.

Also, he was unable to purchase a firearm because of his criminal record ...so his dad bought him one for his 21st birthday. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on June 18, 2015, 03:07:25 PM
If walking into a church and shooting 10 people because of their race isn't an act of terror to you, then you need to reevaluate your life.

This kid said he was there to "kill black people"
I think there's a difference between terrorism and lunacy

I think terrorism is usually in support of some kind of misguided cause...

This kid just looks like he's butt freaking nuts. Like that kid who shot up the schools in Connecticut.

Some bonified lunatic psychopath who just let loose
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 18, 2015, 03:16:38 PM
I think there's a difference between terrorism and lunacy

I think terrorism is usually in support of some kind of misguided cause...

This kid just looks like he's butt freaking nuts. Like that kid who shot up the schools in Connecticut.

Some bonified lunatic psychopath who just let loose


There's not much of a difference. 

He said he wanted to kill black people, except he didn't use those exact words.  What part of that don't you get?

This was all about race.  How is that not a misguided cause?  He's probably a little insane considering he went through with it, but this was planned out and premeditated.  Roof targeted, attacked, and murdered a community of people inside of a church...because they were black.

If he was Muslim and did this to a predominantly white church, it'd be labeled as terrorism. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on June 18, 2015, 03:19:24 PM


There's not much of a difference. 

He said he wanted to kill black people, except he didn't use those exact words.  What part of that don't you get?

This was all about race.  How is that not a misguided cause?  He's probably a little insane considering he went through with it, but this was planned out and premeditated.  Roof targeted, attacked, and murdered a community of people inside of a church...because they were black.

If he was Muslim and did this to a predominantly white church, it'd be labeled as terrorism.

He just looks like a psychopath.

I'm sure the experts will analyze the excrement out of this to determine if be was strictly racist, or a complete looney
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 18, 2015, 03:22:39 PM
I'm sure the experts will analyze the excrement out of this to determine if be was strictly racist, or a complete looney

And they'll be wrong, just like you are.  Some jackass on MSNBC said this was not racially motivated and it was faith-related.  This is AFTER this motherfucking coward said he went to the church to kill blacks.

Watch whiteness work.  The media will say he's crazy.  The media will make excuses for him.  This is a piece of excrement, racist terrorist that should not be breathing right now.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 18, 2015, 03:34:33 PM
Also, he was unable to purchase a firearm because of his criminal record ...so his dad bought him one for his 21st birthday. 

Great decision, Dad.....
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 18, 2015, 03:34:53 PM
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) on Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in 2013:

Quote
This man, in my view, should be designated as a potential enemy combatant and we should be allowed to question him for intelligence gathering purposes to find out about future attacks and terrorist organizations that may exist that he has knowledge of, and that evidence cannot be used against him in trial. That evidence is used to protect us as a nation.

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) on Dylann Rooff earlier today:

Quote
I just think he was one of these whacked out kids. I don’t think it’s anything broader than that. It’s about a young man who is obviously twisted.

Both are US citizens. Both committed hideous acts in the name of a fucked up ideology. Amazing that the responses would be so wildly different.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 18, 2015, 03:36:15 PM
Lindsey Graham is the worst
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 18, 2015, 03:44:10 PM
Well, I just think that by calling it racially motivated terrorism you'll just invite potential revenge killings.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 18, 2015, 03:45:09 PM
This is the only state that still flies the Confederate flag over its statehouse. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 18, 2015, 03:45:40 PM
This is the only state that still flies the Confederate flag over its statehouse. 

And one of five that has refused to enact hate crime legislation.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 18, 2015, 03:45:48 PM
Well, I just think that by calling it racially motivated terrorism you'll just invite potential revenge killings.

Or we'll just be calling it what it is. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on June 18, 2015, 04:11:56 PM
There's not much of a difference. 

He said he wanted to kill black people, except he didn't use those exact words.  What part of that don't you get?

This was all about race.  How is that not a misguided cause?  He's probably a little insane considering he went through with it, but this was planned out and premeditated.  Roof targeted, attacked, and murdered a community of people inside of a church...because they were black.

If he was Muslim and did this to a predominantly white church, it'd be labeled as terrorism.

Exactly.


He just looks like a psychopath.

I'm sure the experts will analyze the excrement out of this to determine if be was strictly racist, or a complete looney

As opposed to all of those pictures of the 9/11 terrorists playing frisbee with their kids.

And they'll be wrong, just like you are.  Some jackass on MSNBC said this was not racially motivated and it was faith-related.  This is AFTER this motherfucking coward said he went to the church to kill blacks.

Watch whiteness work.  The media will say he's crazy.  The media will make excuses for him.  This is a piece of excrement, racist terrorist that should not be breathing right now.

If that faith were Islam, suddenly it would be terrorism, but I'm sure they won't talk about that.

This is the only state that still flies the Confederate flag over its statehouse.

And flying it at half-staff today from what I understand.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 18, 2015, 04:23:34 PM
And flying it at half-staff today from what I understand.

Nope.

It's flying high.  The American and state flag are at half-mast though.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 18, 2015, 05:59:10 PM

Well, I just think that by calling it racially motivated terrorism you'll just invite potential revenge killings.

So you're saying black people need to be told what racial hatred looks like?  Do you think there's anyone who doesn't think it was racially motivated terrorism other than white people scared to admit it?  The worst thing you can do is prompt some "[Political leader] doesn't care about black people" by downplaying the role race played in this.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 18, 2015, 06:02:05 PM


He just looks like a psychopath.

I'm sure the experts will analyze the excrement out of this to determine if be was strictly racist, or a complete looney

He has a dangerous ideology and likely fanaticism.  You're describing every terrorist ever with those terms.  Absolutely no one who perpetrated mass killings has a properly functioning mental state.  Well, aside from the ones who do it in power.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 18, 2015, 08:15:39 PM

bonified
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 18, 2015, 08:17:26 PM

And one of five that has refused to enact hate crime legislation.

I can't believe they're holding out after seeing how the other 45 states defeated racism.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on June 18, 2015, 08:18:50 PM

http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/bona-fide-vs-bonified-surprise-bonified-is-a-word/

Bonified is a common misspelling for it — and one that attracts a lot of mockery — but it’s actually a word. 

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on June 18, 2015, 08:36:15 PM
bonerfied
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 18, 2015, 08:44:07 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHxAkFLUcAAysJq.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on June 18, 2015, 11:11:02 PM
Nope.

It's flying high.

Are you serious? That makes me want to vomit.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 18, 2015, 11:20:30 PM
Are you serious? That makes me want to vomit.

It gets better than that. They couldn't fly it at half mast even if they wanted to.

http://gawker.com/every-s-c-statehouse-flag-is-at-half-staff-except-the-1712358244
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: d sw0rdz on June 19, 2015, 03:36:59 AM
https://vid.me/e/8ZOz?card=1
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ukilledkenny on June 19, 2015, 05:51:59 AM
https://vid.me/e/8ZOz?card=1

"The Confederate flag flies high over South Carolina and the roads are named for Confederate generals, yet it's the white guy who feels his country is being taken away from him."

Sums up pretty well how us hoo-ha hippies see a few of you.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on July 16, 2015, 05:59:35 PM
So this piece of excrement that killed 4 US Marines in Chattanooga had already been labeled a domestic terrorist and certain news outlets are still trying to argue that Dylan Roof isn't one. 

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 16, 2015, 07:00:42 PM
It's mildly amusing to me that this thread was bumped instead of the Terrorists one.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on July 16, 2015, 07:06:35 PM
Terrorist Miscellanea
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on July 16, 2015, 08:51:42 PM
It's mildly amusing to me that this thread was bumped instead of the Terrorists one.

My thoughts as well.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on July 16, 2015, 09:05:53 PM
My thoughts as well.

kill yourself
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on July 17, 2015, 09:22:59 AM
kill yourself

Are you his bad coke guy?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 17, 2015, 10:17:56 AM
It's mildly amusing to me that this thread was bumped instead of the Terrorists one.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-33562479
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on July 17, 2015, 10:38:23 AM
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-33562479

But his name is Muhammed!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on July 17, 2015, 10:38:57 AM
But his name is Muhammed!

Terrorist
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: d sw0rdz on July 17, 2015, 02:57:04 PM
apparently the kid got arrested for a DUI recently

the hypocrisy
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 17, 2015, 03:54:46 PM
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-33562479

No link to ISIS - he's still a domestic terrorist by the definition used on Roof.

I'll fix the thread when I get home.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 17, 2015, 04:08:55 PM
No link to ISIS - he's still a domestic terrorist by the definition used on Roof.

I'll fix the thread when I get home.


One key difference. Attacks on the military are generally not considered terrorism, terrorism generally refers to attacks on civilian targets with the aim of inducing fear amongst the populace.

I'm not sure how this sort of event is classified. I don't know that you could really call it an act of war, or an act of resistance against an occupying force. It doesn't seem to really fit any of the existing labels that I'm aware of.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 17, 2015, 06:08:59 PM

One key difference. Attacks on the military are generally not considered terrorism, terrorism generally refers to attacks on civilian targets with the aim of inducing fear amongst the populace.

I'm not sure how this sort of event is classified. I don't know that you could really call it an act of war, or an act of resistance against an occupying force. It doesn't seem to really fit any of the existing labels that I'm aware of.

I'm genuinely curious now so I read up a little.

The targets don't necessarily need to be civilians, but can include non-combatants such as neutral military personnel.

The four victims include three "active duty" veterans assigned to the reserve center, of which two were Iraq vets (war officially ended in 2011) and an Afghanistan vet (conflict ongoing). The other victim was a reservist who had never been deployed.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on July 17, 2015, 06:45:13 PM
Meh.  I don't care if someone calls it terrorism even if it was a military target (in name only).  It obviously has an ideology behind it, and it was a freaking recruitment center in a strip mall.  You could argue he was trying to scare people out of enlisting.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on July 17, 2015, 10:01:18 PM
Meh.  I don't care if someone calls it terrorism even if it was a military target (in name only).  It obviously has an ideology behind it, and it was a freaking recruitment center in a strip mall.  You could argue he was trying to scare people out of enlisting.

Right.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on July 17, 2015, 10:01:55 PM
Are you his bad coke guy?

He is bad coke.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on July 23, 2015, 09:29:15 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/23/us/louisiana-theater-shooting/index.html

god dammit
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on August 03, 2015, 08:10:12 AM
Somebody got some shitty advice.

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/national-international/Family-to-Pay-Price-for-Trying-to-Sue-Ammo-Dealers-320224111.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on August 03, 2015, 09:32:42 AM

Somebody got some shitty advice.

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/national-international/Family-to-Pay-Price-for-Trying-to-Sue-Ammo-Dealers-320224111.html

Oops.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on August 03, 2015, 07:18:11 PM
Why the freak would anyone think that would end well?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on August 03, 2015, 08:04:03 PM
Somebody got some shitty advice.

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/national-international/Family-to-Pay-Price-for-Trying-to-Sue-Ammo-Dealers-320224111.html

Feel kinda bad for them because of what happened to them.

But I also wish this would happen to more people who bring forth frivolous and shitty freaking lawsuits
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on August 04, 2015, 07:38:26 AM
Feel kinda bad for them because of what happened to them.

But I also wish this would happen to more people who bring forth frivolous and shitty freaking lawsuits
The lawsuit wasn't necessarily frivolous as much as it was freaking retarded, their lawyer should pay the entire bill for bad advice.

2 days in a row I agree with you, the space time continuum is imploding.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on August 17, 2015, 03:33:32 PM
http://www.foxsports.com/buzzer/story/south-carolina-church-shooting-mother-player-surprised-by-yankees-081715
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on August 17, 2015, 06:07:01 PM
http://www.foxsports.com/buzzer/story/south-carolina-church-shooting-mother-player-surprised-by-yankees-081715

Throwing out the first pitch tonight.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on August 17, 2015, 06:25:00 PM
http://www.foxsports.com/buzzer/story/south-carolina-church-shooting-mother-player-surprised-by-yankees-081715

That kid is incredibly impressive.  His E:60 segment was great. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on October 01, 2015, 01:41:35 PM
KOMO News Verified account ‏@komonews 17m17 minutes ago

BREAKING: Oregon State Police confirm 15 people killed in shooting at Umpqua Community College. #liveonkomo


http://abcnews.go.com/US/multiple-casualties-shooting-reported-college-oregon/story?id=34181664
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 01, 2015, 02:07:26 PM
Lame.  This is why we need armed response teams at every school, college, day care, and nursery in America.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 01, 2015, 02:45:00 PM
Lame.  This is why we need armed response teams at every school, college, day care, and nursery in America.

Don't forget churches. And government offices. And movie theaters.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 01, 2015, 02:46:07 PM
I have a baseball bat. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on October 01, 2015, 03:13:06 PM
Living in NYC I've already long ago come to terms with the possibility that I could be murdered by a lunatic at any moment. It kind of frees your mind in a way. Terrorism and mass shootings don't really affect my daily routine, and it shouldn't.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on October 01, 2015, 03:14:18 PM
Living in NYC I've already long ago come to terms with the possibility that I could be murdered by a lunatic at any moment. It kind of frees your mind in a way. Terrorism and mass shootings don't really affect my daily routine, and it shouldn't.

what an odd thing to say
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 01, 2015, 03:16:50 PM
Living in NYC I've already long ago come to terms with the possibility that I could be murdered by a lunatic at any moment. It kind of frees your mind in a way. Terrorism and mass shootings don't really affect my daily routine, and it shouldn't.

You can't account for it.  It's simply impossible.  I'm not sure why anyone thinks they'd be able to prevent something from happening with any certainty.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on October 01, 2015, 05:29:28 PM
You can't account for it.  It's simply impossible.  I'm not sure why anyone thinks they'd be able to prevent something from happening with any certainty.

I can see you never watched Person of Interest.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on October 01, 2015, 05:39:18 PM
I can see you never watched Person of Interest.

Minority Report would come in handy as well.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on October 01, 2015, 06:23:46 PM
(http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/10/01/0fc0e9efbc3c0f618aaff9419e929f8b.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 01, 2015, 11:37:53 PM
Lame.  This is why we need armed response teams at every school, college, day care, and nursery in America.

I don't think you're far off. I've been thinking about this today, and I think I have the answer. I've come to the conclusion that the problem is that not enough people are dying at the end of a gun in America.

Hear me out here.

If the American population were going to see the idiocy of their current gun control policies or lack thereof, they would have done so by now. Given there's clearly no way that the utter anachronism that is the Second Amendment is going to be repealed as we stand, the only way that America is going to come to its senses is to actually give the people who support the Second Amendment, which is everyone from the people who think that having a firearm in their house makes them safer, through the probably but not entirely harmless nutters who just love guns as their proxy cocks, to the NRA shills who recognise that fear makes money, exactly what they want.

Guns everywhere. Everyone having them. Schools, police stations, courts, hospitals, churches, high streets, Wal-Mart, the White House, everyone with guns everywhere. Everyone should have a gun. More firearms more more more. M.A.D. After all, it worked with the Russians. If everyone has a gun, no-one will open fire for fear of getting shot, right?

Do it. Open the floodgates and prove the theory right or wrong, once and for all.

(Just please, move to Canada if it happens. I don't want any of you to be part of the collateral damage.)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on October 01, 2015, 11:44:42 PM
I am tired of this excrement. I feel so bad for the victims.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 12:24:39 AM
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Norway has a high rate of gun ownership and low rate of gun violence.  Ditto for Switzerland.  You cannot get rid of guns in this country.  It's damn near an impossibility.  What we need, then, is mandated training.  If people want to argue for ownership for protection, they sure as hell shouldn't argue against becoming a smarter gun owner.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on October 02, 2015, 12:36:52 AM
Mass. Shootings




Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 02, 2015, 12:40:18 AM
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Norway has a high rate of gun ownership and low rate of gun violence.  Ditto for Switzerland.  You cannot get rid of guns in this country.  It's damn near an impossibility.  What we need, then, is mandated training.  If people want to argue for ownership for protection, they sure as hell shouldn't argue against becoming a smarter gun owner.

Actually it's really easy to fix the whole problem of gun ownership in America if you want to. Norway and Switzerland are really terrible arguments trotted out by the NRA, I'm a little surprised that you did.

Norway is a highly rural country with very restrictive gun laws, most guns owned are either hunting or sports weapons - single shot long barrel guns of small calibre, or shotguns. Auto and semi-auto weapons are almost completely illegal, and handguns are only allowed in a sporting context. You can't carry a loaded weapon in public, and there is no concept of a self defence weapon.

Switzerland has a huge gun ownership ratio due to the fact that they still have national service, and it's legal to keep your personal firearm after you have completed your service. The ownership ratio is still around half that of the US. Full auto is illegal in Switzerland, and in order to carry a loaded weapon outside of your home you need to have a specific permit that is only granted to people in specific security-related professions.

Your gun laws are insane, and trying to draw comparisons to other countries doesn't work. There is no comparison except maybe somewhere like Somalia, and they don't produce very good statistics.

Dear America, please be less idiot. For everyone's sake, especially your own.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: NDMick on October 02, 2015, 05:56:08 AM


Dear America, please be less idiot. For everyone's sake, especially your own.
That would cause profits to to be less than last year. Can't help you.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on October 02, 2015, 07:36:11 AM
Maybe people should wait until we find out how he got his guns before getting on their soapboxes.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 08:01:02 AM

Actually it's really easy to fix the whole problem of gun ownership in America if you want to. Norway and Switzerland are really terrible arguments trotted out by the NRA, I'm a little surprised that you did.

Norway is a highly rural country with very restrictive gun laws, most guns owned are either hunting or sports weapons - single shot long barrel guns of small calibre, or shotguns. Auto and semi-auto weapons are almost completely illegal, and handguns are only allowed in a sporting context. You can't carry a loaded weapon in public, and there is no concept of a self defence weapon.

Switzerland has a huge gun ownership ratio due to the fact that they still have national service, and it's legal to keep your personal firearm after you have completed your service. The ownership ratio is still around half that of the US. Full auto is illegal in Switzerland, and in order to carry a loaded weapon outside of your home you need to have a specific permit that is only granted to people in specific security-related professions.

Your gun laws are insane, and trying to draw comparisons to other countries doesn't work. There is no comparison except maybe somewhere like Somalia, and they don't produce very good statistics.

Dear America, please be less idiot. For everyone's sake, especially your own.

Fine.  The countries I listed suck.  I'll accept that.  I don't accept your claim that it's "really easy to fix".  I don't see any proposal for a solution in your post, so please tell me how we solve the issue.  If it involves any sort of gun confiscation, though, you're already wrong.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on October 02, 2015, 08:02:01 AM
Maybe people should wait until we find out how he got his guns before getting on their soapboxes.

I got mine courtesy of Mims Fitness.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 02, 2015, 08:32:30 AM
Maybe people should wait until we find out how he got his guns before getting on their soapboxes.
Maybe he 3d printed them.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 02, 2015, 08:40:37 AM
Fine.  The countries I listed suck.  I'll accept that.  I don't accept your claim that it's "really easy to fix".  I don't see any proposal for a solution in your post, so please tell me how we solve the issue.  If it involves any sort of gun confiscation, though, you're already wrong.

On my way out so don't really have time to go into depth, but essentially this:

1. Make it illegal to keep handguns in the home, with the very specific exception of those people who need them for their jobs. Your domestic weapon is far more likely to be used against your and your family than it is an intruder.

2. Handguns and any form of automatic or semi-automatic rifle currently in private ownership can still be owned, but they must be kept at licensed and secured gun clubs. If you want to pretend to be GI Joe, you may only do so under controlled circumstances. You go to your club, sign out your toy, make blasty holes in a bit of paper, hand your gun back, go home.

3. Should you not wish to join such a club, you may sell your existing weapons to the government for a fair price.

4. The purchase of new weapons must be done through your gun club and will be subject to you having a current license. Licenses must be obtained through the club, will require retesting every three years and an integral part will be a medical approval. There will be no more gun shops other than those inside club premises, and all firearms and ammunition purchases will be recorded and reported.

5. Single shot long guns used in hunting may be owned and kept in the home, under certain conditions. Assault rifles and pump action shotguns do not fall into this category.

6. Antique and collectors weapons may be kept in the home as long as they are deactivated. The ammunition may not.

7. The Second Amendment will be repealed. It's anachronistic, irrelevant and downright dangerous. Owning firearms should be a privilege, not a right. They don't protect you from a government run amok and they don't protect you from the boogeyman climbing through the window. It isn't the 18th century any more and it's ridiculous to try and preserve rules that were made in the day of muskets and flintlocks. If you don't like your government, vote them out. The ballot box is a far more effective weapon against them than an AR-15.

8. The penalties for owning a banned firearm will be extensive, with a first offense carrying a custodial sentence.

This isn't exhaustive and it isn't easy. The political clout to make it happen doesn't exist, even if some (but not enough) have the will. The commercial lobbies whose interests lie in selling military hardware to teenagers and nutters at the expense of your children's lives certainly wouldn't let it happen. Even if you could enact this, it wouldn't take all firearms out of people's houses and it wouldn't take illegal firearms off the streets. This isn't aimed at stopping gangbangers putting holes in each other, because that's an even more complicated scenario. It's designed to stop crazed idiots from waking up one morning and deciding that their "self defense" weapon is the ideal way to exact revenge on classmates or colleagues for whatever wrong they feel has been visited upon them.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on October 02, 2015, 08:47:16 AM
I got mine courtesy of Mims Fitness.

lmao
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on October 02, 2015, 09:05:11 AM

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Norway has a high rate of gun ownership and low rate of gun violence.  Ditto for Switzerland.  You cannot get rid of guns in this country.  It's damn near an impossibility.  What we need, then, is mandated training.  If people want to argue for ownership for protection, they sure as hell shouldn't argue against becoming a smarter gun owner.

I don't most gun violence in this country is a result of a lack of proper training.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on October 02, 2015, 09:07:10 AM
I know Chris Rock was being facetious, but put a huge tax on bullets. Make them really expensive. If legal guns are expensive then the price of black market guns will skyrocket.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 09:54:20 AM
On my way out so don't really have time to go into depth, but essentially this:

1. Make it illegal to keep handguns in the home, with the very specific exception of those people who need them for their jobs. Your domestic weapon is far more likely to be used against your and your family than it is an intruder.

2. Handguns and any form of automatic or semi-automatic rifle currently in private ownership can still be owned, but they must be kept at licensed and secured gun clubs. If you want to pretend to be GI Joe, you may only do so under controlled circumstances. You go to your club, sign out your toy, make blasty holes in a bit of paper, hand your gun back, go home.

3. Should you not wish to join such a club, you may sell your existing weapons to the government for a fair price.

4. The purchase of new weapons must be done through your gun club and will be subject to you having a current license. Licenses must be obtained through the club, will require retesting every three years and an integral part will be a medical approval. There will be no more gun shops other than those inside club premises, and all firearms and ammunition purchases will be recorded and reported.

5. Single shot long guns used in hunting may be owned and kept in the home, under certain conditions. Assault rifles and pump action shotguns do not fall into this category.

6. Antique and collectors weapons may be kept in the home as long as they are deactivated. The ammunition may not.

7. The Second Amendment will be repealed. It's anachronistic, irrelevant and downright dangerous. Owning firearms should be a privilege, not a right. They don't protect you from a government run amok and they don't protect you from the boogeyman climbing through the window. It isn't the 18th century any more and it's ridiculous to try and preserve rules that were made in the day of muskets and flintlocks. If you don't like your government, vote them out. The ballot box is a far more effective weapon against them than an AR-15.

8. The penalties for owning a banned firearm will be extensive, with a first offense carrying a custodial sentence.

This isn't exhaustive and it isn't easy. The political clout to make it happen doesn't exist, even if some (but not enough) have the will. The commercial lobbies whose interests lie in selling military hardware to teenagers and nutters at the expense of your children's lives certainly wouldn't let it happen. Even if you could enact this, it wouldn't take all firearms out of people's houses and it wouldn't take illegal firearms off the streets. This isn't aimed at stopping gangbangers putting holes in each other, because that's an even more complicated scenario. It's designed to stop crazed idiots from waking up one morning and deciding that their "self defense" weapon is the ideal way to exact revenge on classmates or colleagues for whatever wrong they feel has been visited upon them.

This is exactly what I meant when I challenged your assertion that it's "really easy to fix".  Absolutely none of that is ever going to happen.  The best you can hope for is a ban on fully automatic weapons as far as restriction of ownership.  I deal with the reality of the situation.  Improved licensing and training are the best we're going to do right now, and even that encounters a lot of opposition.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 09:56:56 AM
I don't most gun violence in this country is a result of a lack of proper training.

Training includes responsible ownership and storage.  Adam Lanza's mother didn't lock her guns up properly, and her son was able to swipe an arsenal out of her home.  Issue licenses based on the completion of courses that teach responsible gun ownership and force people to think about the choices they make.  Gun owners react the way they do to the fear that their guns are going to be stripped from them.  I know people like that who would be VERY responsive to actually getting educated if the threat of gun confiscation were off the table.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on October 02, 2015, 10:00:45 AM

Training includes responsible ownership and storage.  Adam Lanza's mother didn't lock her guns up properly, and her son was able to swipe an arsenal out of her home.  Issue licenses based on the completion of courses that teach responsible gun ownership and force people to think about the choices they make.  Gun owners react the way they do to the fear that their guns are going to be stripped from them.  I know people like that who would be VERY responsive to actually getting educated if the threat of gun confiscation were off the table.

That's fine, but I wasn't just referring to mass shootings like this, but all gun violence. I'll bet the guns used to commit most of the murders in this country weren't obtained legally.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on October 02, 2015, 10:05:07 AM
I don't necessarily like the gun laws in this country but if anyone thinks it will be fixed or easy to fix, I have a bridge to sell you.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 02, 2015, 10:10:33 AM
The process to do it is easy. The will to implement that process is what's missing.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 10:19:23 AM

The process to do it is easy. The will to implement that process is what's missing.

That's a rather important component.  It would be easy for me to freak Alexandra Daddario if she wanted to.  I sure wouldn't say it's an easy prospect.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 10:20:23 AM

That's fine, but I wasn't just referring to mass shootings like this, but all gun violence. I'll bet the guns used to commit most of the murders in this country weren't obtained legally.

Sure, and most of the victims are criminals too.  I'm talking about reducing what you can.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: NDMick on October 02, 2015, 11:04:44 AM
I don't most gun violence in this country is a result of a lack of proper training.

The other part is the lack of mental health education in this country. Tell people not to be a hoo-ha and suck it up enough times usually results in harm to someone. Military guys seem to keep telling that story, and no one seems to listen.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 11:09:41 AM

The other part is the lack of mental health education in this country. Tell people not to be a hoo-ha and suck it up enough times usually results in harm to someone. Military guys seem to keep telling that story, and no one seems to listen.

Nah, it's easier to just excrement on what we don't understand and assume people with mental illness just need to snap out of it and quit being little bitches.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on October 02, 2015, 11:25:44 AM
On my way out so don't really have time to go into depth, but essentially this:

1. Make it illegal to keep handguns in the home, with the very specific exception of those people who need them for their jobs. Your domestic weapon is far more likely to be used against your and your family than it is an intruder.

2. Handguns and any form of automatic or semi-automatic rifle currently in private ownership can still be owned, but they must be kept at licensed and secured gun clubs. If you want to pretend to be GI Joe, you may only do so under controlled circumstances. You go to your club, sign out your toy, make blasty holes in a bit of paper, hand your gun back, go home.

3. Should you not wish to join such a club, you may sell your existing weapons to the government for a fair price.

4. The purchase of new weapons must be done through your gun club and will be subject to you having a current license. Licenses must be obtained through the club, will require retesting every three years and an integral part will be a medical approval. There will be no more gun shops other than those inside club premises, and all firearms and ammunition purchases will be recorded and reported.

5. Single shot long guns used in hunting may be owned and kept in the home, under certain conditions. Assault rifles and pump action shotguns do not fall into this category.

6. Antique and collectors weapons may be kept in the home as long as they are deactivated. The ammunition may not.

7. The Second Amendment will be repealed. It's anachronistic, irrelevant and downright dangerous. Owning firearms should be a privilege, not a right. They don't protect you from a government run amok and they don't protect you from the boogeyman climbing through the window. It isn't the 18th century any more and it's ridiculous to try and preserve rules that were made in the day of muskets and flintlocks. If you don't like your government, vote them out. The ballot box is a far more effective weapon against them than an AR-15.

8. The penalties for owning a banned firearm will be extensive, with a first offense carrying a custodial sentence.

lol
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on October 02, 2015, 11:30:47 AM
That's fine, but I wasn't just referring to mass shootings like this, but all gun violence. I'll bet the guns used to commit most of the murders in this country weren't obtained legally.

Not to mention the numbers from other forms of gun violence dwarf the casualties from mass shootings
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on October 02, 2015, 11:36:50 AM
Not to mention the numbers from other forms of gun violence dwarf the casualties from mass shootings

I wouldn't have as much of a problem with mass shootings if the shooter simply put the gun to his head and pulled the trigger as the first thing he/she did.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on October 02, 2015, 11:42:43 AM
If I ever hear about the 2nd amendment again my head is going to freaking explode.  You could have a musket for hunting and keeping the government from killing you.  A freaking musket.

I'll solve this whole shitstorm now.  Guns for Caaaash!

Not even kidding.

Make everyone an offer they cannot refuse.  Take the money from the military budget.  Apparently a sidearm costs them 500k anyway.  Give said guns to the military.  At the very least you get 75% of guns off the street.

Then just make new guns nearly impossible to buy, other than long barrel hunting rifles.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on October 02, 2015, 12:27:04 PM

If I ever hear about the 2nd amendment again my head is going to freaking explode.  You could have a musket for hunting and keeping the government from killing you.  A freaking musket.

I'll solve this whole shitstorm now.  Guns for Caaaash!

Not even kidding.

Make everyone an offer they cannot refuse.  Take the money from the military budget.  Apparently a sidearm costs them 500k anyway.  Give said guns to the military.  At the very least you get 75% of guns off the street.

Then just make new guns nearly impossible to buy, other than long barrel hunting rifles.

They had guns for toys in NYC years ago during Xmas.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ukilledkenny on October 02, 2015, 12:58:07 PM
If I ever hear about the 2nd amendment again my head is going to freaking explode.  You could have a musket for hunting and keeping the government from killing you.  A freaking musket.

I'll solve this whole shitstorm now.  Guns for Caaaash!

Not even kidding.

Make everyone an offer they cannot refuse.  Take the money from the military budget.  Apparently a sidearm costs them 500k anyway.  Give said guns to the military.  At the very least you get 75% of guns off the street.

Then just make new guns nearly impossible to buy, other than long barrel hunting rifles.

You're head is going to explode haha. I agree the 2nd amendment is not strongly worded for the types of freedoms it is used to justify but that ship sailed long before we even entered the world.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 01:39:38 PM
If I ever hear about the 2nd amendment again my head is going to freaking explode.  You could have a musket for hunting and keeping the government from killing you.  A freaking musket.

I'll solve this whole shitstorm now.  Guns for Caaaash!

Not even kidding.

Make everyone an offer they cannot refuse.  Take the money from the military budget. Apparently a sidearm costs them 500k anyway.  Give said guns to the military.  At the very least you get 75% of guns off the street.

Then just make new guns nearly impossible to buy, other than long barrel hunting rifles.

500k for a sidearm?  What the freak are you talking about?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on October 02, 2015, 01:42:12 PM
500k for a sidearm?  What the freak are you talking about?

I believe he's using hyperbole.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on October 02, 2015, 01:52:30 PM
500k for a sidearm?  What the freak are you talking about?

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-JKde9cXfpJs/UYW3TxPX0aI/AAAAAAAAmVY/V0anpUtHsEg/s400/620x+(1).jpg)

http://sbynews.blogspot.com/2013/05/the-500000-gun-and-17-of-other-coolest.html (http://sbynews.blogspot.com/2013/05/the-500000-gun-and-17-of-other-coolest.html)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 02:00:46 PM

I believe he's using hyperbole.

I was hoping the whole thing was a joke.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on October 02, 2015, 02:26:12 PM
I was hoping the whole thing was a joke.

I have a 20k hammer if you need one.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 02:29:32 PM
I have a 20k hammer if you need one.

http://www.govexec.com/federal-news/1998/12/the-myth-of-the-600-hammer/5271/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 02, 2015, 02:52:47 PM
Few things:

This fuckbag used legally purchased guns and had a stockpile of them. He was armed, had extra ammo, and body armor at the scene, and another cache was found at his home.

I just saw that the piece of excrement actually sought mental help. I didn't bother to read the story because freak him.

(Both of the above are via @BreakingNews on Twitter.)

I'm sick and tired of hearing bullshit that amounts to "you can't close Pandora's box." Guns are a problem. Yes, mental health issues need to be addressed too, but guns are a goddamned problem and it needs to be addressed. Strongly and definitively.

A buyback program through the government is fine with me. I'd happily allow my tax dollars to take automatic weapons away from common citizens. I don't want to hear any more about "responsible ownership" or other such nonsense. The time for "responsible ownership" is the ship that has sailed. Kids are being murdered. That's all I give a excrement about.

If you're still anti gun control then you're a terrorist sympathizer. That's not me joking. That's not me being hyperbolic. That's how I view you at this point. It's not the 1700s anymore. Hiding behind a law written centuries ago just so you can hang onto weapons capable of murdering groups of people in seconds is the epitome of cowardice.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 03:03:50 PM
There are over 300 million guns in this country.  While you can technically get a cheap shotgun for about $200, you're more realistically looking at most of those guns running in the $500-$1000 range.  Then there's the ammo.  What kind of pricing do you think would convince people to willingly hand over their guns?  Let's say you can get people to, on average, turn in their guns for $700/each.  I still think that's awfully low to convince people to do it, but that's ok.  You're looking at $210 billion right there just to get the guns off the street plus God knows how much more for ammo.  You're telling me that you think a bill asking for an additional $500 billion or so to buy guns and ammo would pass? 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 03:05:57 PM
Oh, and being opposed to gun control makes a person a terrorist sympathizer.  LOL.  That's not a reach or anything.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on October 02, 2015, 03:17:06 PM
There are over 300 million guns in this country.  While you can technically get a cheap shotgun for about $200, you're more realistically looking at most of those guns running in the $500-$1000 range.  Then there's the ammo.  What kind of pricing do you think would convince people to willingly hand over their guns?  Let's say you can get people to, on average, turn in their guns for $700/each.  I still think that's awfully low to convince people to do it, but that's ok.  You're looking at $210 billion right there just to get the guns off the street plus God knows how much more for ammo.  You're telling me that you think a bill asking for an additional $500 billion or so to buy guns and ammo would pass? 

He was too emotional and reactionary to see any of this.

It would be great if it was feasible, but like you've said over and over again in this thread and others...just too many guns in circulation. 

The only recourse is more education and some type of restriction when it comes to mental health and firearms.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 02, 2015, 03:38:52 PM
I don't care what's considered "reasonable" anymore. It's unreasonable that weapons that have no purpose other than taking other human lives (and that's all automatic weapons are for) still have a place in this country; despite repeated mass murders. It's time to make them illegal.

I don't give a excrement that people wouldn't get "fair value" back for their guns. Offer them $100 for their cache. Don't like it? Tough excrement. If automatic firearms are illegal you can either take the $100 and STFU or the government can come take them "from your cold dead hands." I'm okay with either outcome. (And before someone says that's hypocritical: nope. Kids aren't asking for these guns to exist--but they're suffering the consequences of their existence.)

Is this an emotional response? You're goddamned right it is because enough is enough. Kids are dying because we have a section of the population that views ownership of weapons capable of instant multiple homicides as a right, and a special interest lobbying government to keep it that way.

And yes. You're a terrorist sympathizer. If you're refusing to look for ways to get murderous weapons out of the hands of people who would use them, you're just as bad as them. I don't give a excrement if you think that's ridiculous.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 03:51:20 PM
AliotheFlanders

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh2sWSVRrmo

So, let me get this straight.  Kids are endangered by guns, so we should get rid of guns so no more kids have to die, but if people won't get rid of guns, the government should step in and kill them if necessary to take their guns, and if you don't agree with all of this, you clearly love terrorism?  Did you donate to childhood cancer treatment this year?  Because, you know, if you didn't then you're clearly a serial rapist.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 03:53:08 PM
freak.  I just realized I live in California and left the water running while I brushed my teeth today.  I must be a climate change denier.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: NDMick on October 02, 2015, 05:53:11 PM
Dude was unfit for the military.

I'm tired of the nut jobs.

30k+ killed every year from guns. Gotta change sooner or later.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on October 02, 2015, 06:46:06 PM
Maybe we could just tax the excrement out of registered guns and use the revenue to fund buy back programs?

At the very least we need legislation to limit the size of individual arsenals.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 02, 2015, 06:47:54 PM
Just make all guns pink and dick shaped.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on October 02, 2015, 06:50:32 PM

Maybe we could just tax the excrement out of registered guns and use the revenue to fund buy back programs?

At the very least we need legislation to limit the size of individual arsenals.

lol
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 02, 2015, 07:09:17 PM
 this is the point in the conversation where someone usually jumps in and says:
"the only solution to this problem is more guns."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on October 02, 2015, 08:49:03 PM
Are guns easier to get now than they were 30 years ago? Why haven't there been many cases of murderous rampages back then? And why does it seem like it's getting worse?

There has to be another explanation. And it's not like crazies didn't exist more than 30 years ago either. So what gives? What makes this generation different?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on October 02, 2015, 09:13:10 PM

Are guns easier to get now than they were 30 years ago? Why haven't there been many cases of murderous rampages back then? And why does it seem like it's getting worse?

There has to be another explanation. And it's not like crazies didn't exist more than 30 years ago either. So what gives? What makes this generation different?

It's objectively more difficult now than it was 30-40 years ago.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on October 02, 2015, 09:20:02 PM

It's objectively more difficult now than it was 30-40 years ago.

Which makes me wonder what's really going on. Most of these shooters were young, too. And I'm just talking about mass shootings. There have always been senseless acts of murder, and that was more frequent back in the day. But mass shootings like these involving young shooters? Seems like a recent phenomenon. Just wondering if theres something particular about our society today that breeds these kinds of killers.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 10:10:21 PM

Are guns easier to get now than they were 30 years ago? Why haven't there been many cases of murderous rampages back then? And why does it seem like it's getting worse?

There has to be another explanation. And it's not like crazies didn't exist more than 30 years ago either. So what gives? What makes this generation different?

"Crazies" didn't have a worldwide audience at their fingertips.  I'm not suggesting these are people who rationally decided this was their way to get famous.  I'm suggesting that disaffected and neglected people with severe derangement and cognitive dissonance see this as a way to act upon their frustration and gather attention.  The trouble is that we look at it and say "Wow what a freaking evil poopchute, killing people just because he's sad and wants to get famous."  We should look at it and say "Wow, what a sick freaking poopchute, killing people because his freaking mind is a disease.  freak him.  freak what he did.  Now how can we limit it from happening again?"  We feel like acknowledging the mental disease somehow excuses what they did.  It doesn't.  It's just much more proactive to recognize mental illness and irrational thought as contributing factors and try to address them.

This guy is a freaking scumbag for what he did.  There's just a chance that changing the discussion could help someone else from doing this excrement.

Also, look up the UT Austin killer.  I can't remember his name, but that's a freaking case study right there.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2015, 10:11:50 PM

Which makes me wonder what's really going on. Most of these shooters were young, too. And I'm just talking about mass shootings. There have always been senseless acts of murder, and that was more frequent back in the day. But mass shootings like these involving young shooters? Seems like a recent phenomenon. Just wondering if theres something particular about our society today that breeds these kinds of killers.

I think there's serious merit to the argument that we shouldn't broadcast names and faces of these people.  It isn't the motivation, but it can certainly appear a viable outlet for someone who is fucked in the head.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 05, 2015, 11:11:22 AM
First off, I just lost a parent to cancer a month ago for the second time, so please don't assume to know anything about me. (Yeah, I donate to cancer research, because I want an answer to the problem--just like I want an answer to the mass murder problem.)

Anyway, I've often said mental health in this country needs to be addressed. It's a huge problem and too often we treat mental health as something that the person suffering "should just get over."

But we're also a country full of people who don't want to have publicly funded health care. Telling people they should spend whatever meager means they have on an issue they can't see (as opposed to paying the rent or preventing their stomach from growling) isn't particularly helpful.

All of that said, it's still time to do something about the number of guns both in civilian hands today, and those that will be someday. The idea that "well they're already out there so there's nothing we can do" actually leads me back to cancer. It's akin to saying "Well, there are hundreds of forms of cancer, and we'll never be able to cure them all, so it's time to stop worrying about a cure and just worry about treating future cases."

While legal acquisition of firearms is objectively harder today than decades past, illegal acquisition is not. So what is anyone supposed to do about that? Make guns less profitable to produce and sell. Even illegal firearms were produced legally to begin with.

We're not just making it easier for the black market to trade in firearms either. The large-scale production of military-grade weapons is increasing the militarization of police departments as well--and we'll certainly have that discussion again in another thread.

To set the record straight, I wasn't advocating the government walk into people's homes who refuse to comply with stricter gun laws and execute them. "Pry them from my cold dead hands" is famous enough to stand on its own and doesn't need further clarification.

The argument that citizens have the right to military-grade weaponry because it's equal to what the government has (and therefore fulfills the intent of the Second Amendment) is laughable at best. How many people who own an M-16 also own an F-16? If the government is going to attack you, you're not going to win. Hell, they can do it completely unmanned.

The time for respectful discussion of the topic is gone. Guns kill people. People kill people. With guns. Radical change is necessary, whether you like it or not.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ukilledkenny on October 05, 2015, 11:58:48 AM
One thing that always gets me about the people who want guns to protect themselves from "the government" tend to be the biggest supporters of the military. If their fear ever  comes true it's going to be those same troops coming to get them.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 05, 2015, 12:33:52 PM
One thing that always gets me about the people who want guns to protect themselves from "the government" tend to be the biggest supporters of the military. If their fear ever  comes true it's going to be those same troops coming to get them.

Yeah, and like I said, if the government were ever to actually "come after you" they could roll tanks into your town, or just carpet bomb it, or send unmanned drones. No civilian group would stand a chance against them.

The only thing that stops us from instant wins over in the middle east is the backlash that comes from civilian deaths. Otherwise we'd just level entire areas on the map and call it a day. If the US government were to decide to forcibly take land/lives from its citizens it would no longer be worrying about civilian casualty backlash.

The reality is, the whole "protect ourselves from the government" is just one more excuse to justify ownership of assault rifles. Because honestly, there is nothing useful about them other than taking human life (or using them as toys for target practice) and you can't reasonably say that.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 05, 2015, 01:11:25 PM
First off, I just lost a parent to cancer a month ago for the second time, so please don't assume to know anything about me. (Yeah, I donate to cancer research, because I want an answer to the problem--just like I want an answer to the mass murder problem.)

Well, I know something now.  You're not a serial rapist.  Thank God for that.

Quote
Anyway, I've often said mental health in this country needs to be addressed. It's a huge problem and too often we treat mental health as something that the person suffering "should just get over."

That's awesome.  Because if you don't support addressing mental health, you're a child abuser.  It's a very complicated system of figuring out what support means.  Don't worry, I have a hard time keeping up too.  The whole no gun confiscation means you love terrorists one was new to me, but in light of these other ones, it totally makes sense.

Quote
But we're also a country full of people who don't want to have publicly funded health care. Telling people they should spend whatever meager means they have on an issue they can't see (as opposed to paying the rent or preventing their stomach from growling) isn't particularly helpful.

Yeah, thinking you missed the point there.  If you look straight up, you may be able to see it flying by.

Quote
All of that said, it's still time to do something about the number of guns both in civilian hands today, and those that will be someday. The idea that "well they're already out there so there's nothing we can do" actually leads me back to cancer. It's akin to saying "Well, there are hundreds of forms of cancer, and we'll never be able to cure them all, so it's time to stop worrying about a cure and just worry about treating future cases."

That's actually an absolutely terrible analogy.  You don't have every cancer patient in America actually fighting to keep their cancer.  Cancer treatment doesn't involve attacking the cancer lobby and cancer manufacturers and all of the attendant anti-capitalist arguments.

A better comparison would be to tobacco.  Hell, they're even mingled up in the same lobby and the same bureau. Of course, we didn't make cigarettes illegal.  We absolutely diminished their usage, though.  And how?  Slapped a big label on them saying that they'll kill you (totally fine by me with regard to guns), taxed the hell out of them (again something I fully support), eliminated advertising in most publications (which you already can't do), and in a lot of places outlawed using them in bars, restaurants, and public areas (which again, already mercifully is the case with guns).   Again, though, didn't walk into people's homes and take them away while they tried to fight it.  Do you want even more violence?  Because that's how you get even more violence.

Quote
While legal acquisition of firearms is objectively harder today than decades past, illegal acquisition is not. So what is anyone supposed to do about that? Make guns less profitable to produce and sell. Even illegal firearms were produced legally to begin with.

Great.  Tax the hell out of them and make them less profitable.  That's certainly a valid option.  Of course, you have to accept the fact that illegal sales of guns will skyrocket, and even the states with licensing will now have massively increased numbers of unlicensed weaponry.  As was mentioned earlier, the best hope is to make bullets unprofitable.  Limiting the influx of guns does little.  With proper maintenance, a gun can last nearly forever.  Limit the influx of bullets, though, and people become more selective about how they use those guns.  Unlike guns, you can't just reload a bullet.

Quote
We're not just making it easier for the black market to trade in firearms either. The large-scale production of military-grade weapons is increasing the militarization of police departments as well--and we'll certainly have that discussion again in another thread.

To set the record straight, I wasn't advocating the government walk into people's homes who refuse to comply with stricter gun laws and execute them. "Pry them from my cold dead hands" is famous enough to stand on its own and doesn't need further clarification.

Then you underestimate the number of people who would absolutely fight tooth and nail to keep their guns.  It's not just a phrase for a lot of people, so insisting that you're perfectly fine with law enforcement to take them up on the offer means you're ready to condemn not just those people to the possibility of death but a lot of law enforcement as well.  I guess you're just a cop-killer sympathizer.  You know how police departments and such will combat that?  That's right, more military grade weapons. 

Quote
The argument that citizens have the right to military-grade weaponry because it's equal to what the government has (and therefore fulfills the intent of the Second Amendment) is laughable at best. How many people who own an M-16 also own an F-16? If the government is going to attack you, you're not going to win. Hell, they can do it completely unmanned.

The time for respectful discussion of the topic is gone. Guns kill people. People kill people. With guns. Radical change is necessary, whether you like it or not.

I'm pretty sure I never said that military grade weaponry is ok by me, but seeing as the rest of this post flies off in unforeseen directions, I'll just let that one go.

Yes, the self-defense argument against the government is absurd.  A well-regulated militia stood a chance (obviously) against an oppressive government in 1791.  It absolutely does not now.

Radical change is necessary?  The radical change you were talking about simply isn't feasible, whether you like it or not.  I'm not a gun owner.  I'm just pragmatic enough to recognize what's possible.  Both sides are absurd.  Those who think any gun legislation is unacceptable are fools.  Those who think we can seize all guns are naive.  Those who would call people "terrorist sympathizers" for having a levelheaded opinion?  I don't even have a word for it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 05, 2015, 01:58:48 PM
^Without the unnecessary sarcasm, I don't think we're too far off.

First off, I don't disagree with what you're saying, but you're artificially inserting yourself into a category I'm not placing you in. You're flat out saying you want to look for ways to reform gun control--the exact opposite of the people I was saying I'm now going to refer to as "terrorist sympathizers."

I'm tired of consistently having to say here that I am not an "everything is black and white and here's the answer to everything" type of person. I'm a "throw a lot of excrement at the wall until something sticks" type. You can knock the words I used there, whatever, I'm simply saying that I'd rather talk about any answer than just say "it's too complicated to fix"--and that goes for any topic: guns, the school system, systemic racism, healthcare, the Jets, whatever.

I went back to see exactly what I wrote to see if there was some reason you should have taken so much direct offense. Here's what I said:

Quote
If you're still anti gun control then you're a terrorist sympathizer. That's not me joking. That's not me being hyperbolic. That's how I view you at this point. It's not the 1700s anymore. Hiding behind a law written centuries ago just so you can hang onto weapons capable of murdering groups of people in seconds is the epitome of cowardice.

Are you anti gun control Iggy? It doesn't appear so. You seem to want to find answers other than "it's not fixable." So why are you taking such personal offense to what I said? I do make a conscious effort to not hide meaning behind my words. When I write something, the vast majority of the time I'm saying exactly what I mean with little to nothing inferred behind it.

FTR, I don't find fault with the "make bullets prohibitively expensive" except that while it will deter some people from buying them, those who are suicidal and planning a homicidal spree aren't really going to care about spending every last dime on ammunition. But it is an answer.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 05, 2015, 02:52:31 PM
I'm taking offense because a lot of the people I know who are anti gun control also fought against terrorism while you were sitting on your derriere playing Batman at home.  Calling them terrorist sympathizers is disgustingly inappropriate, including from a purely logical standpoint.

I'm also opposed to the type of gun control you're advocating on the basis of sheer pragmatism.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 05, 2015, 02:53:43 PM
Also, how are those who are suicidal and planning to go on a homicidal spree going to be deterred by any feasible type of gun control?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 05, 2015, 03:46:27 PM
I'm not getting into a juncian "I know someone who fought for this country and this is what they believe" nonsense argument with you. Jesus.

As for the suicidal-homicidal situation, do you think there are only people with those mental issues in the United States? Because it doesn't happen in other civilized nations the way it does here. Why is that?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on October 05, 2015, 05:23:11 PM
Also, how are those who are suicidal and planning to go on a homicidal spree going to be deterred by any feasible type of gun control?

Just create gun free zones. Problem solved.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 05, 2015, 06:25:01 PM
I'm not getting into a juncian "I know someone who fought for this country and this is what they believe" nonsense argument with you. Jesus.

You're the one who said everyone opposed to gun control is a terrorist sympathizer.  There are a ton of ex-military who are opposed to gun control, along with a lot of other military supporters.  It was a stupid comment and you've never owned up to how stupid it was.  Your failure to do so is the juncian part of this whole thing.

Quote
As for the suicidal-homicidal situation, do you think there are only people with those mental issues in the United States? Because it doesn't happen in other civilized nations the way it does here. Why is that?

That's another flawed tangent.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 06, 2015, 10:08:01 AM
You're the one who said everyone opposed to gun control is a terrorist sympathizer.  There are a ton of ex-military who are opposed to gun control, along with a lot of other military supporters.  It was a stupid comment and you've never owned up to how stupid it was.  Your failure to do so is the juncian part of this whole thing.

That's another flawed tangent.

The only thing I'll "own up to" is that I should have initially phrased it "I will from now on view anyone who is anti-gun-control-reform as a terrorist sympathizer." I'm sure you'll still take issue with that, and frankly, I couldn't possibly care less. It seems honest discussion has never actually been on the table, so at this point, I don't care about the feelings of people who prioritize their right to hold onto tools designed for the specific purpose of taking human lives over the lives of children.

I have zero tolerance for people who don't want to do whatever possible to stop children from being shot. If that's the thing that makes me an awful person, or viewed as somehow unreasonable, well, too freaking bad.

I'm not anti-gun. I have argued in the past that responsible ownership and addressing mental health is critical to solving the problem. The problem is: no one wants to do a goddamned thing. When you can count mass school shootings by the dozen, the time for calm discussion is over. The opportunity for "reasonable" reform was after Columbine, or Sandy Hook, or the movie theater, or the church.

I love how other nations with stricter control is a "flawed tangent." Why? Because those citizens didn't already have guns? Okay. Why did crimes in NYC decrease with the tightening of gun laws in the city? Too small a sample? Or are you going to side with the NRA's argument that crime has been decreasing across the board while gun ownership has risen? Because that's a flawed argument. Some farmer in Nebraska buying a gun has no bearing on crime in NYC.

Whatever. This isn't a discussion. It's a fundamental argument and there isn't much room in either of ours for agreement. You can have the last word but I'm done discussing this, at least until this excrement happens again.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on October 06, 2015, 10:15:06 AM
The only thing I'll "own up to" is that I should have initially phrased it "I will from now on view anyone who is anti-gun-control-reform as a terrorist sympathizer." I'm sure you'll still take issue with that, and frankly, I couldn't possibly care less. It seems honest discussion has never actually been on the table, so at this point, I don't care about the feelings of people who prioritize their right to hold onto tools designed for the specific purpose of taking human lives over the lives of children.

I have zero tolerance for people who don't want to do whatever possible to stop children from being shot. If that's the thing that makes me an awful person, or viewed as somehow unreasonable, well, too freaking bad.

I'm not anti-gun. I have argued in the past that responsible ownership and addressing mental health is critical to solving the problem. The problem is: no one wants to do a goddamned thing. When you can count mass school shootings by the dozen, the time for calm discussion is over. The opportunity for "reasonable" reform was after Columbine, or Sandy Hook, or the movie theater, or the church.

I love how other nations with stricter control is a "flawed tangent." Why? Because those citizens didn't already have guns? Okay. Why did crimes in NYC decrease with the tightening of gun laws in the city? Too small a sample? Or are you going to side with the NRA's argument that crime has been decreasing across the board while gun ownership has risen? Because that's a flawed argument. Some farmer in Nebraska buying a gun has no bearing on crime in NYC.

Whatever. This isn't a discussion. It's a fundamental argument and there isn't much room in either of ours for agreement. You can have the last word but I'm done discussing this, at least until this excrement happens again.

You're just doing what most idealists do. Take an issue, say that something must be done, and attack anyone who wants to take a more measured approach.

"Racism is bad! Mandatory jail time for using the N word."

"How will that solve anything?"

"Shut up, racist."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 06, 2015, 11:15:16 AM
You're just doing what most idealists do. Take an issue, say that something must be done, and attack anyone who wants to take a more measured approach.

"Racism is bad! Mandatory jail time for using the N word."

"How will that solve anything?"

"Shut up, racist."

I'd have been fine with a measured approach if one had ever been actually, you know, attempted. But every time one of these incidents happens, it's "Don't use a tragedy to get on your soapbox" and it gets swept under the rug until it happens again. And again. And then again.

This is why I'm beating the drum for radical change. Because at some point, someone has to do something. And if it's progressive changes to shut up people like me demanding radical changes, then I get what I actually want, which is something rather than nothing.

FTR, I didn't attack people who wanted to take a measured approach. I specifically targeted people who are anti gun control reform. "Anti" is a very specific designation.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 06, 2015, 01:01:41 PM
I'd have been fine with a measured approach if one had ever been actually, you know, attempted. But every time one of these incidents happens, it's "Don't use a tragedy to get on your soapbox" and it gets swept under the rug until it happens again. And again. And then again.

This is why I'm beating the drum for radical change. Because at some point, someone has to do something. And if it's progressive changes to shut up people like me demanding radical changes, then I get what I actually want, which is something rather than nothing.

FTR, I didn't attack people who wanted to take a measured approach. I specifically targeted people who are anti gun control reform. "Anti" is a very specific designation.

Ok, but the people who are completely anti-gun control view positions like yours as the reason why they don't want to give any ground.  Measured change isn't happening because each side is terrified that the other will get something it wants.  The other side is saying "ZERO GUN CONTROL" because they're terrified the government will listen to people like you and try to take their weapons entirely.  If you can't see that, it's because you're too wrapped up in the other side.  Do you really believe it's not possible that people on the other side are saying the same thing?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 06, 2015, 01:02:22 PM
addressing mental health is critical to solving the problem.

I have a bit of an issue with this. I don't see a huge difference between the Oregon or Charleston shootings and any other terrorist attack. They're ideologically motivated, an ideology being promoted by various sections of the media and scarily large sections of society. I don't know that it's necessarily right to describe an ideologically motivated killer as being mentally ill; their main aim is to strike back at sections of society they feel have wronged them and that are opposed to their ideology, and to strike fear into others. That's terrorism.

The guy in Aurora was indiscriminate and perhaps better suited to the mental illness discussion, Oregon and Charleston were specific types of individual. There's a whole different conversation to be had here and the media is at the core of it, it isn't on the outside looking in.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 06, 2015, 01:13:03 PM
The only thing I'll "own up to" is that I should have initially phrased it "I will from now on view anyone who is anti-gun-control-reform as a terrorist sympathizer." I'm sure you'll still take issue with that, and frankly, I couldn't possibly care less. It seems honest discussion has never actually been on the table, so at this point, I don't care about the feelings of people who prioritize their right to hold onto tools designed for the specific purpose of taking human lives over the lives of children.

I have zero tolerance for people who don't want to do whatever possible to stop children from being shot. If that's the thing that makes me an awful person, or viewed as somehow unreasonable, well, too freaking bad.

As long as you agree that it's ok for pro-lifers to call people child-hating murderers for allowing abortion.  As I said, some of the biggest anti-gun control people I know actually fought terrorists.  You're just behaving like a child who doesn't understand the world isn't comprised of absolutes.  There is a very obvious personal argument I could use to illustrate how silly that line of reasoning is, but I'm not going to counter your bullshit with a personal attack.

Quote
I'm not anti-gun. I have argued in the past that responsible ownership and addressing mental health is critical to solving the problem. The problem is: no one wants to do a goddamned thing. When you can count mass school shootings by the dozen, the time for calm discussion is over. The opportunity for "reasonable" reform was after Columbine, or Sandy Hook, or the movie theater, or the church.

I love how other nations with stricter control is a "flawed tangent." Why? Because those citizens didn't already have guns? Okay. Why did crimes in NYC decrease with the tightening of gun laws in the city? Too small a sample? Or are you going to side with the NRA's argument that crime has been decreasing across the board while gun ownership has risen? Because that's a flawed argument. Some farmer in Nebraska buying a gun has no bearing on crime in NYC.

Whatever. This isn't a discussion. It's a fundamental argument and there isn't much room in either of ours for agreement. You can have the last word but I'm done discussing this, at least until this excrement happens again.

Yes.  That's exactly why.  Because they never had more guns than people in those countries.  It's absolutely impossible for us to reach the point they're at.  That's why it's a shitty comparison.  The rest of the paragraph is just silly and arbitrary.  You suddenly launched from murder-suicides in other countries to all crime in New York to the NRA and Nebraska.  It's like you're having a stroke.

And I'll gladly take the last word.  That word is: moist.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 06, 2015, 02:43:36 PM
I have a bit of an issue with this. I don't see a huge difference between the Oregon or Charleston shootings and any other terrorist attack. They're ideologically motivated, an ideology being promoted by various sections of the media and scarily large sections of society. I don't know that it's necessarily right to describe an ideologically motivated killer as being mentally ill; their main aim is to strike back at sections of society they feel have wronged them and that are opposed to their ideology, and to strike fear into others. That's terrorism.

The guy in Aurora was indiscriminate and perhaps better suited to the mental illness discussion, Oregon and Charleston were specific types of individual. There's a whole different conversation to be had here and the media is at the core of it, it isn't on the outside looking in.

I don't disagree with you on the shootings = terrorism opinion at all. It's where I got the whole "I'll view any anti-reform as terrorist sympathizing" thing in the first place.

I see no difference between a shitbag with an automatic rifle walking into a school and shooting kids in America, and a shitbag with a bomb strapped to his chest walking into a crowded market in Israel.

I do agree with the argument that addressing mental health in the United States is an important step in fixing the problem though. I haven't kept up-to-date with the most recent details, but this guy last week--last I saw at least--pursued psychiatric help and didn't get it.

I discussed addressing the bullying epidemic back as far as TGG. A lot of the problem in America is the whole cowboy culture. Everyone is expected to be mentally tough and that's just not the case. (The cowboy attitude doesn't help with the gun situation itself either.)

There isn't a single answer to the question. It's a multifaceted problem. My biggest issue is that no matter which angle anyone believes is most important to tackle first, no one is addressing anything, and I'm sick of that.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 02, 2015, 01:24:50 PM
God damnit
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 02, 2015, 01:33:59 PM
God damnit

Yep
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on December 02, 2015, 01:34:21 PM
Story still developing.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/02/us/san-bernardino-shooting/index.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on December 02, 2015, 02:19:52 PM
Honestly, what the freak do we do to stop this

Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 02, 2015, 02:21:13 PM
Honestly, what the freak do we do to stop this

Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk



Pretty much this, I hope you know the movie:

(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view2/2167758/kill-em-all-o.gif)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 02, 2015, 02:59:31 PM
I'm watching the news.  It sounds like they've had a couple of sightings of POSSIBLE getaway cars, but the cops haven't been able to find any of them.  I don't see how they're going to catch these guys unless they decide they really want everyone to know who they are.  San Bernardino is a pooper filled with idiots, so it's definitely possible.

There's also a guy on now (police haven't allowed witnesses to speak to the news) who normally works in the building.  It's not just disabled services, there are other offices.  His daughter also works for another department and was present and hiding in the bathroom.  The shooting took place at a Christmas party or just outside.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 02, 2015, 03:04:05 PM
Honestly, what the freak do we do to stop this

Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk



If the disabled services center actually was the target, we need to work with gun manufacturers to develop some new, easy to use weaponry that will make it easier to arm the developmentally disabled.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 02, 2015, 03:12:33 PM
If the disabled services center actually was the target, we need to work with gun manufacturers to develop some new, easy to use weaponry that will make it easier to arm the developmentally disabled.
Just attach laser beams to their foreheads.

worked for dr.evil

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 02, 2015, 03:18:31 PM
I read where they have the name of at least one shooting suspect.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 02, 2015, 03:21:37 PM
I read where they have the name of at least one shooting suspect.

Really?  They didn't say that on here.  That would be awesome if true.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 02, 2015, 03:26:42 PM
Really?  They didn't say that on here.  That would be awesome if true.

It was definitely on Yahoo but it looks like they took that down.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 02, 2015, 03:31:30 PM
I found a partial, they said  in stronger terms that they had a name:

Quote
According to radio traffic, law enforcement may have sought information on one of the gunmen last week. Officers at the scene have been sharing a possible suspect name.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 02, 2015, 03:37:40 PM
Less exciting, but hopefully it pans out.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 02, 2015, 03:52:57 PM
If it's 3 gunmen then we can rule disgruntled employee out. Also, why the camo? All camp does is make it easier for people to spot you.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on December 02, 2015, 03:56:03 PM
Cortana is telling me 12 fatalities, disabled center christmas party, 3 attackers with rifles in body armor, black suv getaway car.

These are some seriously sick fucks.  When was the last time we had a coordinated attack like this?  I can only think of lone gunmen in recent years.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 02, 2015, 03:58:21 PM
Cortana is telling me 12 fatalities, disabled center christmas party, 3 attackers with rifles in body armor, black suv getaway car.

These are some seriously sick fucks. When was the last time we had a coordinated attack like this? I can only think of lone gunmen in recent years.

That's sort of why I'm thinking ISIS related. Nothing will strike fear into people more than knowing that they aren't even safe at a fuckn' Christmas party in a community center.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 02, 2015, 04:08:30 PM
So ISIS came into a center for the mentally impaired to foment panic and fear? ok

I think I will wait on ISIS confirmation for that.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 02, 2015, 04:20:34 PM
So ISIS came into a center for the mentally impaired to foment panic and fear? ok

I think I will wait on ISIS confirmation for that.

ISIS sympathizers maybe? These people don't give a freak who the targets are, as long as they're civilians.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 02, 2015, 04:35:21 PM
ISIS sympathizers maybe? These people don't give a freak who the targets are, as long as they're civilians.

Dude. If they were wearing camo they were obviously white.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 02, 2015, 06:24:32 PM

ISIS sympathizers maybe? These people don't give a freak who the targets are, as long as they're civilians.

If ISIS is coordinating attacks in a pooper like San Bernardino, the armpit of Southern California, we are all fucked. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on December 02, 2015, 06:56:24 PM
If ISIS is coordinating attacks in a pooper like San Bernardino, the armpit of Southern California, we are all fucked. 

The good old 909.  Thanked for it's existence by all morning DJ's in LA area.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 02, 2015, 07:27:55 PM
If ISIS is involved and in Cali...do something useful like target the Kardashians.

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 02, 2015, 08:06:18 PM
Two suspects killed, one in custody.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/news/a40149/mass-shooting-san-bernardino-california/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 02, 2015, 08:07:11 PM

The good old 909.  Thanked for it's existence by all morning DJ's in LA area.

It's not even the part of the 909 that's considered safe and normal, either.  People get shot in San Bernardino all the time.  It's hardly the place to send a message if you want people to feel like they can't be safe any more.  If you want to feel safe, you don't live in San Bernardino.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 02, 2015, 09:24:22 PM
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/12/02/police-id-suspect-in-san-bernardino-massacre-as-syed-farook.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 02, 2015, 09:43:55 PM
Well now. I wonder what the motive was.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on December 02, 2015, 10:04:54 PM
Maybe you should wait till it's verified by a valid source before finger wagging.

How many people thought the Sandy Hook killer was actually his hipster brother because law enforcement fucked up the ID? I know i did.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 02, 2015, 10:06:48 PM
Maybe you should wait till it's verified by a valid source before finger wagging.

How many people thought the Sandy Hook killer was actually his hipster brother because law enforcement fucked up the ID? I know i did.

Tommy just desperately wants the shooters to be anything but white.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on December 02, 2015, 10:17:23 PM
Tommy just desperately wants the shooters to be anything but white.

pretty much.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 02, 2015, 10:24:25 PM

Tommy just desperately wants the shooters to be anything but white.

So do I, just to see all the back pedaling.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 02, 2015, 10:26:50 PM
So do I, just to see all the back pedaling.

The fact that I was initially told "it looks like another Planned Parenthood shooting" makes it obvious people on both sides have their hopes for what the shooter looks like.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 02, 2015, 10:30:06 PM
Well now. I wonder what the motive was.

I do too.  There have been reports that the Christmas party was being held by the San Bernardino Department of Public Health.  There's apparently a Syed Farook who works for the Department of Health.  Nobody can figure out if it's the same guy, and there are conflicting reports about who this one is/was and whether he was involved.  It's all so crazy right now.  I really want to know what the motivation was.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 02, 2015, 10:38:11 PM
This is crazy.  Could be a workplace dispute according to his co-workers.  His dad says he's super religious, so it could be related to Islamic extremism.  Could be a combination.  All we know is the guy was born and raised here and worked for the county.

http://heavy.com/news/2015/12/syed-sayeed-farouk-farook-inland-regional-center-san-bernardino-shooting-suspect-gunman-name-identified-redlands-age-motive-photos-social-media-family-facebook-video-chase-shot-killed-dead/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 02, 2015, 10:43:12 PM
BTW, on the Planned Parenthood shooting, why the freak are we now debating whether it's a mental health issue or domestic terrorism?  It's obviously both.  Crazy sociopath living in the middle of nowhere feeds on right wing rhetoric and the combo pushes him to shoot up an abortion clinic.  Seems pretty straightforward, or at least as straightforward as that could be.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 02, 2015, 10:46:55 PM
BTW, on the Planned Parenthood shooting, why the freak are we now debating whether it's a mental health issue or domestic terrorism?  It's obviously both.  Crazy sociopath living in the middle of nowhere feeds on right wing rhetoric and the combo pushes him to shoot up an abortion clinic.  Seems pretty straightforward, or at least as straightforward as that could be.

Same excrement was talked about after Dylann Roof walked into a church in Charleston and killed 9 people.

It's absurd.  Too many people are making excuses for these pieces of excrement.  Just call them what they are. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 02, 2015, 10:57:09 PM

Same excrement was talked about after Dylann Roof walked into a church in Charleston and killed 9 people.

It's absurd.  Too many people are making excuses for these pieces of excrement.  Just call them what they are.

That's another problem.  When you call mental illness a contributing factor, it can prompt a discussion that we need to have about how to better deal with it.  That's a discussion that's relevant to so much, though, and much more nuanced than the discussion that gets had after a shooting.

When you call mental illness the cause, it rubs people the wrong way because it seems like you're excusing the behavior.  That's a very dangerous path, and it's the wrong one.  Mental illness so rarely results in extreme and dangerous antisocial behavior, and this idea that shootings are the great boogeyman of mental disease just makes it less likely people want to address their issues and seek help.  It just stigmatizes it more.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 02, 2015, 10:58:46 PM
Yeah I just cracked open a 6 pack knowing this guy has a Muslim name. It's a great day, freaking wonderful let's celebrate.

I am watching the shooters family on t.v., they're saying death to America and screaming cursing and showing zero remorse, freaking heathens, sociopaths.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on December 02, 2015, 11:01:51 PM
That's another problem.  When you call mental illness a contributing factor, it can prompt a discussion that we need to have about how to better deal with it.  That's a discussion that's relevant to so much, though, and much more nuanced than the discussion that gets had after a shooting.

When you call mental illness the cause, it rubs people the wrong way because it seems like you're excusing the behavior.  That's a very dangerous path, and it's the wrong one.  Mental illness so rarely results in extreme and dangerous antisocial behavior, and this idea that shootings are the great boogeyman of mental disease just makes it less likely people want to address their issues and seek help.  It just stigmatizes it more.

It's really really annoying when people can't tell the difference between explanation and excuses.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 02, 2015, 11:02:26 PM
The fact that I was initially told "it looks like another Planned Parenthood shooting" makes it obvious people on both sides have their hopes for what the shooter looks like.

In fairness, that was being reported by the news early on.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 02, 2015, 11:03:21 PM
It's really really annoying when people can't tell the difference between explanation and excuses.

I don't understand why jihadists killing in the name of a sky fairy aren't ever explained as having mental health issues though.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 02, 2015, 11:04:50 PM
I don't understand why jihadists killing in the name of a sky fairy aren't ever explained as having mental health issues though.

Pretty much every rational thinking poster here knows this.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 02, 2015, 11:15:59 PM

I don't understand why jihadists killing in the name of a sky fairy aren't ever explained as having mental health issues though.

Probably because religion preys upon very natural human mental processes.  Our brains are wired for God.  Exploit that and it's insanely powerful.  It's not the religion per se that is making people kill.  It's the way the religion is used.  It's the medium.  Do it right and any religion can be used to get people to kill.  Especially the Abrahamic ones.  The combination of one of those religions, a violent and self righteous interpretation, and a generally shitty state of life that can in part be blamed on Western civilization?  That's a powerful reason for them to kill.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 03, 2015, 12:39:15 AM
Even if it's not islam related, I would love to see people stop Fuckn talking about domestic terrorism as if it's a white thing. Wasn't one of the deadliest mass shootings committed by an Asian American? A coworker of mine (bleeding heart liberal) almost sounded giddy about the possibility that it might be a right wing extremist. Full disclosure I was hoping it was ISIS. Whatever. They're all assholes.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 03, 2015, 12:52:06 AM
I was actually just hoping that this excrement would stop happening.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 03, 2015, 01:07:12 AM
I hope the killer is a black lesbian.  I'd be so confused.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 03, 2015, 01:57:26 AM
Even if it's not islam related, I would love to see people stop Fuckn talking about domestic terrorism as if it's a white thing. Wasn't one of the deadliest mass shootings committed by an Asian American? A coworker of mine (bleeding heart liberal) almost sounded giddy about the possibility that it might be a right wing extremist. Full disclosure I was hoping it was ISIS. Whatever. They're all assholes.

Wow.  Where to start?  I guess with the biggest issue.

Why the crap would you want ISIS starting to run attacks in random towns in America?  An isolated shooter is bad enough.  If ISIS starts sending shooters, we're talking about a wave of coordinated attacks like this.  I don't get why anyone would wish for that.

Domestic terrorism isn't exclusively a white thing.  It's a mental illness/extreme belief/easy gun access thing.  It just so happens that the majority of domestic terrorist activity is carried out by white people.  As for dismissing that because of one Asian shooter, a pair of Muslims (Fort Hood), or even the black Beltway shooter, you can't have it both ways.  You're constantly arguing that black people are violent and have poor family values.  It's a "black problem" and perfectly acceptable to stereotype (by the way, a study showed the latter is massively wrong).  Now that there's a problem with white extremists, though, you look for exceptions because it offends you?  It's fine that you're a wannabe white supremacist, but at least own up to it instead of couching it in some skewed logical perspective based on guesswork and anecdotes.

People are engaging in domestic terrorism because they're trying to get some stupid point across.  It doesn't matter who it is doing it.  It's a universal problem.  Your coworker is a freaking idiot.  Liberals have a serious problem when it comes to reacting to these acts, as do conservatives.  In the case of liberals, they do look for right wing extremists behind these acts.  Why?  Largely because the right has absolutely no interest in stopping the attacks.  None.  It shifts blame around, but ultimately, it has no problem with the attacks occurring.  Meanwhile, the right has a big problem with dismissing these acts by seeking out causes that diminish the gun control issues.  This one's going to be easy since he's a Muslim.  They don't have to worry about selling irrelevance to their constituency.  That sure wasn't the case with Planned Parenthood.

Nothing's going to be done.  Again.  Neither side has enough support to actually make anything happen.  The left will whine and moan about nothing getting done and then move on.  The right will buy up as many guns as possible (go witness a Walmart raid on gun day) and rest easy in the knowledge that the NRA will take care of everything.  Business as usual will continue, and the shootings will likely just increase.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on December 03, 2015, 03:03:14 AM
Clap clap
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Nope. on December 03, 2015, 04:10:47 AM
I was actually just hoping that this excrement would stop happening.
This.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 03, 2015, 05:55:28 AM
On my phone so I can't really dig further but I just read that the two dead shooters left behind a six month old baby. What the freak?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on December 03, 2015, 05:56:54 AM
I wonder if the dispute was related to Christmas.

Like someone egging them on to do something Christmasy at the party or saying something about Muslims and then they just lost their excrement.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 03, 2015, 05:57:45 AM
I wonder if the dispute was related to Christmas.

WAR ON CHRISTMAS
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on December 03, 2015, 06:10:49 AM
Eggnog should not be allowed to be made with high fructose corn syrup.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 03, 2015, 06:40:45 AM
(http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/12/03/0c0d45a36a63d9eec78bcd3fa740cb5c.jpg)

(http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/12/03/1435148be72e08615e15e9c8ab315883.jpg)

Thought the completely different headlines were interesting. I get that the post is going for sensationalism, but the Daily News article doesn't mention their religion at least once as a possible motive. That's just being disingenuous.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on December 03, 2015, 06:50:29 AM
(http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/12/03/0c0d45a36a63d9eec78bcd3fa740cb5c.jpg)

(http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/12/03/1435148be72e08615e15e9c8ab315883.jpg)

Thought the completely different headlines were interesting. I get that the post is going for sensationalism, but the Daily News article doesn't mention their religion at least once as a possible motive. That's just being disingenuous.

I would normally say " maintaining journalistic standard and not speculating is disingenuous ? " but the Daily news is awful.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on December 03, 2015, 06:52:04 AM
Also you failed the Internet and posted the daily news photo twice
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 03, 2015, 06:58:51 AM
(http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/12/03/39cb085c199ad03861ab584448464abd.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on December 03, 2015, 07:04:55 AM
New York papers outside the Wall Street journal are so so bad. Even the times is hit or miss because it gets too far left. 

It's really surprising how there isn't more attention put on how awful the New York media is. Not "tough". Just generally awful.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: NDMick on December 03, 2015, 09:08:57 AM
I hope the killer is a black lesbian.  I'd be so confused.

A buddhist black lesbian.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 03, 2015, 09:13:29 AM
I hope the killer is a black lesbian.  I'd be so confused.

You see what some of the lesbo's out there look like?


Some of those diesel dyke psuedo-men look so angry and macho, they could probably wipe out our entire tailgate in hand to hand with nothing but a huge blue jelly rooster strap on. I don't see how that would be confusing.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 03, 2015, 09:49:37 AM
There's still a lot of questionable info out there.  The guy's coworkers are saying he picked up the bride while he was in Saudi Arabia early this year.  His brother in law says he's been married for a couple of years.  He's got a profile on some dating website from a few years back that lists "target practice in the backyard with my sister" as one of his hobbies.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 03, 2015, 09:54:01 AM
I don't think we're close at all to understanding the motive here, but to take a wild stab at it with absolutely no proof whatsoever:

We know the guy is deeply religious.  He took the hajj, which is no small commitment and just about the deepest sign of devotion to Islam.  Also, saw a photo with his sister in a hijab, so there's some traditional practice going on there.  We know he had a baby shower with his wife and his coworkers not long ago.  We know he's a gun lover.  My guess is that someone said or did something to offend his wife and his religion and he decided that was reason enough to start shooting if they didn't give him the response he was looking for.  He didn't get that response, so he and his wife went in shooting.  It's got everything: the damning influence of religion, the problem with unchecked gun obsession, and the clear rational disconnect.  Covers all the bases.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 03, 2015, 09:59:51 AM
You see what some of the lesbo's out there look like?


Some of those diesel dyke psuedo-men look so angry and macho, they could probably wipe out our entire tailgate in hand to hand with nothing but a huge blue jelly rooster strap on. I don't see how that would be confusing.

Check Koz's train bully.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 03, 2015, 10:06:28 AM
Check Koz's train bully.

(http://i.imgur.com/CY63v.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 03, 2015, 10:25:06 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/other-mass-shooting-wednesday-didnt-150340934.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 03, 2015, 10:45:06 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/other-mass-shooting-wednesday-didnt-150340934.html

Quote
Reacting to the San Bernardino shooting on Wednesday, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton reiterated her call for gun safety reform, tweeting, "I refuse to accept this as normal."

What an idiotic thing to say. Exceptional events are easy to dismiss. There's nothing practical you can do about exceptional events by their very nature. If I drive down the nearest highway and suddenly decide to veer into oncoming traffic, lots of people will die and there's nothing you can do about it because it's exceptional. You can't legislate for that.

Either it's normal to have mass shootings, in which case you can look for patterns and commonalities and do something to mitigate them, or it's exceptional in which case you're just throwing your hands up and saying "oh well, what's a girl to do?". Not very presidential at all.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 03, 2015, 11:23:43 AM
I had more of an issue with the idea that she just keeps dropping these sound bytes without any actual plan.  I didn't read it the way you did at all.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 03, 2015, 12:06:36 PM
I had more of an issue with the idea that she just keeps dropping these sound bytes without any actual plan.  I didn't read it the way you did at all.

Well, I think you're right. I don't think she really knows what to say because I don't think she has any real principles, or at least none that are as important to her as her ascent to the throne. I'm just pointing out the idiocy of her statement.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 03, 2015, 12:11:58 PM
Well, I think you're right. I don't think she really knows what to say because I don't think she has any real principles, or at least none that are as important to her as her ascent to the throne. I'm just pointing out the idiocy of her statement.

In a nutshell, this boils her and her ambitions down perfectly .
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 03, 2015, 12:23:17 PM
In a nutshell, this boils her and her ambitions down perfectly .

Sadly, it's why she'll probably get the nomination. The bidders all know she's available for the right price.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 03, 2015, 12:25:23 PM
Sadly, it's why she'll probably get the nomination. The bidders all know she's available for the right price.

She's sadly not much different than hubby, he just seems more likable, excuse me, has that perception of being more likable. She's definitely not likable. I wouldn't vote for hubby and lol at voting for her, not even looking down the barrel of an Abrams tank.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 03, 2015, 01:35:00 PM
(http://cdn.barstoolsports.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/03/Screen-Shot-2015-12-03-at-8.48.04-AM.png?7d137a)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 03, 2015, 05:33:30 PM
^ That's a ballsy front page.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 03, 2015, 10:05:45 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/wheres-syed-how-the-san-bernardino-shooting-unfolded/2015/12/03/2ee90128-9a15-11e5-8917-653b65c809eb_story.html?tid=sm_fb
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 03, 2015, 11:40:35 PM
http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/12/white-male-murderers-planned-parenthood-robert-dear.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 04, 2015, 12:00:55 AM
So I'm guessing the workplace issue is either insanely one sided or non-existent.  No way this guy didn't leave something behind to tell why he did it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 04, 2015, 12:05:02 AM

http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/12/white-male-murderers-planned-parenthood-robert-dear.html

That article was a lot more interesting than I thought it was going to be when I read the first paragraph.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 04, 2015, 12:16:24 AM
http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/12/white-male-murderers-planned-parenthood-robert-dear.html

I'm really, really interested to hear your view on that article.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 04, 2015, 12:19:54 AM

I'm really, really interested to hear your view on that article.

Comparing mass shootings to random acts of police brutality? Also the article conveniently forgets to mention one of the beltway shooters, Colin Ferguson (LIRR mass killer), hell and even the Boston Bomber, who all were allowed to surrender. But let's just focus on the few recent ones who happened to be white, and compare them to guys like Garner.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 04, 2015, 12:21:17 AM
lmaooooooo
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 04, 2015, 12:26:11 AM
And of course the author ends with a comment about the Bechtel test that JE mentioned the other day. What the actual freak?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 04, 2015, 12:35:49 AM
Wow. You actually didn't read the article, did you?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 04, 2015, 12:36:34 AM

Wow. You actually didn't read the article, did you?

I read enough of it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 04, 2015, 12:37:58 AM
I read enough of it.

lolololololol

Go to bed.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 04, 2015, 08:45:48 PM
http://www.theonion.com/article/crazed-palestinian-gunman-angered-by-stereotypes-1651
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 05, 2015, 06:27:48 AM
Frenzied Media Pore Over Home Of San Bernardino Killers During Live Broadcasts http://n.pr/1OLu0Iz

Quote
MSNBC was particularly aggressive, claiming it had broadcast an exclusive with its footage, shown only a few minutes before its competitors. Indeed, MSNBC's Kerry Sanders complained that rival news teams were "a-pushing and a-shoving."

He subsequently held up photographs from the apartment, presumably of family and friends, and even showed a California driver's license of the mother of the male shooter. Her identifying characteristics, including her date of birth, address, eye color and the like, were clearly visible on screen.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 05, 2015, 09:29:47 AM
Oh no.  This is going to be bad.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 05, 2015, 09:39:28 AM
ISIS has claimed responsibility, and they had both been contacting terrorist groups.

Congratulations, Tommy.  Your wet dream of more Americans getting killed as a terrorist organization starts attacking the most random of locales is coming true.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 05, 2015, 09:46:53 AM
I will say this for the white supremacists in this country: if they had their way back in the day, Tommy wouldn't be in this country.  I guess sometimes they have good ideas.  Unfortunately for those of us who aren't pieces of excrement, as more groups enter, it always becomes necessary to embrace other groups and allow them to become white.  So now we're stuck with a group of pieces of excrement whose ranks swelled by even more pieces of excrement like our resident white supremacist Albanian.

Of course, given that the department was decidedly multinational, it's no shock that he loved that the attack happened.  I can only imagine how conflicted he'd be if ISIS had attacked a group of purebloods.  The righteous indignation all mingled up with his desire for more terrorist attacks.  He would have been raping up a storm.

freak anyone who thinks ISIS attacks on American soil are a good thing.  I hope the FBI locks your derriere up, shithead.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 05, 2015, 11:02:03 AM
Lol

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 05, 2015, 11:12:24 AM

I will say this for the white supremacists in this country: if they had their way back in the day, Tommy wouldn't be in this country.  I guess sometimes they have good ideas.  Unfortunately for those of us who aren't pieces of excrement, as more groups enter, it always becomes necessary to embrace other groups and allow them to become white.  So now we're stuck with a group of pieces of excrement whose ranks swelled by even more pieces of excrement like our resident white supremacist Albanian.

Of course, given that the department was decidedly multinational, it's no shock that he loved that the attack happened.  I can only imagine how conflicted he'd be if ISIS had attacked a group of purebloods.  The righteous indignation all mingled up with his desire for more terrorist attacks.  He would have been raping up a storm.

freak anyone who thinks ISIS attacks on American soil are a good thing.  I hope the FBI locks your derriere up, shithead.

K
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 05, 2015, 11:13:59 AM
Lol

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 06, 2015, 11:18:18 AM
https://vine.co/v/i7qzgUdYVM5

how Tommy accepts awards from black people
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 06, 2015, 10:01:55 PM
http://www.npr.org/2015/12/05/458492474/how-many-mass-shootings-this-year-theres-no-consensus

Every time I hear that 353 number it doesn't feel right.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 06, 2015, 10:20:09 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/iuUFxCq.png)

I'm not sure how true this is but on a really glib and superficial level it sounds like an awesome idea.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 06, 2015, 10:31:04 PM
Actually that's a pretty good idea.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 06, 2015, 10:41:49 PM

(http://i.imgur.com/iuUFxCq.png)

I'm not sure how true this is but on a really glib and superficial level it sounds like an awesome idea.

It will definitely keep legal guns out of the hands of poor minorities.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 06, 2015, 10:44:29 PM
It will definitely keep legal guns out of the hands of poor minorities.

That's true. Struggling to see a problem still. Fewer guns in fewer hands sounds like a good thing. I don't care which hands they come out of first.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 06, 2015, 11:00:07 PM
I don't know the statistics but I am pretty sure the majority of guns that are in the hands of people that are going to use the guns in the commission of a crime are not going to get those firearms legally.

If I am wrong the numbers are still substantial. Point being, of the need to get rid of the excess guns and not necessarily the ones obtained legally.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 06, 2015, 11:22:10 PM

(http://i.imgur.com/iuUFxCq.png)

I'm not sure how true this is but on a really glib and superficial level it sounds like an awesome idea.

If the guns aren't the problem and cars are used to argue the point, going through licensing and insurance would make perfect sense.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on December 06, 2015, 11:29:39 PM

I don't know the statistics but I am pretty sure the majority of guns that are in the hands of people that are going to use the guns in the commission of a crime are not going to get those firearms legally.

If I am wrong the numbers are still substantial. Point being, of the need to get rid of the excess guns and not necessarily the ones obtained legally.

I would imagine it would at least illegal gun trade a bit if you could be held responsible for guns that weren't legally traded.  I hate the thought of my rates going up for driving issues.  I'd hate to thing what would happen to my premium if one of my guns was used to kill someone.  Ouch!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 06, 2015, 11:33:33 PM
I would imagine it would at least illegal gun trade a bit if you could be held responsible for guns that weren't legally traded.  I hate the thought of my rates going up for driving issues.  I'd hate to thing what would happen to my premium if one of my guns was used to kill someone.  Ouch!

Was it this simple all along?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 06, 2015, 11:38:04 PM

That's true. Struggling to see a problem still. Fewer guns in fewer hands sounds like a good thing. I don't care which hands they come out of first.

I said legal guns. #notallguns
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 06, 2015, 11:41:38 PM
I said legal guns. #notallguns

Doesn't change my point.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 06, 2015, 11:47:17 PM

Doesn't change my point.

Was your point that this would be very profitable for a select few and do little to save lives?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 06, 2015, 11:49:46 PM
Is yours that you think that it's better to let more people die in order to prevent corporations making money? Because it sounds like a win-win to me.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 07, 2015, 12:02:15 AM
Lol at trying to get insurance company's in this game. I honestly don't think many would want to be playing in this market. You would have to set up some type of national firm that would have to underwrite gun policies. For instance the CEO of Geico would laugh himself silly if Obama came and asked him to underwrite gun policies.

I understand the law of large numbers, premiums and how insurance companies create profits but still it's not a market that would be readily/willingly served. I don't think Lloyd's of London, a company that would insure Octomom's vag, would even want to get into this field.


Still it's an interesting proposal and possible solution.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 07, 2015, 05:25:23 AM

Is yours that you think that it's better to let more people die in order to prevent corporations making money? Because it sounds like a win-win to me.

You have yet to demonstrate how it saves lives.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 07, 2015, 06:20:01 AM
Do the same with cigarettes. Just tax the hell out of guns. This will effectively drive up the price of illegal firearms, which will make obviously make it harder for most people to afford them. At the very least you'll see less inner city shootings.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 07, 2015, 07:42:59 AM
Do the same with cigarettes. Just tax the hell out of guns. This will effectively drive up the price of illegal firearms, which will make obviously make it harder for most people to afford them. At the very least you'll see less inner city shootings.

It's not a panacea but it's a better idea than creating a mandatory cash cow for private insurance companies.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 07, 2015, 07:46:21 AM
It's not a panacea but it's a better idea than creating a mandatory cash cow for private insurance companies.

Most likely, the gun lobby isn't going to allow either but the tax option is even less likely than the insurance idea. Politicians would be scared stiff instituting a new tax plan.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 07, 2015, 08:17:52 AM
Tax ammunition then. It'll be a good compromise. I'd start with a heavy tax on the guns themselves, and then find middle ground on taxing ammunition. High taxes on guns would be seen as taxing home defense etc. Taxing ammunition is a good counter. How many bullets do you really need to protect your home anyway? Also, do you need a permit to buy ammunition? Maybe we should look into that as well.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 07, 2015, 08:39:41 AM
You have yet to demonstrate how it saves lives.

I haven't claimed that it would, in fact I think I made it pretty clear that I haven't actually thought the concept through at all. I was responding to your suggestion that it "would be very profitable for a select few and do little to save lives"; if that's true then I'm all for it, because even if does only do a little to save lives I'm entirely fine with that if the only side effect is insurance companies making profit.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 07, 2015, 08:47:40 AM
It's not a panacea but it's a better idea than creating a mandatory cash cow for private insurance companies.

Why? What's so terrible about insurance companies making money from it? It's in many ways a perfect system - people are paying an annual licence fee that varies based upon the degree of risk they represent, and private industry is employing hugely powerful analysis methodologies to do that assessment. The government still makes money from the additional sales and corporation taxes levied, and the people least suited to gun ownership are priced out of it.

If you wanted you could impose a special tax on firearm liability insurance and have it paid into a central pot, the purpose of which is to compensate those injured and killed by illegal and/or uninsured firearm usage. Or you could use it to hire a small group of people whose job it is to do nothing but irritate Wayne LaPierre 24 hours a day, perhaps by playing mariachi music in his ear every time he goes out for dinner and firing elastic bands at him whenever he walks down the street and double parking on him every time he leaves his car somewhere.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on December 07, 2015, 09:51:42 AM
If we're going to debate this we really need to work off some facts.

Firstly, I want to know how many murders are committed using illegally obtained weapons vs legally obtained.

Second, does buying ammunition require a gun license or any kind of permit?

Third, are you legally able to sell your gun to someone else? Someone without a permit? I'm assuming that's illegal, as well it should be, but that's obviously how they get into the black market in the first place. I know tracking systems have been brought up but shot down because of the possibility that someone could steal someone else's gun, use it to murder someone, and just pin it on the original gun owner.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ukilledkenny on December 08, 2015, 07:40:26 AM
In the time it took you to write that post you could have just Google searched some of those questions but you're probably not as interested in knowing that stuff as you claim.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: guinness77 on December 08, 2015, 10:00:33 AM
In the time it took you to write that post you could have just Google searched some of those questions but you're probably not as interested in knowing that stuff as you claim.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IoZfl5TR6MA
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 02, 2016, 09:47:08 AM
Not a mass shooting, but I figured the UCLA thing should go here:

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-mainak-sarkar-ucla-20160602-snap-story.html

So the gunman has been named. Apparently he was pissed off over a fuckn' grade.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 02, 2016, 10:58:25 AM
Wow his name was Mainak?  I knew a guy named Mainak and this may be the first time I've heard of an Indian guy doing something like this.

freak this guy.  I'm just glad it wasn't some Higher Learning excrement, which is exactly what it sounded like when it started being reported yesterday.  My sister was at UCLA when that movie came out and there were some people who got all scared that it could happen there.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 02, 2016, 11:22:51 AM
Wow his name was Mainak?  I knew a guy named Mainak and this may be the first time I've heard of an Indian guy doing something like this.

freak this guy.  I'm just glad it wasn't some Higher Learning excrement, which is exactly what it sounded like when it started being reported yesterday.  My sister was at UCLA when that movie came out and there were some people who got all scared that it could happen there.

Like catching someone named Peter Pumpre for indecent exposure.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 03, 2016, 06:56:48 AM
Quote
A former UCLA graduate student killed his estranged wife in Minnesota before driving to Los Angeles and murdering one of his former professors before turning the gun on himself, authorities said Thursday.

The body of Ashley Hasti, 31, was found early Thursday in her home in Brooklyn Park, northwest of Minneapolis. Hennepin County records confirmed the gunman, Mainak Sarkar, married Hasti in June of 2011.

Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck said Thursday that Hasti's name was on a "kill list" composed by Sarkar. The list also named William Klug, a mechanical engineering professor who died in the Wednesday morning shooting on the Westwood campus, and another engineering professor who was unharmed. Authorities did not identify the second professor.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 03, 2016, 08:30:30 AM
what a crazy piece of excrement
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 12, 2016, 03:20:13 AM
https://www.rt.com/news/346278-orlando-night-club-shooting/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 12, 2016, 04:37:49 AM

https://www.rt.com/news/346278-orlando-night-club-shooting/

Apparently it's a gay nightclub having Latin night.  Hopefully this isn't another hate crime.  Not that it's a rosey situation anyway.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 12, 2016, 07:22:22 AM
Boy this got awful in a hurry.  At least 20 dead, 40-some injured.  Don't know yet whether it's a foreign or domestic terrorist. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 12, 2016, 08:20:27 AM
Shooter ID'd as Omar Mateen.  US citizen from Port St. Lucie, FL.  Has Afghan parents.  Early suspicion is Islamic terrorism per CBS news.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 12, 2016, 08:32:45 AM
Just woke up and read this.
freaking Orlando too?

Jesus

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 12, 2016, 09:22:00 AM

Shooter ID'd as Omar Mateen.  US citizen from Port St. Lucie, FL.  Has Afghan parents.  Early suspicion is Islamic terrorism per CBS news.

I actually thought it was going to be some Christian right nutcase, but then I remembered the group and religion that hates gays far more.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 12, 2016, 09:36:24 AM
Death toll up to 50. Holy excrement.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 12, 2016, 09:38:59 AM
Death toll up to 50. Holy excrement.
Yeah I thought it was a typo.  Not so.  Horrible.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 12, 2016, 09:57:27 AM
It's apparently Pride weekend in Orlando.  That bar was probably packed.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 12, 2016, 09:59:35 AM

It's apparently Pride weekend in Orlando.  That bar was probably packed.

Shooter probably knew that too. This was obviously planned way in advance.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 12, 2016, 10:01:24 AM
Shooter probably knew that too. This was obviously planned way in advance.

Of course he did.  He probably spent a lot of time researching gay bars, which is the only amusing part of this.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 12, 2016, 10:03:30 AM

Of course he did.  He probably spent a lot of time researching gay bars, which is the only amusing part of this.

Yeah I was thinking the same. I heard on the news that the shooter's father said that he saw two guys kissing in Miami a few months ago and he flipped his excrement. Might've been the trigger.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Pope on June 12, 2016, 10:06:40 AM
Americans conservatives won't know how to feel. On one hand it's another Muslim extremist. On the other he targeted a gay bar. Their brains may short circuit
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 12, 2016, 10:09:27 AM
Americans conservatives won't know how to feel. On one hand it's another Muslim extremist. On the other he targeted a gay bar. Their brains may short circuit


Just call everybody a bundle of sticks and call it a day.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 12, 2016, 10:17:22 AM
Yeah Orlando was probably packed with gays, I think it's a big Disney weekend for that as well. Thank god he didn't try to go there, it could have been way worse.

At least he's dead, too bad didn't take it his parents first.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 12, 2016, 10:19:00 AM
Just call everybody a bundle of sticks and call it a day.



That word doesn't have the same ring to it today, maybe tomorrow.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 12, 2016, 10:22:50 AM
Yeah Orlando was probably packed with gays, I think it's a big Disney weekend for that as well. Thank god he didn't try to go there, it could have been way worse.

The bar is a much more confined space though and Disney has to have better security than what he faced walking into that place.

This is terrible and I worry that a bunch of a freaking idiots will overlook this because the victims are gay.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 12, 2016, 10:42:59 AM
Yeah Orlando was probably packed with gays, I think it's a big Disney weekend for that as well. Thank god he didn't try to go there, it could have been way worse.

At least he's dead, too bad didn't take it his parents first.

Nah.  He wouldn't have gotten an assault rifle into Disney World.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 12, 2016, 10:44:22 AM
The bar is a much more confined space though and Disney has to have better security than what he faced walking into that place.

This is terrible and I worry that a bunch of a freaking idiots will overlook this because the victims are gay.

Yeah.  You would think the deadliest mass shooting in American history would prompt a huge response, but it's mostly been "Such tragic.  So horror."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 12, 2016, 10:44:34 AM
I'm guessing he chose this place specifically because of the lack of security.

I know a couple of guys who ran security in some of the clubs here and the supervisor was almost always packing.

He picked an easy target to cause as much carnage as possible. Gay clubs usually don't have metal detectors or pat downs (yeah yeah. phrasing).





Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 12, 2016, 10:45:54 AM
Yeah.  You would think the deadliest mass shooting in American history would prompt a huge response, but it's mostly been "Such tragic.  So horror."

I didn't register that fact until now. When I saw the initial numbers it was still in the 20s. the 50+ didn't mentally bring up the history books.

that's fucked.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 12, 2016, 10:49:15 AM
I imagine there to be a fair amount of women who died. I wouldn't be surprised if it was 15+ out of the 50.



Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 12, 2016, 10:50:09 AM
Why is reddit censoring the thread about the shooting? It was on the front page this morning but they locked and moved it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 12, 2016, 11:09:15 AM
I get emails from Ted Cruz love site American Action News.  It wanted everyone to know today that the shooter was a registered Democrat and that it had nothing to do with religion.  Just a plain old hate crime.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 12, 2016, 11:09:52 AM
Why is reddit censoring the thread about the shooting? It was on the front page this morning but they locked and moved it.

because have you ever met a redditor? They're the most neurotic and insane wildfire spreaders in the world.




Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 12, 2016, 11:10:53 AM
Why is reddit censoring the thread about the shooting? It was on the front page this morning but they locked and moved it.

Apparently r/news has been censoring it so a mod added it to AskReddit for some reason. Bizarre.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 12, 2016, 11:30:40 AM
Americans conservatives won't know how to feel. On one hand it's another Muslim extremist. On the other he targeted a gay bar. Their brains may short circuit

Conservatives are 100% going after Islam for this one.

The more amusing situation will be seeing people who can't decide if they should be defending the LGBT community or defending Islam from backlash.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 12, 2016, 11:32:49 AM
Conservatives are 100% going after Islam for this one.

The more amusing situation will be seeing people who can't decide if they should be defending the LGBT community or defending Islam from backlash.

You would think so, but a lot of conservatives have been parroting the dad's line that it's not a religious issue.

I don't even get how it's a question of who to defend on the latter front.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on June 12, 2016, 12:14:55 PM
The bar is a much more confined space though and Disney has to have better security than what he faced walking into that place.

This is terrible and I worry that a bunch of a freaking idiots will overlook this because the victims are gay.

Not that this makes it any better. But i doubt it gets overlooked because the shooter has strong ties with Afghanistan

Of course I doubt it gets the attention of Sandy Hook because little children were the target there
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 12, 2016, 01:43:38 PM
They found Part 2 about a mile from where I live.  He was caught because he looked suspicious.  Police found a shitload of weaponry and he said he was on his way to Pride week in West Hollywood:

https://www.google.com/amp/ktla.com/2016/06/12/man-with-weapons-possible-explosives-arrested-in-santa-monica-said-he-was-going-to-l-a-gay-pride-parade-report/amp/?client=safari#
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on June 12, 2016, 02:36:21 PM
This sucks.  I have a million political things to say, but no.  I hope it doesn't go there.  This just sucks.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on June 12, 2016, 02:39:40 PM
freak.

 (http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/12/us/orlando-nightclub-shooting/index.html)

I'm starting to get back to middle east bombed into a parking lot mentality, and I hate it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 12, 2016, 02:40:47 PM
I'm starting to get back to middle east bombed into a parking lot mentality, and I hate it.

The problem with that is that this dude is from Florida...
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on June 12, 2016, 02:55:30 PM
The problem with that is that this dude is from Florida...

911 pledge to ISIS.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 12, 2016, 02:57:58 PM
This sucks.  I have a million political things to say, but no.  I hope it doesn't go there.  This just sucks.

It's just better to stay off twitter/facebook/comment sections when this excrement happens.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on June 12, 2016, 03:03:18 PM
911 pledge to ISIS.

I know that, but bombing the Middle East wouldn't stop this. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 12, 2016, 03:05:41 PM
I know that, but bombing the Middle East wouldn't stop this. 

Bombing them is what allowed the insurgency to evolve in the first place.



Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 12, 2016, 03:46:38 PM

Bombing them is what allowed the insurgency to evolve in the first place.

So this is our fault. Gotcha.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 12, 2016, 03:51:51 PM
The problem with that is that this dude is from Florida...

I think we're all open to bombing Florida too.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 12, 2016, 04:03:58 PM
So this is our fault. Gotcha.

Well, technically when you attack the wrong country and let an insurgency spiral out of control due to your own actions, yes maybe that has something to do with it.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 12, 2016, 04:14:53 PM
I think we're all open to bombing Florida too.
This never would have happened if we did!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 12, 2016, 05:03:23 PM
Apparently ISIS said three days ago that it was targeting Florida.  I'm guessing they put excrement like that out hoping some sympathizer will actually take action on it.

I notice nobody is commenting on the fact that this guy was deemed ok for a concealed carry permit.  Good luck controlling which people get to have guns and which don't.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 12, 2016, 05:07:38 PM
I think we're all open to bombing Florida too.

For freak sake, can you let me get out of here first?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 12, 2016, 05:38:56 PM
For freak sake, can you let me get out of here first?

Consider that a 90 day warning.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Jumbo on June 12, 2016, 06:37:39 PM
Well, technically when you attack the wrong country and let an insurgency spiral out of control due to your own actions, yes maybe that has something to do with it.



Yep, the Danes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Copenhagen_shootings) and Australians (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Endeavour_Hills_stabbings) and Frenchmen (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shooting) sure did have it coming!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 12, 2016, 06:58:55 PM
Yep, the Danes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Copenhagen_shootings) and Australians (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Endeavour_Hills_stabbings) and Frenchmen (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shooting) sure did have it coming!

Definitely not even in the realm of what i was saying.

This is that cycle of insanity thing that happens with politics talk.

How about this:

"The United States made a series of foreign policy and military mistakes that led to fostering of ISIS growth in Iraq".  I mean, do you or Tommy want to argue that? This isn't about whether islam or shitty is not.

This wasn't even a conversation till Tommy had an unhinged reaction to a very obvious thing like "not commiting genocide in a region".








Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 12, 2016, 09:30:57 PM
Americans conservatives won't know how to feel. On one hand it's another Muslim extremist. On the other he targeted a gay bar. Their brains may short circuit


I know a lot of conservatives, none have a problem with gays.

The liberals can't justify radical Islam's hatred of gays and gay rights at the same time,  so the narrative will just be guns. Because terrorists would never use a pressure cooker or a bomb.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on June 13, 2016, 01:01:19 AM
No civilian should legally own an AR-15.  Why that is not obvious at this point...
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 01:20:02 AM
No civilian should legally own an AR-15.  Why that is not obvious at this point...


When even the Democratic candidate is only willing to say that we need to keep those weapons out of the hands of dangerous people, it should be obvious why it's not obvious.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 13, 2016, 03:08:10 AM
Short of making guns illegal in this country, which would never happen in a million freaking years, there's no other way to keep assault rifles out of assholes hands other than a methodology that actually tries to screen gun owners or potential gun owners. Even then if they're resourceful that won't work but will at least make them go through hoops.

Also the FBI was aware of this guy, he probably was on a no fly list or at the very least he couldn't just walk into the TSA and get a PRE-Check pass similar to me. I got one rather easily after they did their due diligence. Now if a person like this jerk off is on FBI lists of potential threats why the freak does he have the unfettered ability to buy firearms. You can't get on planes? Hey freak it buy all the weapons you want....... it simply doesn't make sense.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 13, 2016, 05:16:22 AM
The liberals can't justify radical Islam's hatred of gays

Um.... when did anyone even try?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 13, 2016, 05:21:05 AM
Um.... when did anyone even try?

"X has nothing to do with Islam"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 13, 2016, 06:16:53 AM
"X has nothing to do with Islam"

We don't really have to rehash this entire tired argument again, do we?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 08:31:55 AM
We don't really have to rehash this entire tired argument again, do we?

We might.

Guns are out there, pass all the laws you want, people will get them. Don't tell me about "should", it's just like outlawing booze or weed, good luck.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 13, 2016, 09:25:53 AM
We might.

Guns are out there, pass all the laws you want, people will get them. Don't tell me about "should", it's just like outlawing booze or weed, good luck.


I didn't say anything about guns. I was talking about your suggestion that "liberals ..... justify radical Islam's hatred of gays".
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on June 13, 2016, 10:03:56 AM
Honestly it's inevitable for some kind of assault rifle ban with stricter regulations on semi automatics and or conversion kits. I think this mass shooting could be the one that gets it done.


That said I honestly don't think they will do much to reduce these kinds of events. I believe decision makers are just misguided and blame guns for this. The laws need to be changed, they just won't have the desired outcome
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 10:27:58 AM
"X has nothing to do with Islam"

The only thing I've seen people argue is that radicalists are not true Muslims.  Which isn't true.  They use Islam to justify all of the horrible excrement they do, and they've been able to find support for everything they do in the Q'uran.  People argue that most Muslims are good people, which is very likely true, but I've never seen anyone try to suggest that radical Islam is positive in the slightest.  And IS specifically mentioned radical Islam.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 10:29:24 AM
I know a lot of conservatives, none have a problem with gays.

The liberals can't justify radical Islam's hatred of gays and gay rights at the same time,  so the narrative will just be guns. Because terrorists would never use a pressure cooker or a bomb.

So if conservatives don't have a problem with gays, who has consistently fought against gay rights in this country?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 10:31:21 AM
Honestly it's inevitable for some kind of assault rifle ban with stricter regulations on semi automatics and or conversion kits. I think this mass shooting could be the one that gets it done.


That said I honestly don't think they will do much to reduce these kinds of events. I believe decision makers are just misguided and blame guns for this. The laws need to be changed, they just won't have the desired outcome

Clinton simply wants to find a way to keep the guns out of the hands of would-be criminals while protecting the rights of legal gun owners.  That's where the discussion is.  Whether we should have any gun control whatsoever.  I don't get why people even worry that the 2nd Amendment is in any danger whatsoever.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 13, 2016, 10:32:13 AM
So if conservatives don't have a problem with gays, who has consistently fought against gay rights in this country?

I wrote a post but forgot to click on it saying

"Tri State Area Conservatives". That's a big difference.  Very small segment of the conservative base.

Most Tri State conservatives are conservatives out of economic self interest.


Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 10:37:55 AM
So if conservatives don't have a problem with gays, who has consistently fought against gay rights in this country?

Not speaking for all conservatives here, but I'm an older guy and I'm in more conservative circles most of the time, so I'm exposed to a lot of it. Most of them are more interested in preserving religious liberty more than fighting gay rights. I don't know anyone who has a problem with gay people getting married, they have a problem being forced by law to participate in it if they don't want to. Tolerance is a two-way street.

Defending ourselves and not bankrupting our country are the topic of almost every conversation, I've never heard a person tell me they give two sh*ts about what gay people do or don't do. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 13, 2016, 10:41:15 AM
Not speaking for all conservatives here, but I'm an older guy and I'm in more conservative circles most of the time, so I'm exposed to a lot of it. Most of them are more interested in preserving religious liberty more than fighting gay rights. I don't know anyone who has a problem with gay people getting married, they have a problem being forced by law to participate in it if they don't want to. Tolerance is a two-way street.

Defending ourselves and not bankrupting our country are the topic of almost every conversation, I've never heard a person tell me they give two sh*ts about what gay people do or don't do. 

What you mean to say, is "I know a few people in a very specific region known for being open minded about gay rights,and it's not an issue for them."

Okay, so...that's reflective of what you're exposed to, not the base or country as a whole. That's a very "New York bubble" type comment.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 10:42:02 AM
Clinton simply wants to find a way to keep the guns out of the hands of would-be criminals while protecting the rights of legal gun owners.  That's where the discussion is.  Whether we should have any gun control whatsoever.  I don't get why people even worry that the 2nd Amendment is in any danger whatsoever.

There is absolutely no way to do that, the rest of the discussion is bluster.

As much as this guy was on the radar, there was no legal basis to prevent him from any rights anyone else has based on what he might do. The answer is in the Constitution, individuals need the right to defend themselves, that's why it's up there at #2 right behind free speech. Law enforcement and intelligence can't solve every problem. You don't stop a gunman until someone else shows up with another gun.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 10:44:18 AM
What you mean to say, is "I know a few people in a very specific region known for being open minded about gay rights,and it's not an issue for them."

Okay, so...that's reflective of what you're exposed to, not the base or country as a whole. That's a very "New York" bubble type comment.



I lived on the road full time for years and have spent a lot of time all over the country, and this was 20 years ago before a lot of attitudes have come even further in favor of gay rights. Most people care about their own interests--security and financial--wherever they live. I still know people all over the place, it's easier to keep up with everyone than it used to be.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 10:55:31 AM
I didn't say anything about guns. I was talking about your suggestion that "liberals ..... justify radical Islam's hatred of gays".


Again we're speaking in general terms here, so of course not all liberals, just like you can't paint all conservative or gun owners with one brush. But I've been arguing with them on message boards for years--just not here because I like you guys and aim to keep it that way.

But I've have seen them justifying Islam's mass killing of random people for years--generally based in some kind of logic that it's the US's fault for one thing or another. Obama won't even acknowledge it exists and he's the f*cking president, so certainly there's a problem. So on one hand I hear conservatives hate gays--not from conservatives, mind you--and on the other we're racists and imperialists for wanting to take down an enemy who hates gays. And they oppress women, but somehow we're anti-women, too. That's the only reason I'm fired up today, which is it? Can't be both. We're either fighting intolerance or we're not, but being intolerant of homicidal intolerance I think is ok.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 10:59:15 AM
There is absolutely no way to do that, the rest of the discussion is bluster.

As much as this guy was on the radar, there was no legal basis to prevent him from any rights anyone else has based on what he might do. The answer is in the Constitution, individuals need the right to defend themselves, that's why it's up there at #2 right behind free speech. Law enforcement and intelligence can't solve every problem. You don't stop a gunman until someone else shows up with another gun.

Yes, that's my point.  Nobody is talking about doing anything that will in any way, shape, or form infringe upon basic gun rights OR do a damn thing about gun violence, and yet people are freaking out that their gun rights are under attack and that the 2nd amendment is being threatened.

And quartering is #3 in the Constitution.  I'd argue gun possession is the 2nd least necessary amendment after quartering.  It's there for the same antiquated reasons that quartering is.  There's a reason why it's so controversial today and its interpretation is attacked from both sides.  The most valid argument against gun control is one of pragmatism, not necessity.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 13, 2016, 11:05:26 AM
we're racists and imperialists for wanting to take down an enemy who hates gays.

LOL. You're cute.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 13, 2016, 11:05:46 AM
I lived on the road full time for years and have spent a lot of time all over the country, and this was 20 years ago before a lot of attitudes have come even further in favor of gay rights. Most people care about their own interests--security and financial--wherever they live. I still know people all over the place, it's easier to keep up with everyone than it used to be.

What i'm telling you is your anecdotal experience is not reflective of the larger base, supported by the data and polling numbers.  Honest question, how much of that traveling time included Missouri, Indiana, Texas, Oklahoma, Georgia, Arkansas?   

People tend to get along with like minded people, so I'm guessing you're not forming long lasting relationships with dipshit rednecks.

but you do , whether intentionally or unintentionally make a good point about the how the republican base has changed from 20 years+ to now.  Social media has a lot to do with it and those all quelled or subdued thoughts tend to leak out, and people are suddenly more confident in displaying their opinions.

BTW, the "religious freedom" angle is the only angle to take now because they can't just openly be hateful about gays, so they have to conceal it in a separate issue.
The whole bathroom issue is a perfect example of that.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 11:05:52 AM
Religious liberty is a sham.  It's an attempt to legitimize arguments against the extension of civil rights.  It's been that way since religion was used to justify slavery.  This idea that conservatives don't care if gays marry is absurd.  Hell, a lot of liberals opposed gay marriage.  California required a court decision after voters voted against gay marriage in 2008.  Only 3 states managed to legalize gay marriage by popular vote and 8 more by legislative decision before the Supreme Court ruled.  That's 39 states what had to be dragged into it, and the ones who required a Supreme Court decision due to the maintenance of explicit legal bans and constitutional amendments were entirely red.  Every single one.  The idea that conservatives as a whole really don't care if gay marriage is legal is hilarious.  There's a large swath of libertarian leaning conservatives who genuinely don't care, but the fact that most states had a majority opposed to the concept shoots down your argument with ease.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 11:09:12 AM

Again we're speaking in general terms here, so of course not all liberals, just like you can't paint all conservative or gun owners with one brush. But I've been arguing with them on message boards for years--just not here because I like you guys and aim to keep it that way.

But I've have seen them justifying Islam's mass killing of random people for years--generally based in some kind of logic that it's the US's fault for one thing or another. Obama won't even acknowledge it exists and he's the f*cking president, so certainly there's a problem. So on one hand I hear conservatives hate gays--not from conservatives, mind you--and on the other we're racists and imperialists for wanting to take down an enemy who hates gays. And they oppress women, but somehow we're anti-women, too. That's the only reason I'm fired up today, which is it? Can't be both. We're either fighting intolerance or we're not, but being intolerant of homicidal intolerance I think is ok.

It's almost like the world isn't black and white.  Imagine that.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 11:09:45 AM
Yes, that's my point.  Nobody is talking about doing anything that will in any way, shape, or form infringe upon basic gun rights OR do a damn thing about gun violence, and yet people are freaking out that their gun rights are under attack and that the 2nd amendment is being threatened.

And quartering is #3 in the Constitution.  I'd argue gun possession is the 2nd least necessary amendment after quartering.  It's there for the same antiquated reasons that quartering is.  There's a reason why it's so controversial today and its interpretation is attacked from both sides.  The most valid argument against gun control is one of pragmatism, not necessity.

Basic gun rights are already infringed upon in most blue states. Reality suggests that guns are out there and are going to remain out there, creating a black market never helps anything. Individual liberty means being able to own property and protect yourself and your property, we see store owners do it all the time and the gun debate never emerges when that happens. As much as humanity has evolved since our founding, the basic need for personal protection still exists, especially when we have an enemy adhering to 7th century ideology.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 11:13:29 AM
Since we're taking pages out of the IS book of anecdotes clearly indicating general beliefs, I live in maybe the most liberal state in the US, and I've never, ever seen anyone justify terrorism.  I have seen people discuss the contributory factors of US involvement, which is absolutely fair.  That doesn't mean it justifies the actions, but it's a chance to learn from past mistakes by acknowledging some contribution to the effects seen today.

I'd love to see these people you've argued with for years, though.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 11:15:25 AM
Basic gun rights are already infringed upon in most blue states. Reality suggests that guns are out there and are going to remain out there, creating a black market never helps anything. Individual liberty means being able to own property and protect yourself and your property, we see store owners do it all the time and the gun debate never emerges when that happens. As much as humanity has evolved since our founding, the basic need for personal protection still exists, especially when we have an enemy adhering to 7th century ideology.

So citizens need to be armed to protect themselves from Islamic terrorists?  Can you show me an example of that actually happening?

Basic gun rights are not already infringed upon.  Extended gun rights absolutely are.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on June 13, 2016, 11:15:26 AM
There is absolutely no way to do that, the rest of the discussion is bluster.

As much as this guy was on the radar, there was no legal basis to prevent him from any rights anyone else has based on what he might do. The answer is in the Constitution, individuals need the right to defend themselves, that's why it's up there at #2 right behind free speech. Law enforcement and intelligence can't solve every problem. You don't stop a gunman until someone else shows up with another gun.

The guy was interviewed by the FBI 3 times, and was still able to legally purchase an AR-15.  That is beyond insane.  This is not the deadliest mass shooting in US history if the guy doesn't have an assault rifle.  Period.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 11:17:59 AM
What i'm telling you is your anecdotal experience is not reflective of the larger base, supported by the data and polling numbers.  Honest question, how much of that traveling time included Missouri, Indiana, Texas, Oklahoma, Georgia, Arkansas?   

With the exception of Arkansas I've spent months living in each of those other states. We would set up shop in small town newspapers and spend 6-10 weeks selling ads in the TV guides that used to run in the weekend editions, then we'd go back each year and renew the ads. I would have loved to have been in large markets with more to do but our program worked best in places like Enid, OK, Poplar Bluff, MO, Kokomo, IN, etc. I could reel them off for hours if you like but hopefully that paints the picture.

And yes, there are pockets of ignorance anywhere you go. I was taken back by some of it as a young guy from NJ, but it goes both ways, too.

Quote
People tend to get along with like minded people, so I'm guessing you're not forming long lasting relationships with dipshit rednecks.

but you do , whether intentionally or unintentionally make a good point about the how the republican base has changed from 20 years+ to now.  Social media has a lot to do with it and those all quelled or subdued thoughts tend to leak out, and people are suddenly more confident in displaying their opinions.

BTW, the "religious freedom" angle is the only angle to take now because they can't just openly be hateful about gays, so they have to conceal it in a separate issue.
The whole bathroom issue is a perfect example of that.


Not sure where you're at with the bathroom angle, but religious liberty is also a founding principle of our country. And I say this personally as an atheist. I'm sure some do have an issue with gay marriage, that's their business, but I think most people only actively try to fight it when they are being forced by social justice warriors to bake the cakes or take part in something they don't want to take part in. People are going to have some ignorant views, that's allowed too. Everyone doesn't have to like it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 11:19:14 AM
Can we also mention, given IS's desire to drag the Constitution into this, that the 2nd Amendment makes no mention of personal property, liberty, or protection?  It's so silly to discuss this in any but pragmatic terms in this day and age.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 11:22:12 AM
The guy was interviewed by the FBI 3 times, and was still able to legally purchase an AR-15.  That is beyond insane.  This is not the deadliest mass shooting in US history if the guy doesn't have an assault rifle.  Period.

They interviewed him but did he do anything? If the government can interview anyone they like and then take away constitutional rights based on that we have a problem. Would it have mattered if he bought a gun on the street or made a home made bomb?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 11:22:59 AM
Can we also mention, given IS's desire to drag the Constitution into this, that the 2nd Amendment makes no mention of personal property, liberty, or protection?  It's so silly to discuss this in any but pragmatic terms in this day and age.

Yes, sorry to drag the Constitution into it. LOL
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 11:24:55 AM
Since we're taking pages out of the IS book of anecdotes clearly indicating general beliefs, I live in maybe the most liberal state in the US, and I've never, ever seen anyone justify terrorism.  I have seen people discuss the contributory factors of US involvement, which is absolutely fair.  That doesn't mean it justifies the actions, but it's a chance to learn from past mistakes by acknowledging some contribution to the effects seen today.

I'd love to see these people you've argued with for years, though.

Nirvana Fan Page (http://www.nirvana2.com/system/display.php?forum=11)

Have fun there, makes this place look like an NRA meeting with red meat dripping from the ceiling.

Established in the late 90s, Nirvana fans from around the world who think the world had no evil until America came along.

PS--I'm easy to find, Italian Seafood.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 11:26:08 AM
Yes, sorry to drag the Constitution into it. LOL

The Constitutional argument on gun ownership is tired, misguided, and misapplied.  The justification for the 2nd Amendment as stated is a well-regulated militia.  That's fine.  I have no problem with that.  I'm tired of hearing all of these arguments that the 2nd Amendment exists to give people the right to protect their property from intruders.  It's so silly.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 11:27:17 AM
Nirvana Fan Page (http://www.nirvana2.com/system/display.php?forum=11)

Have fun there, makes this place look like an NRA meeting with red meat dripping from the ceiling.

Established in the late 90s, Nirvana fans from around the world who think the world had no evil until America came along.

Oh my God.  You're clearly trolling here.  Your argument for liberal idiocy comes from a Nirvana fan page?  Jesus Christ.

By the way, the "around the world" part of your description hurts your argument considerably.  Not that there's any substance to it to begin with.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 11:29:08 AM
The Constitutional argument on gun ownership is tired, misguided, and misapplied.  The justification for the 2nd Amendment as stated is a well-regulated militia.  That's fine.  I have no problem with that.  I'm tired of hearing all of these arguments that the 2nd Amendment exists to give people the right to protect their property from intruders.  It's so silly.

What's silly about it? The police are supposed to be everywhere all the time? We know they're racist and shouldn't have guns either, so where does that leave us? Be vigilant? How?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 11:30:44 AM
Oh my God.  You're clearly trolling here.  Your argument for liberal idiocy comes from a Nirvana fan page?  Jesus Christ.

By the way, the "around the world" part of your description hurts your argument considerably.  Not that there's any substance to it to begin with.

Nirvana has been gone a while, so in the 15 years I've been there the conversations have covered a lot of ground. But the point is the original site attracted a younger, international crowd with much more left-leaning views than a football site in the US. They're not all dummies, just a lot of them. :D
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 11:34:26 AM
So citizens need to be armed to protect themselves from Islamic terrorists?  Can you show me an example of that actually happening?


Texas for one. The guy was a security guard but had his own gun and prevented a massacre at Pamela Geller's event. That's off the top of my head.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 11:39:57 AM
Texas for one. The guy was a security guard but had his own gun and prevented a massacre at Pamela Geller's event. That's off the top of my head.

What, Culwell?  That was a police officer who handled things until SWAT arrived.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 11:45:04 AM
What's silly about it? The police are supposed to be everywhere all the time? We know they're racist and shouldn't have guns either, so where does that leave us? Be vigilant? How?

That's not at all what I said, and none of that is addressed by the 2nd Amendment either.  I'm not sure where your argument is trailing off to after that, but it's absolutely bizarre.

As I said, the 2nd Amendment uses the necessity of a well regulated militia and protection of the STATE to justify gun ownership by the people.  It says nothing of protecting individual property, nor does it mention the inefficiency of the police.  I have no idea how to address the rant that followed that statement about police losing their guns due to racism and helpless people living in fear watching for criminal activity all the time.

As I've said before, I've had a gun pulled on me once.  I'm pretty sure I'd be dead if I had pulled one out as well.  I don't personally know anyone else who has been assaulted or threatened with assault by a gun that was actually present, so I can't really comment on safety as a whole.  I have to rely on statistics, which state that guns don't make us safer.  Still, I oppose gun bans from a pragmatic standpoint.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on June 13, 2016, 12:01:58 PM
Established in the late 90s, Nirvana fans from around the world who think the world had no evil until America came along.

Imperialism absolutely has paved the way for radical violent Islam stemming from the Middle East. It just hasn't been all America, and only very recently became mostly America.

From the Ottoman Empire essentially making the Middle East into a tax center for England/France, to the carving up of the region following WWI by the League of Nations, to the further dividing up of the region following WWII, to being used as the battlegrounds for numerous proxy wars during the Cold War, to being flooded with oil money creating absurd wealth disparity - the region has been fucked for 200 hundred years. Violent organizations and individuals who cling to fanatical religious ideology in the face of generations of poverty, violence, and disenfranchisement shouldn't be surprising.

The actions they take are appalling, but people do need to know why they are so violent if we have any hope of the violence subsiding.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 13, 2016, 12:41:55 PM
(https://media4.giphy.com/media/Y2nbrJyAR6RiM/200_s.gif)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 02:20:16 PM
That's not at all what I said, and none of that is addressed by the 2nd Amendment either.  I'm not sure where your argument is trailing off to after that, but it's absolutely bizarre.

As I said, the 2nd Amendment uses the necessity of a well regulated militia and protection of the STATE to justify gun ownership by the people.  It says nothing of protecting individual property, nor does it mention the inefficiency of the police.  I have no idea how to address the rant that followed that statement about police losing their guns due to racism and helpless people living in fear watching for criminal activity all the time.

As I've said before, I've had a gun pulled on me once.  I'm pretty sure I'd be dead if I had pulled one out as well.  I don't personally know anyone else who has been assaulted or threatened with assault by a gun that was actually present, so I can't really comment on safety as a whole.  I have to rely on statistics, which state that guns don't make us safer.  Still, I oppose gun bans from a pragmatic standpoint.

Glad anecdotal evidence is back on the table then.

How many homeowners and store owners have been captured on video stopping a robbery and more? You never hear the gun debate arise when that happens.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 02:23:29 PM
Imperialism absolutely has paved the way for radical violent Islam stemming from the Middle East. It just hasn't been all America, and only very recently became mostly America.

From the Ottoman Empire essentially making the Middle East into a tax center for England/France, to the carving up of the region following WWI by the League of Nations, to the further dividing up of the region following WWII, to being used as the battlegrounds for numerous proxy wars during the Cold War, to being flooded with oil money creating absurd wealth disparity - the region has been fucked for 200 hundred years. Violent organizations and individuals who cling to fanatical religious ideology in the face of generations of poverty, violence, and disenfranchisement shouldn't be surprising.

The actions they take are appalling, but people do need to know why they are so violent if we have any hope of the violence subsiding.

Is that why they execute gays in Iran? Or punish women who are raped in Saudi Arabia? Did we do that? If the American left is so gay friendly and pro-women, why did they let so many of these animals out of Gitmo and empower the mullahs in Iran with $150 billion dollars? For a "citizen of the world" Obama sure has no problem with the oppression of gays and women once they are outside the boundaries to vote for his party.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 02:41:21 PM
Glad anecdotal evidence is back on the table then

Please try to keep up:

Since we're taking pages out of the IS book of anecdotes clearly indicating general beliefs

As I said, as long as we were operating with anecdotal evidence, I might as well share some.

Quote
How many homeowners and store owners have been captured on video stopping a robbery and more? You never hear the gun debate arise when that happens.

I can't personally think of any.  Do you have some numbers on that?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 13, 2016, 02:46:00 PM
Imperialism absolutely has paved the way for radical violent Islam stemming from the Middle East. It just hasn't been all America, and only very recently became mostly America.

From the Ottoman Empire essentially making the Middle East into a tax center for England/France, to the carving up of the region following WWI by the League of Nations, to the further dividing up of the region following WWII, to being used as the battlegrounds for numerous proxy wars during the Cold War, to being flooded with oil money creating absurd wealth disparity - the region has been fucked for 200 hundred years. Violent organizations and individuals who cling to fanatical religious ideology in the face of generations of poverty, violence, and disenfranchisement shouldn't be surprising.

The actions they take are appalling, but people do need to know why they are so violent if we have any hope of the violence subsiding.

good post. To the point where I can't think of anything to add


Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 02:48:33 PM
Is that why they execute gays in Iran? Or punish women who are raped in Saudi Arabia? Did we do that? If the American left is so gay friendly and pro-women, why did they let so many of these animals out of Gitmo and empower the mullahs in Iran with $150 billion dollars? For a "citizen of the world" Obama sure has no problem with the oppression of gays and women once they are outside the boundaries to vote for his party.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/jA8TT03Sj2pXO/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 13, 2016, 02:50:07 PM
Is that why they execute gays in Iran? Or punish women who are raped in Saudi Arabia? Did we do that? If the American left is so gay friendly and pro-women, why did they let so many of these animals out of Gitmo and empower the mullahs in Iran with $150 billion dollars? For a "citizen of the world" Obama sure has no problem with the oppression of gays and women once they are outside the boundaries to vote for his party.

So much wrong with this post but the bold jumped out

.....Which one is it?  Obama is a bleeding heart liberal or he doesn't give a excrement about gays and women? It can't be both.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 02:56:32 PM
They execute gays in Iran because they are fucked up and backwards and use twisted ideology to justify horrific laws.

Repeat the above for Saudi treatment of women.

We didn't give Iran $150 billion.  We held on to Iran's money via economic sanctions.  It wasn't our money to begin with.  They held up their end of the deal to get that money which belonged to them.  That's how sanctions work.  Terms are applied and when those terms are met, the sanctions are lifted.

How does Obama not care about women and gays being oppressed?  Nobody on either side is arguing for war or continued military involvement to ensure rights for women and gays.  They argue for war to prevent future attacks on America and the West.

Bottom line: the Middle East is fucked up because leaders in the Middle East subscribe to fucked up ideologies.  Our involvement there simply supplied them with more weaponry and painted a target on our backs.  They'd have hated us no matter what, I'm sure.  If we had stayed the hell out of there, though, do you honestly think they'd have gone out of their way to start attacking us?  What possible purpose could that have served?  We didn't cause the Middle East to be fucked up and oppressive.  We just helped turn that on the West.  In absolutely no way does that excuse the violent response, which ons was pretty clear about.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 13, 2016, 03:54:15 PM

Imperialism absolutely has paved the way for radical violent Islam stemming from the Middle East. It just hasn't been all America, and only very recently became mostly America.

From the Ottoman Empire essentially making the Middle East into a tax center for England/France, to the carving up of the region following WWI by the League of Nations, to the further dividing up of the region following WWII, to being used as the battlegrounds for numerous proxy wars during the Cold War, to being flooded with oil money creating absurd wealth disparity - the region has been fucked for 200 hundred years. Violent organizations and individuals who cling to fanatical religious ideology in the face of generations of poverty, violence, and disenfranchisement shouldn't be surprising.

The actions they take are appalling, but people do need to know why they are so violent if we have any hope of the violence subsiding.

This isn't a good argument. Most of recent terrorists have been Western educated people from upper middle class families (see 9/11 hijackers). Others have been the children of economic migrants. The Middle East and North Africa isn't as ravaged as you make it out to be. Where are all the African terrorists? How about Southeast Asia?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on June 13, 2016, 04:28:51 PM
This isn't a good argument. Most of recent terrorists have been Western educated people from upper middle class families (see 9/11 hijackers). Others have been the children of economic migrants. The Middle East and North Africa isn't as ravaged as you make it out to be. Where are all the African terrorists? How about Southeast Asia?

SE Asia has had massively more stable governments compared to the Mid East, and borders that were created to separate tribes/regions were actually maintained by imperialism. Not really comparable on the same scale.

Much of Africa was dicked around worse than the Middle East (and has a HUGE terrorist problem) but doesn't have the massive oil money and access to weaponry that enables the terrorism to move abroad.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 04:30:40 PM

.....Which one is it?  Obama is a bleeding heart liberal or he doesn't give a excrement about gays and women? It can't be both.


Never said he was a bleeding heart liberal, that's for college students. He's a statist liberal whose interest in gay and women's rights extends as far as the ones who can vote for him or his party to keep him in power. Probably why he only "evolved" on gay marriage in the middle of his re-election bid in 2012.

If he truly was a citizen of the world and interested in the rights of gay people and women, he wouldn't be coddling Islamic extremists, letting them out of Gitmo and empowering the regime in Iran. Excuse that deal away any way you want, Iran wouldn't be getting that money if Obama didn't enable them, and he had to lie to the public to get that done.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 04:32:47 PM
They execute gays in Iran because they are fucked up and backwards and use twisted ideology to justify horrific laws.

Repeat the above for Saudi treatment of women.

We didn't give Iran $150 billion.  We held on to Iran's money via economic sanctions.  It wasn't our money to begin with.  They held up their end of the deal to get that money which belonged to them.  That's how sanctions work.  Terms are applied and when those terms are met, the sanctions are lifted.

How does Obama not care about women and gays being oppressed?  Nobody on either side is arguing for war or continued military involvement to ensure rights for women and gays.  They argue for war to prevent future attacks on America and the West.

Bottom line: the Middle East is fucked up because leaders in the Middle East subscribe to fucked up ideologies.  Our involvement there simply supplied them with more weaponry and painted a target on our backs.  They'd have hated us no matter what, I'm sure.  If we had stayed the hell out of there, though, do you honestly think they'd have gone out of their way to start attacking us?  What possible purpose could that have served?  We didn't cause the Middle East to be fucked up and oppressive.  We just helped turn that on the West.  In absolutely no way does that excuse the violent response, which ons was pretty clear about.

I certainly think they would attack us, just like they attack anyone who isn't like them. They attack each other. What purpose does any of it serve? These aren't rational people, many of them are under 25 and have no idea what the f*ck happened more than ten years ago. They know what they are taught, it doesn't have to be true.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 13, 2016, 04:34:52 PM
This isn't a good argument. Most of recent terrorists have been Western educated people from upper middle class families (see 9/11 hijackers). Others have been the children of economic migrants. The Middle East and North Africa isn't as ravaged as you make it out to be. Where are all the African terrorists? How about Southeast Asia?

I know black people live there which makes it less inclined for you to pay attention, but Boko Haram is a thing.

And the Phillipines  particularly ,and Malaysia to a lesser extent, have had their issues with terrorism.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on June 13, 2016, 04:35:59 PM
Never said he was a bleeding heart liberal, that's for college students. He's a statist liberal whose interest in gay and women's rights extends as far as the ones who can vote for him or his party to keep him in power. Probably why he only "evolved" on gay marriage in the middle of his re-election bid in 2012.

If he truly was a citizen of the world and interested in the rights of gay people and women, he wouldn't be coddling Islamic extremists, letting them out of Gitmo and empowering the regime in Iran. Excuse that deal away any way you want, Iran wouldn't be getting that money if Obama didn't enable them, and he had to lie to the public to get that done.

He's interested in trying to cultivate stability in certain Middle Eastern countries, and compromises on issues of gay rights and women. Obama's long game is clearly hoping that moderate leaders who bring relative peace and stability to certain Middle Eastern countries will end in slow and steady self-reform toward more moderate social and foreign policy agendas. It's not working yet, but it's idiotic to determine he doesn't care about gay rights and women because he's willing to negotiate with Hassan Rouhani's government.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on June 13, 2016, 04:48:40 PM
He's interested in trying to cultivate stability in certain Middle Eastern countries, and compromises on issues of gay rights and women. Obama's long game is clearly hoping that moderate leaders who bring relative peace and stability to certain Middle Eastern countries will end in slow and steady self-reform toward more moderate social and foreign policy agendas. It's not working yet, but it's idiotic to determine he doesn't care about gay rights and women because he's willing to negotiate with Hassan Rouhani's government.

Why did he turn is back on the real moderates who were getting shot in the streets in 2009 when they had a chance for real reform? Oppressive regimes were falling all around them, the people took a chance and rose up, Obama did nothing. He was more interested in doing business with the largest state sponsor of terrorism in the world than helping the people being oppressed by it. Including gays who are executed.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 13, 2016, 04:50:38 PM
Never said he was a bleeding heart liberal, that's for college students. He's a statist liberal whose interest in gay and women's rights extends as far as the ones who can vote for him or his party to keep him in power. Probably why he only "evolved" on gay marriage in the middle of his re-election bid in 2012.

If he truly was a citizen of the world and interested in the rights of gay people and women, he wouldn't be coddling Islamic extremists, letting them out of Gitmo and empowering the regime in Iran. Excuse that deal away any way you want, Iran wouldn't be getting that money if Obama didn't enable them, and he had to lie to the public to get that done.

I have issues with Obama, most of them stemming from that I think he's too much of an idealist, and like many liberals tend not to be good at engaging sociopathic dictactors/regimes without getting railroaded.

Seeing the way he got puppetted around for photo ops by the Cuban Government was a shining example of that. It was a pretty embarrassing moment of his presidency.

However with Iran, they already had fairly advanced nuclear capabilities with or without the deal.     





Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 13, 2016, 06:30:26 PM
I know black people live there which makes it less inclined for you to pay attention, but Boko Haram is a thing.

And the Phillipines  particularly ,and Malaysia to a lesser extent, have had their issues with terrorism.

Can't forget the MILF.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 09:09:55 PM
I certainly think they would attack us, just like they attack anyone who isn't like them. They attack each other. What purpose does any of it serve? These aren't rational people, many of them are under 25 and have no idea what the f*ck happened more than ten years ago. They know what they are taught, it doesn't have to be true.

Of course they attack each other.  They have ideological differences about the same religion, and each tries to assert itself as the one true interpretation and gain control over the Muslim world.  I just can't understand this idea that they would still attack us if we had remained uninvolved with the region, failed to arm and train them, and failed to establish a lasting presence in the region.  You say they're irrational and illogical, but within their system they're perfectly rational.  That system just has incredibly fucked up values.  I still can't see anything in it that would make them want to stop fighting with each other and turn on some outside force that has nothing to do with them.  They hate us for a lot of reasons that are not our fault, and ultimately the responsibility falls squarely on their shoulders.  That doesn't mean we didn't play some part in bringing them about.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 09:11:15 PM
This isn't a good argument. Most of recent terrorists have been Western educated people from upper middle class families (see 9/11 hijackers). Others have been the children of economic migrants. The Middle East and North Africa isn't as ravaged as you make it out to be. Where are all the African terrorists? How about Southeast Asia?

We haven't intervened heavily at all in SS Africa, hence why they just kill each other instead of coming here to kill us.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 10:52:08 PM
LOL the ACLU is trying to blame Christian extremists for creating a climate that led a radical Muslim to shoot up the club.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 13, 2016, 11:08:23 PM
Of course they attack each other.  They have ideological differences about the same religion, and each tries to assert itself as the one true interpretation and gain control over the Muslim world.

Yeah, but I can't think of any other religion in the world ever has had sects that disagree with each other and manifest that disagreement through the medium of homemade bombs and assault rifles, can you?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 13, 2016, 11:34:47 PM
Yeah, but I can't think of any other religion in the world ever has had sects that disagree with each other and manifest that disagreement through the medium of homemade bombs and assault rifles, can you?

I only intended that in response to his idea that attacking each other is a sign that they'll attack anyone.  They attack people with whom they have a quarrel.  They do so violently because they're an incredibly fucked up people.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 14, 2016, 07:03:07 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/14/orlando-gunman-made-multiple-visits-to-nightclub-attacked-reports-say.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 14, 2016, 07:20:00 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/14/orlando-gunman-made-multiple-visits-to-nightclub-attacked-reports-say.html
TIL there is a gay dating app called Jack'd.  Hilarious.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 14, 2016, 07:55:59 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/14/orlando-gunman-made-multiple-visits-to-nightclub-attacked-reports-say.html

So with the various reports about this guy's repressed and not so repressed sexuality, and the fact that neither he nor anyone else has tried to make any claims of his actions on behalf of ISIS, Al Qaeda, the Taliban or Mohammed himself, and the fact that the guy arrested in Santa Monica with a car full of guns and explosives ingredients was a white dude from Indiana called James Howell, can we perhaps drop the Islamic terrorist narrative and go to the other narrative ("lone wolf, mental illness, guns good, armed poofters are good poofters")?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on June 14, 2016, 07:57:58 AM
So with the various reports about this guy's repressed and not so repressed sexuality, and the fact that neither he nor anyone else has tried to make any claims of his actions on behalf of ISIS, Al Qaeda, the Taliban or Mohammed himself, and the fact that the guy arrested in Santa Monica with a car full of guns and explosives ingredients was a white dude from Indiana called James Howell, can we perhaps drop the Islamic terrorist narrative and go to the other narrative ("lone wolf, mental illness, guns good, armed poofters are good poofters")?

(http://i.imgur.com/yNlQWRM.jpg?fb)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 14, 2016, 08:11:42 AM

So with the various reports about this guy's repressed and not so repressed sexuality, and the fact that neither he nor anyone else has tried to make any claims of his actions on behalf of ISIS, Al Qaeda, the Taliban or Mohammed himself, and the fact that the guy arrested in Santa Monica with a car full of guns and explosives ingredients was a white dude from Indiana called James Howell, can we perhaps drop the Islamic terrorist narrative and go to the other narrative ("lone wolf, mental illness, guns good, armed poofters are good poofters")?

Why can't he be both a mentally disturbed person and influenced by radical Islam?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 14, 2016, 08:24:20 AM
Why can't he be both a mentally disturbed person and influenced by radical Islam?

That's the point, isn't it? Despite the prevalence of mass killings in the US there are only two narratives - evil terrorist acting on behalf of 1.6 billion people, or mentally ill lone wolf.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 14, 2016, 09:19:08 AM
Why can't he be both a mentally disturbed person and influenced by radical Islam?

You forgot hate crime and conflicted sexuality.  Dude seems to have all kinds of stuff going on.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 14, 2016, 09:39:30 AM
So the guy shot over 100 gay people killing 50 all because he was upset he wanted to suck rooster. Thank God women don't do that excrement.

I hope he is in hell sucking off the devils minions for eternity.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 14, 2016, 09:43:48 AM
So with the various reports about this guy's repressed and not so repressed sexuality, and the fact that neither he nor anyone else has tried to make any claims of his actions on behalf of ISIS, Al Qaeda, the Taliban or Mohammed himself, and the fact that the guy arrested in Santa Monica with a car full of guns and explosives ingredients was a white dude from Indiana called James Howell, can we perhaps drop the Islamic terrorist narrative and go to the other narrative ("lone wolf, mental illness, guns good, armed poofters are good poofters")?

What "narrative" are you talking about? You're saying that he wasn't influenced by Islamic Terrorism? Maybe I haven't been following this story as closely as you, but I'm not sure how you can possibly say that.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 14, 2016, 09:47:47 AM
That makes sense because Orlando is a very obscure spot to attack a gay club. Something about that struck me as off from the beginning.

I thought maybe it's because it's an easier target (less security, not really a city)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 14, 2016, 10:00:21 AM
What "narrative" are you talking about? You're saying that he wasn't influenced by Islamic Terrorism? Maybe I haven't been following this story as closely as you, but I'm not sure how you can possibly say that.

Again, not my point. I was simply saying that given the lack of evidence for Islamic terrorist motivations other than the fact that he was brown (good enough for the Republican nominee, apparently) it's probably time to activate the other stock explanation.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 14, 2016, 10:24:26 AM

Again, not my point. I was simply saying that given the lack of evidence for Islamic terrorist motivations other than the fact that he was brown (good enough for the Republican nominee, apparently) it's probably time to activate the other stock explanation.

Didn't the guy call 911 during the attack and pledge loyalty to ISIS? How much more proof do we need that radical Islam was at least part of his motivation?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 14, 2016, 10:31:02 AM
Didn't the guy call 911 during the attack and pledge loyalty to ISIS? How much more proof do we need that radical Islam was at least part of his motivation?

He drank a lot. He frequented gay clubs and used a gay hookup app. His ex-wives say that he displayed clear symptoms of mental illness. His family and friends say that he wasn't particularly religious.

Radical Islam was responsible for this like Donald Trump was responsible for Dylann Roof killing black people in a church in Charleston.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Pope on June 14, 2016, 11:04:22 AM
JE definitely has a Muslim boyfriend
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 14, 2016, 11:48:34 AM
JE definitely has a Muslim boyfriend


A woman for duty, a boy for pleasure, a melon for ecstasy.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ukilledkenny on June 14, 2016, 11:51:10 AM
Didn't the guy call 911 during the attack and pledge loyalty to ISIS? How much more proof do we need that radical Islam was at least part of his motivation?

When the stuff about him also being gay came out I assumed it was an insane man's attempt to get into heaven at the last second.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 14, 2016, 12:00:51 PM
He drank a lot. He frequented gay clubs and used a gay hookup app. His ex-wives say that he displayed clear symptoms of mental illness. His family and friends say that he wasn't particularly religious.

Radical Islam was responsible for this like Donald Trump was responsible for Dylann Roof killing black people in a church in Charleston.

Quote
His father, Seddique Mateen, posted a video in the Dari language of Afghanistan on his Facebook page early Monday.

In a message to the people of Afghanistan, he said: “I don’t know what made him (do this), I have no idea, I had no idea that he felt resentful in his heart and had gone to the gay (he used the derogatory term hamjensbazi) club and killed men and women there,” according to the Guardian.

He described his son as “a very good and well-educated son with a wife and a child.”

He said: “I am very sad and I’ve announced this to the American people as well. Why did he do this act during this holy month of Ramadan. On the topic of being hamjensbazi, punishment and the things that they do, God will give the punishment."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ukilledkenny on June 14, 2016, 02:58:15 PM
I just think Islam more than any other religion promotes self hatred for their members who are also gay. It's just so acceptable for their friends and family to dehumanize gays that it breeds this crazy desire to prove how not gay you are by hating them even harder than a straight Muslim would.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 14, 2016, 03:00:51 PM
I just think Islam more than any other religion promotes self hatred for their members who are also gay. It's just so acceptable for their friends and family to dehumanize gays that it breeds this crazy desire to prove how not gay you are by hating them even harder than a straight Muslim would.

Have you ever spent any time in any kind of rural community?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ukilledkenny on June 14, 2016, 03:19:23 PM
Have you ever spent any time in any kind of rural community?

Yeah, used to spend a few weeks a year in the upstate part of NY which is pretty much indistinguishable from the southern clichés. It's just not main stream to glorify violence against people who are seen as sinners in the same way as it is with Islam.

Maybe it's just a numbers thing and the percentage that glorify this type of action are actually the same. I don't know enough about it to say anything else.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 14, 2016, 03:24:01 PM
Yeah, used to spend a few weeks a year in the upstate part of NY which is pretty much indistinguishable from the southern clichés. It's just not main stream to glorify violence against people who are seen as sinners in the same way as it is with Islam.

Maybe it's just a numbers thing and the percentage that glorify this type of action are actually the same. I don't know enough about it to say anything else.

My in-laws are all in rural Ontario and while they're mostly perfectly nice people, some of their views about gay people are absolutely abhorrent and are gleefully reinforced by the Catholic churches they attend every Sunday. I can't imagine how difficult it would be to grow up gay there. I doubt that mainstream Islam is any worse than mainstream Catholicism for demonising homosexuality.

I think the glorification of violence against homosexuals is far more a radical/fundamentalist thing, regardless of the religion you're talking about.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 14, 2016, 03:49:06 PM
Have we established the guy was actually gay?  From what I read, he visited the club and sat in the corner and got angry and talked about his wife and kid.  Given that his wife said he was plotting an attack there, it makes sense if he was trying to learn the security there.  Either explanation works, but if he's gay and then made a call pledging loyalty to ISIS before going on a shooting spree, it sure seems like an attempt to cover up the real motive.  Go to his grave proving how not gay he is.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 14, 2016, 03:50:32 PM
Didn't the guy call 911 during the attack and pledge loyalty to ISIS? How much more proof do we need that radical Islam was at least part of his motivation?

It doesn't make a whole lot of sense, though.  Why call and do that unless he was trying to make a show of it?  I bought into that immediately, but as the stuff about him possibly being gay comes out, it seems more like an excuse he gave.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 14, 2016, 04:03:03 PM
Given that his wife said he was plotting an attack there, it makes sense if he was trying to learn the security there.

That doesn't explain his use of gay hookup apps to meet gay fellas though.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 14, 2016, 04:08:26 PM
I would be willing to bet the guy was so fucked up because he knew he was a Peter Puffer. So to prove he wasn't he decided to shoot up a gay club.

 He was so angry seeing two guys kiss because he loved it. Too bad, if he gave in to his nature and sucked rooster, 50 people would still be alive and many many times that wouldn't be fucked up for life. Oh well it sucks.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 14, 2016, 04:11:56 PM
I would be willing to bet the guy was so fucked up because he knew he was a Peter Puffer. So to prove he wasn't he decided to shoot up a gay club.

 He was so angry seeing two guys kiss because he loved it. Too bad if he gave in to his nature and sucked rooster 50 people would still be alive and many many times that wouldn't be fucked up for life.

Seriously. I can see a whole bunch of advantages to being gay, unfortunately I just don't fancy men.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 14, 2016, 04:14:52 PM
Seriously. I can see a whole bunch of advantages to being gay, unfortunately I just don't fancy men.

Same...... People are so quick to call this terrorism, it is, but not in the way they're trying to label it. This was gay on gay terrorism masked in an Isis flag.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 14, 2016, 04:29:24 PM
Same...... People are so quick to call this terrorism, it is, but not in the way they're trying to label it. This was gay on gay terrorism masked in an Isis flag.

The other place he scouted to shoot up was Disney World
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 14, 2016, 04:32:46 PM

The other place he scouted to shoot up was Disney World

JE: "Him wanting to be Mickey Mouse is more plausible than him being influenced by radical Islamic ideology."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 14, 2016, 04:41:15 PM
The other place he scouted to shoot up was Disney World

Pride week spills over, it's huge there. My buddy wanted to take his kids there that week because school let out, and was warned ahead of time, basically advised against it. So there's half truths there as far as he wanted to hit Disney as well.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 14, 2016, 05:14:29 PM
Doesn't Disney have separate Gay Days there though?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 14, 2016, 05:19:16 PM
That doesn't explain his use of gay hookup apps to meet gay fellas though.

True.  My point is just that there seem to be two explanations:

Radical Muslim who staked out his targets and legitimately sympathized with ISIS.

Self loathing gay man who snapped and used the ISIS call to cover up the real reason for the attack.

I can't wrap my head around him actually supporting ISIS while exploring his sexuality.  The drinking and such has me thinking the latter is the real one.  The wife beating and dad's history lend support to the latter.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 14, 2016, 08:06:09 PM
(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160615/d4809b7183dd16976ec618f4df990bc7.jpg)

This guy.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 14, 2016, 08:22:40 PM
LOL the ACLU is trying to blame Christian extremists for creating a climate that led a radical Muslim to shoot up the club.

(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160615/d4809b7183dd16976ec618f4df990bc7.jpg)

This guy.

So people will know who that is.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 15, 2016, 09:34:46 AM
Doesn't Disney have separate Gay Days there though?

I honestly do not know. I figured those days were not official, just a tacit approval.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 15, 2016, 10:26:07 AM
I honestly do not know. I figured those days were not official, just a tacit approval.

I very much doubt Gay Days are official, but employees are prepared for them.  We have ended up there inadvertently and the best is when families have made those ugly matching shirts for their vacation and they're the same color as whatever all the gay people wear that year.  The look on their faces when they realize they look like they're there for Gay Days.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 15, 2016, 10:47:43 AM
I very much doubt Gay Days are official, but employees are prepared for them.  We have ended up there inadvertently and the best is when families have made those ugly matching shirts for their vacation and they're the same color as whatever all the gay people wear that year.  The look on their faces when they realize they look like they're there for Gay Days.

Haha a Kodak moment.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on June 15, 2016, 11:25:01 AM
the shooter's wife is now being investigated by the FBI for possibly being involved.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on June 15, 2016, 11:39:41 AM
She's going to be in big trouble.  She clearly knew it was coming and knew intimate details about his plot.  Not reporting him to the authorities makes her an accomplice.  She's looking at 20+ years.  There wouldn't even be any question if she was male.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 15, 2016, 11:40:46 AM
And now their kid will be raised by an angry Afghan national who loves the Taliban.  Can't see that kid having any problems.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on June 15, 2016, 11:46:17 AM
And now their kid will be raised by an angry Afghan national who loves the Taliban.  Can't see that kid having any problems.


this kid is going to grow up to be a Bond villain.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 15, 2016, 01:25:48 PM
the shooter's wife is now being investigated by the FBI for possibly being involved.

I think it's because she knew about it ahead of time and didn't tell anyone.  Apparently she tried to talk him out of it unsuccessfully, but never came forward to tell anyone what he was doing.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on June 15, 2016, 02:08:16 PM
I think it's because she knew about it ahead of time and didn't tell anyone.  Apparently she tried to talk him out of it unsuccessfully, but never came forward to tell anyone what he was doing.

she'll have time to ponder her decision to withhold information while she's sharing a bunk with Jodi Arias.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 16, 2016, 12:05:21 AM
And now their kid will be raised by an angry Afghan national who loves the Taliban.  Can't see that kid having any problems.

The New York Times had this dipshit on a facebook live stream video earlier in the day, basically an AMA format like he's a freaking actor. It was offensively tone deaf and tasteless. It's a sad microcosm of the twitter era "being first" journalism, if you can even call it journalism.


Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 16, 2016, 02:08:35 AM
How about this Sacramento preacher who says that we shouldn't mourn them because God wanted them dead, and his biggest problem is that this guy took it upon himself to kill them when it should be the government's job to kill gays.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 16, 2016, 03:14:21 AM
Their mayor is a sexual predator and the airport has the ugliest people i've ever seen in this country. What an awful place.



Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 16, 2016, 08:47:22 AM
Their mayor is a sexual predator and the airport has the ugliest people i've ever seen in this country. What an awful place.

They have an awesome ice cream place called Gunther's.  That's about the best thing I can say for Sacramento.  The park around the Capitol is nice too.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 16, 2016, 08:52:19 AM
Someone should kill the preacher, he's an ignorant fuckwad let him pollute this world with his ignorance.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 16, 2016, 05:29:03 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/16/us/orlando-shooter-omar-mateen/index.html

The more that comes out, the more evident it is that the guy had serious insecurity issues with his sexuality, and that it conflicted with his upbringing. I'm leaning towards this, and his claims of ISIS support, were just a ruse to kill the demons in his head and prove to the world that he isn't gay.

What an poopchute.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 16, 2016, 05:36:47 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/16/us/orlando-shooter-omar-mateen/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/16/us/orlando-shooter-omar-mateen/index.html)

The more that comes out, the more evident it is that the guy had serious insecurity issues with his sexuality, and that it conflicted with his upbringing. I'm leaning towards this, and his claims of ISIS support, were just a ruse to kill the demons in his head and prove to the world that he isn't gay.

What an poopchute.

Yeah I was going to post a similar article. I think it was obvious after a day or two this guys insecurity over sucking rooster caused him to actually kill people that had no such insecurities. It really is a shame, if he simply faced what he was he would have been one of those dancing during latin night, enjoying himself.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 16, 2016, 05:59:29 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/16/us/orlando-shooter-omar-mateen/index.html

The more that comes out, the more evident it is that the guy had serious insecurity issues with his sexuality, and that it conflicted with his upbringing. I'm leaning towards this, and his claims of ISIS support, were just a ruse to kill the demons in his head and prove to the world that he isn't gay.

What an poopchute.

That's basically what I thought when the latent homosexuality stuff came out.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 18, 2016, 08:44:52 PM
And now this

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/06/18/482621690/investigators-say-orlando-shooter-showed-few-warning-signs-of-radicalization
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 18, 2016, 09:40:32 PM
direct Radicalization no....

but the stuff coming out about his father makes sense that he would be conflicted about his beliefs. Especially excrement like ;

"God will punish those involved in homosexuality," . " not an issue that humans should deal with."

the balls on that freaking dude to have his son be the killer and then throw that in there as an immediate public response.


Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 18, 2016, 09:56:19 PM
They can say he was radicalized all they want that guy was dying to suck rooster. He literally died because he couldn't face the fact, he was a bundle of sticks.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 18, 2016, 10:02:46 PM
They can say he was radicalized all they want that guy was dying to suck rooster. He literally died because he couldn't face the fact, he was a bundle of sticks.

That's already been agreed upon.

I'm trying to get to the next point in the conversation is, why would he feel THAT uncomfortable with being gay?   




This is a pretty interesting, comprehensive profile I read today.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/troubled-quiet-macho-angry-the-volatile-life-of-omar-mateen/2016/06/17/15229250-34a6-11e6-8758-d58e76e11b12_story.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 18, 2016, 10:11:41 PM

That's already been agreed upon.

I'm trying to get to the next point in the conversation is, why would he feel THAT uncomfortable with being gay?   




This is a pretty interesting, comprehensive profile I read today.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/troubled-quiet-macho-angry-the-volatile-life-of-omar-mateen/2016/06/17/15229250-34a6-11e6-8758-d58e76e11b12_story.html

Well Islam is pretty no-tolerance when it comes to homosexuality, considering it's  illegal and punishable by death in pretty much most predominately Muslim countries. And that's not radical Islam. It's just, well, Islam.

No one wants to talk about his religion or upbringing because he isn't exactly radicalized, but I'm sure if he was part of some Christian church people would be all over his religion.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 18, 2016, 10:14:57 PM
Well Islam is pretty no-tolerance when it comes to homosexuality, considering it's  illegal and punishable by death in pretty much most predominately Muslim countries. And that's not radical Islam. It's just, well, Islam.

No one wants to talk about his religion or upbringing because he isn't exactly radicalized, but I'm sure if he was part of some Christian church people would be all over his religion.

Dude.  Everyone is all over his religion.  What do you mean no one wants to talk about it?

One of America's biggest pastors lost his son to suicide and there were rumors from friends and members of the church that he offed himself because of his dad's stance on homosexuality.  Nobody dragged it into it in public or in the press, so there goes that.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 18, 2016, 10:18:08 PM

Dude.  Everyone is all over his religion.  What do you mean no one wants to talk about it?

One of America's biggest pastors lost his son to suicide and there were rumors from friends and members of the church that he offed himself because of his dad's stance on homosexuality.  Nobody dragged it into it in public or in the press, so there goes that.

If he shot up a a bunch of people then it totally would have been.

The largest attack on homosexuals in this country has just been committed by a Muslim and not the big bad Christian Religious fanatics we've been warned about in this country.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 18, 2016, 10:21:13 PM
Well Islam is pretty no-tolerance when it comes to homosexuality, considering it's  illegal and punishable by death in pretty much most predominately Muslim countries. And that's not radical Islam. It's just, well, Islam.

No one wants to talk about his religion or upbringing because he isn't exactly radicalized, but I'm sure if he was part of some Christian church people would be all over his religion.

That's what I'm getting at.

I don't agree with the last sentence though.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 18, 2016, 10:22:52 PM
And while it's not even most Muslim countries but actually fewer than half that punish homosexuality by death, the fact that so many countries, Muslim and as many non-Muslim, give punishment for homosexuality is so unconscionable.  There are a ton of people who would love to have that power here, though.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 18, 2016, 10:26:04 PM
If he shot up a a bunch of people then it totally would have been.

The largest attack on homosexuals in this country has just been committed by a Muslim and not the big bad Christian Religious fanatics we've been warned about in this country.

And that asshat from the ACLU was excrement on for trying to put some blame on conservative Christians.  What's your point?  If a Christian shot up a gay club because he felt unable to come to grips with the conflict between his attraction and his faith, of course it would be mentioned.  Just like this guy's religion has been mentioned.  It doesn't matter that he was apparently a shitty Muslim.  It very clearly influenced his ability to deal with who he was.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 18, 2016, 10:29:47 PM

And that asshat from the ACLU was excrement on for trying to put some blame on conservative Christians.  What's your point?  If a Christian shot up a gay club because he felt unable to come to grips with the conflict between his attraction and his faith, of course it would be mentioned.  Just like this guy's religion has been mentioned.  It doesn't matter that he was apparently a shitty Muslim.  It very clearly influenced his ability to deal with who he was.

My point is that you're a bundle of sticks.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 18, 2016, 10:29:56 PM
I saw a few different new sources run with a quote from his former manager at GNC:

"He bulked up his arms from 20 inches to 40 inches".


Okay...so he had Hulk Hogan arms as a 19 year old and then became literally the Incredible Hulk?
That's exactly why you don't buy anything from GNC. 



Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 18, 2016, 10:33:08 PM
As for those laws, they exist in less developed countries of many religious persuasions.  Look at SS Africa.  Islam is a religion which is resistant to change, so while you have a lot of Muslims in developed countries who work their religion into their modern lives and views, there are a ton of Muslims who live in pre-modern worlds, and their opinions are reflected by people in other poor and backwards regions.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 18, 2016, 10:33:36 PM
My point is that you're a bundle of sticks.

I win.  Thanks.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 18, 2016, 10:34:46 PM

I win.  Thanks.

I'm at the pub. Go ahead. In the mrimjgn I'll try and fix this or something.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 19, 2016, 06:40:38 AM
They can say he was radicalized all they want that guy was dying to suck rooster. He literally died because he couldn't face the fact, he was a bundle of sticks.
So he was too gay to admit he was gay.  Gay vortex created.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 19, 2016, 07:57:53 AM
Mass shooting of loads is what he really wanted
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 20, 2016, 12:24:11 PM
And now this

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/06/18/482621690/investigators-say-orlando-shooter-showed-few-warning-signs-of-radicalization

Looks like you were right

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/20/fbi-to-release-partial-transcript-between-orlando-nightclub-gunman-and-police.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 20, 2016, 02:26:19 PM
They scrubbed any references to radical Islam out of an official police transcript?  That's freaking stupid.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 20, 2016, 02:34:45 PM
Lol this administration is run like it's a third grade operation.

 Now children it's bad to stereotype, the SS wasn't run by ruthless ideological murderers they were just misunderstood, if we gave them more love and affection they would have gotten along with the Jews, Gypsies, Communists, people that like the same sex and all the other groups of people they didn't treat well.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 20, 2016, 03:01:42 PM
The admin is really going all-in now. This is ridiculous, and they're blatantly treating the public like morons.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 20, 2016, 03:10:37 PM
They scrubbed any references to radical Islam out of an official police transcript?  That's freaking stupid.

They already reversed their decision lol

Quote
The FBI and DOJ reversed the morning decision and released the full transcript in an afternoon news release.

"Unfortunately, the unreleased portions of the transcript that named the terrorist organizations and leaders have caused an unnecessary distraction from the hard work that the FBI and our law enforcement partners have been doing to investigate this heinous crime," the organizations said in a statement.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 20, 2016, 03:32:03 PM
"Unnecessary distraction"? It's written in the fuckn transcript!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 20, 2016, 04:22:19 PM
I get that they determined that the ISIS stuff was likely bullshit, but doing that makes it reek of a cover up.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 20, 2016, 04:32:07 PM

I get that they determined that the ISIS stuff was likely bullshit, but doing that makes it reek of a cover up.

Why didn't they just come out and say that they believe the ISIS stuff was a cover blah blah, and that they don't want this used as ISIS propaganda?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 20, 2016, 04:50:11 PM
Why didn't they just come out and say that they believe the ISIS stuff was a cover blah blah, and that they don't want this used as ISIS propaganda?

Because they're idiots?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 20, 2016, 04:58:51 PM
The admin is really going all-in now. This is ridiculous, and they're blatantly treating the public like morons.

To be fair, the public are overwhelmingly morons.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 20, 2016, 05:01:28 PM

To be fair, the public are overwhelmingly morons.

I get that, but doing something without an explanation is insulting the intelligence of those who aren't morons.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 20, 2016, 06:52:19 PM
I get that, but doing something without an explanation is insulting the intelligence of those who aren't morons.

yep

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: guinness77 on June 20, 2016, 07:02:48 PM
I get that, but doing something without an explanation is insulting the intelligence of those who aren't morons.
They don't care anymore. Some stupid, non-sequitur celebrity story will replace it soon enough.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 20, 2016, 07:23:57 PM
I get that, but doing something without an explanation is insulting the intelligence of those who aren't morons.

Look at the way that party is treating its own party members.  Democratic voters are so stupid that the party can anoint a nominee before anyone has declared, rig the entire election process to ensure she gets nominated, constantly get exposed for it, and STILL get voters to wring their hands about how terrifying the thought of people not falling in line is because of some outcome that's not seriously in doubt.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on June 20, 2016, 10:55:35 PM
Look at the way that party is treating its own party members.  Democratic voters are so stupid that the party can anoint a nominee before anyone has declared, rig the entire election process to ensure she gets nominated, constantly get exposed for it, and STILL get voters to wring their hands about how terrifying the thought of people not falling in line is because of some outcome that's not seriously in doubt.

Not sure if stupid is the word.

spineless, cowardice (which I'm perfectly aware you've used many times to describe voters) definitely fit.

That's the problem with *certain* people that are too liberal specifically in the US. Anxious and afraid of confrontation, mistaking it for some type of virtue


 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 21, 2016, 12:34:23 AM
Not sure if stupid is the word.

spineless, cowardice (which I'm perfectly aware you've used many times to describe voters) definitely fit.

That's the problem with *certain* people that are too liberal specifically in the US. Anxious and afraid of confrontation, mistaking it for some type of virtue


 


Those are the words.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 21, 2016, 01:50:13 PM
Orlando Police Dispatcher: Emergency 911, this is being recorded.

Omar Mateen: In the name of God the Merciful, the beneficent [said in Arabic]

OD: What?

OM: Praise be to God, and prayers as well as peace be upon the prophet of God [said in Arabic]. I wanna let you know, I’m in Orlando and I did the shootings.

OD: What’s your name?

OM: My name is I pledge of allegiance to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi of the Islamic State.

OD: Ok, What’s your name?

OM: I pledge allegiance to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi may God protect him [said in Arabic], on behalf of the Islamic State.

OD: Alright, where are you at?

OM: In Orlando.

OD: Where in Orlando?

[End of call.]

2:48 a.m.: First crisis negotiation call occurred lasting approximately nine minutes.

3:03 a.m.: Second crisis negotiation call occurred lasting approximately 16 minutes.

3:24 a.m.: Third crisis negotiation call occurred lasting approximately three minutes.

In these calls, the shooter, who identified himself as an Islamic soldier, told the crisis negotiator that he was the person who pledged his allegiance to [omitted], and told the negotiator to tell America to stop bombing Syria and Iraq and that is why he was “out here right now.” When the crisis negotiator asked the shooter what he had done, the shooter stated, “No, you already know what I did.” The shooter continued, stating, “There is some vehicle outside that has some bombs, just to let you know. You people are gonna get it, and I’m gonna ignite it if they try to do anything stupid.” Later in the call with the crisis negotiator, the shooter stated that he had a vest, and further described it as the kind they “used in France.” The shooter later stated, “In the next few days, you’re going to see more of this type of action going on.” The shooter hung up and multiple attempts to get in touch with him were unsuccessful.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 22, 2016, 09:12:12 AM
Oh man, that's even more pathetic than I thought.

"I have a vest!"

"What kind of vest?"

"You know, the kind they used in France!"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 22, 2016, 12:56:29 PM
http://abc7news.com/news/man-claims-orlando-shooter-was-his-gay-lover/1396650/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 22, 2016, 03:28:20 PM
^ Can't be true he proclaimed his allegiance to ISIS.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 22, 2016, 05:09:17 PM
Why can't he be all three?

An insane repressed-gay Islamic extremist.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 22, 2016, 06:54:47 PM

Why can't he be all three?

An insane repressed-gay Islamic extremist.

Joking aside the guy grew up in a pretty traditional Islamic family where homosexuality is absolutely off-limits. Countries that abide by Sharia law punish homosexuals with death. It's not absurd to think that his upbringing had something to do with his response. Maybe he thought this was a way to make his peace with God. "Hey I know I did gay excrement, but I pledged allegiance to ISIS and slaughtered a bunch of them for you."

But religion absolutely didn't play a role. People are really going out of their way to not blame extremism. Why?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 22, 2016, 07:44:04 PM
What does it matter? This didn't fall under the guise of a true terrorist act. It was perpetuated by a self hating guy not in the name Isis, that part was bullshit. People go out of their minds to label this crap or in the Obama administration's case, not label it because they're  a bunch of pussies.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 22, 2016, 09:15:37 PM

What does it matter? This didn't fall under the guise of a true terrorist act. It was perpetuated by a self hating guy not in the name Isis, that part was bullshit. People go out of their minds to label this crap or in the Obama administration's case, not label it because they're  a bunch of pussies.

Just because he didn't do it for Isis doesn't mean he wasn't influenced by radical Islam.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 22, 2016, 09:26:33 PM
Just because he didn't do it for Isis doesn't mean he wasn't influenced by radical Islam.

Meh how many thousands of people over the years either offed themselves or others or were killed by non Muslims because they couldn't face their sexuality?  Let's face it the stigma is still real, not as bad as it was but still.

The Muslim excrement didn't help for sure but radical beliefs had nothing to do with this, he wasn't radicalized it was a convenient label. This wasn't Mumbai, not even close, ideologically speaking.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 22, 2016, 10:05:44 PM

Meh how many thousands of people over the years either offed themselves or others or were killed by non Muslims because they couldn't face their sexuality?  Let's face it the stigma is still real, not as bad as it was but still.

The Muslim excrement didn't help for sure but radical beliefs had nothing to do with this, he wasn't radicalized it was a convenient label. This wasn't Mumbai, not even close, ideologically speaking.

Again, we've seen closeted gay people commit suicide etc. Nothing like this. It's fair to assume that his beliefs, and the huge conflict his sexuality crisis posers, played some kind of role in this. Not saying that radicals told him to do this, but he could very well have been sympathetic to the ISIS cause and it may have influenced his decision to go out while taking other with him in a blaze of glory for Allah, perhaps to atone for his sin, rather than just offing himself.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on June 22, 2016, 10:17:37 PM
Again, we've seen closeted gay people commit suicide etc. Nothing like this. It's fair to assume that his beliefs, and the huge conflict his sexuality crisis posers, played some kind of role in this. Not saying that radicals told him to do this, but he could very well have been sympathetic to the ISIS cause and it may have influenced his decision to go out while taking other with him in a blaze of glory for Allah, perhaps to atone for his sin, rather than just offing himself.

I guess we just have agree to disagree as far as the radical Islam component of this crime. I am positive the religous pressure and the stigma associated with being gay made the dude snap in a nuclear way. Then add a dose or two of crazy, gun enthusiast and here we are.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 23, 2016, 09:55:14 AM
Joking aside the guy grew up in a pretty traditional Islamic family where homosexuality is absolutely off-limits. Countries that abide by Sharia law punish homosexuals with death. It's not absurd to think that his upbringing had something to do with his response. Maybe he thought this was a way to make his peace with God. "Hey I know I did gay excrement, but I pledged allegiance to ISIS and slaughtered a bunch of them for you."

But religion absolutely didn't play a role. People are really going out of their way to not blame extremism. Why?

I think there's a difference between your last two sentences.  He obviously wasn't a Muslim extremist.  The guy had gay sex, drank, and generally just excrement all over Islam.  However, if he hadn't grown up in a household like the one he did with that religion in the back of his mind, he's not going to have the same response.  I don't see how anyone could suggest that religion didn't play a role.  It informed his self loathing.  That doesn't mean he was an extremist, but he was raised Muslim and raised to view homosexuality as completely unacceptable.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on June 23, 2016, 10:25:11 AM
I think there's a difference between your last two sentences.  He obviously wasn't a Muslim extremist.  The guy had gay sex, drank, and generally just excrement all over Islam.  However, if he hadn't grown up in a household like the one he did with that religion in the back of his mind, he's not going to have the same response.  I don't see how anyone could suggest that religion didn't play a role.  It informed his self loathing.  That doesn't mean he was an extremist, but he was raised Muslim and raised to view homosexuality as completely unacceptable.

My point is that what if recently he started becoming more sympathetic to ISIS and their cause. That's been known to happen to a lot of young Muslims who weren't necessarily religious. That could've been the trigger that caused him to do what he did. It's just a theory on my part, as we don't have enough evidence to suggest otherwise. I get that people want to assume he used his supposed extremist leanings as a convenient excuse to cover up the fact that he was closeted, but I'm sure he even knew that it would eventually come out. My personal theory is that he was troubled, and started becoming more radicalized to find the answer, and then decided to perform an act that would reconcile his relationship with the religion and with Allah.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on June 23, 2016, 11:07:01 AM
My point is that what if recently he started becoming more sympathetic to ISIS and their cause. That's been known to happen to a lot of young Muslims who weren't necessarily religious. That could've been the trigger that caused him to do what he did. It's just a theory on my part, as we don't have enough evidence to suggest otherwise. I get that people want to assume he used his supposed extremist leanings as a convenient excuse to cover up the fact that he was closeted, but I'm sure he even knew that it would eventually come out. My personal theory is that he was troubled, and started becoming more radicalized to find the answer, and then decided to perform an act that would reconcile his relationship with the religion and with Allah.

What you want to be true and what is likely are two very different things.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on July 08, 2016, 12:53:54 AM
Joy, there's another one, this time it's in Dallas.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 08, 2016, 05:25:24 AM
Joy, there's another one, this time it's in Dallas.

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/07/07/485185632/3-police-officers-killed-at-least-7-others-wounded-by-2-snipers-in-dallas
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on July 08, 2016, 03:32:19 PM
 Breaking News Feed ‏@pzf 23m23 minutes ago

BREAKING NEWS: Reports of an active shooter at Miami children's hospital. Emergency crews rushing.




FFS...enough already.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on July 08, 2016, 03:34:11 PM
Holy freak
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on July 08, 2016, 03:38:25 PM
Breaking News Feed ‏@pzf 12m12 minutes ago

UPDATE: Police say NO shots have been fired at Nicklaus Children's hospital. They're investigating a threat to the hospital.


Hopefully they got that under control....shooting up a childrens' hospital, there are no words.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 08, 2016, 05:02:57 PM
Stop following breaking news aggregators.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on July 08, 2016, 05:29:51 PM
Breaking News Feed ‏@pzf 12m12 minutes ago

UPDATE: Police say NO shots have been fired at Nicklaus Children's hospital. They're investigating a threat to the hospital.


Hopefully they got that under control....shooting up a childrens' hospital, there are no words.
Stop following breaking news aggregators.

Yeah follow Sean King you freaking freak lover of the older lady player of the pink oboe hoo-ha derriere bundle of sticks
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on July 08, 2016, 05:30:56 PM
Stop following breaking news aggregators.
BREAKING: frrrrrt

There's nothing I love more than the taste of cum.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on July 08, 2016, 05:57:25 PM
There's no active shooter and no bomb was found in Miami Children's hospital.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on July 08, 2016, 06:03:43 PM
Stop following breaking news aggregators.

lol @ him making fun of me for using census numbers as sources and then posting this

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on July 08, 2016, 07:28:13 PM
lol @ him making fun of me for using census numbers as sources and then posting this
I was making fun of you for using comedians as sources.

Your reading comprehension is funny too.

There's nothing I love more than the taste of cum.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on July 09, 2016, 12:36:38 AM
I was making fun of you for using comedians as sources.

Your reading comprehension is funny too.

There's nothing I love more than the taste of cum.



"Jwiki" or whatever gay name you came up with.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 09, 2016, 10:13:16 PM
http://www.thoughtsandprayersthegame.com/

Click this
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on July 09, 2016, 11:10:44 PM

http://www.thoughtsandprayersthegame.com/

Click this

I don't get it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on July 10, 2016, 12:02:23 PM
http://www.thoughtsandprayersthegame.com/

Click this
My thought and prayer rockets are much more modern.  I feel like mine could save twice as many lives as the zero saved here.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 25, 2016, 08:00:01 AM
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fort-myers-nightclub-shooting-1-dead-14-others-reportedly-wounded-n61596
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on July 25, 2016, 10:54:29 AM
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fort-myers-nightclub-shooting-1-dead-14-others-reportedly-wounded-n61596


Body Doubles, CGI Can Bring Actors Back to Life
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on September 29, 2016, 10:54:54 PM
http://abcnews4.com/news/nation-world/authorities-south-carolina-school-shooter-killed-father-before-rampage
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on November 28, 2016, 10:33:32 AM
possible shooter on Ohio State campus.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on November 28, 2016, 10:43:23 AM
I hate seeing this thread come up
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on November 28, 2016, 10:49:07 AM
he dead
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on November 28, 2016, 11:20:44 AM
I hate seeing this thread come up

Yeah, at least when you see the Obituary one you can hope it was at least somebody old and due to natural causes.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on November 28, 2016, 11:42:46 AM
technically a mass "knifing"

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 06, 2017, 12:39:20 PM
Nine people wounded in a shooting at Fort Lauderdale Airport, shooter in custody but no details yet so we get to play the "white lone wolf with mental illness or evil scheming soldier of ISIS" guessing game for a little while.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on January 06, 2017, 12:40:36 PM
Nine people wounded in a shooting at Fort Lauderdale Airport, shooter in custody but no details yet so we get to play the "white lone wolf with mental illness or evil scheming soldier of ISIS" guessing game for a little while.
Plot twist.  Eskimo transvestite.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 06, 2017, 12:42:06 PM
Plot twist.  Eskimo transvestite.

That's Inuit, you racist cisgender bastard.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on January 06, 2017, 12:43:43 PM


bastard.

It's father-challenged.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 06, 2017, 12:48:11 PM
Broward County sheriff confirms multiple people dead.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on January 06, 2017, 12:54:00 PM
There goes that airport, freak. It's one of my favorite airports. They're saying three people. Rip
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on January 06, 2017, 01:12:13 PM
Nine people wounded in a shooting at Fort Lauderdale Airport, shooter in custody but no details yet so we get to play the "white lone wolf with mental illness or evil scheming soldier of ISIS" guessing game for a little while.

Why do people care? Either way the person is a disgraceful excuse for a human being. There's plenty of both so the continual desire to play the blame game is a pointless exercise.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 06, 2017, 01:13:42 PM
Why do people care? Either way the person is a disgraceful excuse for a human being. There's plenty of both so the continual desire to play the blame game is a pointless exercise.

I agree entirely, I'm just pre-empting the blame/excuse game that will inevitably ensue.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on January 06, 2017, 01:21:14 PM
I agree entirely, I'm just pre-empting the blame/excuse game that will inevitably ensue.

Yup, not directed at you at all
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 06, 2017, 01:38:00 PM
Sounds like it might still be going on. CNN showing more people being evacuated from different parts of the building. Not sure if it's more excrement going down or just security sweeps.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 06, 2017, 01:46:00 PM
Shooter in custody named as Esteban Santiago. Believed to be military, unknown if current or former.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 06, 2017, 01:51:13 PM
Trying to reach my boss who's based out of Ft Lauderdale and said she was traveling today. No word yet.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on January 06, 2017, 02:06:03 PM
As of around 2:30 p.m. local time, the TSA said there was another active shooter at the airport and that all terminals were closed.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/01/06/at-least-5-dead-8-hospitalized-after-shooting-at-ft-lauderdale-airport.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 06, 2017, 02:15:44 PM
As of around 2:30 p.m. local time, the TSA said there was another active shooter at the airport and that all terminals were closed.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/01/06/at-least-5-dead-8-hospitalized-after-shooting-at-ft-lauderdale-airport.html

Broward County is calling it "unconfirmed reports of additional shots fired".
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 06, 2017, 02:35:55 PM
Broward Sheriff live now, saying that there is no second attack and that the only shots they believe have been fired were by the original shooter.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on January 06, 2017, 02:36:52 PM
Broward Sheriff live now, saying that there is no second attack and that the only shots they believe have been fired were by the original shooter.

Thus ends my breaking news career.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 06, 2017, 02:38:00 PM
Thus ends my breaking news career.

In your defence, TSA did send out that tweet. Ignore Reddit though, it's full of people listening to scanners and saying that it's a full scale military conflict.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 06, 2017, 02:42:58 PM
So it was a Canadian flight. Guy checked his gun when he got on the plane, gave it back to him, went to the bathroom, loaded, and went to baggage claim and started firing head shots.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 06, 2017, 02:57:30 PM
Army Reserve, from NJ, been living in Alaska. Apparently surrendered himself to police when he ran out of ammo.

I reckon the storyline we get is mental illness (possibly PTSD), Obama failed the vets, wouldn't have happened if people were allowed to carry in the airport. It's depressingly predictable.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on January 06, 2017, 03:16:21 PM
I picked a wonderful weekend to travel. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 06, 2017, 03:19:28 PM
I picked a wonderful weekend to travel. 

Forgot about that. Suggest you don't pack a firearm, if you were planning to. Legal or not, I imagine there's going to be a whole world of extra scrutiny on people with guns in checked luggage.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on January 06, 2017, 03:20:42 PM
Forgot about that. Suggest you don't pack a firearm, if you were planning to. Legal or not, I imagine there's going to be a whole world of extra scrutiny on people with guns in checked luggage.

I don't own a gun and I never plan on it.

On Sunday, I'm flying from Charleston, SC to Charlotte, NC to Dallas, TX to Lafayette, LA.  I'll have about 24 hours to find a place to live.  Then we're moving next Friday.

I am going to die of exhaustion.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 06, 2017, 03:21:20 PM
I don't own a gun and I never plan on it.

You are a smart man.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 06, 2017, 03:32:13 PM

Army Reserve, from NJ, been living in Alaska. Apparently surrendered himself to police when he ran out of ammo.

I reckon the storyline we get is mental illness (possibly PTSD), Obama failed the vets, wouldn't have happened if people were allowed to carry in the airport. It's depressingly predictable.

I wonder why he waited to do it in Fort Lauderdale if his goal was to just kill people. Why not walk into the check in line at Anchorage and shoot people there? Why not a mall? Guy really went out of his way to do something that most crazies just choose an easier route.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 06, 2017, 03:33:27 PM
Okay just heard that he got into a fight with some people on the flight, so that may have set him off. That theory makes more sense.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: d sw0rdz on January 06, 2017, 04:04:27 PM
the plastic surgery fellow i am working with right now just used that airport last friday. said the first thing he is going to do when he gets home tonight is count his blessings by getting wasted
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on January 06, 2017, 04:05:51 PM
the plastic surgery fellow i am working with right now just used that airport last friday.

don't forget to post a pic of your new funbags when the heal
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: d sw0rdz on January 06, 2017, 04:23:46 PM
don't forget to post a pic of your new funbags when the heal

im getting my funbags done after i recover from my a$s shots
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 06, 2017, 04:24:10 PM
The stupid governor of Florida says "let's not bring politics into this", but says he called Trump and Pence and not Obama. Why wouldn't you call the current president? What can Trump and Pence do now?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on January 06, 2017, 04:53:13 PM
The stupid governor of Florida says "let's not bring politics into this", but says he called Trump and Pence and not Obama. Why wouldn't you call the current president? What can Trump and Pence do now?

Scott is a gigantic poopchute.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Coach K on January 07, 2017, 09:34:52 AM
The stupid governor of Florida says "let's not bring politics into this", but says he called Trump and Pence and not Obama. Why wouldn't you call the current president? What can Trump and Pence do now?

Rick Scott looks like Voldemort or a python

He's an absolute POS. Worst governor here in a while
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on January 07, 2017, 09:37:21 AM
The stupid governor of Florida says "let's not bring politics into this", but says he called Trump and Pence and not Obama. Why wouldn't you call the current president? What can Trump and Pence do now?

What's Obama going to do? Hes got less than 2 weeks left in office, so he's not getting excrement done
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on January 07, 2017, 09:50:37 AM
Whoever thought it was OK to let people check guns on a plane has litterally never seen a movie, ever.

Keep your guns at home.  Yosemite Sam had open carry.  How did that go?

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on January 07, 2017, 10:09:30 AM
Whoever thought it was OK to let people check guns on a plane has litterally never seen a movie, ever.

Keep your guns at home.  Yosemite Sam had open carry.  How did that go?

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
(http://www.dowitcherdesigns.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/hk-litter.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 10, 2017, 04:38:13 PM
Dylann Roof sentenced to death for the Charleston church shooting.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on January 10, 2017, 04:40:56 PM
Dylann Roof sentenced to death for the Charleston church shooting.


Awesome he should be dead in twenty five years.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 10, 2017, 04:45:13 PM


Awesome he should be dead in twenty five years.

I don't get why it takes so long when people openly admit to doing it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on January 10, 2017, 05:43:54 PM
I don't get why it takes so long when people openly admit to doing it.

Due process.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on January 10, 2017, 09:58:53 PM
Due process.

Yeah but still.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 29, 2017, 08:43:43 PM
Oh goody, it's leaking.

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/breaking-five-reported-to-be-killed-in-shooting-at-quebec-city-mosque
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 29, 2017, 08:50:12 PM
Oh goody, it's leaking.

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/breaking-five-reported-to-be-killed-in-shooting-at-quebec-city-mosque

Yeah, totally Trump's fault.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 29, 2017, 08:50:55 PM
Yeah, totally Trump's fault.

I didn't say anything about Trump.....
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 29, 2017, 08:51:24 PM
I didn't say anything about Trump.....

It was implied.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 29, 2017, 08:53:05 PM
It was implied.

Actually not even remotely, but you chose to read it that way. You're getting very defensive of your pet lunatic.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 29, 2017, 08:54:39 PM
Actually not even remotely, but you chose to read it that way. You're getting very defensive of your pet lunatic.

Thought you were gonna go play video games?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 29, 2017, 08:57:54 PM
Thought you were gonna go play video games?

Sadly I find myself watching the news of more hateful pieces of excrement committing acts of terrorism.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 29, 2017, 08:59:47 PM
Sadly I find myself watching the news of more hateful pieces of excrement committing acts of terrorism.

Been watching Miss Universe. Miss Canada is fat.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Pope on January 29, 2017, 09:47:47 PM
Thought you were gonna go play video games?
He's texting guys to freak his wife while he watches
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on January 29, 2017, 09:47:50 PM
Been watching Miss Universe. Miss Canada is fat.
"Miss Canada has let herself go.  She should have more CLASS than that.  Sad.  Miss America.  Great funbags.  Tremendous. #MAGA"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 30, 2017, 07:08:12 PM
Turns out it was white male French-Canadian who was an outspoken supporter of Trump and Marine Le Pen. Try and contain your surprise.

White right wing radicalisation is at least as big a problem as Islamic fundamentalist radicalisation and it's time to stop picking sides.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 07:59:51 PM
Turns out it was white male French-Canadian who was an outspoken supporter of Trump and Marine Le Pen. Try and contain your surprise.

White right wing radicalisation is at least as big a problem as Islamic fundamentalist radicalisation and it's time to stop picking sides.

Picking sides? You have got to be kidding me. There are organized fundamentalist Islamic groups that are actively engaged in terrorist activities worldwide and open about it. To equate right-wing extremism to fundamentalist Islamic extremism is disingenuous and you know it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 30, 2017, 08:06:21 PM
Picking sides? You have got to be kidding me. There are organized fundamentalist Islamic groups that are actively engaged in terrorist activities worldwide and open about it. To equate right-wing extremism to fundamentalist Islamic extremism is disingenuous and you know it.

A fundamentalist white supremacist is sitting on the National Security Council.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 08:12:05 PM
A fundamentalist white supremacist is sitting on the National Security Council.

No evidence that he's a white supremacist, that's just dumb. Guys like Andrew Breitbart and Ben Shapiro (who ran the site for the last 4 years until recently) are Jewish. I don't know any white supremacists who would associate with Jews.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 30, 2017, 08:22:19 PM
No evidence that he's a white supremacist, that's just dumb. Guys like Andrew Breitbart and Ben Shapiro (who ran the site for the last 4 years until recently) are Jewish. I don't know any white supremacists who would associate with Jews.

I will defer to your knowledge on white supremacists as it's very clear that you're a lot closer to them than me.

You do know though that white is a racial characteristic whereas Judaism is a religion, just like you've been very fond of telling us that Islam is a religion and therefore hating Muslims doesn't make you racist?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 08:27:28 PM
I will defer to your knowledge on white supremacists as it's very clear that you're a lot closer to them than me.

You do know though that white is a racial characteristic whereas Judaism is a religion, just like you've been very fond of telling us that Islam is a religion and therefore hating Muslims doesn't make you racist?

Christ. You can't just call people white supremacists just because they're far right of your position.

Anyway, being against Islam isn't racist. I don't hate Muslims - I grew up with them. White Muslims, but Muslims nonetheless. Islam was never a white/brown thing for me, as if you know anything about the Balkans, Muslims make up a good chunk of the population of Albania, Bosnia, etc. What I don't like is radical Islam, just as you don't like radical Christianity or whatever.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 30, 2017, 08:29:46 PM
Christ. You can't just call people white supremacists just because they're far right of your position.

Anyway, being against Islam isn't racist. I don't hate Muslims - I grew up with them. White Muslims, but Muslims nonetheless. Islam was never a white/brown thing for me, as if you know anything about the Balkans, Muslims make up a good chunk of the population of Albania, Bosnia, etc. What I don't like is radical Islam, just as you don't like radical Christianity or whatever.
I don't like radical anything, which was my original point.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 08:33:05 PM
I don't like radical anything, which was my original point.

I don't either, but I'm more afraid of the ones who kill my countrymen, and more personally, a close relative.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 30, 2017, 08:58:19 PM
I don't either, but I'm more afraid of the ones who kill my countrymen, and more personally, a close relative.

Yeah, I wasn't a big fan of when the Catholics spent most of my youth taking out my countrymen, came within a few feet of killing my uncle as he was on parade, and blew up Bishopsgate a few weeks after I'd started working a few blocks away, some of it financed by American money, but thankfully I was able to recognise that it's the responsibility of the individual and not the entire freaking people.
I don't either, but I'm more afraid of the ones who kill my countrymen, and more personally, a close relative.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:02:12 PM
Yeah, I wasn't a big fan of when the Catholics spent most of my youth taking out my countrymen, came within a few feet of killing my uncle as he was on parade, and blew up Bishopsgate a few weeks after I'd started working a few blocks away, some of it financed by American money, but thankfully I was able to recognise that it's the responsibility of the individual and not the entire freaking people.

Who said its the entire people? I'm not labeling all Muslims as terrorists, but clearly certain groups within Islam have an agenda and will kill indiscriminately for it. Just as the IRA had their own agenda independent of 99.99pct of all Catholics. If the IRA made threats against the U.S you don't think there would be tighter vetting of people coming in from Ireland at the time?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on January 30, 2017, 09:04:51 PM
Who said its the entire people? I'm not labeling all Muslims as terrorists, but clearly certain groups within Islam have an agenda and will kill indiscriminately for it. Just as the IRA had their own agenda independent of 99.99pct of all Catholics. If the IRA made threats against the U.S you don't think there would be tighter vetting of people coming in from Ireland at the time?

There already is 'tighter vetting' of people coming in who may be terrorists. Fermenting fear, anger, and a sense of betrayal for people who have already been vetted is not the way to stifle violence.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:07:48 PM
There already is 'tighter vetting' of people coming in who may be terrorists. Fermenting fear, anger, and a sense of betrayal for people who have already been vetted is not the way to stifle violence.

Yeah, all that vetting we did and those travel bans made Al Qaeda plan attacks on us from the 93 bombing through 911. These guys are going to try and kill us regardless. If this travel ban pushes a few over the edge then they were probably going to get radicalized anyway.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 30, 2017, 09:08:17 PM
Who said its the entire people? I'm not labeling all Muslims as terrorists, but clearly certain groups within Islam have an agenda and will kill indiscriminately for it. Just as the IRA had their own agenda independent of 99.99pct of all Catholics. If the IRA made threats against the U.S you don't think there would be tighter vetting of people coming in from Ireland at the time?
We had the Ring Of Steel. For several years I drove to work through checkpoints surrounding the Square Mile, they were mainly interested in stopping vans but they'd periodically check cars as well. I know what living under threat of terrorism feels like and I know what increased security feels like.

What stopped it was talking and diplomacy.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on January 30, 2017, 09:10:28 PM
Yeah, all that vetting we did and those travel bans made Al Qaeda plan attacks on us from the 93 bombing through 911. These guys are going to try and kill us regardless. If this travel ban pushes a few over the edge then they were probably going to get radicalized anyway.

Two attacks, one 24 years ago and one 16 years ago. Okay.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:10:37 PM
We had the Ring Of Steel. For several years I drove to work through checkpoints surrounding the Square Mile, they were mainly interested in stopping vans but they'd periodically check cars as well. I know what living under threat of terrorism feels like and I know what increased security feels like.

What stopped it was talking and diplomacy.

So you think we can reason with the likes of Al Qaeda and ISIS?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:11:53 PM
Two attacks, one 24 years ago and one 16 years ago. Okay.

Yeah because those were the only terrorist attacks against American civilians. Give me a break.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on January 30, 2017, 09:12:47 PM
Yeah because those were the only terrorist attacks against American civilians. Give me a break.

What else could have been prevented with the extreme vetting that is happening under Trump that didn't happen under Obama?

You're the one who didn't give actual examples of failures of the previous administration's vetting policy.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:14:38 PM
What else could have been prevented with the extreme vetting that is happening under Trump that didn't happen under Obama?

You're the one who didn't give actual examples of failures of the previous administration's vetting policy.

So we should wait until another terrorist attack before we act? I don't get what's wrong with reviewing the vetting process, it's a different administration.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:16:08 PM
You're the one who didn't give actual examples of failures of the previous administration's vetting policy.

I didn't say the last administration failed to keep us safe or anything like that. All I said that we have to remain vigilant because anything can happen. Can't just be reactive.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 30, 2017, 09:16:34 PM
So you think we can reason with the likes of Al Qaeda and ISIS?
No, Tommy, I don't. Just like we couldn't reason with the Provisional IRA. What we did was stop treating young Northern Irish people like the enemy and invested in their communities to create jobs, helped them to achieve a stronger sense of self government and built a generation that would rather travel the world, get educated and get good jobs than take up arms.

You don't beat radicals. You starve them of recruits. You voted for more terrorists.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:17:52 PM
No, Tommy, I don't. Just like we couldn't reason with the Provisional IRA. What we did was stop treating young Northern Irish people like the enemy and invested in their communities to create jobs, helped them to achieve a stronger sense of self government and built a generation that would rather travel the world, get educated and get good jobs than take up arms.

You don't beat radicals. You starve them of recruits. You voted for more terrorists.

We tried nation building. Didn't work out very well.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on January 30, 2017, 09:17:59 PM
I didn't say the last administration failed to keep us safe or anything like that.

You literally just said that previous vetting failed to prevent Al Qaeda attacks against our nation.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:19:40 PM
You literally just said that previous vetting failed to prevent Al Qaeda attacks against our nation.

I used the 90s as an example of why vetting is necessary, and how extremists have been trying to kill us regardless of our vetting process and travel bans. That doesn't mean we have to stop improving.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on January 30, 2017, 09:23:35 PM
So we should wait until another terrorist attack before we act? I don't get what's wrong with reviewing the vetting process, it's a different administration.

What is currently happening isn't a 'review' of the vetting process. It's a complete overhaul of the fundamental values of immigration, implemented inconsistently and potentially illegally because there was no roll-out plan. There was no review, it was purely reactionary based on a need to change something dramatically from what the previous administration was already accomplishing.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 30, 2017, 09:23:57 PM
We tried nation building. Didn't work out very well.
I'm sorry, I don't understand that statement. Explain please.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on January 30, 2017, 09:24:43 PM
We tried government destroying. Didn't work out very well.

ftfy
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:25:41 PM
What is currently happening isn't a 'review' of the vetting process. It's a complete overhaul of the fundamental values of immigration, implemented inconsistently and potentially illegally because there was no roll-out plan. There was no review, it was purely reactionary based on a need to change something dramatically from what the previous administration was already accomplishing.

Did you even read the executive order? The review will happen during the 90 ban.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:28:00 PM
I'm sorry, I don't understand that statement. Explain please.

Northern Ireland is part of the UK, so it's not apples to apples. How can we expect to change the ideologies of people in the Middle East when we don't run their governments, unless we go in and try and forcibly inject democracy, which didn't work out very well for us (Iraq).
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on January 30, 2017, 09:29:55 PM
Did you even read the executive order? The review will happen during the 90 ban.

Did you even think about what you're typing? A review doesn't necessitate a 90 day ban, and the decision to indefinitely ban Syrians obviously preceded any review.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:33:22 PM
Did you even think about what you're typing? A review doesn't necessitate a 90 day ban, and the decision to indefinitely ban Syrians obviously preceded any review.

Stop travel while the visa vetting process is reviewed for each country. That was the whole point.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 30, 2017, 09:33:41 PM
Northern Ireland is part of the UK, so it's not apples to apples. How can we expect to change the ideologies of people in the Middle East when we don't run their governments, unless we go in and try and forcibly inject democracy, which didn't work out very well for us (Iraq).
How many Americans have been killed by Iraqi terrorist attacks on US soil, Tommy?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on January 30, 2017, 09:35:00 PM
Stop travel while the visa vetting process is reviewed for each country. That was the whole point.

I'm glad you are so adept at taking Trump's word at face value without introducing any critical thought into the process.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Andrew Ryan on January 30, 2017, 09:36:31 PM
I'm glad you are so adept at taking Trump's word at face value without introducing any critical thought into the process.

I'm glad you two were finally introduced.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on January 30, 2017, 09:37:25 PM
Northern Ireland is part of the UK, so it's not apples to apples. How can we expect to change the ideologies of people in the Middle East when we don't run their governments, unless we go in and try and forcibly inject democracy, which didn't work out very well for us (Iraq).

It's amazing to me how you could have supported the war in Iraq and yet want to face 0 consequences for being wrong, while people who vehemently opposed the war in Iraq are able to take responsibility for your mistake.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:38:29 PM
How many Americans have been killed by Iraqi terrorist attacks on US soil, Tommy?

Yeah, let's just wait until something bad happens before acting.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:39:17 PM
It's amazing to me how you could have supported the war in Iraq and yet want to face 0 consequences for being wrong, while people who vehemently opposed the war in Iraq are able to take responsibility for your mistake.

At the time I was for it, but hindsight is 20/20. Looking back it was definitely not a good idea.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 30, 2017, 09:47:19 PM
Yeah, let's just wait until something bad happens before acting.

No, hang on. You're defending the ban on visas for Iraqi citizens despite none of their citizens having attacked the US on the basis that US attempts to rebuild their government didn't immediately turn it into a land of milk and honey?

I don't think you really have the first clue about international diplomacy, which would explain your voting preferences.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Andrew Ryan on January 30, 2017, 09:53:34 PM
Yeah, let's just wait until something bad happens before acting.

I'm going to take a wild guess here and assume that you don't know the number of Americans that have been killed by citizens of the seven countries affected by this ban over the last 40 years. That number is zero, so if you want to justify banning citizens of seven countries from coming here based on what could happen, that's your prerogative, but I think you're going to find that this does far more to endanger American lives than it does to protect them.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 09:56:37 PM
I'm going to take a wild guess here and assume that you don't know the number of Americans that have been killed by citizens of the seven countries affected by this ban over the last 40 years. That number is zero so if you want to justify banning citizens of seven countries from coming here based on what could happen, that's your prerogative, but I think you're going to find that this does far more to endanger American lives than it does to protect them.

Before the first WTC bombing we didn't see any killings of U.S citizens, or attempted terrorist attacks, but citizens in any middle eastern country's but it happened.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Andrew Ryan on January 30, 2017, 10:14:00 PM
Before the first WTC bombing we didn't see any killings of U.S citizens, or attempted terrorist attacks, but citizens in any middle eastern country's but it happened.

None of the men that were responsible for carrying out the 9/11 terror attacks originated from any of the countries that are the subject of this ban. However, 15 of the 19 highjackers were Saudi Arabian citizens, yet somehow Saudi Arabia is not among the countries that are being banned. Perhaps that's because they're our second largest supplier of oil or perhaps it's because the Trump Organization has significant business ties there (including eight new companies that were registered during the campaign)? It bewilders the mind.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 10:19:31 PM
None of the people that were responsible for carrying out the 9/11 terrorist attacks originated from any of the countries that are the subject of this ban. However, 15 of the 19 highjackers were Saudi Arabian citizens, yet Saudi Arabia is somehow not one the countries that is being banned. Perhaps that's because they're our second largest supplier of oil or perhaps it's because the Trump Organization has significant business ties there (including eight new companies that were registered during the campaign)? I just don't know.

It's extremely difficult for your run of the mill Saudi citizen to come to the U.S. already. Same with Egypt. These were vetting processes that were put into place after 9/11. Again, why should we have to wait until a Yemeni visitor who shouldn't have been here commits an attack before we take a closer look at the vetting process? Also, these countries have become increasingly more radicalized in the last few years, especially because of their respective civil wars.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Andrew Ryan on January 30, 2017, 10:24:39 PM
Don't give me that excrement. We have one of the most stringent immigration processes in the world. It takes an average of 18 to 24 months for a Syrian refugee to be considered for a visa. The only motive here is to stoke fear and induce hysteria.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 30, 2017, 10:27:52 PM
Don't give me that excrement. We have one of the most stringent immigration processes in the world. It takes an average of 18 to 24 months for a Syrian refugee to be considered for a visa. The only motive here is to stoke fear and induce hysteria.

Then why freak out over a temporary 90 day ban?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on January 30, 2017, 10:31:54 PM
Then why freak out over a temporary 90 day ban?

because it's freaking stupid and unnecessary.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Andrew Ryan on January 30, 2017, 10:32:23 PM
Then why freak out over a temporary 90 day ban?

I don't know? Maybe because it betrays everything that we represent as a country?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Andrew Ryan on January 30, 2017, 10:33:26 PM
We are endangering our citizens overseas.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Andrew Ryan on January 30, 2017, 10:33:56 PM
We're giving our enemies a tool to recruit from within our borders.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Andrew Ryan on January 30, 2017, 10:35:22 PM
We are breeding distrust in our allies and hostility in our enemies.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Andrew Ryan on January 30, 2017, 10:37:24 PM
Most of all it's just freaking stupid.

The recklessness and amateurishness that this new administration has displayed in implementing policy is just embarrassing.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on January 30, 2017, 10:39:42 PM
Most of all it's just freaking stupid.

The recklessness and amateurishness that this new administration has displayed in implementing policy is just embarrassing.

You guys are only a week in with that clown.  He needs to go before he does some real damage that can't be undone.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on January 31, 2017, 07:43:04 AM
You guys are only a week in with that clown.  He needs to go before he does some real damage that can't be undone.
Replace him with Bowles.  He would punt them back to their countries in 4th down.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on January 31, 2017, 11:02:43 AM
I don't understand how the same people who keep reiterating that we need to keep out Muslims that might attack us within our border if allowed in are absolutely silent when a white dude commits an actual act of terrorism against people within our border.

But it's a "lone wolf" every time it's a radicalized white dude. It doesn't matter that they consistently espouse the same ideology. It's just "different."

White supremacists are an actual problem in this country, not a theoretical one.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 31, 2017, 11:08:44 AM
I don't understand how the same people who keep reiterating that we need to keep out Muslims that might attack us within our border if allowed in are absolutely silent when a white dude commits an actual act of terrorism against people within our border.

But it's a "lone wolf" every time it's a radicalized white dude. It doesn't matter that they consistently espouse the same ideology. It's just "different."

White supremacists are an actual problem in this country, not a theoretical one.

I think it's disingenuous to suggest that the federal government isn't taking all domestic terrorist threats seriously, including monitoring various radical groups (both right and left). We actually had a program designed to help identify targets already in the states, but the whole Snowden thing kind of put the kibosh on that. Also, it's easier to just prevent potential radicals from entering the country than it is to read the minds and monitor individuals already here who may commit acts of terror.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on January 31, 2017, 11:26:53 AM
I think it's disingenuous to suggest that the federal government isn't taking all domestic terrorist threats seriously, including monitoring various radical groups (both right and left). We actually had a program designed to help identify targets already in the states, but the whole Snowden thing kind of put the kibosh on that. Also, it's easier to just prevent potential radicals from entering the country than it is to read the minds and monitor individuals already here who may commit acts of terror.

Yeah, I mean it's not like they post their ideology all over the web or anything.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 31, 2017, 11:35:13 AM
I don't understand how the same people who keep reiterating that we need to keep out Muslims that might attack us within our border if allowed in are absolutely silent when a white dude commits an actual act of terrorism against people within our border.

But it's a "lone wolf" every time it's a radicalized white dude. It doesn't matter that they consistently espouse the same ideology. It's just "different."

White supremacists are an actual problem in this country, not a theoretical one.

I wonder why they're not subject to the same scrutiny.

https://theintercept.com/2017/01/31/the-fbi-has-quietly-investigated-white-supremacist-infiltration-of-law-enforcement/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on January 31, 2017, 11:44:20 AM
The dumbest thing about banning refugees from Iraq is that we just had one of our biggest successes in Iraq, clearing East Mosul from ISIS rule, with the help of American troops.

Now, you give ISIS free recruiting by giving them reasons to show that America hates them. Then you have Trump say that we should have just taken their oil, and we may get another chance to do it.

So just as we have one of our most important recent wins in Iraq, Trump does everything he can to turn Iraqis against us, both with his executive order and his reckless statements.

Not only does that help ISIS recruit, which puts America at risk, but it puts American troops who have been fighting with Iraqis at more risk.

So we sold out our American ideology to make our nation and our troops more unsafe. There is zero proof that banning refugees makes us safer.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 31, 2017, 05:27:21 PM
Good job by Trudeau's office.

http://www.cp24.com/news/pmo-slams-fox-news-for-incorrect-tweet-about-quebec-city-shooting-suspect-1.3265408

That's what actual fake news looks like, you orange queynte.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 31, 2017, 05:38:03 PM
Good job by Trudeau's office.

http://www.cp24.com/news/pmo-slams-fox-news-for-incorrect-tweet-about-quebec-city-shooting-suspect-1.3265408

That's what actual fake news looks like, you orange queynte.

What was the tweet?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 31, 2017, 05:43:03 PM
What was the tweet?

It's referenced in the article, but they basically read some bullshit on Reddit or Twitter and believed it, so they tweeted out before anything was clear that the shooter was Moroccan. As we know, it turned out that it was a white supremacist French-Canadian. I haven't checked, but I'm told that the tweet is still up.

Faux News can freak off.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on January 31, 2017, 05:48:21 PM
It's referenced in the article, but they basically read some bullshit on Reddit or Twitter and believed it, so they tweeted out before anything was clear that the shooter was Moroccan. As we know, it turned out that it was a white supremacist French-Canadian. I haven't checked, but I'm told that the tweet is still up.

Faux News can freak off.

Ah, I was following on Reddit's live feed and don't remember a specific Fox News tweet, but I guess it highlights the major difference between the media in both countries. I also found it pretty disgusting that both sides were licking their chops hoping it would be a white supremacist/radical Islamist depending on what fit your narrative.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Jetaho on February 01, 2017, 12:07:10 PM
I don't understand how the same people who keep reiterating that we need to keep out Muslims that might attack us within our border if allowed in are absolutely silent when a white dude commits an actual act of terrorism against people within our border.

But it's a "lone wolf" every time it's a radicalized white dude. It doesn't matter that they consistently espouse the same ideology. It's just "different."

White supremacists are an actual problem in this country, not a theoretical one.

Let's not forget the mentally ill.  Our system right now puts too much emphasis on the rights of the mentally ill and essentially must wait until they act out before addressing it in a criminal or quasi-criminal setting.  When a potentially dangerous mentally ill person (I'm talking paranoid schizos, bipolar primarily) stops taking meds or treatment, it is not a question of if, but when they will become manic and act out violently.  Sandy Hook, Va Tech, Aurora, Gabby Giffords' shooter, UC Santa Barbara, all come to mind.  There are millions more examples where community and family members have been killed or seriously injured by the mentally ill.   

Regardless of the ACLUs stance that people have a right to be mentally ill and refuse medication and treatment, I feel that the risk of non-treatment is too high to the communities in which these people live.  I don't advocate locking them up, but we should have a way to involuntarily evaluate, diagnose, monitor, treat, and medicate these people PREEMPTIVELY for the benefit of everyone, patient included, before they get to that manic stage.   To me, it's more of a treatment issue as it is only when they are noncompliant with their treatment regimen that they pose a danger.  Due to massive underfunding at the federal and state level, however, there have been no new laws or strategies developed to address these issues, and it's been politicized into arguments about gun control and Islamaphobia.       
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 01, 2017, 02:16:00 PM
Now you cucks are going to be hoping for a radical Islamic terrorism attack on US soil so you can gloat and blame Trump. SOJFs.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on February 01, 2017, 02:23:02 PM
Let's not forget the mentally ill.  Our system right now puts too much emphasis on the rights of the mentally ill and essentially must wait until they act out before addressing it in a criminal or quasi-criminal setting.  When a potentially dangerous mentally ill person (I'm talking paranoid schizos, bipolar primarily) stops taking meds or treatment, it is not a question of if, but when they will become manic and act out violently.  Sandy Hook, Va Tech, Aurora, Gabby Giffords' shooter, UC Santa Barbara, all come to mind.  There are millions more examples where community and family members have been killed or seriously injured by the mentally ill.   

Regardless of the ACLUs stance that people have a right to be mentally ill and refuse medication and treatment, I feel that the risk of non-treatment is too high to the communities in which these people live.  I don't advocate locking them up, but we should have a way to involuntarily evaluate, diagnose, monitor, treat, and medicate these people PREEMPTIVELY for the benefit of everyone, patient included, before they get to that manic stage.   To me, it's more of a treatment issue as it is only when they are noncompliant with their treatment regimen that they pose a danger.  Due to massive underfunding at the federal and state level, however, there have been no new laws or strategies developed to address these issues, and it's been politicized into arguments about gun control and Islamaphobia.       

Well I'm sure drug abuse is an issue that's probably keeping sweeping reforms on treatment. It's very easy to convince a licensed therapist that you have anxiety so they can subscribe some valium. Same with other medications. Also, people with mental issues rarely ever seek treatment on their own. I was diagnosed with ADHD when I was in H.S and tried some ritalin but gave up because I didn't like the way it changed me. Then there are people who refuse to admit they have a problem. Not sure how we could really enforce getting people who need treatment to get treated.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 01, 2017, 02:40:27 PM
Well I'm sure drug abuse is an issue that's probably keeping sweeping reforms on treatment. It's very easy to convince a licensed therapist that you have anxiety so they can subscribe some valium. Same with other medications. Also, people with mental issues rarely ever seek treatment on their own. I was diagnosed with ADHD when I was in H.S and tried some ritalin but gave up because I didn't like the way it changed me. Then there are people who refuse to admit they have a problem. Not sure how we could really enforce getting people who need treatment to get treated.

For a change, I mostly agree with you (although I don't completely disagree with Jetaho either). Involuntary incarceration of people for fear of what they might do without credible evidence of specific intent is an incredibly dangerous path to go down, especially with the cunts you just elected, and requires an intensive and complex combination of services from assorted healthcare and law enforcement organisations to do effectively.

You might be better off just preventing weapons of war available to the average man in the street by repealing the Second Amendment, something which I'm sure you're completely in favour of given your stated desire to do away with anachronistic regulation.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on February 01, 2017, 05:52:10 PM
Now you cucks are going to be hoping for a radical Islamic terrorism attack on US soil so you can gloat and blame Trump. SOJFs.

No way. A major attack would probably help him. Bush would have been one and done if not for 9/11 and the ensuing war.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on February 01, 2017, 06:44:50 PM
No way. A major attack would probably help him. Bush would have been one and done if not for 9/11 and the ensuing war.

If 9/11 didn't happen we probably wouldn't have gone into Iraq. Bush's policy at the time was to continue sanctions and the occasional bombing that was part of Clinton's containment policy during his last term. His domestic policies weren't really much of an issue during the 2004 election.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on February 01, 2017, 08:21:38 PM
If 9/11 didn't happen we probably wouldn't have gone into Iraq. Bush's policy at the time was to continue sanctions and the occasional bombing that was part of Clinton's containment policy during his last term. His domestic policies weren't really much of an issue during the 2004 election.

"Can't change presidents during a war." was the talking point.

Without national tragedy he would have fumbled his way through a few years at a steady low approval rating before losing in 2004.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 01, 2017, 10:35:48 PM
No way. A major attack would probably help him. Bush would have been one and done if not for 9/11 and the ensuing war.


Oh. Good point. Good thing all the terrorists are banned now
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: sg3 on February 02, 2017, 03:49:04 AM
I agree

If we still had stronger policies for institutionalizing the mentally, folks like Trump and Bannon would be safely in solitary confinement and not in the WH issuing insane EOs and destroying our Nation
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 01, 2017, 12:54:54 PM
Lone wolf, mental illness, blah blah blah.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-la-jolla-shooting-20170430-story.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 05, 2017, 01:33:33 PM
This is more like it, a good old fashioned case of going postal like we used to get in more innocent times.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/06/05/multiple-people-killed-in-shooting-at-florida-business/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on September 14, 2017, 10:58:08 AM
http://nypost.com/2017/09/13/cops-respond-to-shooting-reports-at-high-school/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on September 19, 2017, 04:43:46 PM
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/09/19/552025083/dylann-roof-asks-to-fire-legal-team-of-biological-enemies
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on September 25, 2017, 07:22:42 AM
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41382492

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on October 02, 2017, 01:19:05 AM
Yo what the freak is happening in Vegas right now??
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: JFIF on October 02, 2017, 01:19:42 AM
Automatic weapon??

https://youtu.be/KMfjLD8eMAc
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on October 02, 2017, 04:28:53 AM
Goddammit
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on October 02, 2017, 04:32:06 AM
Automatic weapon??

https://youtu.be/KMfjLD8eMAc

"excrement just got real"

"This is why Trump - "

How is this chick not running for her life instead of snap chatting?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 02, 2017, 06:05:05 AM
Christ what freaking news to wake up to
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on October 02, 2017, 07:47:45 AM
No idea what allowed this excrement to happen. But I have to imagine this is going to result in the biggest push for gun control we've ever seen.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on October 02, 2017, 08:33:00 AM
Meanwhile, a guy that scumbag Sheldon Adelson hired to write for the Las Vegas Review Journal was spouting off that it's Muslim terror before any news is released.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLIkctWWsAAugUS.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on October 02, 2017, 08:50:07 AM
64 year old white male, Las Vegas resident Stephen Paddock.

jesus this is terrifying.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 02, 2017, 08:53:11 AM
Apparently he was able to fire for 10 minutes before they got to him (or he off'd himself).  That had to be horrible to endure constant fire for 10 minutes straight.  Who knows how many bullets were fired before it stopped. Horrible.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2017, 08:54:09 AM
No idea what allowed this excrement to happen. But I have to imagine this is going to result in the biggest push for gun control we've ever seen.

What do you mean "what allowed this excrement to happen"?  The guy smuggled a bunch of guns up to his room, kicked out his hotel window, and fired down.  What was supposed to prevent this besides a moral compass and human decency?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on October 02, 2017, 09:01:05 AM
Wow that is crazy my thoughts and prayers to the victims. It literally must have been a war zone down there. I can't imagine how frightening it was..... They were just there to listen to bad music.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on October 02, 2017, 09:04:53 AM
TMZ...

Quote
Stephen Paddock is an outlier for police profilers ... at least so far.
The 64-year-old Nevada resident lived in a retirement community.  He has no criminal record, at least none we've been able to find so far.
We found Paddock has a hunting license in Alaska.  He got a pilot's license in 2003, which means he's undergone some physical and mental evaluation.
As we reported, Paddock, died in his hotel room after slaughtering more than 50 people and injuring more than 400.  It appears he died from a self-inflicted gunshot.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ScotlandJet on October 02, 2017, 09:08:00 AM
Shocking, shocking news. So sad. There was some film of this outrage on the early news but it seems to have been pulled. Looked terrifying.

I hope our Bro Fenwyr is safe.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2017, 09:14:23 AM
Shocking, shocking news. So sad. There was some film of this outrage on the early news but it seems to have been pulled. Looked terrifying.

I hope our Bro Fenwyr is safe.

I think he works daytime weekdays and avoids the Strip otherwise, but he probably knows plenty of people who were there.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 02, 2017, 09:17:27 AM
Shocking, shocking news. So sad. There was some film of this outrage on the early news but it seems to have been pulled. Looked terrifying.

I hope our Bro Fenwyr is safe.

He is, he marked himself safe on Facebook.

I've already seen the first post mooting it as a false flag operation designed to help the gun control lobby.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on October 02, 2017, 09:47:37 AM
jesus

what the freak is wrong with some people
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 02, 2017, 09:50:05 AM
jesus

what the freak is wrong with some people
We day them same thing about Puck every tailgate.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: sg3 on October 02, 2017, 09:53:05 AM
Meanwhile, a guy that scumbag Sheldon Adelson hired to write for the Las Vegas Review Journal was spouting off that it's Muslim terror before any news is released.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLIkctWWsAAugUS.jpg)
Too bad this right wing piece of garbage wasn't one of the victims

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on October 02, 2017, 10:00:35 AM
What do you mean "what allowed this excrement to happen"?  The guy smuggled a bunch of guns up to his room, kicked out his hotel window, and fired down.  What was supposed to prevent this besides a moral compass and human decency?

Well they're gonna do all kinds of investigations. How did he purchase the guns, did he modify them, how were they purchased and moved etc etc. Could ot have been prevented? Minimized, anything?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2017, 10:01:32 AM
Trump love love loved this.  He got to mention unity about 30 times in a 2 minute statement and didn't have to worry about any divisive racial issues in the shooting.  It's a wet dream for a guy who doesn't actually give a freak about the people anyway and just wants to get rid of negative distractions and welcome ones that boost his profile.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on October 02, 2017, 10:11:25 AM
Well they're gonna do all kinds of investigations. How did he purchase the guns, did he modify them, how were they purchased and moved etc etc. Could ot have been prevented? Minimized, anything?

Shut the freak up, dcm.  You really can't be this much of a piece of excrement in real life...can you?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on October 02, 2017, 10:12:51 AM
Trump love love loved this.  He got to mention unity about 30 times in a 2 minute statement and didn't have to worry about any divisive racial issues in the shooting.  It's a wet dream for a guy who doesn't actually give a freak about the people anyway and just wants to get rid of negative distractions and welcome ones that boost his profile.

"This was an act of...evil."

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 02, 2017, 10:13:35 AM
I can't imagine the logistics of trying to close down the strip and conduct a large scale investigation in the middle of all that.   
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on October 02, 2017, 10:26:06 AM
Shut the freak up, dcm.  You really can't be this much of a piece of excrement in real life...can you?

?

I'm actually not against them doing something about guns. After something like this I DO think they should do a thorough investigation and change something. Clearly the system failed to allow something of this magnitude to happen, so the system needs to get fixed.


I realize this is a little more big government than my typical standpoint, but this shits not gonna get better.

Not sure how you interpreted what I said, but my point was  that this was a huge enough tragedy to get bipartisan support for change.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on October 02, 2017, 10:47:21 AM
Well they're gonna do all kinds of investigations. How did he purchase the guns, did he modify them, how were they purchased and moved etc etc. Could ot have been prevented? Minimized, anything?

It's irrelevant in Nevada.  There are no permits, no registration, and prior to Jan 1 of this year, no background checks.  There's no such thing as illegal gun purchasing in Nevada, so it makes absolutely no difference.  No laws against modification or any form of assault weapon either.  Absolutely nothing that could have been done.  Nada.  This was not preventable in any feasible way.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 02, 2017, 10:55:32 AM
Apparently ISIS tried to take credit for it. Vegas Metro and the FBI say that there is no evidence of the guy having any religious or political affiliation, and I'd be surprised if some white dude in his 60s living in a gated community is a secret convert to fundamentalist religious doctrine.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 02, 2017, 10:59:02 AM
ISIS will try to take credit for a fart cloud in a 7/11
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on October 02, 2017, 01:00:07 PM
freaking crazy.  I hate country music, so we were safe, but this happened 5 minutes from my house.

The were jumping the fence to the airport and still getting shot.  Needless to say the airport was shut down.

The irony is I need get on a flight pretty damn soon.  My mom in south carolina went into ICU last night.  Some of you know she's been fighting for over a year now.  Never been hospitalized until now.  It looks bad.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on October 02, 2017, 01:01:48 PM
freaking crazy.  I hate country music, so we were safe, but this happened 5 minutes from my house.

The were jumping the fence to the airport and still getting shot.  Needless to say the airport was shut down.

The irony is I need get on a flight pretty damn soon.  My mom in south carolina went into ICU last night.  Some of you know she's been fighting for over a year now.  Never been hospitalized until now.  It looks bad.

glad you're safe and sound.  Good luck with your mom. :)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 02, 2017, 01:53:45 PM
freaking crazy.  I hate country music, so we were safe, but this happened 5 minutes from my house.

The were jumping the fence to the airport and still getting shot.  Needless to say the airport was shut down.

The irony is I need get on a flight pretty damn soon.  My mom in south carolina went into ICU last night.  Some of you know she's been fighting for over a year now.  Never been hospitalized until now.  It looks bad.

Glad to hear you're safe. Best wishes in the situation with your mother.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on October 02, 2017, 02:08:10 PM
freaking crazy.  I hate country music, so we were safe, but this happened 5 minutes from my house.

The were jumping the fence to the airport and still getting shot.  Needless to say the airport was shut down.

The irony is I need get on a flight pretty damn soon.  My mom in south carolina went into ICU last night.  Some of you know she's been fighting for over a year now.  Never been hospitalized until now.  It looks bad.

Damn man. Glad you and the misses are safe and I really hope your mom recovers. All the best to you and your family.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on October 02, 2017, 02:19:18 PM
freaking crazy.  I hate country music, so we were safe, but this happened 5 minutes from my house.

The were jumping the fence to the airport and still getting shot.  Needless to say the airport was shut down.

The irony is I need get on a flight pretty damn soon.  My mom in south carolina went into ICU last night.  Some of you know she's been fighting for over a year now.  Never been hospitalized until now.  It looks bad.

Glad you're ok and I hope your Mom gets better.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on October 02, 2017, 02:53:18 PM
shots fired at USC

Quote
Shelley Smith‏Verified account @ShelleyESPN · 6m6 minutes ago 

At usc... active shooter on campus. A bunch of us huddled safely.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 02, 2017, 03:15:19 PM
shots fired at USC
False alarm.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: guinness77 on October 02, 2017, 03:20:08 PM
freaking crazy.  I hate country music, so we were safe, but this happened 5 minutes from my house.

The were jumping the fence to the airport and still getting shot.  Needless to say the airport was shut down.

The irony is I need get on a flight pretty damn soon.  My mom in south carolina went into ICU last night.  Some of you know she's been fighting for over a year now.  Never been hospitalized until now.  It looks bad.
Sorry to hear, good luck.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 02, 2017, 03:37:52 PM
I just read that it actually took police 72 minutes to find and get into his room from the time of the first 911 call.  Holy excrement, this could have been even worse than it was.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on October 02, 2017, 03:43:32 PM
I just read that it actually took police 72 minutes to find and get into his room from the time of the first 911 call.  Holy excrement, this could have been even worse than it was.


On the flip side I think 72 minutes is a really damn long time. If this guy knew what he was doing the count could have ever been cranked up significantly

I mean the police need to think of their safety and formulate a plan. But there's gotta be a way to have a quicker initial response
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 02, 2017, 03:48:51 PM
On the flip side I think 72 minutes is a really damn long time. If this guy knew what he was doing the count could have ever been cranked up significantly

I mean the police need to think of their safety and formulate a plan. But there's gotta be a way to have a quicker initial response

Pretty sure he knew what he was doing - he was on the 32nd floor of a hotel, spraying with an automatic weapon did far more damage than any kind of precision shooting would have. He couldn't have hit over 600 people any other way.

As for why it took so long, I imagine it took quite some time to figure out where he was shooting from. I imagine that finding a guy with an automatic rifle and a flash suppressor in that sort of vantage point is extremely difficult, I don't think the police have much to be blamed for here.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 02, 2017, 03:51:34 PM
Here you go - imagine it's also night, with all of the lights and sounds of the Strip and the concert stage:

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-gBrf-kWeMyU/WdKkIFZBxHI/AAAAAAAABNY/Jo6PXgNB3gw4c3ksg2v14XBujXjq16C2gCL0BGAYYCw/h2250/2017-10-02.png)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on October 02, 2017, 04:11:42 PM
Here you go - imagine it's also night, with all of the lights and sounds of the Strip and the concert stage:

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-gBrf-kWeMyU/WdKkIFZBxHI/AAAAAAAABNY/Jo6PXgNB3gw4c3ksg2v14XBujXjq16C2gCL0BGAYYCw/h2250/2017-10-02.png)
There was a secondary hole around the corner to the left.  Both holes were pretty damn big, but yeah, you wouldn't be able to see excrement at night.

The logistics are intetesting.  He was firing from accross the strip.  Take into account he was 32 floors up.  He was over a football field from his victims.  And he was still hitting people jumping the fence to the airport.  That's another 50 yards right there.

And yeah, the airlines doubled their rates since yesterday.  SMH
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 02, 2017, 04:17:52 PM
There was a secondary hole around the corner to the left.  Both holes were pretty damn big, but yeah, you wouldn't be able to see excrement at night.

The logistics are intetesting.  He was firing from accross the strip.  Take into account he was 32 floors up.  He was over a football field from his victims.  And he was still hitting people jumping the fence to the airport.  That's another 50 yards right there.

And yeah, the airlines doubled their rates since yesterday.  SMH

The power of a fully automatic weapon. Spray, reload, repeat.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 02, 2017, 04:25:27 PM
I haven't seen it confirmed, but I saw a story that the police only figured out where he was when the amount of smoke from his weapons set off the fire alarm in his room. I can't imagine how many bullets he fired off.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 02, 2017, 04:53:57 PM
On the flip side I think 72 minutes is a really damn long time. If this guy knew what he was doing the count could have ever been cranked up significantly

I mean the police need to think of their safety and formulate a plan. But there's gotta be a way to have a quicker initial response
How is that the flip side?   

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on October 02, 2017, 04:55:13 PM
How is that the flip side?   



I was at the pub

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 02, 2017, 04:57:22 PM
I was at the pub
Lol.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on October 02, 2017, 05:44:24 PM
The power of a fully automatic weapon. Spray, reload, repeat.
The person that modded his ar15 needs to be tried for 59 counts of murder.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on October 02, 2017, 05:47:01 PM
I haven't seen it confirmed, but I saw a story that the police only figured out where he was when the amount of smoke from his weapons set off the fire alarm in his room. I can't imagine how many bullets he fired off.
Fire alarm is false.

A small group of cops determined where the shots were coming from and hit mandalay.  The went floor by floor until they found him.  He put up a fight but swat got him.  I'm guessing sniper rifle from the ground, but who the hell knows yet.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 02, 2017, 05:50:06 PM
Fire alarm is false.

A small group of cops determined where the shots were coming from and hit mandalay.  The went floor by floor until they found him.  He put up a fight but swat got him.  I'm guessing sniper rifle from the ground, but who the hell knows yet.
Everything I read said they found him dead when they went in and he likely committed suicide before they got there.  Has that changed?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on October 02, 2017, 05:50:45 PM
Also, the guy was a millionaire with a girlfriend, with literally nothing on him as far as priors.  Not sick, no apparent reason to be pissed off.

All I can figure is he just wanted to kill some Trump voters.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on October 02, 2017, 05:52:06 PM
Everything I read said they found him dead when they went in and he likely committed suicide.  Has that changed?
Yes.  That's what I heard originally as well, but the story is evolving.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on October 02, 2017, 08:27:32 PM
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/10/02/raiders-nfl-donate-to-las-vegas-victims-fund/

The Raiders and NFL only donate $50k a piece? WTF?

The UFC donated $1mm
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 05, 2017, 01:50:22 PM
Crazed lone wolf, or evil brainwashed religious fundamentalist? We wait with bated breath to see which narrative we get to enjoy this time.....

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/05/us/texas-church-shooting/index.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: sg3 on November 05, 2017, 02:01:53 PM
Our President will interrupt golfing in Japan to comment....

If and only if the shooter is identified as an immigrant Muslim

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 05, 2017, 02:21:15 PM
27 people dead, 30 injured. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 05, 2017, 02:33:46 PM
27 people dead, 30 injured. 

That can't be right, I've been repeatedly told that fatal mass shootings only happen in places where people aren't allowed to carry guns.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 05, 2017, 03:41:04 PM
Crazed lone wolf, or evil brainwashed religious fundamentalist? We wait with bated breath to see which narrative we get to enjoy this time.....

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/05/us/texas-church-shooting/index.html
Obviously crazed lone wolf, based on geography and demographics.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 05, 2017, 04:06:28 PM
Obviously crazed lone wolf, based on geography and demographics.
Plot twist:  Illegal Mexican. 

I'm kidding, who knows.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 05, 2017, 04:35:55 PM
Plot twist:  Illegal Mexican. 

I'm kidding, who knows.

The shooter has been dead for several hours, so police know his identity or at least his ethnicity. If he was brown and had a long beard, the Dickhead-In-Chief would have been raging about it on Twitter by now.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: sg3 on November 05, 2017, 05:11:54 PM
26 year old white male identified as Devin Patrick.

Posted pic of his AR 15 on social media earlier.

Sorry Donnie boy.  Appears to be more like one of your base than some evil islamic immigrant guy for you to ragetweet about

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 05, 2017, 05:17:35 PM
Ex USAF, taught Bible study classes. Walked into the church in full combat gear and started shooting.

Crazed lone wolf confirmed. Main issue is lack of armed congregation members. Probably Hillary and Obama's fault.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on November 05, 2017, 05:22:29 PM
either let everyone carry a gun, or no one.  Tired of innoncent people getting slaughtered.

At least if everyone has a gun, they can defend themselves. 


Personally, I would prefer that guns were completely outlawed.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 05, 2017, 05:40:10 PM
26 year old white male identified as Devin Patrick.

Posted pic of his AR 15 on social media earlier.

Sorry Donnie boy.  Appears to be more like one of your base than some evil islamic immigrant guy for you to ragetweet about

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk
But is he Muslim?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: sg3 on November 05, 2017, 05:51:03 PM
But is he Muslim?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5052163/Up-27-shot-Texas-church-gunman-opens-fire.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus#ixzz4xbPOYQSB


Doesn't appear to be

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 05, 2017, 05:53:25 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5052163/Up-27-shot-Texas-church-gunman-opens-fire.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus#ixzz4xbPOYQSB


Doesn't appear to be

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk
He could be whuslim.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 05, 2017, 05:55:35 PM
All the usual rumors abound.  He is alt left antifa, redneck with guns, racist.  We'll see soon enough.  freaking sick to know there are parents who lost a 2 year old in church of all places. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 05, 2017, 06:47:35 PM
Antifa soldier confirmed, sorry sg3
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: sg3 on November 05, 2017, 08:18:52 PM
Antifa soldier confirmed, sorry sg3
False, of course.

Antifa, Muslim, Sanders supporter all BS spread by Putin BOTS on Twitter and RWNJ media like Breitbart, Newsmax, OAN and FauxNews

Facts:


26 yr.old dishonorably discharged white guy from Texas with a AR15 automatic weapon





Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 05, 2017, 08:33:36 PM
Antifa sounds like an aggressive lesbian group.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 05, 2017, 08:47:59 PM
Facts:

26 yr.old dishonorably discharged white guy from Texas with a AR15 automatic weapon

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk

Sounds like an InfoWars fan.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 05, 2017, 09:26:45 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20171106/83c3abd4734e102b9d11c770e8f8376b.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 05, 2017, 11:50:50 PM
Sounds like an InfoWars fan.

He looks like someone who spends an unhealthy amount of time on 4chan and Call Of Duty.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 06, 2017, 09:18:15 AM
False, of course.

Antifa, Muslim, Sanders supporter all BS spread by Putin BOTS on Twitter and RWNJ media like Breitbart, Newsmax, OAN and FauxNews

Facts:


26 yr.old dishonorably discharged white guy from Texas with a AR15 automatic weapon





Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk


Isn’t it illegal for a dishonorably discharged veteran to purchase a firearm?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: sg3 on November 06, 2017, 09:19:36 AM
Isn’t it illegal for a dishonorably discharged veteran to purchase a firearm?
Probably not in a rathole like TX

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on November 06, 2017, 09:20:10 AM
Isn’t it illegal for a dishonorably discharged veteran to purchase a firearm?

He was court marshaled for assault, so it was illegal for him to purchase a firearm. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 06, 2017, 09:39:27 AM
He was court marshaled for assault, so it was illegal for him to purchase a firearm.
I have to imagine that there is a bit of drama going on in that gun store today
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on November 06, 2017, 09:43:38 AM
I have to imagine that there is a bit of drama going on in that gun store today

The state of Texas denied him a firearm's license, yet he walked into an Academy Sports and purchased an assault rifle.

Baffling. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on November 06, 2017, 09:46:38 AM
Quote
When Kelley filled out the background check paperwork at the store, he checked the box to indicate he didn't have disqualifying criminal history, the official said. He listed an address in Colorado Springs, Colorado when he bought the rifle, the official said

But we don't need strict gun laws...
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 06, 2017, 09:50:24 AM
But we don't need strict gun laws...

How can that be? Doesn’t a background check delve into your criminal history no matter what box you check?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 06, 2017, 05:55:59 PM
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/359037-air-force-says-it-failed-to-enter-texas-gunmans-court-martial-into-database
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 07, 2017, 06:17:11 AM
"Lapse in background check database allowed Texan church gunman to buy weapons: Pentagon" - http://www.reuters.com/article/us-texas-shooting/lapse-in-background-check-database-allowed-texan-church-gunman-to-buy-weapons-pentagon-idUSKBN1D715Q

Quote
The man who committed the deadliest mass shooting in Texas history was able to buy guns legally from a sporting goods store because a prior domestic violence conviction was never entered into an FBI database used in background checks, officials said.

.......

The Air Force also acknowledged that it had failed to transmit information about Kelley's conviction to the National Criminal Information Center (NCIC) system, a U.S. government data bank used by licensed firearms dealers to check prospective gun buyers for criminal backgrounds.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 07, 2017, 07:04:38 AM
Nice work guys. Doesn’t sounds like those procedures/paperwork are important at all.  The article I posted says this guy was court martialed for cracking open his baby’s skull, how the freak do you not take the preventative measures to make sure this bundle of sticks is accounted for?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 07, 2017, 07:17:15 AM
He looks like someone who spends an unhealthy amount of time on 4chan and Call Of Duty.
Yeah, that's what I said.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 07, 2017, 08:16:51 AM
Yeah, that's what I said.

Antifa soldier confirmed
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 07, 2017, 11:39:39 AM
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2017/11/07/gunman-checked-each-aisle-shot-babies-at-point-blank-range/

Someday maybe we'll find a way to delete people like this from general society.  I don't know how the hell you can fix someone that has the capacity to do this. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 07, 2017, 12:51:22 PM
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2017/11/07/gunman-checked-each-aisle-shot-babies-at-point-blank-range/

Someday maybe we'll find a way to delete people like this from general society.  I don't know how the hell you can fix someone that has the capacity to do this. 

They seem to have a tendency to delete themselves pretty shortly afterwards.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on November 07, 2017, 01:05:46 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/yIPCSok.png)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: sg3 on November 07, 2017, 01:54:50 PM
All of the tweeting of false BS about Antifa, Bernie supporter, Hillary voter etc sprang up like wildfire on Twitter from fake Putin bot and Trumpkin supporter accounts immediately after his identity was revealed.

And, sadly also from SFD here

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 07, 2017, 02:09:11 PM
All of the tweeting of false BS about Antifa, Bernie supporter, Hillary voter etc sprang up like wildfire on Twitter from fake Putin bot and Trumpkin supporter accounts immediately after his identity was revealed.

And, sadly also from SFD here

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk



I read it on Facebook, blame it on the Russian hackers.


Sadly!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: sg3 on November 07, 2017, 02:47:47 PM
I read it on Facebook, blame it on the Russian hackers.


Sadly!
Your refreshing honesty is appreciated

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 09, 2017, 03:35:07 PM
Dylan Roof sentenced to death
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 09, 2017, 04:54:38 PM
Dylan Roof sentenced to death

Good
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 09, 2017, 05:21:25 PM
Dylan Roof sentenced to death

I'm opposed to the death penalty as a point of principle, but I find it very hard to give a freak in this case.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on November 09, 2017, 05:40:47 PM
I'm opposed to the death penalty as a point of principle, but I find it very hard to give a freak in this case.

Depends on the punishment. If he's getting daily beatings and assfuckings then it's alright by me, but just dealt penalty is a bit different.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Fenwyr on November 10, 2017, 10:00:12 AM
I'm opposed to the death penalty as a point of principle, but I find it very hard to give a freak in this case.
I am completely opposed to the death penalty.  I'd rather they just get (their short derriere) life committed to general population.

Much cheaper.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 10, 2017, 10:06:11 AM
I am completely opposed to the death penalty.  I'd rather they just get (their short derriere) life committed to general population.

Much cheaper.

Is life in prison cheaper than the death penalty?  Assuming they survive in prison.  Especially for a young kid who you'd expect to live for quite a while barring getting killed in prison.  Legit question.  I don't know the costs of the death penalty and all that leads up to it vs. long-term prison costs.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on November 10, 2017, 12:05:25 PM
Is life in prison cheaper than the death penalty?  Assuming they survive in prison.  Especially for a young kid who you'd expect to live for quite a while barring getting killed in prison.  Legit question.  I don't know the costs of the death penalty and all that leads up to it vs. long-term prison costs.

I've seen it said a lot that it's more expensive to execute someone, but I think that takes into account all the appeals they can go through before the actual execution.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on November 10, 2017, 03:33:27 PM
The death penalty sucks.  Life without hope of parole is much better and generally offers less protection for the convict.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on November 10, 2017, 04:31:53 PM
Can you imagine Roof having to go to a regular prison in general pop? That would be way better than the death penalty or life without parole. He goes to prison, gets shanked and beaten to death by 10 angry black dudes, and we no longer have to worry about him or pay for his sentence.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 10, 2017, 05:21:20 PM
Can you imagine Roof having to go to a regular prison in general pop? That would be way better than the death penalty or life without parole. He goes to prison, gets shanked and beaten to death by 10 angry black dudes, and we no longer have to worry about him or pay for his sentence.

I can't imagine they put him in general population due to safety reasons, but I'm no expert on jail.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on November 10, 2017, 05:50:33 PM
I can't imagine they put him in general population due to safety reasons, but I'm no expert on jail.

Nah they definitely wouldn't put him there, just thought it would be great.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on November 10, 2017, 09:23:34 PM
If Roof was in gen pop the aryans would probably protect him.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 11, 2017, 12:08:32 AM
If Roof was in gen pop the aryans would probably protect him.
I've never been to prison but I suspect it isn't like every prison movie you've ever watched.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Tommy on November 11, 2017, 02:05:12 AM
I've never been to prison but I suspect it isn't like every prison movie you've ever watched.

Did a quick google search and found that the Aryan Brotherhood represents only about 0.1% of the prison population.

Probably not enough of them to protect Roof.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on November 11, 2017, 10:41:57 AM
I've never been to prison but I suspect it isn't like every prison movie you've ever watched.

Yeah I know, that's why there are Jews in the aryan brotherhood. People will do anything to survive in jail.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 11, 2017, 10:44:19 AM
https://twitter.com/chenueher/status/928710206770606080
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on November 11, 2017, 10:53:42 AM
Jesus that guy is a loon.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 11, 2017, 11:20:31 AM
There is a 100% chance he fucks those dolls.   

Also it would be hilarious if someone did break into his "fortress" and destroyed all his excrement.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on November 11, 2017, 11:35:15 AM
There is a 100% chance he fucks those dolls.   

Also it would be hilarious if someone did break into his "fortress" and destroyed all his excrement.

This
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 14, 2017, 02:43:27 PM
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tehama-county-california-shooting-leaves-three-dead-near-school-n820766

In other news, Scott Walker just signed legislation removing the age limit on how old children have to be before they can legally use firearms.

You people are silly.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on November 14, 2017, 02:49:37 PM
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tehama-county-california-shooting-leaves-three-dead-near-school-n820766

In other news, Scott Walker just signed legislation removing the age limit on how old children have to be before they can legally use firearms.

You people are silly.

This is how the US thins the herd.  #naturalselection
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 14, 2017, 02:51:10 PM
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tehama-county-california-shooting-leaves-three-dead-near-school-n820766

In other news, Scott Walker just signed legislation removing the age limit on how old children have to be before they can legally use firearms.

Some of you people are silly.

Minor correction.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 14, 2017, 02:54:10 PM
Minor correction.

Nah, I was right first time. Like the great comedian Jerry Sadowitz said when he stepped on stage in Montreal, "Hello moosefuckers! Let me tell you why I hate Canada. Half of you speak French, and the other half let them."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: sg3 on November 14, 2017, 03:10:53 PM
Every time I see this thread bumped I open it hoping that a crazed gunman snuck into Foxboro and took out a bunch if Pats starting with Beli, Gronk and Brady

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 14, 2017, 03:11:45 PM
Every time I see this thread bumped I open it hoping that a crazed gunman snuck into Foxboro and took out a bunch if Pats starting with Beli, Gronk and Brady

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk



When that happens it will be in the lolPats thread.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 14, 2018, 04:01:20 PM
If only you had more guns.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/14/florida-high-school-under-lockdown-after-reports-shooter-victims-police-say.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on February 14, 2018, 06:22:13 PM
17 dead...absolutely terrible
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on February 14, 2018, 07:37:07 PM
disgusting.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on February 14, 2018, 08:29:35 PM
Queue that one Onion article.  FFS.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 14, 2018, 08:43:40 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/fox5vegas/status/963886021220868096?ref_src=twcamp%5Eshare%7Ctwsrc%5Eios%7Ctwgr%5Eother%7Ctwcon%5E7100%7Ctwterm%5E0

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on February 15, 2018, 07:55:35 AM
Do you guys have a set limit of kids that need to die before addressing your gun laws?  The rest of the world would like to know.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 15, 2018, 08:18:17 AM
Do you guys have a set limit of kids that need to die before addressing your gun laws?  The rest of the world would like to know.

If Sandy Hook and Vegas didn't make a difference, this will be forgotten before the weekend.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/10/04/opinion/thoughts-prayers-nra-funding-senators.html

Vote Republican. Vote for dead children.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 15, 2018, 08:18:44 AM
http://www.nydailynews.com/amp/news/national/fbi-warned-cruz-professional-school-shooter-plans-months-article-1.3822163#click=https://t.co/VPzQ3o4ibw
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 15, 2018, 08:19:29 AM
https://twitter.com/chaddiedabaddie/status/963906423880118273
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 15, 2018, 08:22:01 AM
http://www.nydailynews.com/amp/news/national/fbi-warned-cruz-professional-school-shooter-plans-months-article-1.3822163#click=https://t.co/VPzQ3o4ibw

If the FBI followed up every douchebag comment on the internet then the entire agency's budget would be dedicated to doing nothing but reading Reddit and YouTube comments.

Appreciate the efforts by the NYDN to make it a problem of mental health and the failure of law enforcement though, they're really getting out of the gate early on this one. I guess when you've written the same bullshit justifications enough times you can just start cutting and pasting.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 15, 2018, 08:22:20 AM
Nothing will change
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on February 15, 2018, 09:46:06 AM
Nothing will change

when do the shooters upgrade to bazookas?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on February 15, 2018, 10:28:25 AM
I don't expect any Republicans in Congress to recommend any changes to our current gun laws if they care about getting re-elected. It would be nice to see a Republican go out in a blaze of glory against the NRA's pull. 

This would be a perfect opportunity for Trump to make a statement about addressing meaningful change to gun laws.  If there was ever anyone who wasn't too worried about the backlash when he really wants to do something, it's him.  He has 3 years left as the president (assuming he doesn't get impeached or kick the bucket) and there is no one else in the party that would stand a chance to win in 2020 so they can only bash him so much.  It would be a chance for him to garner at least a tiny bit of popular support from the other side.  What would the NRA do if Trump came out and said "we need to make changes to these gun laws, we can't keep doing this"?  Would they support a democrat in 2020 (lol)?  It's Trump or bust for the Republicans in 2020 so the NRA would have to eat a nice excrement sandwich and recommend Trump no matter what. 

But it will never happen.  Trump will just do nothing or worse yet, make some stupid statement about not taking muh guns.  As many have said, there is a reason that the US leads the world in this type of violence.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 15, 2018, 10:35:31 AM
when do the shooters upgrade to bazookas?

That's one of the key pillars of the NRA's 2018 Marketing Strategy:

- Make it easier for the mentally ill to purchase firearms (check)
- Make it easier for children to own and/or access firearms (check)
- Remove gun free zones and ensure that teachers, professors, baristas and anyone else serving in a professional function is armed (in progress)
- Increase the firepower available to shooters as a response to the previous point (to be actioned)

And people keep voting for this excrement.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 15, 2018, 11:25:44 AM
Let's remember that Trump signed a bill last year, sponsored and voted for by Republicans, to remove Obama era restrictions on the mentally ill buying firearms:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-signs-bill-revoking-obama-era-gun-checks-people-mental-n727221

I don't know if Nikolas Cruz was considered mentally ill prior to yesterday's events. I wonder whether the next one will be? Maybe that will be the one that will make voters finally say "wait a minute, perhaps an industry lobby whose sole interest is selling more of its product isn't actually the right organisation to be writing policy relating to that product, and maybe we shouldn't be voting for people whose campaigns are bankrolled by that industry lobby just in case they're asked to actually return the favour at some point".

I'm not holding my breath.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on February 15, 2018, 11:36:00 AM
And it sounds like there were 1-2 armed guards at this school.

Why don't we just send in the national guard at every school?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on February 15, 2018, 12:01:27 PM
Why don't we just send in the national guard at every school?

At my last school, we had one student resource officer for a school of almost one thousand students. One guy.   

This is a state trooper specifically trained for Code Red situations.  The guy was a lazy, overweight knucklehead that was usually nowhere to be found if any act of violence took place.  He'd always very conveniently stroll up to the aftermath of a fight after teachers and administrators had calmed the situation.  It's a waste of state resources and no one felt safer because of his presence. 

Even if you had a super cop in a situation like the one that happened yesterday, he/she is not preventing most of that damage from happening.  Too many people, too much chaos and the armed guards aren't equipped to combat a modified assault weapon or smoke grenades.

I'm so sick and tired of the narrative that guns don't kill people, people kill people.  We are paranoid at work because of terrorist attacks like this.  This was a planned assault.  I don't give a damn if that kid is troubled or depressed or whatever the hell else excuse they're using this time.  This does not happen if assault weapons are unavailable.

There has been a school shooting every other day in America this year and it's only February. 

Something has to be done, but nothing will change.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 15, 2018, 12:09:00 PM
Former Republican Congressman David Jolly on CNN Tonight yesterday:

Quote
“The idea of gun policy in the Republican Party is to try to get a speaking slot at the NRA and prove to that constituency that you’re further right than generations past of Republicans have been on guns.”

Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn) in Senate today:

Quote
"This happens nowhere else other than the United States of America — this epidemic of mass slaughter. It only happens here not because of coincidence, not because of bad luck, but as a consequence of our inaction. We are responsible for a level of mass atrocity that happens in this country with zero parallel anywhere else."

I keep hearing people say "nothing will change", but that's because you keep voting for the people the NRA tells you to vote for. The NRA even conveniently give you a scoring system to tell you who they consider to be the most and least gun-friendly candidates - use it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on February 15, 2018, 12:11:23 PM
I hope Chris Murphy runs in 2020.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on February 15, 2018, 12:12:33 PM
I keep hearing people say "nothing will change", but that's because you keep voting for the people the NRA tells you to vote for.

"you"

The southern United States is a hell of a place.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 15, 2018, 12:14:18 PM
"you"

The southern United States is a hell of a place.

Sorry, that wasn't aimed specifically at you or anyone on here. "You" as in America.

It's not just the south though, is it? Aren't California and New Hampshire and pretty much the whole of the Mid West also in love with their firearms?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on February 15, 2018, 12:17:07 PM
It's not just the south though, is it?

No, it's not.  But it's far less progressive down here than California or New Hampshire.  I don't know a damn thing about Iowa or Nebraska and I have no urge to go there, but I feel like those states would have a very similar feel.

The amount of idiocy that I've seen and heard here about school shootings is just disgusting. 

"Arm the teachers!  That'll stop 'em!"

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 15, 2018, 12:32:28 PM
AP is now reporting that Cruz was a member of a white nationalist group called Republic Of Florida, although it sounds more like some tinpot mob trying to get a bit of brand recognition than any particular claim of responsibility.

Quote
The leader of a white nationalist militia says Florida school shooting suspect Nikolas Cruz was a member of his group and participated in paramilitary drills in Tallahassee.

Jordan Jereb told The Associated Press on Thursday that his group, the Republic of Florida, wants Florida to become its own white ethno-state. He said his group holds “spontaneous random demonstrations” and tries not to participate in the modern world.

Jereb said he didn’t know Cruz personally and that “he acted on his own behalf of what he just did and he’s solely responsible for what he just did.”

He also said he had “trouble with a girl” and he believed the timing of the attack, carried out on Valentine’s Day, wasn’t a coincidence.

https://apnews.com/892a28db92924e2faa15e7b90a5b843f
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on February 15, 2018, 04:11:30 PM
Do you guys have a set limit of kids that need to die before addressing your gun laws?  The rest of the world would like to know.
We haven't hit our deductible yet.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on February 15, 2018, 04:47:36 PM
Do you guys have a set limit of kids that need to die before addressing your gun laws?  The rest of the world would like to know.

"Nope, there are already 1MM assault rifles in circulation in the US.  What would a law preventing the purchase of them do?" - Marco Rubio
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 15, 2018, 04:53:43 PM
"Nope, there are already 1MM assault rifles in circulation in the US.  What would a law preventing the purchase of them do?" - Marco Rubio

"That's 299M potential customer opportunities we've yet to capitalise on!" - The NRA, probably
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on February 15, 2018, 05:43:29 PM
"That's 299M potential customer opportunities we've yet to capitalise on!" - The NRA, probably

I get the premise of the argument, and it does hold some weight, but does he mean that 1,010,000 assault rifles isn't any worse than 1,000,000?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 15, 2018, 07:33:33 PM
I get the premise of the argument, and it does hold some weight, but does he mean that 1,010,000 assault rifles isn't any worse than 1,000,000?

I am assuming it's predicated upon the age old and still completely ludicrous premise that if other people have guns then it's safer if you do too, and as it's impossible to take a lot of the existing inventory out of circulation whatchagonnado?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on February 16, 2018, 06:01:46 AM
So pulling back into port today after a week underway and we get yelled at over one of out communications channels for not having the flag at half mast as we enter port. Imagine how freaking delighted I was when I fogured out the reason. Holy excrement, I’ll happily volunteer for the team that has to tale all of the rednecks’ guns.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on February 16, 2018, 06:47:34 AM
The 18 shootings in 48 days myth is about as factually correct as the story the ADL put out (because they used 4CHAN as a freaking source), that the jerkoff was a part of some far-right militia. But I digress.

Forget all of the hysterics and hyperbole, what I'd like to know is what specific policy positions do you have in mind that would strike the balance between an individuals right to bare arms and the safety and security you all seek. Because I hate to tell some of this to you, but just indiscriminately grabbing everyones guns isn't a realistic position.

As we learned from the war on drugs, banning something isn't going to keep it out of the hands of a motivated purchaser.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on February 16, 2018, 08:52:05 AM
The 18 shootings in 48 days myth is about as factually correct as the story the ADL put out (because they used 4CHAN as a freaking source), that the jerkoff was a part of some far-right militia. But I digress.

Forget all of the hysterics and hyperbole, what I'd like to know is what specific policy positions do you have in mind that would strike the balance between an individuals right to bare arms and the safety and security you all seek. Because I hate to tell some of this to you, but just indiscriminately grabbing everyones guns isn't a realistic position.

As we learned from the war on drugs, banning something isn't going to keep it out of the hands of a motivated purchaser.

While I do agree that taking back guns will never happen in the US.  I dont think banning guns and prohibition is the same.

Look at the crime and gun violence in NYC over the past 30 years.  You barely ever hear about gun issues. I understand a densely populated area is much easier to patrol and enforce, but it doesn't mean that really harsh laws wouldn't stop assault rifles from being kept at home.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 16, 2018, 09:14:10 AM
The 18 shootings in 48 days myth is about as factually correct as the story the ADL put out (because they used 4CHAN as a freaking source), that the jerkoff was a part of some far-right militia. But I digress.

Forget all of the hysterics and hyperbole, what I'd like to know is what specific policy positions do you have in mind that would strike the balance between an individuals right to bare arms and the safety and security you all seek. Because I hate to tell some of this to you, but just indiscriminately grabbing everyones guns isn't a realistic position.

As we learned from the war on drugs, banning something isn't going to keep it out of the hands of a motivated purchaser.

Except that the vast majority of mass shootings happen using legally purchased firearms. And anyway, firearms and drugs are completely different markets, buyers and motivations.

Operate an amnesty and/or buyback program as every other country that has outlawed private ownership of firearms has, and you'll take a shitload more off the street.

My biggest issue with your post though is this:

"what specific policy positions do you have in mind that would strike the balance between an individuals right to bare arms and the safety and security you all seek"

Er, none. Because the fallacy of 2A doing anything positive for safety and security is utter horseshit and it's the refusal to face up to that irrefutable fact that is behind the crisis that you are facing. Stop trying to find an unattainable "balance", and face down the industry lobby that has spent so much time and money buying your politicians in order to continue profiting from the endless deaths of innocent Americans.

The problem isn't that there's no answer to the questions, it's that you're asking the wrong ones.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 16, 2018, 09:47:07 AM
I don’t see how a buyback would work to solve the problem. The only people turning them in would be responsible gun owners. What incentive does a criminal or someone with the intention of shooting up a school have to turn in a gun? They need that much more than the money, especially if they’re operating in a marketplace where it’s harder to get a gun.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 16, 2018, 09:48:40 AM
I would be happy if we could start with getting rid of the sale of AR-15s to the public. I haven’t seen an argument that makes even a little sense as to why a civilian should have one.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 16, 2018, 09:57:30 AM
I don’t see how a buyback would work to solve the problem. The only people turning them in would be responsible gun owners. What incentive does a criminal or someone with the intention of shooting up a school have to turn in a gun? They need that much more than the money, especially if they’re operating in a marketplace where it’s harder to get a gun.

Again, most of these shootings are done with legally acquired and owned firearms. Does Sandy Hook happen if Mom didn't have an arsenal in her house? I don't know. It would certainly have been far more difficult for a 20 year old shut-in living in a nice town in middle class America to obtain military grade assault weapons.

Pretty much all illegally owned weapons are originally acquired legally. Take legally owned firearms out of circulation, make it illegal to sell them new or used. If you really want, give a special licence to gun clubs allowing them to own and keep such hardware under very restricted conditions, so that enthusiasts can go fire them in controlled conditions. Sure, there will be plenty of people who won't turn in their guns, but now every one of them is illegal. Every one that gets taken off the street now reduces the number in circulation, and isn't being replaced by two more from the gun dealer down the street or the gun show at the weekend.

This isn't a new thing. Pretty much every other developed country in the world has done it already; yours might be a different scale, but it's the same principle. No, you're not going to take the gun out of the hand of every gangbanger and stick up kid, but you're making it much harder for the next Adam Lanza or Nikolas Kruz or Stephen Paddock to reach their manifest destiny.

"Sorry kids, it's just too difficult, I'm afraid that some of you are not going to come home from school one day because daddy needs an assault rifle to make him feel safer" is a pretty bogus argument IMO. You're perpetuating a marketing message.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on February 16, 2018, 10:55:24 AM
I don't see any reason that semi-automatic weapons should be legal for the general public.  Why not just make nuclear tipped missles legal while we're at it.  "You can't infringe on my right to own this nuke! I use it to hunt rabbits for my family's survival!!" GTFO.

I'm not going to pretend to be some expert on the finer points of the gun laws in the US. I don't own one, don't plan on ever owning one.  People tend to get all in a tizzy that making gun ownership something that is responsible and not easily attainable by anyone in 5 minutes is equivalent to "taking muh guns".  You don't need a semi-automatic weapon to hunt or defend yourself. 

This is not the same world that it was when the 2nd amendment was written.  There were no automatic weapons in the 1700's.  But you can't tell that to unreasonable people.

As JE mentioned, I have no problem if automatic/semi-automatic weapons were relegated to well-controlled, licensed, facilities where you can fire them until you're little gun-loving heart is content.  Hell, put a freaking Howitzer or a flame-thrower in there if you want, I don't care.  You want to own an automatic weapon?  Great!  It's stored at a controlled facility (not your house), you pay to store it safely, and you can go there and shoot the excrement out of paper targets or whatever all you want.  You can have unlimited visits to cuddle with it, tell you love it, have sex with it, whatever.

You can never fix the problem 100%.  There isn't a country that has never had a gun-related death to my knowledge.  That doesn't mean you can't make it much less frequent.  There are plenty of countries that have policies that have worked.  We are behind the 8 ball because of the sheer amount of guns that are already out there in this country, but you have to start somewhere.

Simple steps:

1. Make the waiting period to purchase a gun longer to allow more thorough background checks- 30 days minimum.
2. Require firearms safety class for anyone to own a gun.
3. Have expiration dates on licenses. 
4. All firearms must be registered.

This doesn't fix the issue with firearms already out there but it stems the bleeding.

The 2nd amendment should allow you to own a gun to defend yourself at your home if you know how to use it and aren't unstable.  You can own a batshit crazy weapon in a safe, regulated place. 

This is impossible to fully enforce perfectly, but dammit you can take steps that make things better.  I'm not saying we can have the success that the UK and Canada have, but we can do better than the current US.

 

 

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 16, 2018, 11:01:07 AM
Again, most of these shootings are done with legally acquired and owned firearms. Does Sandy Hook happen if Mom didn't have an arsenal in her house? I don't know. It would certainly have been far more difficult for a 20 year old shut-in living in a nice town in middle class America to obtain military grade assault weapons.

Pretty much all illegally owned weapons are originally acquired legally. Take legally owned firearms out of circulation, make it illegal to sell them new or used. If you really want, give a special licence to gun clubs allowing them to own and keep such hardware under very restricted conditions, so that enthusiasts can go fire them in controlled conditions. Sure, there will be plenty of people who won't turn in their guns, but now every one of them is illegal. Every one that gets taken off the street now reduces the number in circulation, and isn't being replaced by two more from the gun dealer down the street or the gun show at the weekend.

This isn't a new thing. Pretty much every other developed country in the world has done it already; yours might be a different scale, but it's the same principle. No, you're not going to take the gun out of the hand of every gangbanger and stick up kid, but you're making it much harder for the next Adam Lanza or Nikolas Kruz or Stephen Paddock to reach their manifest destiny.

"Sorry kids, it's just too difficult, I'm afraid that some of you are not going to come home from school one day because daddy needs an assault rifle to make him feel safer" is a pretty bogus argument IMO. You're perpetuating a marketing message.

I personally don’t have a problem with any of this. I’m not saying what you propose wouldn’t help, I just think it’s unrealistic (which you know).


You think American want guns because of NRA and political marketing? I think the people that want guns are going to want guns no matter what and support/fund the politicians/NRA, not the other way around. The NRA wouldn’t be so powerful if there weren’t millions of passionate gun nuts supporting them.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 17, 2018, 04:46:18 PM
I personally don’t have a problem with any of this. I’m not saying what you propose wouldn’t help, I just think it’s unrealistic (which you know).


You think American want guns because of NRA and political marketing? I think the people that want guns are going to want guns no matter what and support/fund the politicians/NRA, not the other way around. The NRA wouldn’t be so powerful if there weren’t millions of passionate gun nuts supporting them.

I think people want guns for a number of reasons, but a huge amount I am sure are purchased as "personal protection" because they've bought into the NRA marketing of the boogeyman climbing through their window in the dead of night. I'm also pretty sure that a not insignificant number harbour a hero fantasy that involves them bravely bringing down Osama with their hardware store 9mm.

We know, from things like facts, that the chances of you achieving either of these things are overwhelmingly outweighed by the likelihood of you and/or a loved one being killed or seriously injured with your legally purchased firearm, but it doesn't stop people buying into the marketing.

I have no problem with firearms that are used for hunting and livestock protection, but those aren't AR-15s and Glocks. They're shotguns and long rifles, which are highly available in countries with strict gun control laws like Canada, the UK and Australia. I also have no problem with enthusiasts owning and shooting military hardware in the controlled environment of a gun club, as long as those weapons stay there. Just go to Youtube and put "open carry" in the search bar to see countless fat wannabe soldiers deliberately courting conflict, fear and intimidation by walking around with a military rifle slung over their back, and ask yourself whether those people and their views are what you want to see continued to be enshrined in your legislation.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Hobbes3259 on February 18, 2018, 07:06:24 PM
Bundy freaking Ranch.

it really is that simple.

arms keep governments at bay.

 And by last account Americans own 40% of the worlds privately held firearms.

Federalist 46.

Quote
still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger. The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties,
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Hobbes3259 on February 18, 2018, 07:08:48 PM
and yes, right here in the good ole U.S. of A. we are discovering that the Federal Government tried to rig an election, like some third rate banana republic.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on February 18, 2018, 09:30:02 PM
I would be happy if we could start with getting rid of the sale of AR-15s to the public. I haven’t seen an argument that makes even a little sense as to why a civilian should have one.

There's a significant number of people out there who would think this opinion makes you a gun-grabbing librul.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 19, 2018, 01:01:39 AM
There's a significant number of people out there who would think this opinion makes you a gun-grabbing librul.
Let's be clear, there's a perfectly good argument for why people should be allowed to have an assault rifle. It's because firing them is awesome fun.

There's nothing wrong with accepting that argument, as long as you also accept that the arguments as to why people shouldn't be allowed to own an assault rifle massively outweigh it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 19, 2018, 09:07:01 AM
There's a significant number of people out there who would think this opinion makes you a gun-grabbing librul.

That’s my problem with politics in general. This system is geared toward having extreme views. People/opinions in the middle barely register as a blip on the radar.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 19, 2018, 09:51:28 AM
That’s my problem with politics in general. This system is geared toward having extreme views. People/opinions in the middle barely register as a blip on the radar.

It didn't always used to be that way. Karl Rove and Rupert Murdoch were the key architects of the current venomous partisanship that increasingly dominates all political conversations. The system itself isn't the problem, the way it has been corrupted to suit partisan purposes is.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 19, 2018, 12:27:58 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/chet_cannon/status/964234637760389121?s=12
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Hobbes3259 on February 20, 2018, 05:40:47 PM
It didn't always used to be that way. Karl Rove and Rupert Murdoch were the key architects of the current venomous partisanship that increasingly dominates all political conversations. The system itself isn't the problem, the way it has been corrupted to suit partisan purposes is.

Duuuude...Seriously? 

Quote
Jefferson v. Adams, 1800: Attack of the Personal Attacks!

Remember those founding fathers, so brilliant, so inspirational? They were also mean. Jefferson was accused of being pro-French and running a “Congo harem” out of Monticello. Adams was accused of conspiring to marry his daughter off to the British king’s family, in order to establish a royal bloodline. Also, foes said he had smuggled British prostitutes across the Atlantic to serve his needs.

Andrew Jackson v. John Quincy Adams, 1828: Swift Boats + Birtherism!

Jackson was accused of murdering defectors in the War of 1812 — charges laid out in what becomes known as the “Coffin Handbill.” He was also accused of having an illegitimate marriage, because his wife, Rachel, had been divorced. Meanwhile, Jackson supporters accused Adams of serving as a pimp for the Russian czar. Jackson won, but Rachel died before the election, likely of a heart attack. Jackson believed the election had broken her heart.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2012/10/08/partisan-politics-take-look-century/04FsP1WkuqPNEUioPSqpUP/story.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Italian Seafood on February 20, 2018, 06:29:46 PM
Duuuude...Seriously? 

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2012/10/08/partisan-politics-take-look-century/04FsP1WkuqPNEUioPSqpUP/story.html

He's not from here, he doesn't know anything about it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 20, 2018, 07:52:25 PM
Duuuude...Seriously? 

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2012/10/08/partisan-politics-take-look-century/04FsP1WkuqPNEUioPSqpUP/story.html

It appears that your time away has done freak all for your intelligence or your reading comprehension. Maybe next time you take a sabbatical try spending some time in a library rather than turning tricks out back of a truck stop? The latter might pay better but the former will make you a smarter person.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on February 21, 2018, 01:23:18 PM
If someone who is pro-choice is a baby killer, anyone who supports guns being in the hands of civilians is a child murderer. But then again, it's the same side that tries to get child molesters elected and puts rapists in the White House. Good ol' Conservatism, motherfuckers!

The idea that civilian guns keep a government in check is utterly ridiculous and no longer worth responding to other than "The US government levels towns in the Middle East with unmanned drones. Your guns aren't protecting you. Please proceed to STFU."

The government should offer one year of amnesty. We'll buy back all of your weapons if you turn them in--including all ammunition. After that, anything apart from simple shotguns and single shot rifles are illegal, and if you are caught with one, you'll face the possibility of jail time and massive fines.

People used to argue that you couldn't force people to wear seat belts. Or that nothing was ever going to stop a smoker from smoking. You know how it all changed? Cigarette taxes made it prohibitive to start or continue. Click it or ticket made it cost prohibitive to drive without a seatbelt. Do people still smoke and drive without a seatbelt? Yup. Is the number drastically reduced? Yup.

Children are being murdered and the answer from the right is "Well you can't close Pandora's box y'all!" freak. YOU.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on February 21, 2018, 02:18:01 PM
The government should offer one year of amnesty. We'll buy back all of your weapons if you turn them in--including all ammunition.

I agree with you about guns, but I wonder what the cost of buying them back would be to the government/taxpayer.  i have no idea.  What do you do with all that excrement afterwards?  Melt it down?  Give it to the military?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on February 21, 2018, 02:38:06 PM
I agree with you about guns, but I wonder what the cost of buying them back would be to the government/taxpayer.  i have no idea.  What do you do with all that excrement afterwards?  Melt it down?  Give it to the military?

I would say it would all become the property of the military. That would make the most sense. As for the cost, screw it. The government pisses away our tax money all the time, at least this I could look at as "we're saving children's lives, I'll foot the bill."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on February 21, 2018, 03:11:29 PM
I would say it would all become the property of the military. That would make the most sense. As for the cost, screw it. The government pisses away our tax money all the time, at least this I could look at as "we're saving children's lives, I'll foot the bill."

That sounds great to say, but you have to know the cost. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 21, 2018, 03:15:48 PM
I agree with you about guns, but I wonder what the cost of buying them back would be to the government/taxpayer.  i have no idea.  What do you do with all that excrement afterwards?  Melt it down?  Give it to the military?

Sell it to tinpot dictators and revolutionary armies, the same way you have for decades.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on February 21, 2018, 03:23:09 PM
That sounds great to say, but you have to know the cost. 

Or what? We just let people keep their guns and offer free thoughts and prayers next time a school shooting happens?

Yes, you can be sure it'll be an expensive program. At this point, drastic times call for drastic measures.

Given the choice, I'd just flat out make all firearms illegal and call it a day. No refunds, no exchanges. Just drop off your armory and be glad we're not sending in the ATF to take it all by force. But that would cross over both the right to bear arms and the prohibition against illegal search and seizure.

Maybe money can be saved with the idea of locking your weapons at the gun range with no option to remove it from the premises. I'd be okay with that idea as part of the overall plan, but that's about it. Owners would have to sign out the weapon while at the club, and sign it back in before they leave. No exceptions.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 21, 2018, 03:27:19 PM
Serious answer: put the cost on the weapons manufacturers, and tell them that the bill for the repatriation and destruction of surrendered military hardware is the price they're paying if they want to be considered for any future military and public supply contracts. They've had no problem handing billions of dollars to the NRA for countless years to finance lobbying, it's time to pay the piper with a small portion of the vast amounts of money they've made at the cost of hundreds of thousands of innocents lives.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on February 21, 2018, 03:27:34 PM
Or what? We just let people keep their guns and offer free thoughts and prayers next time a school shooting happens?

Yes, you can be sure it'll be an expensive program. At this point, drastic times call for drastic measures.

Given the choice, I'd just flat out make all firearms illegal and call it a day. No refunds, no exchanges. Just drop off your armory and be glad we're not sending in the ATF to take it all by force. But that would cross over both the right to bear arms and the prohibition against illegal search and seizure.

Maybe money can be saved with the idea of locking your weapons at the gun range with no option to remove it from the premises. I'd be okay with that idea as part of the overall plan, but that's about it. Owners would have to sign out the weapon while at the club, and sign it back in before they leave. No exceptions.

I'm just saying you can't go blindly into it.  Same thing for health insurance.  Even the leftiest of lefties looks at the costs of insurance programs before proposing any laws. 

Personally I don't give 2 shits about guns and wouldn't care if they were all gone. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on February 21, 2018, 03:41:10 PM
Serious answer: put the cost on the weapons manufacturers, and tell them that the bill for the repatriation and destruction of surrendered military hardware is the price they're paying if they want to be considered for any future military and public supply contracts. They've had no problem handing billions of dollars to the NRA for countless years to finance lobbying, it's time to pay the piper with a small portion of the vast amounts of money they've made at the cost of hundreds of thousands of innocents lives.

This seems like a fair plan.

I'm just saying you can't go blindly into it.  Same thing for health insurance.  Even the leftiest of lefties looks at the costs of insurance programs before proposing any laws. 

Personally I don't give 2 shits about guns and would't care if they were all gone. 

Sure, it's not a "snap your fingers and presto we're fixed" situation. But the reality is, we have to do something. And not just talking about it. The time for "reasonable" conversation is over. The opportunity was the multiple previous mass executions. Now it's time to go all-in on solutions, even if that upsets some numbskulls who desperately want to cling to their AR-15s.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on February 21, 2018, 04:38:17 PM
This seems like a fair plan.

Sure, it's not a "snap your fingers and presto we're fixed" situation. But the reality is, we have to do something. And not just talking about it. The time for "reasonable" conversation is over. The opportunity was the multiple previous mass executions. Now it's time to go all-in on solutions, even if that upsets some numbskulls who desperately want to cling to their AR-15s.

I agree.  There should be an assault weapon ban, further extended waiting periods for gun purchases (30 days), safety course to receive license, just as a starting point. 

Some people think that because an assault weapon ban won't solve the problem completely (and it won't) means that it isn't something that should be done.  We shouldn't let perfect be the enemy of good.  There is no freaking reason for a civilian to have an assault weapon.  I also find it insane to think that adding more guns in a school by arming teachers and staff is a good solution to stopping gun violence.  It's a real good idea to have guns in a room with a bunch of students.  It only takes one kid to get the gun from the teacher or the janitor.........It's just more opportunities for something bad to happen.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 21, 2018, 04:45:14 PM
I also find it insane to think that adding more guns in a school by arming teachers and staff is a good solution to stopping gun violence.  It's a real good idea to have guns in a room with a bunch of students.  It only takes one kid to get the gun from the teacher or the janitor.........It's just more opportunities for something bad to happen.

(https://i.imgur.com/5ZFa4s3.png)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on February 21, 2018, 04:51:55 PM
I can't say I'd be thrilled at the prospects of sending my kids to a school where random lunch ladies are armed.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 21, 2018, 06:49:26 PM
I can't say I'd be thrilled at the prospects of sending my kids to a school where random lunch ladies are armed.

Libtard cuck. If you lived in America you'd understand.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on February 21, 2018, 06:55:35 PM
Libtard cuck. If you lived in America you'd understand.
When I was in elementary school our lunch ladies didn't need to be armed, they could just sit on me and I'd be McCowned.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on February 22, 2018, 09:43:30 AM
I agree.  There should be an assault weapon ban, further extended waiting periods for gun purchases (30 days), safety course to receive license, just as a starting point. 

Some people think that because an assault weapon ban won't solve the problem completely (and it won't) means that it isn't something that should be done.  We shouldn't let perfect be the enemy of good.  There is no freaking reason for a civilian to have an assault weapon.  I also find it insane to think that adding more guns in a school by arming teachers and staff is a good solution to stopping gun violence.  It's a real good idea to have guns in a room with a bunch of students.  It only takes one kid to get the gun from the teacher or the janitor.........It's just more opportunities for something bad to happen.

Exactly. That's why nothing gets done anymore. Because every bit of legislation (on both sides) isn't "good enough" if it isn't deemed "perfect."

Like you said, no civilian needs an assault weapon. Once a firearm is capable of firing more than a couple of shots in a minute, it's no longer for protection, it's sole meaning is to take lives as efficiently as possible.

When I was in elementary school our lunch ladies didn't need to be armed, they could just sit on me and I'd be McCowned.

Fantastic.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 22, 2018, 04:40:18 PM
https://twitter.com/marcacaputo/status/966801127168716800?s=12
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 22, 2018, 04:47:03 PM
So let me get this right.

To blame for the Parkland shooting:

- the FBI
- Nikolas Cruz
- the school guard
- gun laws

Not in any way to blame for the Parkland shooting:

- guns
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 22, 2018, 04:57:17 PM
I would be happy if we could start with getting rid of the sale of AR-15s to the public. I haven’t seen an argument that makes even a little sense as to why a civilian should have one.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 22, 2018, 05:09:49 PM
Post not aimed at you. Was a general statement on the usual reaction of parts of the media and the political machine.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on February 22, 2018, 06:26:54 PM
Resource officers are placed in schools because they are not the best police to have on the street.

Like I mentioned earlier in the thread, the one we had when I was in SC was a coward and had very little control over even the smallest incidents.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on February 22, 2018, 06:48:13 PM
That dude is going to have to live with that excrement for the rest of his life.  That and I bet he gets death threats.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on February 22, 2018, 07:07:54 PM
I can't say I'd be thrilled at the prospects of sending my kids to a school where random lunch ladies are armed.

Especially since National Gun Problem #1B (or maybe it's 1A) is that the people professionally and extensively trained to carry and use firearms are killing innocent people at a distressing rate.     

The people promoting this idea don't really believe in it, though.  They've just learned that they need to throw up an idea that'll be debated for a couple of news cycles until everyone moves on and it's back to business as usual.  The idea doesn't need to be plausible; in fact, it's better if it isn't.  If it isn't implemented, it hasn't failed, and they can trot it out after every shooting as the solution the libs are resisting. 

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 23, 2018, 09:57:15 AM
Resource officers are placed in schools because they are not the best police to have on the street.

Like I mentioned earlier in the thread, the one we had when I was in SC was a coward and had very little control over even the smallest incidents.

Quote
Armed deputy resource officer, Scott Peterson sat in his car & never went into the school as he heard shots going off. He did not leave his car until the shooting stopped.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on February 23, 2018, 10:29:38 AM
Resource officers are placed in schools because they are not the best police to have on the street.

Like I mentioned earlier in the thread, the one we had when I was in SC was a coward and had very little control over even the smallest incidents.

I guess they're the "cops" who couldn't even be meter maids.

But that's why you have to arm the teachers. If you want to stop a shooting spree, the only answer is to make it a shootout. Any idiot knows god will protect the righteous.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on February 23, 2018, 10:38:40 AM
Armed deputy resource officer, Scott Peterson sat in his car & never went into the school as he heard shots going off. He did not leave his car until the shooting stopped.

(https://i.imgur.com/3jNgg.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 23, 2018, 10:47:04 AM
I guess they're the "cops" who couldn't even be meter maids.

But that's why you have to arm the teachers. If you want to stop a shooting spree, the only answer is to make it a shootout. Any idiot knows god will protect the righteous.

Absolutely. Where the trained and sworn LEO fails in his duty, surely Mrs Mitchell the 3rd grade history teacher who runs the after school cookery club will have no problem pulling out her .45 and going all Dirty Harry on Blasty McDickface with his military grade hardware and his satchel full of ammo.

Seriously though. All that giving the teachers the right and incentive to carry arms in the classroom does is put a target on their chests, because the next shooter who walks into a school is going to aim for them first regardless of whether they're carrying or not.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on February 23, 2018, 11:00:37 AM
When you have a problem with obesity in schools, the solution is to make sure and spread plenty of M&Ms and fudge rounds all around campus.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 23, 2018, 11:08:48 AM
When you have a problem with obesity in schools, the solution is to make sure and spread plenty of M&Ms and fudge rounds all around campus.

If everyone is obese then no one is obese!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on February 23, 2018, 12:07:10 PM
When you have a problem with obesity in schools, the solution is to make sure and spread plenty of M&Ms and fudge rounds all around campus.

You're never going to stop people from overeating by taking food away. That's just going to make the obese the only ones who can eat!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 23, 2018, 02:23:26 PM
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/fbi-tip-line-caller-said-nikolas-cruz-is-going-to-explode-1519415442?__twitter_impression=true

Such a poor job on the part of the FBI here.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 23, 2018, 04:52:13 PM
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/fbi-tip-line-caller-said-nikolas-cruz-is-going-to-explode-1519415442?__twitter_impression=true

Such a poor job on the part of the FBI here.

Right. Because assholes are the sole preserve of the USA, and the failure of law enforcement is why they go all shooty blasty in schools.

Maybe let's focus on the actual problem?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 23, 2018, 06:59:49 PM
That NRA spokesbint is my new favourite hate freak fantasy. She can suck on my automatic weapon any time.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 23, 2018, 07:39:32 PM
Quote
(CNN)When Coral Springs police officers arrived at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, on February 14 in the midst of the school shooting crisis, many officers were surprised to find not only that Broward County Sheriff's Deputy Scot Peterson, the armed school resource officer, had not entered the building, but that three other Broward County Sheriff's deputies were also outside the school and had not entered, Coral Springs sources tell CNN. The deputies had their pistols drawn and were behind their vehicles, the sources said, and not one of them had gone into the school.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 23, 2018, 07:39:57 PM
Right. Because assholes are the sole preserve of the USA, and the failure of law enforcement is why they go all shooty blasty in schools.

Maybe let's focus on the actual problem?

Maybe it’s possible to have more than one problem?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 23, 2018, 07:49:41 PM
Maybe it’s possible to have more than one problem?
Sure. Like it's possible to have cancer, and a cold, and eczema. So focus on the Sudafed and hydrocortisone cream, right?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: d sw0rdz on February 23, 2018, 08:38:59 PM
trump couldn't be more wrong when he said that these killers/cowards would think twice if they knew that teachers were armed if he thinks they'd be scared and cower down

the people that commit these types of atrocities are fucked in the head and thoughts like these will not enter their minds or instill fear in them when they are about to do these things.

moreover, from a logical standpoint trump doesn't make any sense. what is the student-teacher ratio in your average school across america...20-30:1? and not every teacher will be armed. how many kids will be gunned down before these shooters run into a single armed teacher, and will that armed teacher be able to stop a crazed killer who has most definitely shot guns before? chances are the teacher will get gunned down too

they go into these acts ready to die, and armed teachers inside wouldn't deter them from committing these acts. they'd probably be seen as a means to their end
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on February 23, 2018, 08:46:15 PM
I would say it would all become the property of the military. That would make the most sense.

wat

That sounds great to say, but you have to know the cost.

That's literally the least problematic part of that scenario.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 23, 2018, 08:48:27 PM
The teacher thing is one of the most idiotic ideas I have ever heard, in a year+ of ridiculous ideas. I agree with whoever said it’s just a red herring to distract from meaningful conversation. Completely unsafe and unrealistic.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on February 23, 2018, 09:02:19 PM
The teacher thing is one of the most idiotic ideas I have ever heard, in a year+ of ridiculous ideas. I agree with whoever said it’s just a red herring to distract from meaningful conversation. Completely unsafe and unrealistic.

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180224/a938f116e10cb0a92f371d14dabc757e.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 23, 2018, 09:22:02 PM
So that’s how Star Wars starts.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on February 24, 2018, 03:56:23 PM
Lol.(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180224/03268b49dbbbdf9d1af771c8f9801a46.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 24, 2018, 04:15:05 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/FNk6j4Z.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 24, 2018, 04:16:18 PM
Also: Chris Kyle was killed by a bad guy with a gun. He was the most decorated sniper in US military history. Therefore, in order to be the good guy with a gun successfully, teachers are going to have to be slightly better than Chris Kyle.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 26, 2018, 11:11:19 AM
Quote
Trump rips Fla. Deputies for not going into school. "I really believe I'd run in there even if I didn't have a weapon."

Wow what a hero
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 26, 2018, 11:12:31 AM
Also: Chris Kyle was killed by a bad guy with a gun. He was the most decorated sniper in US military history. Therefore, in order to be the good guy with a gun successfully, teachers are going to have to be slightly better than Chris Kyle.

I saw this tweet go viral the other day. Do you know how Chris Kyle died, without googling it? I don’t remember if they covered that in the movie.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 26, 2018, 12:07:15 PM
I saw this tweet go viral the other day. Do you know how Chris Kyle died, without googling it? I don’t remember if they covered that in the movie.

From memory, didn't he get shot at the range by some guy? I don't remember the details but I'll google them now.

Edit: looked it up. Not shot at the range, but shot in their truck by a guy who they knew was armed and mentally troubled and who they had already discussed as being a risk to their health. So we have two highly decorated combat veterans and a single guy with known mental health issues and access to firearms, and they still couldn't do anything about it.

If only Mrs Mitchell from 3rd grade History class had been there with her .45 they'd have been fine.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 26, 2018, 01:23:44 PM
From memory, didn't he get shot at the range by some guy? I don't remember the details but I'll google them now.

Edit: looked it up. Not shot at the range, but shot in their truck by a guy who they knew was armed and mentally troubled and who they had already discussed as being a risk to their health. So we have two highly decorated combat veterans and a single guy with known mental health issues and access to firearms, and they still couldn't do anything about it.

If only Mrs Mitchell from 3rd grade History class had been there with her .45 they'd have been fine.

You do a fine job of storytelling. He was volunteering to spend time with a veteran from the town he was from, that had severe ptsd. At the request of the veterans’s mother.  This was something Kyle did for a lot of veterans/troubled former military. They knew he was mentally ill and armed because they were there with him.

Kyle and his friend were shot and killed from behind, without warning, with their weapons holstered.  It wasn’t a shootout and it’s a poor metaphor to use in comparison to this type of situation.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 26, 2018, 01:48:36 PM
You do a fine job of storytelling. He was volunteering to spend time with a veteran from the town he was from, that had severe ptsd. At the request of the veterans’s mother.  This was something Kyle did for a lot of veterans/troubled former military. They knew he was mentally ill and armed because they were there with him.

Kyle and his friend were shot and killed from behind, without warning, with their weapons holstered.  It wasn’t a shootout and it’s a poor metaphor to use in comparison to this type of situation.

So are you anticipating that Mrs Mitchell is going to spend the day poised behind her desk in Weaver stance? Because unless you are, it's an exactly correct metaphor - the fact is that elite combat veterans with prior knowledge of a situation's risk can't always stop excrement happening, so what the hell chance does a teacher have?

I don't even know why you're arguing this given you agree with how ludicrous the idea of arming teachers is.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 26, 2018, 03:24:27 PM
So are you anticipating that Mrs Mitchell is going to spend the day poised behind her desk in Weaver stance? Because unless you are, it's an exactly correct metaphor - the fact is that elite combat veterans with prior knowledge of a situation's risk can't always stop excrement happening, so what the hell chance does a teacher have?

I don't even know why you're arguing this given you agree with how ludicrous the idea of arming teachers is.

It’s a very poor metaphor, sorry man. I can mantain that position and that arming teachers is a ludicrous proposal.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: d sw0rdz on February 28, 2018, 05:38:42 PM
yeah it sucks that those resource officers didn't do anything but it's still a deflection from the main point. common citizens shouldnt have the access to these assault rifles that we do now

it's rich that trump is bullshitting that he'd have gone in even without a gun when he's a freaking draft dodger
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 28, 2018, 05:47:51 PM
Quote
President Trump: "I like taking the guns early ... Take the guns first, go through due process second."

Go Trump Go!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 28, 2018, 05:53:58 PM
Walmart and Dick’s Sporting Goods announced today they won’t sell firearms to people under 21. Pretty sure I also saw that Dick’s said they will no longer sell AR-15 style rifles.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 28, 2018, 07:07:25 PM
Walmart and Dick’s Sporting Goods announced today they won’t sell firearms to people under 21. Pretty sure I also saw that Dick’s said they will no longer sell AR-15 style rifles.

Also announced that they will no longer sell high capacity magazines.

(https://i.imgur.com/WcblR0r.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on February 28, 2018, 10:52:25 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180301/12346c275e8f28b56f724997778c341e.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 01, 2018, 11:48:03 AM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180301/12346c275e8f28b56f724997778c341e.jpg)

That moment when Republicans realize Trump isn’t really a Republican and will do/say whatever pops into his barely functioning brain on a whim.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on March 01, 2018, 02:04:53 PM
Say what you will about The Washington Post, but this article is worth a read by everyone. It's terrifying.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/we-studied-thousands-of-anonymous-posts-about-the-parkland-attack---and-found-a-conspiracy-in-the-making/2018/02/27/04a856be-1b20-11e8-b2d9-08e748f892c0_story.html?utm_term=.a067a133e47f (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/we-studied-thousands-of-anonymous-posts-about-the-parkland-attack---and-found-a-conspiracy-in-the-making/2018/02/27/04a856be-1b20-11e8-b2d9-08e748f892c0_story.html?utm_term=.a067a133e47f)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 01, 2018, 02:33:57 PM
Say what you will about The Washington Post, but this article is worth a read by everyone. It's terrifying.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/we-studied-thousands-of-anonymous-posts-about-the-parkland-attack---and-found-a-conspiracy-in-the-making/2018/02/27/04a856be-1b20-11e8-b2d9-08e748f892c0_story.html?utm_term=.a067a133e47f (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/we-studied-thousands-of-anonymous-posts-about-the-parkland-attack---and-found-a-conspiracy-in-the-making/2018/02/27/04a856be-1b20-11e8-b2d9-08e748f892c0_story.html?utm_term=.a067a133e47f)

Maybe the media should be responsible for checking their sources rather than running national stories based on a blog post from freaking 4chan or a tweet from a troll? Only reason this excrement happens is because they’re all in a race to be “first”

Quote
“A spokesperson for the white supremacist group Republic of Florida (ROF) told the Anti-Defamation League on Thursday, February 15, that Nikolas Cruz [....] was associated with his group,” the ADL reported. The ADL quoted a man named Jordan Jereb, who runs the small group, which is based in Tallahassee.

“Jereb added that ROF had not ordered or wanted Cruz to do anything like the school shooting,” the ADL wrote in a blog post that was quickly picked up by ABC News and The Associated Press, and later percolated through dozens of other media outlets.

Quote
But a few hours later, after law enforcement agencies said they had no evidence linking Cruz to ROF, Jereb said his identification of Cruz was a “misunderstanding” and that he, too, had been the subject of a “prank.” On online forums and Twitter, trolls and white nationalists gloated at the disinformation they had sowed.

“All of our evidence seems to point to the ADL getting this wrong,” said Joan Donovan, a researcher who tracks online misinformation campaigns for Data & Society, a think tank in New York City.

The ADL subsequently revised its report, as did many news outlets.

"ADL shared information from our experts on extremism and claims from white supremacist that we believed could be helpful to both law enforcement and the public due to the fluid and evolving nature of the events," an ADL spokesperson said in a statement on Friday. "Confirmation of whether Cruz was part of ROF is now in the hands of law enforcement, and that’s what the Broward sheriff’s team is looking into."

Quote
The ADL traced its original tip to posts on 4chan, where researchers found “self-described ROF members” claiming that Cruz was a brother-in-arms. But many of those posts seem to have been written specifically to deceive reporters and researchers.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on March 01, 2018, 02:56:33 PM
Maybe the media should be responsible for checking their sources rather than running national stories based on a blog post from freaking 4chan or a tweet from a troll? Only reason this excrement happens is because they’re all in a race to be “first”


You didn't read the entire article I linked. Because the stuff you cut and pasted was a completely different story from the one in the article I linked.

The WaPo article tells a story, that while specific to this incident, shows a much more far-reaching problem. And I'm not talking about white supremacy, I'm talking about information and how it's shared/manipulated.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 02, 2018, 10:13:10 AM
Central Michigan University, 2 dead, gunman at large
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on March 02, 2018, 10:24:37 AM
Central Michigan University, 2 dead, gunman at large

Those Dorm R.A.'s need to shoot better.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 02, 2018, 10:26:12 AM
Shooter is black. Something something crime something something gang culture something something black community's fault.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on March 02, 2018, 10:35:38 AM
Shooter is black. Something something crime something something gang culture something something black community's fault.

It will get swept aside because he's black.  It was expected because he's black.  They are savages. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on March 02, 2018, 10:49:53 AM
trump couldn't be more wrong when he said that these killers/cowards would think twice if they knew that teachers were armed if he thinks they'd be scared and cower down

the people that commit these types of atrocities are fucked in the head and thoughts like these will not enter their minds or instill fear in them when they are about to do these things.

moreover, from a logical standpoint trump doesn't make any sense. what is the student-teacher ratio in your average school across america...20-30:1? and not every teacher will be armed. how many kids will be gunned down before these shooters run into a single armed teacher, and will that armed teacher be able to stop a crazed killer who has most definitely shot guns before? chances are the teacher will get gunned down too

they go into these acts ready to die, and armed teachers inside wouldn't deter them from committing these acts. they'd probably be seen as a means to their end
This is the dumbest argument from Trump about this.

You're absolutely right. School shooters aren't going to be scared of getting shot by a teacher for their lives. Most of them kill themselves or get killed in the process. The English Lit teacher isn't going to scare off someone who is so fucked in the head that they plan on shooting up a school. If anything, they would just take the teachers out first.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on March 02, 2018, 10:56:17 AM
This is the dumbest argument from Trump about this.

You're absolutely right. School shooters aren't going to be scared of getting shot by a teacher for their lives. Most of them kill themselves or get killed in the process. The English Lit teacher isn't going to scare off someone who is so fucked in the head that they plan on shooting up a school. If anything, they would just take the teachers out first.

And it introduces a whole new level of confusion when the police arrive and multiple people have guns.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 02, 2018, 11:29:26 AM
Shooter is black. Something something crime something something gang culture something something black community's fault.

According to my #sources on 4chan he was in ISIS
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 02, 2018, 11:30:35 AM
According to my #sources on 4chan he was in ISIS

8chan says he is actually Osama and that the Seal Team 6 execution was a false flag operation financed by George Soros and set up by the Hollywood studios.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 02, 2018, 11:52:30 AM
I actually knew a guy who, the morning after Bin Laden was killed, declared it to be staged.

We don't talk anymore (since 2011-12) but there's no chance he didn't vote for Trump.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 02, 2018, 12:55:16 PM
I’ll wait for a good source before publishing my national news article, but twitter is saying he killed his parents when they came to pick him up.

Go nuts with the narratives, guys.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 10, 2018, 10:24:58 AM
http://www.pressdemocrat.com/news/8094369-181/report-of-gunman-taking-hostages
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 10, 2018, 10:31:56 AM
http://www.pressdemocrat.com/news/8094369-181/report-of-gunman-taking-hostages

Look, you can't afford to look after your veterans and have military parades for your President, right? Some sacrifices have to be made.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 10, 2018, 11:11:37 PM
https://theintercept.com/2018/03/05/as-the-trial-of-omar-mateens-wife-begins-new-evidence-undermines-beliefs-about-the-pulse-massacre-including-motive/

TL; DR The Pulse nightclub shooter probably wasn't targeting gay people, he just picked a popular nightclub.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: klaximilian on March 14, 2018, 12:30:49 PM
http://www.pressdemocrat.com/news/8094369-181/report-of-gunman-taking-hostages

I’ve been sick of these shootings for some time now, but this one really makes my stomach turn. Not only because one of the victims were 7 months pregnant, but because I also knew her very well.

I met the one of the victims, the psychiatrist (Jenn Gonzales) in high school. She was the kind of person you look up and try to live up to the bar she set. Jenn graduated in my class, and we were very close until we went off to different colleges.

A lot of people say a lot of nice excrement about the departed once they are gone. It’s easy to highlight someone’s life by reminiscing about only the good.. But Jenn truly was only good, and one of the most amazing people I have ever had the pleasure of knowing. Always smiling, always positive, always looking to help out someone in some way. She was truly selfless and the world lost one of the better ones.

Her parents said it best when they said that Jenn wouldn’t have wanted her family and friends to hate the man who killed her -  the man was clearly suffering and needed help. And Jenn dedicated her life to helping people with PTSD.

I knew at the rate of these mass shootings, it was only a matter of time before one claimed the life of someone I knew.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on March 14, 2018, 12:33:55 PM
I’ve been sick of these shootings for some time now, but this one really makes my stomach turn. Not only because one of the victims were 7 months pennant, but because I also knew her very well.

I met the one of the victims, the psychiatrist (Jenn Gonzales) in high school. She was the kind of person you look up to, and honestly feel a little bad about yourself because of how amazing of a person she was. Jenn graduated in my class, and we were very close until we went off to different colleges.

A lot of people say a lot of nice excrement about the departed once they are gone. It’s easy to highlight someone’s life by reminiscing about only the good.. But Jenn truly was only good, and one of the most amazing people I have ever had the pleasure of knowing. Always smiling, always positive, always looking to help out someone in some way. She was truly selfless and the world lost one of the better ones.

Her parents said it best when they said that Jenn wouldn’t have wanted her family and friends to hate the man who killed her -  the man was clearly suffering and needed help. And Jenn dedicated her life to helping people with PTSD.

I knew at the rate of these mass shootings, it was only a matter of time before one claimed the life of someone I knew.



Awful.

Sorry for your loss, dude.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 14, 2018, 02:06:53 PM
Sorry man. I can't imagine what it's like to be personally affected by one of these tragedies.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on March 14, 2018, 02:56:36 PM
Jeez klax, I'm so sorry.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 15, 2018, 08:56:08 PM
http://deadstate.org/this-is-the-thread-you-need-to-read-if-you-oppose-arming-teachers/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 15, 2018, 09:36:00 PM
Runs in the family.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/03/15/593799322/sister-of-charleston-shooter-dylann-roof-arrested-after-menacing-social-media-po
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 20, 2018, 10:44:55 AM
Quote
A gunman was killed Tuesday morning after opening fire at a southeast Maryland high school where two students were critically wounded during the chaos.

A school resource officer took down the unidentified shooter after exchanging gunfire inside Great Mills High School, the St. Mary’s County sheriff said.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2018/03/20/shooting-reported-maryland-high-school/440981002/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Jumbo on April 03, 2018, 07:03:47 PM
Shooting at YouTube HQ in San Francisco. Female shooter. Victims are taken to Zuckerberg General Hospital. Very bizarre
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on April 03, 2018, 07:05:29 PM
Shooting at YouTube HQ in San Francisco. Female shooter. Victims are taken to Zuckerberg General Hospital. Very bizarre
Female shooter, that's new.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: klaximilian on April 03, 2018, 07:20:55 PM
Another day, another shooting. This excrement is out of control.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 03, 2018, 08:31:10 PM
Female shooter, that's new.

San Bernardino.

Also:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dplpWIpofHI
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on April 03, 2018, 10:00:07 PM
https://youtu.be/3eG0y_nb5IA
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on April 23, 2018, 07:05:18 AM
The Waffle House shooter is still at large.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on April 23, 2018, 11:24:27 AM
The Waffle House shooter is still at large.

And assumed still naked.

But he's a "sovereign citizen" so it's okay.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on April 23, 2018, 01:39:22 PM
Got the waffle house dude.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on April 23, 2018, 01:56:34 PM
Give him the death penalty.

His father should face charges too for giving that poopchute back his guns after the police only gave him the guns on the condition that he not return them to his son.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 23, 2018, 02:09:02 PM
Quote
Authorities confiscated Travis Reinking’s AR-15 months before he used it to kill four people at a Waffle House in Tennessee, according to Illinois police records.

Reinking, who has been on the run since the Sunday shooting, was detained by secret service in July after breaching the White House perimeter in an attempt to meet with President Donald Trump. Following the incident, police revoked his Illinois gun identification card due to mental health concerns and confiscated his four legally owned firearms.

When police arrived at Reinking’s home to take the guns, his father, who is licensed in Illinois, asked to keep them and promised to keep them away from his son, but now admits he returned them after police left.

“He was allowed to do that after he assured deputies he would keep them secure and away from Travis,” Tazewell County Sheriff Robert M. Huston told reporters Sunday, referring to Reinking’s father.

Nice work guys
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on April 23, 2018, 02:14:51 PM
Nice work guys

Great police work and parenting.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on April 23, 2018, 02:18:09 PM
Great police work and parenting.

#MAGA
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on April 23, 2018, 02:25:22 PM
#MAGA

This could have been prevented if every fry cook was issued a Desert Eagle.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on April 23, 2018, 02:27:32 PM
freaking stupid gun people. theres some poopchute around here who is always preaching about gun control and why should good gun owners be punished because of the bad ones. he just ignores and blocks anyone who points out the fact that his son stole a shotgun from his own closet and went and shot a kid at a party 2 years ago and his currently in prison for attempted murder.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 24, 2018, 12:34:35 PM
https://www.thebeaverton.com/2018/04/nra-outraged-waffle-house-shooting-hero-didnt-use-gun-be-white/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 11, 2018, 05:59:39 AM
Get ready for some real pieces of excrement to celebrate that the last mass shooting happened in Australia.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/11/world/australia/worst-mass-shooting-margaret-river.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Koz on May 11, 2018, 06:57:19 AM
Another day, another shooting. This excrement is out of control.

When did you rise from the dead?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 18, 2018, 09:12:03 AM
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/05/witnesses-vegas-shooter-ranted-about-govt-gun-grabbing-plot.html

Quote
Less than a month before he killed 58 people and injured hundreds more at an outdoor concert in Las Vegas, Stephen Paddock ranted to a new friend about a supposed government plot to confiscate guns from the American public. The man, whose statement is among many released by investigators this week, told authorities that he met Paddock just weeks before the massacre after the 58-year-old answered an online ad for “schematics to convert semi-automatic guns to fire automatically,” the AP reports.

The man, whose identity is redacted, spoke to authorities in a jailhouse interview after getting arrested on a “possession charge.” He told police during the interview that he was an unemployed chef who’d become desperate for cash after his trust fund ran dry.

The man said in their conversations Paddock ranted about a popular right-wing conspiracy theory that claims FEMA’s actions after Hurricane Katrina were “a dry run for law enforcement and military to start kickin’ down doors and … confiscating guns.”

“Somebody has to wake up the American public and get them to arm themselves,” Paddock said, according to the man. “Sometimes sacrifices have to be made.”
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 18, 2018, 10:22:38 AM
Another shooting.  A Texas high school this time.  At least 8 dead.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-texas-shooting/multiple-fatalities-after-shooting-at-texas-high-school-cnn-idUSKCN1IJ1PA

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 18, 2018, 10:43:06 AM
I’m so sick of this.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on May 18, 2018, 01:41:39 PM
https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/997543987446722562

CBS News

Verified account
 
@CBSNews
Follow Follow @CBSNews
More
Texas high school shooting suspect identified as 17-year-old Dimitrios Pagourtzis, law enforcement sources tell CBS News; sources confirm law enforcement is searching property related to the suspected gunman https://cbsn.ws/2wZC4GC

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ddf8-DbVAAAGX-F.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 18, 2018, 01:44:35 PM
^ dammit 624
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 18, 2018, 04:15:33 PM
Just as I suspected, a muslim illegal immigrant. 

Conservative estimate... 2027 before everyone in America knows someone who was in a school shooting.  Maybe then we can slightly extend the waiting period for anti-tank cannons.   
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Libero_2 on May 18, 2018, 04:48:58 PM
I’m so sick of this.

The whole damn country is. The fact it doesn’t even register any empathy in my brain bothers me so much. But it just goes to show how many happen and how many are yet to come until we do something
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 18, 2018, 05:11:50 PM
kids these days really love shooting their classmates
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 25, 2018, 12:46:33 PM
Today is also a day that ends in -y.

https://www.indystar.com/story/news/crime/2018/05/25/noblesville-school-shooting-active-shooter-reported-middle-school/644021002/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 25, 2018, 12:46:55 PM
kids these days really love shooting their classmates

Remember pogs? Let's bring back pogs.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 31, 2018, 08:46:36 AM
https://patch.com/florida/miami/accused-parkland-shooter-you-will-all-know-who-i-am
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 28, 2018, 11:18:44 PM
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2018/jun/28/capital-gazette-shooting-annapolis-latest-live-news-updates-today-maryland

Anyone want to have a guess at motive?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on August 26, 2018, 06:15:20 PM
Apparently a mass shooting at a Madden tournament in Jacksonville at least 5 dead so far
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on August 27, 2018, 09:33:08 PM
Might want to delete this......

https://twitter.com/buffalobills/status/836003181826027521?s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on August 27, 2018, 10:27:50 PM
Might want to delete this......

https://twitter.com/buffalobills/status/836003181826027521?s=19


ugh
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on August 28, 2018, 08:49:55 AM
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2018/jun/28/capital-gazette-shooting-annapolis-latest-live-news-updates-today-maryland

Anyone want to have a guess at motive?

How'd that bit of speculation work out.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on August 28, 2018, 09:17:55 AM
How'd that bit of speculation work out.

Angry loner bearing a grudge.

(https://coedmagazine.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/mugshot.png)

So pretty much as expected.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on August 28, 2018, 09:22:03 AM
(https://coedmagazine.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/mugshot.png)

Is that abyzmul? 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on August 28, 2018, 09:37:43 AM
hahahahaha
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on August 28, 2018, 10:50:30 AM
I wonder if abyz is a full blown Qanon guy now.

Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on August 28, 2018, 11:05:08 AM
I wonder if abyz is a full blown Qanon guy now.

Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk



After seeing his pics, i figured he was one of those weirdos that dressed up in fur suits and had sex with other people in fur suits.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on August 28, 2018, 11:51:13 AM
After seeing his pics, i figured he was one of those weirdos that dressed up in fur suits and had sex with other people in fur suits.
He may be many things but I've never suspected him of being a furry.

Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on August 28, 2018, 12:14:51 PM
He may be many things but I've never suspected him of being a furry.

Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk
Watch for chemtrails at Disney World
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on August 28, 2018, 01:59:23 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1034263750147272704?s=19

chuds gonna chud

Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on August 28, 2018, 03:24:43 PM
(https://i.redd.it/3e7yj5oonui11.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 27, 2018, 11:15:52 AM
Multiple fatalities after someone opens fire in a Pittsburgh synagogue (https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/27/us/pittsburgh-synagogue-active-shooter/index.html)

Shooter in custody.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Jumbo on October 27, 2018, 12:17:44 PM
Know a few people who regularly attend that synagogue or nearby, thankfully all are safe
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on October 27, 2018, 02:16:18 PM
Multiple fatalities after someone opens fire in a Pittsburgh synagogue (https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/27/us/pittsburgh-synagogue-active-shooter/index.html)

Shooter in custody.
What could have inspired this?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 08, 2018, 08:04:58 AM
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/us/shooting-california-thousand-oaks.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 08, 2018, 08:13:54 PM
Holy excrement.

Quote
NRA @NRA

Someone should tell self-important  anti-gun doctors to stay in their lane. Half of the articles in Annals of Internal Medicine are pushing for gun control. Most upsetting, however, the medical community seems to have consulted NO ONE but themselves.

They're actually telling the people who are patching up holes in people, or worse, to "stay in their lane". This is freaking insane.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 08, 2018, 08:32:58 PM
Holy excrement.

They're actually telling the people who are patching up holes in people, or worse, to "stay in their lane". This is freaking insane.
Maybe they are threatening to shoot the doctors.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on November 08, 2018, 11:36:59 PM
Some one needs to throw a chair at the next big NRA meeting.

Also if I could just go one month without having g to see the flag fly at half mast on the back of the ship that would be just great.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Pope on November 10, 2018, 04:41:43 PM
Gun people are weird, they take that excrement so seriously. I think I’ve shot a handgun once and there was nothing special about it. You threaten gun control with some of these people and they lose their minds
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on November 11, 2018, 01:59:24 AM
Someone in my wardroom subscribed to a magazine called Recoil. I have to assume it's target audience is the type of person who stockpiles guns in the event they have to fight the government.

The number of people who fit this description on the ship and see absolutely zero irony in that is ridiculously high.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 13, 2018, 12:11:04 PM


Someone in my wardroom subscribed to a magazine called Recoil. I have to assume it's target audience is the type of person who stockpiles guns in the event they have to fight the government.

The number of people who fit this description on the ship and see absolutely zero irony in that is ridiculously high.

Virtually every gun nut doesn't see the conflict between worshipping the troops/police and fantasizing about violently overthrowing the government.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on November 13, 2018, 06:02:51 PM

Virtually every gun nut doesn't see the conflict between worshipping the troops/police and fantasizing about violently overthrowing the government.

Yeah but I feel that it's still a little bit worse when they ARE THE FREAKING GOVERNMENT.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 14, 2019, 10:26:00 PM
Christchurch NZ, mosque shooting, livestreamed by shooter
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 14, 2019, 10:40:37 PM
Christchurch NZ, mosque shooting, livestreamed by shooter

Wtf, livestreamed? Reading there were shootings at 2 different mosques
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Jumbo on March 14, 2019, 10:42:14 PM
Reading through what this guy was planning, this is one of the most meticulously planned of these I've ever seen. He dropped a lot of bait and it seems like he's been planning this for weeks/months. Looks like it might even be multiple shooters though obviously nothing is confirmed.

This whole thing is sickening
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 14, 2019, 10:43:50 PM
Dozens dead, Australian suspect, 73 page manifesto. Looks like he/they drove across freaking town to the 2nd mosque to commit the 2nd shooting. Disgusting
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 14, 2019, 10:57:24 PM
...this manifesto may be the most batshit crazy thing I have ever laid eyes on
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 14, 2019, 11:10:24 PM
I was flipping channels earlier to see if I could find live coverage and MSNBC was talking about the goddamn Mueller inevstigation
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 14, 2019, 11:12:05 PM
Deleted. I’ve seen the point made that sharing it is what he wanted and that’s the last thing I want to do
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 14, 2019, 11:42:01 PM
Damnit i really wish I didn’t read any part of that and just went to bed. Gonna be next to impossible to sleep now
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Koz on March 15, 2019, 10:15:11 AM
Did anyone see the video before it was taken down? I've heard from those who frequent the darker areas of the web like some reddit subs and liveleak that it was very difficult to see.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 15, 2019, 10:26:33 AM
No, and I have no desire to. Apparently his "manifesto" and his rifle were covered in white supremacist slogans and internet memes ranging from the Navy SEAL copypasta to PewDiePie.

In recent times we've seen horrific mass murders using firearms and vehicles. An increasingly common theme is the radicalisation of young white males through internet communities. Incels, white supremacists, proto-fascists, whatever the core belief system they're being fostered and encouraged to do these things.

There is no "ironic racism". You can not make person of color jokes or nazi salutes or casual misogynist statements without real world consequences, and this is what those consequences look like - innocent worshippers being shot in their mosques and their churches, women being mown down on sidewalks.

Your children are going to be the next Dylann Roof or Alek Minassian or Anders Breivik unless we all start doing something about it, and not letting the anonymity of the internet be an easy excuse to ignore these attitudes.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on March 15, 2019, 10:47:53 AM
No, and I have no desire to. Apparently his "manifesto" and his rifle were covered in white supremacist slogans and internet memes ranging from the Navy SEAL copypasta to PewDiePie.

In recent times we've seen horrific mass murders using firearms and vehicles. An increasingly common theme is the radicalisation of young white males through internet communities. Incels, white supremacists, proto-fascists, whatever the core belief system they're being fostered and encouraged to do these things.

There is no "ironic racism". You can not make person of color jokes or nazi salutes or casual misogynist statements without real world consequences, and this is what those consequences look like - innocent worshippers being shot in their mosques and their churches, women being mown down on sidewalks.

Your children are going to be the next Dylann Roof or Alek Minassian or Anders Breivik unless we all start doing something about it, and not letting the anonymity of the internet be an easy excuse to ignore these attitudes.

This is a pathetic attempt to use a tragedy to justify a worldview.

No, Count Dankula getting his freaking dog to do a Nazi salute in jest did not lead to this. For fucks sake.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 15, 2019, 10:51:09 AM
This is a pathetic attempt to use a tragedy to justify a worldview.

No, Count Dankula getting his freaking dog to do a Nazi salute in jest did not lead to this. For fucks sake.

No, it's stating that PewDiePie doesn't get to use "it was just a joke, bro" to justify his actions.

You're the one who's going to be bringing children into this world. I don't know why you're defending people's rights to make it one full of hatred.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Jumbo on March 15, 2019, 01:26:21 PM
No, it's stating that PewDiePie doesn't get to use "it was just a joke, bro" to justify his actions.

You're the one who's going to be bringing children into this world. I don't know why you're defending people's rights to make it one full of hatred.

You're playing into exactly what the shooter said he wanted to happen in his manifesto. Sad.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 15, 2019, 01:43:19 PM
You're playing into exactly what the shooter said he wanted to happen in his manifesto. Sad.

"The only way to stop the spread of hatred is to allow it to spread!" Gotcha.

Or are you trying to push the long since debunked fallacy that the politics of hatred can be defeated through rational debate? Like you can somehow reason someone out of bigotry?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on March 15, 2019, 02:50:43 PM
"The only way to stop the spread of hatred is to allow it to spread!" Gotcha.

Or are you trying to push the long since debunked fallacy that the politics of hatred can be defeated through rational debate? Like you can somehow reason someone out of bigotry?

First, magnifying the shooters manifesto and spending time on it, is effectuating one of his goals. I'd rather not. But since we're getting into it, the entirety of the rambling is a mixture of shitposting and views completely incoherent with one another (likely intentional considering his stated goal is to incite more division and war). For example, he spews classic white supremacist link and rails against conservatives (essentially the ultra-rightists version of a leftist saying some claptrap like, "liberals get the bullet too"), before endorsing CANDACE OWENS as his biggest influence.

He wants sides pointing at the other. Don't give this poopchute what he wants.


Or are you trying to push the long since debunked fallacy that the politics of hatred can be defeated through rational debate? Like you can somehow reason someone out of bigotry?

The problem is, there are people defining wholly benign talking points such as "we need an immigration freeze from countries who can't get their excrement together" or "we need a secure border" as "politics of hatred." Pewdiepie is now being cited as some sort of gateway drug to white supremacy, which is absurd.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 15, 2019, 03:05:09 PM
First, magnifying the shooters manifesto and spending time on it, is effectuating one of his goals. I'd rather not. But since we're getting into it, the entirety of the rambling is a mixture of shitposting and views completely incoherent with one another (likely intentional considering his stated goal is to incite more division and war). For example, he spews classic white supremacist link and rails against conservatives (essentially the ultra-rightists version of a leftist saying some claptrap like, "liberals get the bullet too"), before endorsing CANDACE OWENS as his biggest influence.

He wants sides pointing at the other. Don't give this poopchute what he wants.

The problem is, there are people defining wholly benign talking points such as "we need an immigration freeze from countries who can't get their excrement together" or "we need a secure border" as "politics of hatred." Pewdiepie is now being cited as some sort of gateway drug to white supremacy, which is absurd.

I completely agree with you that reasonable discussion about sensitive topics has become exponentially difficult as a result of the screeching overreaction to pretty much everything from the more extreme sides of any debate, but it doesn't mean that we shouldn't still try and have it.

However, I don't think that any debate is enhanced by Youtube "personalities" passing off nazi salutes as just a joke. If you have a platform, inherited or built, you have a responsibility to use it in a fashion that is beneficial, and if you choose to use it in negative fashion then you should expect people to want to tear it down.

"It's only a joke bro" (I know you didn't say that) has become one of the most counterproductive and unpleasant mottos of a generation IMO, serving as it has to excuse behaviour that if you did it in person would get your nose smeared across your face. I find it difficult to reconcile people demanding that we stand, remove our hats and pay respect to a generation that gave everything while at the same time accepting that a nazi salute is simply an expression of free speech. If my grandfathers and likely any of our grandfathers who served had seen such a thing while they were alive they would have filled someone in for doing that, and if they didn't I'd have done it for them. The end result of "it's only a joke bro" is 49 people gunned down in the name of bigotry.

Ignoring this excrement isn't working.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on March 16, 2019, 07:19:50 AM
Not all heroes wear capes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0_Wnh_zEbU
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 16, 2019, 05:42:40 PM
Not all heroes wear capes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0_Wnh_zEbU

Darnold’s little brother is a real one
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 16, 2019, 09:28:58 PM
 (https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190317/f0a69accc900d48eb650c3798cb1c0ea.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Jumbo on March 16, 2019, 10:25:15 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190317/f0a69accc900d48eb650c3798cb1c0ea.jpg)

Ben Shapiro doesn't say any of that excrement, and the shooter was very clearly not inspired by a freaking Jew.

Eli Valley is fucked in the head.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Jumbo on March 16, 2019, 10:31:43 PM
Oh and blaming Shapiro for the Quebec mosque shooting too.

God, what a great human being.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 17, 2019, 08:59:20 AM
Ben Shapiro doesn't say any of that excrement, and the shooter was very clearly not inspired by a freaking Jew.

Eli Valley is fucked in the head.
Hoo boy
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 17, 2019, 09:03:13 AM
 (https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190317/c3d8ba67f05bfadb430b638de1a29770.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 17, 2019, 09:08:59 AM
 (https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190317/19effc8d14c462920c3d414b241de90b.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 17, 2019, 09:13:28 AM
Bonus (https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190317/55e97f379a93bd0112a2a82d2036aec3.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190317/5990359585a37ccae92eb9c024551289.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Jumbo on March 17, 2019, 01:11:37 PM
Cool memes, bro. Look forward to you blaming Bernie Sanders for the congressional baseball shooting. You can throw in all of the senators who were pushing "people will die" rhetoric at the time. (I'm not saying they are responsible, because that's freaking dumb, merely that the same standard holds)

I'm sure, somehow, the guy who worked for Sanders' campaign shooting up a bunch of GOP senators had less to do with that rhetoric. Meanwhile, your citation is from a 5 year old video that you don't even know if the NZ shooter watched. The guy was a white supremacist who hated Jews and, even when citing a famous figure who inspired him, opted for Candace Owens.

Too much time on r/chapotraphouse will rot your freaking brain.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 18, 2019, 08:59:53 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-47611811
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on March 18, 2019, 09:16:14 AM
We're blaming Ben freaking Shapiro for New Zealand now?

How many "acceptable" publications that make fun of how backwards Pence is can I blame for Nigerian christians being ethnically cleansed? See? I can say stupid excrement too!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on April 17, 2019, 12:36:07 PM
Fortunately, no there wasn't a mass shooting today, but relatedly, Sol Pais, the girl on the run who was obsessed with Columbine, is dead. No word yet on how she died.

I can't believe it was 20 years ago that Columbine basically started this mass shooting bullshit.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on April 17, 2019, 12:38:02 PM
Fortunately, no there wasn't a mass shooting today, but relatedly, Sol Pais, the girl on the run who was obsessed with Columbine, is dead. No word yet on how she died.

I can't believe it was 20 years ago that Columbine basically started this mass shooting bullshit.

She obviously shot herself
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on April 17, 2019, 12:39:29 PM
She obviously shot herself

That's what I was thinking.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 17, 2019, 12:41:36 PM
I can't believe it was 20 years ago that Columbine basically started this mass shooting bullshit.

Typical Americans, ripping us off again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungerford_massacre

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunblane_massacre
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on April 17, 2019, 12:47:45 PM
Typical Americans, ripping us off again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungerford_massacre

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunblane_massacre

According to the Dunblane page, it's the deadliest mass shooting in Britain's history at 16 dead. And it led to stricter gun laws.

Learning from your tragedies. What a novel concept.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 17, 2019, 12:51:50 PM
According to the Dunblane page, it's the deadliest mass shooting in Britain's history at 16 dead. And it led to stricter gun laws.

Learning from your tragedies. What a novel concept.

Both of them actually led to stricter gun laws. Hungerford was the catalyst for banning semi-automatic weapons, Dunblane brought in the full handgun ban. You can still own a handgun under very restricted conditions, farmers all have shotguns, hunters still have rifles. Surprisingly, the country isn't awash with armed invaders emboldened by the knowledge that homeowners aren't armed.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on April 17, 2019, 01:43:30 PM
Both of them actually led to stricter gun laws. Hungerford was the catalyst for banning semi-automatic weapons, Dunblane brought in the full handgun ban. You can still own a handgun under very restricted conditions, farmers all have shotguns, hunters still have rifles. Surprisingly, the country isn't awash with armed invaders emboldened by the knowledge that homeowners aren't armed.

Buh whabout th'gubmint?! An' how we s'possed t'fight them Mexy canos when they come stormin' th'border?

Next, you're going to tell me universal health care is a reasonable and achievable goal.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on April 17, 2019, 03:33:09 PM
Buh whabout th'gubmint?! An' how we s'possed t'fight them Mexy canos when they come stormin' th'border?

Next, you're going to tell me universal health care is a reasonable and achievable goal.

That's some strawman ya got there!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 07, 2019, 06:58:48 PM
https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/j5w5ek/at-least-7-students-shot-2-suspects-in-custody-at-denver-school-just-miles-from-columbine
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on May 08, 2019, 11:47:05 AM
https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/j5w5ek/at-least-7-students-shot-2-suspects-in-custody-at-denver-school-just-miles-from-columbine

Stop using a tragedy to get on your soapbox!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 08, 2019, 04:10:22 PM
So now that the shooter is a confirmed leftist, when do the usual suspects show up to tell us that Obama, Occupy Dems, Cenk etc. etc. etc have blood on their hands?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 08, 2019, 06:18:07 PM
So now that the shooter is a confirmed leftist, when do the usual suspects show up to tell us that Obama, Occupy Dems, Cenk etc. etc. etc have blood on their hands?
In a just world Obama would probably be convicted of war crimes and executed, but hey what are you gonna do?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on May 09, 2019, 09:19:13 AM
In a just world Obama would probably be convicted of war crimes and executed, but hey what are you gonna do?

In a just world, the Central Park 5 would be hung from the same tree as Obama without need for trivialities like trials, and it would be Supreme Chancellor Donald who had the humble honor of throwing the lever. Lots of people are saying it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 14, 2019, 08:07:41 PM
In a just world, the Central Park 5 would be hung from the same tree as Obama without need for trivialities like trials, and it would be Supreme Chancellor Donald who had the humble honor of throwing the lever. Lots of people are saying it.
I have no idea what point you were trying to make but every US President in my lifetime has/had inexcusable blood on their hands
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on May 15, 2019, 10:40:53 AM
I have no idea what point you were trying to make but every US President in my lifetime has/had inexcusable blood on their hands

You've got to be kidding me.

The sarcasm is literally dripping from my post. I was just piggybacking off yours. Come on, I know we disagree on AOC and Bernie, but FFS, I'm not on the other side. Even if you believed I was anti-Obama, do you actually think I'm pro-lynching?!

Also, I'm not sure any POTUS in history is without inexcusable blood on their hands, but that's beside the point.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 19, 2019, 06:52:22 PM
You've got to be kidding me.

The sarcasm is literally dripping from my post. I was just piggybacking off yours. Come on, I know we disagree on AOC and Bernie, but FFS, I'm not on the other side. Even if you believed I was anti-Obama, do you actually think I'm pro-lynching?!

Also, I'm not sure any POTUS in history is without inexcusable blood on their hands, but that's beside the point.
I could tell you weren't being sincere but still had no idea what point you were trying to make.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on June 01, 2019, 01:57:43 PM
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/01/us/virginia-beach-shooting.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on August 03, 2019, 09:09:01 PM
Looks like we dropped the ball on Gilroy since these barely move the needle these days.

Here's a snippet of the manifesto of the El Paso shooter:

"In general, I support the Christchurch shooter and his manifesto. This attack is a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas. They are the instigators, not me. I am simply defending my country from cultural and ethnic replacement brought on by an invasion."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on August 03, 2019, 09:21:45 PM
Things you say when you're definitely a good lieutenant governor and not just a dumb piece of excrement

https://www.foxnews.com/media/texas-lt-gov-tells-antifa-to-stay-out-of-el-paso-after-walmart-shooting
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on August 04, 2019, 04:06:12 PM
Still at a loss for what could have inspired this(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190804/a8ff2dafdba552d22212a49ad980d3a9.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190804/c6b30812a591601ede192b49a2b70259.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on August 15, 2019, 08:40:48 AM
Doesn't surprise me that you'd get this in Philly

https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2019/08/14/crowd-taunts-philadelphia-police-officers-laugh-at-them-in-midst-of-gunfire-during-standoff-in-nicetown-tioga/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 09, 2019, 12:34:39 PM
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/7x573a/germany-synagogue-shooter-denies-holocaust-in-apparent-video-uploaded-to-twitch
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on October 09, 2019, 04:25:48 PM
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/7x573a/germany-synagogue-shooter-denies-holocaust-in-apparent-video-uploaded-to-twitch

I'm not saying we should build an army of killer robot bees to take out anyone who identifies as a 4Channer, I'm just saying we could maybe look into figuring out how much it would cost.   
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 14, 2019, 02:27:40 PM
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-11-14/shooting-reported-at-saugus-high-school-in-santa-clarita-police-searching-for-teen-suspect?_amp=true&__twitter_impression=true

Santa Clarita CA, high school, 2 dead
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 08, 2019, 07:39:01 AM
https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/man-suspected-of-posting-videos-plotting-downtown-san-diego-mass-shooting?_amp=true&__twitter_impression=true
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 30, 2019, 05:20:07 PM
https://twitter.com/calebjhull/status/1211484264577024001?s=21
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 30, 2019, 05:53:02 PM
https://twitter.com/grantb911/status/1211384089019858946?s=21

Holy freak
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 30, 2019, 06:53:55 PM
https://twitter.com/grantb911/status/1211384089019858946?s=21

Holy freak

Walker Texas Ranger took him out
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 30, 2019, 07:14:22 PM
I don't know excrement about guns but why was the flash of the muzzle of the shooter blatantly apparent, but there essentially none from the officers gun?

Looking on a cellphone so I can't see excrement but is it because the gunman is using a (shotgun?) and the officer just has a pistol or something?

Also I understand being absolutely freaking terrified during something like this, but the mind-numbing screaming I just don't understand.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 30, 2019, 07:40:24 PM
I don't know excrement about guns but why was the flash of the muzzle of the shooter blatantly apparent, but there essentially none from the officers gun?

Looking on a cellphone so I can't see excrement but is it because the gunman is using a (shotgun?) and the officer just has a pistol or something?

Also I understand being absolutely freaking terrified during something like this, but the mind-numbing screaming I just don't understand.
What would go through your mind during a shooting? That you might not live to see Jamal get traded?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 30, 2019, 07:42:43 PM
What would go through your mind during a shooting? That you might not live to see Jamal get traded?
"I'll never get to see the cap savings!"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on December 30, 2019, 07:51:05 PM
I don't know excrement about guns but why was the flash of the muzzle of the shooter blatantly apparent, but there essentially none from the officers gun?

Looking on a cellphone so I can't see excrement but is it because the gunman is using a (shotgun?) and the officer just has a pistol or something?

Also I understand being absolutely freaking terrified during something like this, but the mind-numbing screaming I just don't understand.

I wish you could hear the "mind-numbing" screaming when you post. The sound is akin to that of a mass shooting, who would have thunk it?
DCM JO's mass shooter.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 31, 2019, 05:38:46 PM
What would go through your mind during a shooting? That you might not live to see Jamal get traded?

I'm just saying when you scream people tend to look in that direction. If a dude starts shooting a gun, last thing I'd wanna do is draw his freaking attention.

I would think the smart response is run or hide, not draw attention.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 31, 2019, 05:40:51 PM
I wish you could hear the "mind-numbing" screaming when you post. The sound is akin to that of a mass shooting, who would have thunk it?
DCM JO's mass shooter.


As obnoxious as I am, it's the Gase hysteria that has turned this board into TGG this season.  Every thread is OMG GASE IZ DA WORST EVAR, WE SHUD HAVE FIRED HIM WHEN HE LOST IN THE PRESEASON.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on December 31, 2019, 10:44:36 PM
As obnoxious as I am, it's the Gase hysteria that has turned this board into TGG this season.  Every thread is OMG GASE IZ DA WORST EVAR, WE SHUD HAVE FIRED HIM WHEN HE LOST IN THE PRESEASON.

He said, derailing a mass shooting thread to talk about Adam Gase. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on February 03, 2020, 05:37:04 PM
https://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Shooting-in-Texas-college-dorm-leaves-2-dead-567527641.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on February 04, 2020, 10:02:03 AM
If only that kid had a gun, none of that would have happened.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 20, 2020, 11:43:54 PM
Things are getting back to normal

https://twitter.com/GlendaleAZPD/status/1263300576596520961?s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 21, 2020, 05:58:46 AM
https://twitter.com/heavysan/status/1263342045466370051?s=21
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 21, 2020, 07:35:37 AM
Quote
A disturbing video shared on social media under the Snapchat handle Arizona Man was shared on May 20, by a man who said his name was Armando Junior Hernandez. After flashing video of a long gun, he said from the seat in his vehicle, “Hello, I’m going to be the shooter of Westgate 2020. This is to get back at mean society. So let’s get this done.”

After putting on a camo face mask, the video then shows the shooter firing off rounds off shots while entering the Westage Entertainment District. Suddenly, the video cuts to a woman lying down by the front left wheel of her car, possibly injured, and the shooter said, “Society is bull****.”

We live in a society
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 21, 2020, 07:37:49 AM
We live in a society

A mean one!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 21, 2020, 07:37:49 AM
We had a shooter prancing around Nova Scotia last month posing as a RCMP officer, and shooting people.

Our prime minister banned assault rifles the next day.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 21, 2020, 08:09:43 AM
What is odd is that the Arizona police department actually arrested the non-white suspect.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on May 21, 2020, 12:14:04 PM
We had a shooter prancing around Nova Scotia last month posing as a RCMP officer, and shooting people.

Our prime minister banned assault rifles the next day.

But muh rights!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 21, 2020, 12:47:24 PM
But muh rights!

Yeah but you see we didn't have the foresight to expect to have to take up arms and form a civil militia in order to overthrow a tyrannical government in 2020, so we don't have that right in the first place.

(Also our military is so puny we could probably overthrow the government with hockey sticks and snow shovels if we really needed to.)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on May 21, 2020, 12:56:07 PM
Yeah but you see we didn't have the foresight to expect to have to take up arms and form a civil militia in order to overthrow a tyrannical government in 2020, so we don't have that right in the first place.

(Also our military is so puny we could probably overthrow the government with hockey sticks and snow shovels if we really needed to.)

Nah you guys have the best snipers. '(For some strange reason I knew this prior)


3 of the top 5:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_recorded_sniper_kills (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_recorded_sniper_kills)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 21, 2020, 01:08:45 PM
Nah you guys have the best snipers. '(For some strange reason I knew this prior)


3 of the top 5:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_recorded_sniper_kills (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_recorded_sniper_kills)

Interesting reading about some of those Canadian chaps. Our man with 5th longest record kill in history:

Quote
In 2002, Perry was accused of discreditable conduct by the Canadian Armed Forces. Forces personnel investigated allegations that he had desecrated a combatant's corpse by removing a finger, putting a cigarette in its mouth, and placing a sign reading "freak Terrorism" on its chest. Military police also suspected that Perry had defecated on another corpse.

And our man at #4:

Quote
After leaving the Canadian Army, Furlong moved to Edmonton, Alberta and joined the Edmonton Police Service in 2004, although he had considered joining Joint Task Force 2. In 2012, Furlong was dismissed from the police for discreditable conduct, after an episode in which he physically abused and urinated on a fellow police officer.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on May 21, 2020, 01:15:32 PM
Interesting reading about some of those Canadian chaps. Our man with 5th longest record kill in history:

And our man at #4:


Can't wait to see how #1 tops those 2.

BTW, I am sure the desecrating the corpses happens quite a bit, Australian special forces were known to take ears for the longest. The Vietcong were deathly scared of them, they thought they were nutso. That said beating up a fellow PO and urinating on him. that's lol crazy
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 21, 2020, 07:38:45 PM
https://twitter.com/amaramarasingam/status/1263581453159264258?s=21
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on August 10, 2020, 09:09:38 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/at-least-21-people-were-shot-one-fatally-at-a-gathering-in-southeast-washington/2020/08/09/dde4ee6c-da34-11ea-8051-d5f887d73381_story.html#click=https://t.co/9eXxREJ5T0
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on August 16, 2020, 07:52:16 PM
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/16/us/texas-police-officers-shot/index.html

Going on in a neighborhood about a block from us.  Likely some Trumper gun nut. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on August 16, 2020, 08:01:31 PM
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/16/us/texas-police-officers-shot/index.html

Going on in a neighborhood about a block from us.  Likely some Trumper gun nut.
Just go over there and finish him.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on November 20, 2020, 04:45:10 PM
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/20/us/wisconsin-wauwatosa-mayfair-mall-shooting/index.html

It's been a while since we've had one of these
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 20, 2020, 05:46:22 PM
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/20/us/wisconsin-wauwatosa-mayfair-mall-shooting/index.html

It's been a while since we've had one of these
I thought a few times this year that it was a silver lining of not having as many large groups of people.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on March 16, 2021, 11:02:32 PM

Eight dead, six of them Asian.  This unconscionable anti-Asian shlt is getting out of hand.   Cracker in custody.

 https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/16/us/atlanta-shootings-massage-parlor.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on March 17, 2021, 09:43:45 AM
Eight dead, six of them Asian.  This unconscionable anti-Asian shlt is getting out of hand.   Cracker in custody.

 https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/16/us/atlanta-shootings-massage-parlor.html

Tommy?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on March 17, 2021, 09:56:22 AM
Tommy?

He had an alibi.  He was already in the back room passed out.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on March 17, 2021, 09:57:45 AM
He had an alibi.  He was already in the back room passed out.

poor sayuki
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on March 17, 2021, 10:53:43 AM
Quote
Eight people, including six Asian women, were killed in shootings at three different massage parlors in Atlanta and Acworth, Georgia, on Tuesday, according to local police. A male suspect was arrested and authorities are “very confident” he is responsible for all three shootings, according to Captain Jay Baker from the Cherokee County Sheriff’s Department. At a Wednesday press conference, authorities in Atlanta said the suspect claims that the shootings were not racially motivated. They also identified the victims in Cherokee County.


i'm interested to see the spin that makes the murder of 6 asian woman working at asian massage parlors by a white guy from rural georgia amidst a time of increased violence and hatred towards asian people NOT racially motivated.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on March 17, 2021, 10:54:32 AM
"he went for a rub and tug, but the women declined, incensing him"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 17, 2021, 11:08:11 AM
"He had perceived that they were threatening local businesses and he was defending them"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on March 17, 2021, 11:08:19 AM
Tommy?
Too bad there weren't good people there with guns.  Maybe we should add security guards to massage parlors.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on March 17, 2021, 11:27:56 AM
Can we talk about this excrement growing from his face?

(https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2021/03/NINTCHDBPICT000642092968.jpg?w=620)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on March 17, 2021, 11:35:39 AM
pube chin
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on March 17, 2021, 11:43:02 AM
pube chin

(https://preview.redd.it/rhjaisbnxryz.png?auto=webp&s=2866e42a1dd0b9d90500074c6f567958a260dfe6)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 17, 2021, 11:49:40 AM
Why wouldn’t he just claim that the shootings were racially motivated? Aren’t freaks like this usually proud of what they’ve done?

maybe he won’t get into Nazi heaven because he didn’t kill any jews or blacks?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on March 17, 2021, 01:18:37 PM
  Originally thought it was Kraft - Pats FA flurry as cover. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on March 17, 2021, 01:53:48 PM
Cops at press conferenses are talking about him like he's Michael Douglas from Falling Down.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on March 17, 2021, 03:16:08 PM
Cops at press conferenses are talking about him like he's Michael Douglas from Falling Down.

  Would liked to have given Barbara Hershey's highway a shot from Falling Down.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on March 17, 2021, 05:50:15 PM

i'm interested to see the spin that makes the murder of 6 asian woman working at asian massage parlors by a white guy from rural georgia amidst a time of increased violence and hatred towards asian people NOT racially motivated.

It takes a lot more spin to say that the rash of attacks against Asian-Americans are fueled by white supremacy than it does to say that an attack that kills two white people may have been motivated by something other than racial animus.  I'm not saying to dismiss it off-hand btw because he happened to be a little more diverse in who he murdered, white people in the rural south were killed in the 60's for trying to effectuate social change, but given what we know so far, I think that might be a stretch as opposed to thinking he was motivated by wanting to murder women for the same twisted motivations as every other incel.



Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 17, 2021, 05:57:41 PM
Cops at press conferenses are talking about him like he's Michael Douglas from Falling Down.
He had a real tough day, guys
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on March 17, 2021, 06:05:08 PM
He had a real tough day, guys

That is freaking wild.

Someone needs to get these bumpkins some media training ASAP.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on March 21, 2021, 11:29:26 AM
wasnt race afterall, it was religion.

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Accused-Atlanta-gunman-was-a-patient-at-16039343.php

Accused Atlanta gunman was a patient at evangelical treatment center within a mile of first targeted spa

Quote
The first spa targeted in the Atlanta-area killings this week was in an area very familiar to accused gunman Robert Aaron Long: It's within a mile of an evangelical treatment facility where he spent time as a patient for what he described as "sex addiction," according to a former roommate.

...

But several experts have said this week that Long's ties to evangelicalism shine a light into a subculture called "purity culture," a belief among some evangelicals that promotes the idea that any sexual desire outside of marriage is lustful, and therefore sinful. Some evangelicals are taught from a young age to control their sexual urges and if they cannot, they are sometimes labeled sex addicts or porn addicts.

HopeQuest is affiliated with several large evangelical churches in and around Atlanta, including the North Point megachurch and the historic First Baptist Church of Woodstock. With several counselors licensed by the state of Georgia, it is also a "professional" affiliate of evangelical organization Focus on the Family.

In addition to its work with patients on "sex addiction," HopeQuest was once a hot spot for what some call "gay conversion therapy" and "ex-gay" rehabilitation. Its founder and creator, Roy Blankenship, was once considered one of the nation's foremost conversion therapists.

Blankenship considered himself "ex-gay" and served on the board of the "ex-gay" Exodus International group, which was disbanded in 2013. In December 2018, Blankenship retired as board chairman at HopeQuest after 22 years. He renounced conversion therapy and publicly came out as gay the following year. Blankenship still offers therapy services on his website, including for "sex addiction."

...


Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 22, 2021, 07:34:44 PM
https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/6956943002?__twitter_impression=true
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 22, 2021, 08:39:15 PM
https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/6956943002?__twitter_impression=true

There's a rumour that he opened fire on a line of people waiting for a vaccine shot, although I stress that I've only seen it as an internet rumour thus far.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on March 22, 2021, 09:00:00 PM
This thread can pretty much be merged with the terrorism one.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on March 22, 2021, 09:17:29 PM
I got a friend from back home who works at a Safeway in Colorado springs, I was tripping when my wife asked me if I saw the "Colorado Grocery store shooting".



I wonder what his motive will be? Ugh
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on March 22, 2021, 09:37:56 PM
https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/6956943002?__twitter_impression=true
So umm. At the expense of being insensitive, how many good people with a gun cancell out a bad person with a gun
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 23, 2021, 06:27:19 AM
So umm. At the expense of being insensitive, how many good people with a gun cancell out a bad person with a gun
It's the thought that counts
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on March 23, 2021, 06:58:58 AM
Ban guns yet? No?



K
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on March 23, 2021, 07:37:13 AM
Multiple mass shootings every year: don't infringe on my rights!!!

2 cases of voter fraud: pass all of the voter suppression!!!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 23, 2021, 08:08:32 AM
Ban guns yet? No?



K
No
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on March 23, 2021, 08:14:45 AM
No

Might want to ban them then....just a suggestion


Saving lives is a hobby of mine.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 23, 2021, 08:18:22 AM
Might want to ban them then....just a suggestion


Saving lives is a hobby of mine.
Can't ban guns from civilians, then they have no way to defend themselves from the police.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on March 23, 2021, 08:22:44 AM
My farts are an assault weapon.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on March 23, 2021, 08:24:10 AM
Can't ban guns from civilians, then they have no way to defend themselves from the police.

your society is terrible
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on March 23, 2021, 08:45:42 AM
I mean I'm against banning guns.  If you live in bumblefuck I understand the desire to have one, but my god can we get a bit stricter on sales, enforcement, and regulation?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on March 23, 2021, 08:48:11 AM
I mean I'm against banning guns.  If you live in bumblefuck I understand the desire to have one, but my god can we get a bit stricter on sales, enforcement, and regulation?

there isn't a single civilian on this planet that requires an AR-15.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on March 23, 2021, 08:53:08 AM
your society is terrible
We invented Lipitor.  You're welcome.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on March 23, 2021, 10:07:52 AM
there isn't a single civilian on this planet that requires an AR-15.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/JohFDxpGjRDtRHxrOt/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on March 23, 2021, 10:38:22 AM
Multiple mass shootings every year: don't infringe on my rights!!!

2 cases of voter fraud: pass all of the voter suppression!!!

This excrement logic brought to you by people who think ID laws = suppression.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 23, 2021, 10:41:58 AM
there isn't a single civilian on this planet that requires an AR-15.

As I've said before, I'd let civilians own all manner of ridiculous military killing hardware. I just would require them to leave it at the range at all times, who they would pay for the responsibility of keeping it secure. If someone wants to go make blasty holes in bits of paper with a TEC-9 then go for it, it's awesome fun and you should absolutely be able to do it. There's just no good reason for them having it in their house.

Obviously shotguns and hunting rifles are a different thing, there's no reason why we would restrict those other than for reasons of mental health or proven criminal tendencies. Handguns are not used for hunting or responsible vermin control, so they fall under the range-only category.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 23, 2021, 07:35:21 PM
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1374428280565035017?s=19

Getting killed in a mass shooting while working the gig economy job you have because you can't afford actual retirement is one of the most American ways to die
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on March 28, 2021, 12:46:41 PM
lindsay graham needs his ar-15 so he can shoot a gang of floods and tornados and other assorted natural disasters.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 31, 2021, 11:20:03 PM
https://twitter.com/AP/status/1377470788253663240?s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on April 01, 2021, 09:57:25 AM
you can really tell things are getting back to normal when the mass shootings resume in america
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on April 01, 2021, 10:00:45 AM
you can really tell things are getting back to normal when the mass shootings resume in america
Nature is healing
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on April 03, 2021, 01:05:08 PM
And the beat goes on
https://www.starnewsonline.com/story/news/2021/04/03/wilmington-nc-mass-shooting-downtown-house-party/7073587002/

This teenager AL-Tarrek Bell gave up his life to save a child - what an awesome human being - RIP:
https://abc11.com/18-year-old-saves-boy-shields-in-shooting-man-being-hailed-a-hero-al-tarrek-bell/10473060/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on April 08, 2021, 08:48:20 AM
The Associated Press
@AP
BREAKING: The gunman who killed five people including a prominent doctor in South Carolina was former NFL pro Phillip Adams, who killed himself, according to a source who was briefed on the investigation.


#CTE
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on April 08, 2021, 08:58:49 AM
The Associated Press
@AP
BREAKING: The gunman who killed five people including a prominent doctor in South Carolina was former NFL pro Phillip Adams, who killed himself, according to a source who was briefed on the investigation.


#CTE

Some poopchute on wikipedia:

Quote
Death
On April 7, 2021, a gunman killed five people with his large black third leg, including a prominent doctor, his wife, and two of his grandchildren, in Rock Hill, South Carolina.[8] The following day, the shooter was identified as Adams, who died by suicide.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on April 08, 2021, 09:14:07 AM
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2231080-does-philip-adams-have-what-it-takes-to-replace-dee-milliner-in-jets-secondary

Damn, the PTSD..
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on April 08, 2021, 06:07:37 PM
NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth: 1 Dead, 5 Hurt in Mass Shooting in Bryan; Trooper Shot Pursuing Suspected Shooter.
https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/texas-news/several-people-injured-in-mass-shooting-in-bryan-shooter-at-large/2600682/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on April 08, 2021, 07:24:01 PM
Two in the same day, wonderful.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on April 08, 2021, 11:10:44 PM
Two in the same day, wonderful.

Former NYJ defensive back Phillip Adams was the shooter
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on April 12, 2021, 03:29:46 PM
and another one

https://www.complex.com/life/knoxville-tennessee-high-school-shooting?utm_campaign=complexmag&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social


Multiple Gunshot Victims Reported in Tennessee High School Shooting
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on April 16, 2021, 04:40:55 AM
https://twitter.com/wrtv/status/1382957194866532355?s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on April 18, 2021, 01:46:46 PM
@washingtonpost
Three dead in active shooting situation in Austin, Texas, officials say

another day, another mass murder in america.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on April 18, 2021, 01:48:33 PM
It happened at an apartment complex directly across the street from the Trader Joe's we usually go to on Sunday afternoons.

Sounds like it's more of a domestic situation than a random shooting, but still awful.

I'm sure Greg Abbott will say something stupid derriere excrement about guns later today.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: IATA on April 19, 2021, 07:27:38 AM
The 19-year-old who killed eight people at a FedEx facility in Indianapolis late Thursday night purchased the two assault rifles used in the attack legally months after being investigated by the FBI due to his potential for violence, according to police.




but theres no way this could have been stopped. theres just no clear path here, nope.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 19, 2021, 08:05:14 AM
The 19-year-old who killed eight people at a FedEx facility in Indianapolis late Thursday night purchased the two assault rifles used in the attack legally months after being investigated by the FBI due to his potential for violence, according to police.




but theres no way this could have been stopped. theres just no clear path here, nope.


This isn't the time to be discussing this.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on April 20, 2021, 11:19:29 AM
https://nypost.com/2021/04/18/fedex-mass-shooter-was-obsessed-with-my-little-pony-report/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 20, 2021, 11:23:27 AM
https://nypost.com/2021/04/18/fedex-mass-shooter-was-obsessed-with-my-little-pony-report/

I'm going to guess that the Venn diagram of brony and incel shows a very significant overlap, and that the latter is probably more pertinent to violent behaviour than the former.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on April 20, 2021, 11:26:14 AM
https://nypost.com/2021/04/18/fedex-mass-shooter-was-obsessed-with-my-little-pony-report/

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210420/781100c0a8aa60d16c8b6a154a7b4aa7.gif)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 20, 2021, 12:34:46 PM
Wtf
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 06, 2021, 09:01:59 PM
https://abcnews.go.com/US/sixth-grade-girl-opens-fire-middle-school-idaho/story?id=77543562&cid=social_fb_abcn
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 26, 2021, 12:09:30 PM
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/05/26/us/san-jose-shooting/index.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 30, 2021, 08:22:47 PM
2 dead, over 20 injured, 3 critically in Hialeah

https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/2-dead-over-20-shot-in-targeted-attack-following-concert-in-nw-miami-dade-police/2462322/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Libero_2 on May 31, 2021, 08:08:42 AM
It is incredibly depressing that this thread is 22 pages long
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 07, 2021, 01:33:27 PM
I think suing gun manufacturers over mass shootings is meritless but Remington is trying hard to make me come around

https://twitter.com/connpost/status/1412819326722351108?s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on August 13, 2021, 06:43:10 AM
Plymouth, UK
5 dead including a child
Shooter killed himself
Incel
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on August 13, 2021, 07:06:54 AM
Plymouth, UK
5 dead including a child
Shooter killed himself
Incel
First mass shooting in the UK for 11 years. Shooter held a firearms license and may have used some kind of shotgun.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on August 13, 2021, 07:22:53 AM
I think suing gun manufacturers over mass shootings is meritless but Remington is trying hard to make me come around

https://twitter.com/connpost/status/1412819326722351108?s=19

This is probably a reason why the United States desperately needs tort reform (and honestly the legal system in general)

We have an immensely freaking retarded legal system.
It's like it encourages people to be an obnoxious queynte
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on August 13, 2021, 08:29:14 AM
This is probably a reason why the United States desperately needs tort reform (and honestly the legal system in general)

We have an immensely freaking retarded legal system.
It's like it encourages people to be an obnoxious queynte
Tort reform gets tossed around as one of those common sense solutions that everyone should agree on but really all it would do is make it harder for people to hold larger entities accountable for bad actions.

So should these people get to sue Remington? IMO go for it. Should they win? I don't think so, but Remington should defend themselves without being assholes.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on September 23, 2021, 04:16:15 PM
https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1441136622091726848?s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on September 23, 2021, 04:40:39 PM
https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1441136622091726848?s=19

Doesn't faze anyone anymore.  There will be another one tomorrow.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on September 23, 2021, 04:48:48 PM
Doesn't faze anyone anymore.  There will be another one tomorrow.

It's horrible when you read the comments and (some) people are celebrating this with glee, to stick it to Trump.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on September 23, 2021, 05:24:34 PM
"Cleanup,  aisle 4..."


.  ....thoughts & prayers    :-/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on September 23, 2021, 06:12:00 PM
Doesn't faze anyone anymore.  There will be another one tomorrow.
Am I wrong or were there significantly less in the past year+?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on September 23, 2021, 06:15:39 PM
Am I wrong or were there significantly less in the past year+?
I don't know, I'm kinda numb to it now unless it's nearby.  We had a school shooting near my work this week, noticed that one.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on September 23, 2021, 07:00:02 PM
Am I wrong or were there significantly less in the past year+?

Hard to have mass shootings when everyone (and most importantly schools) are at home

Plus suicides are way up, so you can probably assume that crazy people who do mass shootings would fit in that demographic
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on September 23, 2021, 07:05:45 PM
Hard to have mass shootings when everyone (and most importantly schools) are at home

Plus suicides are way up, so you can probably assume that crazy people who do mass shootings would fit in that demographic

By way of contrast:

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210923/Study-finds-decrease-in-Canadian-suicide-rates-during-the-pandemic-despite-increase-in-unemployment.aspx
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on September 23, 2021, 07:18:54 PM
By way of contrast:

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210923/Study-finds-decrease-in-Canadian-suicide-rates-during-the-pandemic-despite-increase-in-unemployment.aspx

I am curious how the financial support offered by the Canadian government compared to what the United States offered.

The US had offered unprecedented financial support programs.

And I'm purely speculating on this, but I'd imagine that the biggest spike in suicide would be deaths of despair / isolation exacerbating depression and mental illness. Much more so than the financial aspect of the pandemic (not denying that exists)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on September 23, 2021, 07:37:04 PM
I am curious how the financial support offered by the Canadian government compared to what the United States offered.

The US had offered unprecedented financial support programs.

And I'm purely speculating on this, but I'd imagine that the biggest spike in suicide would be deaths of despair / isolation exacerbating depression and mental illness. Much more so than the financial aspect of the pandemic (not denying that exists)

I don't know how the US programs compare - we had a program called CERB, which paid people who had previously been employed or generated revenues via self employment $2K a month for up to 4 months, no questions asked. CRA recovered / will recover any ineligible claims through the usual tax return process, the point of it was an emergency fund that anyone got if they asked for it. After the 4 months of CERB was exhausted you could apply for CRB if you were still not working, which is more like traditional EI in that you have to demonstrate eligibility for it prior to being paid, but you could make your CRB application while receiving CERB. That paid $1000 every two weeks, for a maximum of 54 weeks. So if you claimed the full CERB / CRB benefit, you received $35K of untaxed benefits over the course of 16 months.

I agree with you that it would seem like social reasons and the exacerbation of mental health issues would be a logical primary cause of suicides, and I can't tell you why the US and Canada would have gone in opposite directions on that.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on September 23, 2021, 07:43:16 PM
Well I'm clearly retarded

Suicides in the United States saw its biggest decrease in 40 years during Covid

Though looking back at old articles, they seemed to suggest otherwise at the time
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on September 23, 2021, 08:10:41 PM
Well I'm clearly retarded

Suicides in the United States saw its biggest decrease in 40 years during Covid

Though looking back at old articles, they seemed to suggest otherwise at the time
Anecdotal but I heard one depressed person's reasoning was that during the pandemic they've felt completely justified in feeling terrible, because the circumstances warranted it. So basically they were "thriving" because the way they felt matched their encironment, they felt normal.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on September 23, 2021, 08:56:42 PM
Once the pandemic hit everyone who stands the duty officer watch at my command was given training to expect an increase in suicide and domestic violence reports, which was exactly what we got. So there's that angle.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 02, 2021, 02:13:16 PM
Looks like another great advert for America's firearm laws. Thoughts and prayers, not the time, yadda yadda yadda.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ethan-crumbley-identified-as-oxford-high-school-michigan-mass-shooter
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 02, 2021, 02:20:28 PM
His parents should go to jail too.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 02, 2021, 04:02:32 PM
His parents should go to jail too.

I think solid gun reform is never going to happen

But making parents criminally liable for their kids murdering people with their parents gun's needs to be a freaking thing. How many mass shooter's have freaking retarded parents
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 02, 2021, 04:20:48 PM
I think solid gun reform is never going to happen

But making parents criminally liable for their kids murdering people with their parents gun's needs to be a freaking thing. How many mass shooter's have freaking retarded parents

Nothing will happen.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 02, 2021, 04:43:11 PM
Nothing will happen.

Congress is more worried about anime on Twitter
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 02, 2021, 04:50:24 PM


Congress is more worried about anime on Twitter and CRT

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 02, 2021, 05:54:19 PM



Even more true
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 03, 2021, 06:48:31 AM
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/15-year-old-michigan-school-shooter-methodically-and-deliberately-walked-down-the-hallway-aiming-the-firearm-at-students-prosecutors/

He looks exactly how you would think he does
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 03, 2021, 07:05:27 AM
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/15-year-old-michigan-school-shooter-methodically-and-deliberately-walked-down-the-hallway-aiming-the-firearm-at-students-prosecutors/

He looks exactly how you would think he does
.(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20211203/d2ac97d19a68349b9f5c35ce02a5e7d3.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on December 03, 2021, 11:11:40 AM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/12/03/oxford-high-school-shooting-suspect-parents-charged/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/12/03/oxford-high-school-shooting-suspect-parents-charged/)

Parents of Michigan shooter charged with manslaughter.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 03, 2021, 11:23:06 AM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/12/03/oxford-high-school-shooting-suspect-parents-charged/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/12/03/oxford-high-school-shooting-suspect-parents-charged/)

Parents of Michigan shooter charged with manslaughter.

good
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 03, 2021, 11:33:55 AM
Wow, they're actually going for it. I don't disagree. I don't think any reasonable person would disagree that the father bears partial responsibility - remains to be seen if his criminality can be proven.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 03, 2021, 11:37:11 AM
Wow, they're actually going for it. I don't disagree. I don't think any reasonable person would disagree that the father bears partial responsibility - remains to be seen if his criminality can be proven.


I'm sure there's already a gofundme that will get rejected and some dumbasses ready to protest.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on December 03, 2021, 12:14:44 PM
I'm sure there's already a gofundme that will get rejected and some dumbasses ready to protest.

"I've set up a GoFundMe to cover the legal fees I will incur from suing GoFundMe for taking down my GoFundMe I set up to cover my legal funds."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on December 03, 2021, 12:27:43 PM
https://twitter.com/nyjets/status/1466801410989776899 (https://twitter.com/nyjets/status/1466801410989776899)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on December 03, 2021, 12:49:27 PM
New York General Obligations Law 3-112 outlines parental responsibility law. New York law states that parents or guardians are responsible for the actions of their children who are older than 10 years, but younger than 18 years. The government decided that at age 10, parents should be accountable for damages caused by their children. At age 18 the child in question is an adult and tried as such in a court of o0
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 03, 2021, 01:08:39 PM
Wow, they're actually going for it. I don't disagree. I don't think any reasonable person would disagree that the father bears partial responsibility - remains to be seen if his criminality can be proven.


https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/02/us/michigan-oxford-high-school-shooting-thursday/index.html

If the parents were somehow unaware that their son was a lunatic, the school made it clear. No idea why the school let him stay, that’s another freak up.

Throw the book at the parents
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 03, 2021, 01:18:16 PM
No idea why the school let him stay, that’s another freak up.

It's not that easy, unfortunately. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on December 03, 2021, 02:25:00 PM
Looks like they’re on the run.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on December 03, 2021, 02:26:45 PM
https://twitter.com/acyn/status/1466860422166822914?s=21 (https://twitter.com/acyn/status/1466860422166822914?s=21)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 03, 2021, 02:34:26 PM
Looks like they’re on the run.
Send Kyle the Bounty Hunter after them
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 03, 2021, 03:06:50 PM
Can't make a better argument for not overturning roe vs wade than this
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 03, 2021, 04:36:08 PM
 LOL, I'm not mad at you.(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20211203/e96210aef09c57f59ed8e1176f1b5230.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 03, 2021, 04:38:05 PM
Alright, so do we think the parents knew he was going to do this?  Sounds more and more like it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 03, 2021, 06:13:29 PM
Alright, so do we think the parents knew he was going to do this?  Sounds more and more like it.

If the above quote led you to that conclusion that's ridiculous.

There's no questions the parents are terrible. But there's no freaking way they knew he was about to be a mass murderer
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 03, 2021, 06:49:31 PM
If the above quote led you to that conclusion that's ridiculous.

There's no questions the parents are terrible. But there's no freaking way they knew he was about to be a mass murderer
There's a bit more out there.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on December 03, 2021, 07:46:17 PM
From what I've seen, I can believe the parents completely whiffed on the obvious signs and just thought their excrement kid loved his Christmas present and that the school administrators were a bunch of hippy commies.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 03, 2021, 07:57:11 PM
Parents took $4K out of an ATM, turned off their phones and now there's a manhunt for them.

Honestly, I'd probably do the same in their shoes at this point.  Might as well go out on a high note before prison.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 03, 2021, 08:31:45 PM
Send Kyle the Bounty Hunter after them

Brian Laundries parents got this
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 03, 2021, 09:39:21 PM
Parents took $4K out of an ATM, turned off their phones and now there's a manhunt for them.

Honestly, I'd probably do the same in their shoes at this point.  Might as well go out on a high note before prison.

I don't know excrement about the law, but I'd imagine it would be fairly challenging to convict the parents  of something like this. Though that's also assuming they could afford and find a quality attorney willing to represent them

Just reading up on it, it sounds like from a legal perspective the charges against the parents is an incredibly rare thing. Making it a very uphill battle, also meaning the NRA presumably would get these people the best money can buy. I'm just assuming, but I'd guess this is more about setting precedent or capitalizing on public outtage
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 03, 2021, 11:46:50 PM
(https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_nbcnews-fp-1200-630,f_auto,q_auto:best/rockcms/2021-12/211203-james-jennifer-crumbley-mn-1600-2f4a6a.jpg)

…parents look exactly how you think they would
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 03, 2021, 11:50:09 PM
I don't know excrement about the law, but I'd imagine it would be fairly challenging to convict the parents  of something like this. Though that's also assuming they could afford and find a quality attorney willing to represent them

Just reading up on it, it sounds like from a legal perspective the charges against the parents is an incredibly rare thing. Making it a very uphill battle, also meaning the NRA presumably would get these people the best money can buy. I'm just assuming, but I'd guess this is more about setting precedent or capitalizing on public outtage

Involuntary Manslaughter, life sentence sounds good to me
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 04, 2021, 05:39:42 AM
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/04/us/michigan-oxford-high-school-shooting-saturday/index.html

Quote
James and Jennifer Crumbley were found on the first floor of an industrial building near where authorities had located their car shortly before they were apprehended, Detroit Police spokesperson Rudy Harper told CNN.

"They appeared to be hiding in the building," Detroit Police Chief James White said during a news conference early Saturday morning. They were "very distressed" after they were detained, the chief said.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 04, 2021, 06:44:55 AM
(https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_nbcnews-fp-1200-630,f_auto,q_auto:best/rockcms/2021-12/211203-james-jennifer-crumbley-mn-1600-2f4a6a.jpg)

…parents look exactly how you think they would
They're holed up at MJ's crib
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 04, 2021, 07:13:34 AM
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/04/us/michigan-oxford-high-school-shooting-saturday/index.html

They have to learn how to not get caught
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 04, 2021, 07:51:40 AM
Imagine going on the lam for 13 hours
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 04, 2021, 08:04:14 AM
Quote
McDonald said that the evidence that led to the decision to charge the parents included the fact that Ethan Crumbley had been present at the time that his father purchased the weapon. The Michigan prosecutor also cited a social media post from his mother that his parents had bought the weapon for the teen as a Christmas present.

The prosecutor further discussed drawings made by the 15-year-old and found by a teacher on the morning of the shooting that depicted a gun pointing at words reading “the thoughts won’t stop, help me” and someone being shot twice.

JFC
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 04, 2021, 08:09:56 AM
JFC

Welp, that picture should've been dealt with a little bit differently.  Him just looking at ammo on his phone is not enough to get him out of school, but that drawing...big fuckin' yikes. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 04, 2021, 09:29:40 AM
https://twitter.com/aaronparseghian/status/1466860612122783751?s=21

Detailed timeline and more info on the drawing

The mom’s 2nd text sounds like she knew exactly what he was thinking/capable of
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 04, 2021, 10:18:19 AM
https://twitter.com/aaronparseghian/status/1466860612122783751?s=21

Detailed timeline and more info on the drawing

The mom’s 2nd text sounds like she knew exactly what he was thinking/capable of
"Parents resisted the idea of pulling their son out of school that day."

WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 04, 2021, 10:24:53 AM
"Parents resisted the idea of pulling their son out of school that day."

WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY

The mom was a massive Trumper.  MUH FREEDOM OF SPEECH! 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on December 04, 2021, 03:25:09 PM
The mom was a massive Trumper.  MUH FREEDOM OF SPEECH!

Tell me, what was the political ideology of the guy who ran over six people during a christmas day parade, or are we already passed that?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 04, 2021, 03:38:11 PM
Welp, that picture should've been dealt with a little bit differently.  Him just looking at ammo on his phone is not enough to get him out of school, but that drawing...big fuckin' yikes. 

You have to wonder what this does to the legal case against the parents. The school caught him looking at where to buy ammo, the school found this drawing, the school allowed him to return to class.

The parents are obviously inbred freaking retards, but the school is a professional institution with teachers security counselors etc etc. I think the school makes it incredibly difficult to convict the parents, and the school almost certainly will get bent over with lawsuits. Quite frankly the leadership of the school district needs to face some kind of criminal neglect charges.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 04, 2021, 04:15:54 PM
The parents are obviously inbred freaking retards, but the school is a professional institution with teachers security counselors etc etc. I think the school makes it incredibly difficult to convict the parents, and the school almost certainly will get bent over with lawsuits. Quite frankly the leadership of the school district needs to face some kind of criminal neglect charges.

It's pretty clear how much you don't know about public education and the lack of power that educators have. 

That teacher is probably screaming I told you so at the administration.   
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 04, 2021, 04:19:27 PM
It's pretty clear how much you don't know about public education and the lack of power that educators have. 

That teacher is probably screaming I told you so at the administration.   

I'm not blaming a specific individual, as none of us know the specifics.

But there's literally no way they couldn't have at the absolute freaking minimum contacted the police and or searched the child and his belongings before sending him back to class

Entire schools have been shut down for less
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 04, 2021, 04:21:39 PM
You have to wonder what this does to the legal case against the parents. The school caught him looking at where to buy ammo, the school found this drawing, the school allowed him to return to class.

The parents are obviously inbred freaking retards, but the school is a professional institution with teachers security counselors etc etc. I think the school makes it incredibly difficult to convict the parents, and the school almost certainly will get bent over with lawsuits. Quite frankly the leadership of the school district needs to face some kind of criminal neglect charges.

Why are you caping so hard for these parents, very weird behavior but par for the course for you
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 04, 2021, 04:25:36 PM
Why are you caping so hard for these parents, very weird behavior but par for the course for you

I'm not. The parents are scumbags and their lives are ruined. But I'm purely discussing the legal aspect, and how the school seriously dropped the ball on their end. The parents are freaking retarded and behaved as such. The school is an organization staffed by presumably educated people. But they made some extremely unwise decisions
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 04, 2021, 04:27:35 PM
I'm not. The parents are scumbags and their lives are ruined. But I'm purely discussing the legal aspect, and how the school seriously dropped the ball on their end. The parents are freaking retarded and behaved as such. The school is an organization staffed by presumably educated people. But they made some extremely unwise decisions

Did the school buy the gun for the kid?  No.

STFU
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 04, 2021, 04:28:28 PM
Tell me, what was the political ideology of the guy who ran over six people during a christmas day parade, or are we already passed that?

This is the mass shootings thread, you melting hippo. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 04, 2021, 04:36:13 PM
Did the school buy the gun for the kid?  No.

STFU

There's legal precedent that buying someone a gun used in a killing is not manslaughter.

If it can be proven they bought him the gun to commit murders that's entirely different.

Laws are the laws, I'm all for laws being changed as I think parents should be responsible for what their kid does with a gun they bought them. But that's not the case.

This is just like the Rittenhouse case and other high profile cases in recent years. People wanting justice, instead of the law.

Regardless, it's improbable the parents getting convicted for manslaughter. And I think there's a high probability of a class action lawsuit against the school (entirely speculation)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 04, 2021, 04:37:07 PM
I'm not. The parents are scumbags and their lives are ruined. But I'm purely discussing the legal aspect, and how the school seriously dropped the ball on their end. The parents are freaking retarded and behaved as such. The school is an organization staffed by presumably educated people. But they made some extremely unwise decisions

"Parents resisted the idea of pulling their son out of school that day."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 04, 2021, 04:38:36 PM
This is just like the Rittenhouse case

lmao

stop
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 04, 2021, 04:39:17 PM
I don't know excrement about the law
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 04, 2021, 04:39:18 PM


Dictionary definition of manslaughter.

I apologize for being completely wrong and foolish. Get the stake, I'll try to afford some gasoline. Let's wrap this up
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 04, 2021, 04:40:24 PM


I don't, but CNN has a nice article interviewing lawyers about the law. I think lawyers know some of that
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 04, 2021, 04:41:24 PM
lmao

stop

I'm talking about from a public outcry perspective of not caring about the law and only wanting justice.

Obviously everything is entirely different
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Libero_2 on December 04, 2021, 05:02:36 PM
It's pretty clear how much you don't know about public education and the lack of power that educators have. 

That teacher is probably screaming I told you so at the administration.   

As a person who works in public education…

We have NO freaking power. If a parent says A then the school will do that. Doesn’t matter if it’s as simple as the kid cheated on a test and mom says “of course he didn’t” and with electronic evidence to support he cheated, the kid gets a slap on the wrist and retake exam.

This incident is incredibly tragic, but they did everything they could since they don’t have the authority to override the parents and force them to take the kid home. We can only hope that this timeline of events is something schools read about and focus on learning from because this is the type of thing that absolutely can happen again if parents are stubborn and refuse to listen while the school powers that be refuse to step in. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 04, 2021, 05:07:56 PM
The only other thing I can think of is the school calling the police if the parents resist taking the kid home.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Libero_2 on December 04, 2021, 05:11:34 PM
The only other thing I can think of is the school calling the police if the parents resist taking the kid home.

And what are the police going to do? They can’t arrest a kid for looking at ammo on his phone and making twisted drawings. They can’t force parents to take him home either as he hadn’t done anything yet.

Best case scenario they can force a search, but school law on what allows kids to be searched is very strange. My school had a kid searched for dope and found a gallon ziplock bag of weed (maybe 8 years ago now) prepackaged into small baggies to distribute and the kid was 18 and he got nothing except his excrement confiscated because the search was illegal, and he wasn’t even allowed to have a conference with his parents mandated before he could go back to class.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 04, 2021, 05:22:37 PM
We have NO freaking power. If a parent says A then the school will do that. Doesn’t matter if it’s as simple as the kid cheated on a test and mom says “of course he didn’t” and with electronic evidence to support he cheated, the kid gets a slap on the wrist and retake exam.

A lot of people think I changed careers because of the money, but this is really why.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on December 04, 2021, 05:38:43 PM
I don't, but CNNLOL has a nice article interviewing lawyers about the law. I think lawyers know some of that


FYP.


Anyway, you'd think so, but this is the same network that employs Jeffrey Tobin.

For what it's worth, these parents actually sound like total freaking retards.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on December 04, 2021, 06:09:24 PM
"Parents resisted the idea of pulling their son out of school that day."

WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY

They didn't want to get shot.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Libero_2 on December 04, 2021, 06:09:39 PM
A lot of people think I changed careers because of the money, but this is really why.
not sure when you swapped careers, but it’s gotten so much worse since Covid. Anything to make it impossible to fail.

It’s a major disservice to kids everywhere
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 04, 2021, 06:14:24 PM
not sure when you swapped careers, but it’s gotten so much worse since Covid. Anything to make it impossible to fail.

It’s a major disservice to kids everywhere

I was out before COVID, fortunately. 

Heard all kinds of bullshit from friends. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 04, 2021, 06:23:06 PM
This is just like the Rittenhouse case

You're not wrong. It's pretty egregious how no one is talking about the threat that all those other kids were posing to Crumbley and how entirely reasonable it was for him to exercise his constitutional rights to carry and use a firearm to defend himself against the clear and present threat of girls refusing to let him feel their funbags under the bleachers.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 04, 2021, 06:25:30 PM
You're not wrong. It's pretty egregious how no one is talking about the threat that all those other kids were posing to Crumbley and how entirely reasonable it was for him to exercise his constitutional rights to carry and use a firearm to defend himself against the clear and present threat of girls refusing to let him feel their funbags under the bleachers.
I should have been a serial shooter based on my high school dating record.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on December 04, 2021, 06:30:27 PM
You're not wrong. It's pretty egregious how no one is talking about the threat that all those other kids were posing to Crumbley and how entirely reasonable it was for him to exercise his constitutional rights to carry and use a firearm to defend himself against the clear and present threat of girls refusing to let him feel their funbags under the bleachers.

LOL you keep on trying to compare apple butter to horseshit in order to fuel your desire to see an innocent 17 year old sentenced to life imprisonment.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Libero_2 on December 04, 2021, 07:02:20 PM
I was out before COVID, fortunately. 

Heard all kinds of bullshit from friends. 

It’s been a disaster man.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on December 04, 2021, 07:06:07 PM
It’s been a disaster man.

Every teacher that I meet is ready to hang it up.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 04, 2021, 07:07:24 PM
LOL you keep on trying to compare apple butter to horseshit in order to fuel your desire to see an innocent 17 year old sentenced to life imprisonment.

You're making the mistake of thinking I give a excrement about Rittenhouse. I'm just using him as the latest example of how astonishingly stupid your laws are.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on December 04, 2021, 08:22:10 PM
You're making the mistake of thinking I give a excrement about Rittenhouse.

Obviously you do considering you're shoehorning shitty examples that have nothing to do with what actually happened in his case in order to express your discontent with the result.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 04, 2021, 09:07:12 PM
Obviously you do considering you're shoehorning shitty examples that have nothing to do with what actually happened in his case in order to express your discontent with the result.

Not sure if you're missing my point because you don't understand it, or because it's inconvenient.

To be clear: Rittenhouse is a symptom, not the disease. No other country in the world has Rittenhouses because no other country in the world has your idiotic laws.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on December 04, 2021, 09:45:33 PM
Not sure if you're missing my point because you don't understand it, or because it's inconvenient.

To be clear: Rittenhouse is a symptom, not the disease. No other country in the world has Rittenhouses because no other country in the world has your idiotic laws.

He's not a symptom or a disease.

The disease rests with the lies that went into the veneration of the piece of excrement that is Jacob Blake and the broader narratives that present an idea that America is a backward, racist pooper.

The symptom is Kenosha going up in flames for absolutely no goddamn reason.

Other functional countries that utilize a similar way of governance certainly have societal elites that hate the common rabble; none are so overt about it as those in the States right now.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 04, 2021, 09:57:48 PM


No other country in the world has Rittenhouses because no other country in the world has your idiotic laws.

Counterpoint: the IDF
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 04, 2021, 10:02:47 PM

Counterpoint: the IDF

Not sure mandatory service for all citizens in support of a shitty government equates to laws that encourage mentally disturbed teenagers to buy and use firearms on their fellow citizens.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 04, 2021, 10:04:51 PM


Not sure mandatory service for all citizens in support of a shitty government equates to laws that encourage mentally disturbed teenagers to buy and use firearms on their fellow citizens.

Unsure if you're naturally missing or trying to miss the comparison. I'd elaborate, but a child threw a rock at me so I'm going to turn them into a sieve.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 04, 2021, 10:05:06 PM
He's not a symptom or a disease.

The disease rests with the lies that went into the veneration of the piece of excrement that is Jacob Blake and the broader narratives that present an idea that America is a backward, racist pooper.

The symptom is Kenosha going up in flames for absolutely no goddamn reason.

Other functional countries that utilize a similar way of governance certainly have societal elites that hate the common rabble; none are so overt about it as those in the States right now.

There you go again with the whatabouts.

The Kenosha riots were also a symptom of your idiotic laws.

Also, it's very clear that much of America is a backward, racist pooper. That's not to say that parts of many other countries aren't, but most of them don't allow their backward racists to buy and use firearms against their fellow citizens. Some despotic African republics maybe, but that's about it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 04, 2021, 10:06:26 PM

Unsure if you're naturally missing or trying to miss the comparison. I'd elaborate, but a child threw a rock at me so I'm going to turn them into a sieve.

Unsure if you think I'm trying to defend the IDF. It's just a different kind of shitty, Israel orders its citizens to be gun wielding cunts whereas you marketize it and make it an appealing choice.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on December 04, 2021, 10:14:43 PM
There you go again with the whatabouts.

The Kenosha riots were also a symptom of your idiotic laws.

Also, it's very clear that much of America is a backward, racist pooper. That's not to say that parts of many other countries aren't, but most of them don't allow their backward racists to buy and use firearms against their fellow citizens. Some despotic African republics maybe, but that's about it.

It's not whataboutism.

Kenosha and the riots of 2020 were a direct result of hacktivists and opportunist political figures utilizing their grand pulpits to ferment propaganda. Jacob Blake is a demonstrative piece of excrement who for lack of a more scientific or politically correct way to put it, fucked around and found out. And he's continued to be lionized, much like Mike Brown is continued to be lionized around absolute lies that aren't even hard to objectively address.

Much of America isn't a backwards, racist pooper. I'm a pretty big misanthrope but wholeheartedly believe that this country is in fact filled with decent people who are just trying to live their day to day, white, black, asian, whatever. I think as it stands right now, our culture freaking sucks, but I digress. 

If you're referring to Ahmad Arbery's murder, justice was served. What, do murders not take place in other countries?!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 04, 2021, 10:18:10 PM
opportunist political figures utilizing their grand pulpits to ferment propaganda

I refuse to believe that you typed that with a straight face
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on December 04, 2021, 10:20:13 PM
I refuse to believe that you typed that with a straight face

That's an interesting attempt to deflect from the examples provided.

No, you're right, Jacob Blake did nothing wrong and was the victim of police brutality, so Kenosha had to burn.

Mike Brown didn't do anything! He had his hands up and said don't shoot!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 04, 2021, 10:26:56 PM
That's an interesting attempt to deflect from the examples provided.

No, you're right, Jacob Blake did nothing wrong and was the victim of police brutality, so Kenosha had to burn.

Mike Brown didn't do anything! He had his hands up and said don't shoot!

No, you were absolutely right. Kenosha was 100% the direct result of opportunist political figures utilizing their grand pulpits to ferment propaganda. On that we are on complete agreement.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 04, 2021, 10:50:17 PM
You're not wrong. It's pretty egregious how no one is talking about the threat that all those other kids were posing to Crumbley and how entirely reasonable it was for him to exercise his constitutional rights to carry and use a firearm to defend himself against the clear and present threat of girls refusing to let him feel their funbags under the bleachers.

I was talking about the public appetite for justice, irrespective of what the actual law is. I think justice would have been Rittenhouse and these parents all going to prison. But I'm not confident that they are guilty under the law
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 05, 2021, 07:21:19 AM
I was talking about the public appetite for justice, irrespective of what the actual law is. I think justice would have been Rittenhouse and these parents all going to prison. But I'm not confident that they are guilty under the law

Yes I know, I agree with you. I'm talking about the proven absurdity of your laws, not whether they're being correctly applied.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on December 05, 2021, 10:52:20 AM
The school released details.  The counselors didn't think he was a threat to any other students.  They should all be removed from their roles. 

Here's the problem with administration and also most guidance counselors that I've worked with:  they are so ridiculously out of touch with the kids and the community and they lean on their overeducation to make decisions.  A lot of these meetings with parents have pre-determined outcomes. 

What does a 50+ year old white woman with a master's degree know about a 15 year old black kid with a 30 year old mother?  Not a god damn thing.  They're quick to label that kind of kid as a nuisance though.  This Crumbley kid has BOTH parents come to a meeting and it's suggested that he gets counseling.  They knew how they were going to handle that situation before the parents were even contacted. 

The professionals that need to be in these roles usually aren't, because the pay is excrement.  And the ones that are have aged out and are in those roles because they have experience plus advanced degrees that they earned 20+ years ago just so they could make an extra $10-$15K a year. 

The American public education system is a joke because it's being run by blind dinosaurs that don't have a pulse. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 05, 2021, 12:23:21 PM
The American public education system is a joke because it's being run by blind dinosaurs that don't have a pulse. 

You are wrong. The biggest problem with the American public education system is that it's teaching CRT.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 06, 2021, 07:32:08 AM


What does a 50+ year old white woman with a master's degree know about a 15 year old black kid with a 30 year old mother?  Not a god damn thing.  They're quick to label that kind of kid as a nuisance though.

If only there was some academic school of thought that could explain why this happens.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 07, 2021, 10:04:34 AM
Quote
TMZ
@TMZ
·
50m
Kyle Rittenhouse said he used to be a fan of LeBron James, but after the Lakers star's shade during his trial, "I'm like, 'You know what, f*** you, LeBron.'"


I'm no Lebron fan either, but freak this kid.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on December 07, 2021, 01:24:28 PM

I'm no Lebron fan either, but freak this kid.
#LessonLearned
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on December 07, 2021, 08:06:40 PM
The Independent: Oxford school shooting: Ethan Crumbley appointed lawyer by court after parents only hired their own.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/ethan-crumbley-oxford-school-shooting-b1971470.html

Damn that's cold.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on December 07, 2021, 08:15:12 PM
The Independent: Oxford school shooting: Ethan Crumbley appointed lawyer by court after parents only hired their own.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/ethan-crumbley-oxford-school-shooting-b1971470.html

Damn that's cold.

Something something learn not to get caught.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 07, 2021, 09:17:59 PM
The Independent: Oxford school shooting: Ethan Crumbley appointed lawyer by court after parents only hired their own.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/ethan-crumbley-oxford-school-shooting-b1971470.html

Damn that's cold.

To be fair that kids fucked no matter who his lawyer is
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 07, 2021, 11:14:29 PM
To be fair that kids fucked no matter who his lawyer is

You sound just like his father
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 07, 2021, 11:38:47 PM
You sound just like his father

I would've told him to test it on himself first before firing
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 09, 2021, 02:40:34 PM
https://twitter.com/breaking911/status/1469034573321449476?s=21
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on December 09, 2021, 10:29:07 PM

I'm no Lebron fan either, but freak this kid.

lol keep crying about it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on December 10, 2021, 04:00:36 AM
I’m no fan of that kid but freak The Decision
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 10, 2021, 07:52:47 AM
lol keep crying about it.

(https://scontent.fyyc2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.15752-9/263014403_953916425215029_3271608738509414067_n.jpg?_nc_cat=107&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=ae9488&_nc_ohc=8L4TfQOq73IAX8kq7Oy&_nc_ht=scontent.fyyc2-1.fna&oh=a64e3ca67092357e9884ee3fc2540641&oe=61D9324F)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 12, 2021, 05:52:22 PM
https://www.foxnews.com/media/lawyer-representing-oxford-parents-in-100m-lawsuit-says-school-ignored-crumbleys-obvious-intent-to-harm

100 million dollar lawsuit against the school a pair of parents whose daughter was shot in the neck

Same lawyer who litigated Columbine
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 12, 2021, 07:18:41 PM
https://www.foxnews.com/media/lawyer-representing-oxford-parents-in-100m-lawsuit-says-school-ignored-crumbleys-obvious-intent-to-harm

100 million dollar lawsuit against the school a pair of parents whose daughter was shot in the neck

Same lawyer who litigated Columbine

No point sueing Crumbenhouse or his parents when they don't have the cash or the insurance to settle.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 12, 2021, 08:54:30 PM
No point sueing Crumbenhouse or his parents when they don't have the cash or the insurance to settle.

I don't disagree

I was more alluding that a high profile attorney probably wouldn't have taken the case if he didn't think he could win.

The school is not the only party at fault. But they did a tremendously excrement job
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 16, 2021, 07:38:39 PM
https://twitter.com/sandyhook/status/1471593224221429769?s=21

Very cool, very normal stuff
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on December 17, 2021, 08:08:21 AM
https://twitter.com/sandyhook/status/1471593224221429769?s=21

Very cool, very normal stuff

The next tiktok challenge should hopefully be them filming their prison beatings
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on December 17, 2021, 08:16:16 AM
As usual I cope by telling myself "that sort of thing doesn't happen here" despite knowing everyone it ever happened to must have thought that at some point.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on January 03, 2022, 02:35:57 PM
https://twitter.com/kyleclark/status/1475967691303407621?s=21
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on February 15, 2022, 05:19:57 PM
This seems significant. But maybe it isn't.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60312237
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 20, 2022, 06:06:07 PM
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/many-10-injured-shooting-arkansas-car-show-state-police-say-rcna20761
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on April 06, 2022, 04:55:39 PM
In the legislative bosom of apparently some pretty lax gun laws

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/07/Flag_of_Sacramento%2C_California_%281964–1989%29.gif)

https://twitter.com/orko_manna/status/1510801396831989764

While this 18 shot, 6 dead mass shooting curiously didn't see the light of day here in JO-land, chances are likely this story (and its inconvenient side narratives) should be off the back pages shortly....https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-04-05/sacramento-shooting-suspect-got-out-of-prison-early-despite-da-opposition




Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 16, 2022, 05:34:59 PM
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/16/us/columbiana-mall-shooting-sc.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on April 16, 2022, 05:44:58 PM
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/16/us/columbiana-mall-shooting-sc.html

#paywall
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 16, 2022, 05:54:41 PM
#paywall

#stopbeingcheap
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on April 16, 2022, 05:59:36 PM
#stopbeingcheap

#eatabagofdicks
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 16, 2022, 06:26:55 PM
#eatabagofdicks

#onlyiftheyrefree
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 13, 2022, 05:44:11 PM
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/police-search-gunman-shot-three-korean-women-texas-hair-salon-rcna28470
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 14, 2022, 03:48:29 PM
Buffalo, supermarket, 10 dead, shooter in custody, "great replacement" white supremacist

https://bnonews.com/index.php/2022/05/mass-shooting-supermarket-buffalo/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 14, 2022, 05:15:39 PM
Quote
A 106-page online manifesto, believed to have been uploaded by the shooter, explained that he was motivated by a conspiracy theory that white people are being replaced by other races. In the document, he says he is 18 years old and a self-described white supremacist and anti-semite.

“If there’s one thing I want you to get from these writings, it’s that White birth rates must change. Everyday the White population becomes fewer in number,” the document says. “To maintain a population the people must achieve a birth rate that reaches replacement fertility levels, in the western world that is about 2.06 births per woman.”

Maybe if young white men would stop being such absolute freaking knobheads, young white women might be slightly more willing to have sex with them.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 14, 2022, 05:22:36 PM
Maybe if young white men would stop being such absolute freaking knobheads, young white women might be slightly more willing to have sex with them.

If only this poor young soul knew,

The real problem is modern men have become a bunch of estrogenic little bitches who have bigger titties than most of the women that aren't dating them. Thus the sperm quality of men is one of the greatest threats to continued existence of mankind.

Of course this isn't unique to Americans or Caucasians, but is a legitimate global crisis.

If only they were breastfed and did a better job raising their sperms
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 14, 2022, 05:23:38 PM
If only this poor young soul knew,

The real problem is modern men have become a bunch of estrogenic little bitches who have bigger titties than most of the women that aren't dating them. Thus the sperm quality of men is one of the greatest threats to continued existence of mankind.

Of course this isn't unique to Americans or Caucasians, but is a legitimate global crisis.



Settle down there Dr Peterson.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 14, 2022, 05:29:44 PM
Settle down there Dr Peterson.

I'm being a little intentionally obnoxious and dramatic.

But the things I'm talking about aren't psych issues, though they may have a psych factor.

But it really is continued a serious threat to the human population. And this isn't subjective psychological analysis bullshit. It's quantifiable that the quality and quantity of the male sperm has declined over 50% from our parents/grandparents, and this has obvious implications for human reproduction.

The speculation as to the why gets into Peterson territory, though I think it's pretty clear that diet and obesity are a huge factor
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 14, 2022, 05:35:28 PM
I'm being a little intentionally obnoxious and dramatic.

But the things I'm talking about aren't psych issues, though they may have a psych factor.

But it really is continued a serious threat to the human population. And this isn't subjective psychological analysis bullshit. It's quantifiable that the quality and quantity of the male sperm has declined over 50% from our parents/grandparents, and this has obvious implications for human reproduction.

The speculation as to the why gets into Peterson territory, though I think it's pretty clear that diet and obesity are a huge factor

I very much agree with your last sentence. I'm a huge fan of the internet and cellphones and videogames and Netflix, and as a child of the video nasty era who was and is a huge fan of intensely violent movies I absolutely reject the argument that such content makes kids violent, but a lot of people (male and female) really do need to spend a lot more time outside, a lot more time moving around, and a lot more time interacting with real people.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 14, 2022, 05:50:31 PM
Trying to reason with the unreasonable is pointless.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 14, 2022, 06:26:45 PM
So what you're saying is my elite sperm could have prevented this.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 14, 2022, 06:27:38 PM
So what you're saying is my elite sperm could have prevented this.

Only if you had more sex with white women.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 14, 2022, 06:33:17 PM
Only if you had more sex with white women.
Good point, I accidentally did a white genocide instead.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 14, 2022, 07:35:09 PM
Good point, I accidentally did a white genocide instead.

You are a race traitor. This is all your fault.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 14, 2022, 09:14:06 PM
Good point, I accidentally did a white genocide instead.
You masturbated?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 08:45:12 AM
you guys take away the right to own an AR-15 yet?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 15, 2022, 09:03:58 AM
you guys take away the right to own an AR-15 yet?

Just bought one to defend my house against gnats.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 15, 2022, 04:24:44 PM
That didn't take long.

https://www.orange-county-church-shooting-multiple-people-shot-laguna-woods/11853777/ (https://www.orange-county-church-shooting-multiple-people-shot-laguna-woods/11853777/)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Gorilla on May 15, 2022, 04:48:00 PM
Just bought one to defend my house against gnats.

I assume that stands for Gays, Negroes, And Trannies.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 05:51:08 PM
I assume that stands for Gays, Negroes, And Trannies.
4 honks
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 15, 2022, 06:40:39 PM
LA, about 30 mins ago.


WARNING: THREAD INCLUDES PICTURES OF SHOOTING VICTIM

https://twitter.com/TinaDesireeBerg/status/1525611374671323136?t=7k1fEMqctMWvCiG-S4zRTg&s=19 (https://twitter.com/TinaDesireeBerg/status/1525611374671323136?t=7k1fEMqctMWvCiG-S4zRTg&s=19)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 15, 2022, 06:48:13 PM
Over 20 people were shot in Milwaukee.....crickets....

https://nypost.com/2022/05/14/24-wounded-3-killed-from-milwaukee-shootings-near-bucks-playoff-game/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 15, 2022, 06:57:21 PM
Over 20 people were shot in Milwaukee.....crickets....

https://nypost.com/2022/05/14/24-wounded-3-killed-from-milwaukee-shootings-near-bucks-playoff-game/

That's the fun part. When the kill ratio goes to one or less per incident it's like it doesn't matter.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 15, 2022, 07:24:44 PM
I don't know how people can defend guns during this excrement

Though I don't think any moderate gun control laws would make a huge difference either
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 07:36:38 PM
I don't know how people can defend guns during this excrement

Though I don't think any moderate gun control laws would make a huge difference either
Guns should've been made illegal as soon as they were used to murder elementary school kids in CT.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 15, 2022, 07:39:01 PM
Guns should've been made illegal as soon as they were used to murder elementary school kids in CT.

I don't give a freak about guns, but this is an absurd overreaction and this is probably the reason gun reform hasn't happened.

Now if you said assault rifles should've been banned after this, I'd say you were completely warranted
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 07:41:46 PM
I don't give a freak about guns, but this is an absurd overreaction and this is probably the reason gun reform hasn't happened.

Now if you said assault rifles should've been banned after this, I'd say you were completely warranted
Are you really splitting hairs on gun type?

GFY
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 15, 2022, 07:42:35 PM
Guns should've been made illegal as soon as they were used to murder elementary school kids in CT.

LOL
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 15, 2022, 07:43:33 PM
On a side note holy excrement almost 50,000 people die a year from guns in the US, I would've thought that number was way lower.

The biggest red flag is almost 30,000 people die from gun suicide a year. Meaning the US does a horrendous problem with people with severe mental illness having access to guns (plus the severely mental Ill mass shooters)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 15, 2022, 07:45:37 PM
Are you really splitting hairs on gun type?

GFY

Uhm yes

Even if the goal was to ban all guns, you have to make it incremental and palatable.

There's freaking over 400 million guns in the United States. A bill to ban all guns is an unrealistic impossibility
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 07:47:10 PM
LOL
I'm a fully functional member of society...and I've never fired a shot in my life.

Unless you're hunting for food or in the military,  everyday citizens don't need guns.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 07:49:24 PM
Uhm yes

Even if the goal was to ban all guns, you have to make it incremental and palatable.

There's freaking over 400 million guns in the United States. A bill to ban all guns is an unrealistic impossibility
Gun disposal is another convo and doesn't impede enforcing strict laws.



Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 15, 2022, 07:51:58 PM
I'm a fully functional member of society...and I've never fired a shot in my life.

Unless you're hunting for food or in the military,  everyday citizens don't need guns.

You're not the one to dictate what people need or don't need in their lives.

It's codified in the most sacred document we have as a nation, so I guess that's just too bad.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 15, 2022, 07:56:55 PM
Once the US decided that murdering elementary school kids in school was OK, gun control was dead in the US.

I'd love to see the second amendment repealed but it will never happen, no matter how many children wind up in coffins with legally purchased fire arms.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 15, 2022, 07:59:08 PM
Gun disposal is another convo and doesn't impede enforcing strict laws.


You think disposal is the issue?

How about the fact that you have 400 million guns out there, so enforcing and working out the logistics of this would be a complete nightmare.

Regardless I think extreme changes to the law overnight is a horrible way to go about it.

Ban assault rifles, revamp laws pertaining to owning/registering a gun, change the process to purchase a gun.

But to go 0-100 in one shot is not the way to go about things, and certainly is a horrible way at getting public/legislative support
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 08:04:34 PM
You're not the one to dictate what people need or don't need in their lives.

It's codified in the most sacred document we have as a nation, so I guess that's just too bad.
Lol...if you're going to continue to be a tone deaf retard, you can refrain from responding. We know where you stand.

Btw, your sacred document is severely flawed.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 08:05:17 PM
You think disposal is the issue?

How about the fact that you have 400 million guns out there, so enforcing and working out the logistics of this would be a complete nightmare.

Regardless I think extreme changes to the law overnight is a horrible way to go about it.

Ban assault rifles, revamp laws pertaining to owning/registering a gun, change the process to purchase a gun.

But to go 0-100 in one shot is not the way to go about things, and certainly is a horrible way at getting public/legislative support
No..I said it's another convo. Try reading it again...you'll get it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 08:06:12 PM
Once the US decided that murdering elementary school kids in school was OK, gun control was dead in the US.

I'd love to see the second amendment repealed but it will never happen, no matter how many children wind up in coffins with legally purchased fire arms.
They should use the blood from these kids to re-write MJ's sacred document.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 15, 2022, 08:06:46 PM
No..I said it's another convo. Try reading it again...you'll get it.

It's also been amended multiple times.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 08:10:46 PM
Imagine hiding behind a 300 year old piece of paper in order to justify the right to carry a needless weapon that nobody has needed since the old west.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 15, 2022, 08:12:05 PM
Lol...if you're going to continue to be a tone deaf retard, you can refrain from responding. We know where you stand.

They should use the blood from these kids to re-write MJ's sacred document.

Imagine hiding behind a 300 year old piece of paper in order to justify the right to carry a needless weapon that nobody has needed since the old west.



Hahahahahahaha. Considering what a freaking gigantic sloppy fatz of a boors head you have, its amazing there's not one synapse of worth that fires off.

Imagine being that freaking stupid.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 08:15:36 PM
Hahahahahahaha. Considering what a freaking gigantic sloppy fatz of a boors head you have, its amazing there's not one synapse of worth that fires off.

Imagine being that freaking stupid.
Hopefully the local English Brit in your neighborhood fucked your wife on your wedding night. You wouldn't want to break the ancient law of Prima Nocta. #SacredPaperSZN
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 15, 2022, 08:19:27 PM
Hopefully the local English Brit in your neighborhood fucked your wife on your wedding night. You wouldn't want to break the ancient law of Prima Nocta. #SacredPaperSZN

LOL @ bringing my wife into this, just the absolute mark of a fat ignorant sack of excrement loser.

Here's hoping that next Arby's order ends in angina.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 08:21:10 PM
LOL @ bringing my wife into this, just the absolute mark of a fat ignorant sack of excrement loser.

Here's hoping that next Arby's order ends in angina.
You're the one following  the ancient laws. Just making sure you recognize ALL of them, half pint. *chefs kiss*
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 15, 2022, 08:21:46 PM
Tailgate will be fun.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 15, 2022, 08:23:26 PM
You're the one following  the ancient laws. Just making sure you recognize ALL of them, half pint. *chefs kiss*

I know you're an absolute mess of an ignoramus, but maybe open a history book to learn two things;

1. Prima nocte never existed.

2. Read up on what happens to unarmed populaces.

Anyway, I highly recommend you stay the freak away from me at the tailgate. No I'm not kidding.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 15, 2022, 08:25:15 PM
I’ll bring the straw
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 15, 2022, 08:25:42 PM
Judging by the degree of mental illness on this board I hope none of you own guns.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 08:25:50 PM
I know you're an absolute mess of an ignoramus, but maybe open a history book to learn two things;

1. Prima nocte never existed.

2. Read up on what happens to unarmed populaces.

Anyway, I highly recommend you stay the freak away from me at the tailgate. No I'm not kidding.
Prima Nocta existed...you're just retarded

What are you gonna do...bite my ankle? Lol
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 15, 2022, 08:33:21 PM
LOL @ bringing my wife into this, just the absolute mark of a fat ignorant sack of excrement loser.

Here's hoping that next Arby's order ends in angina.
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220516/df3fed6cfe672b792ca8fca31b008ea7.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 15, 2022, 11:19:24 PM
Prima Nocta existed...you're just retarded

What are you gonna do...bite my ankle? Lol

Look, I get you get your history from movies and pop culture, but it's widely accepted by historians that the practice never existed you absolute dumb freak.

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220516/df3fed6cfe672b792ca8fca31b008ea7.jpg)

Lol, love that, a constant reminder of how you shoot your freaking mouth off with absolutely no regard for the facts at hand.

As a reminder; Kyle Acquittenhouse did nothing wrong.

And let me make this perfectly clear. Say what you want about me, whatever "hur durr ReTaRd" and dumb short jokes you can come up with while I'm going to have to assume you haven't seen your own johnson past your protruding gut since the last time a Canadian hockey team won a cup. Do not bring my wife or any member of my family into this.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 16, 2022, 06:02:00 AM
You freaking people get way too personal over this political excrement.

I understand that the reality TV/social media element of politics has turned the whole freaking world into hateful assholes

But jesus freaking christ, no matter how much you hate someone who disagrees with you it'll change absolutely nothing politically in the world. It just makes you a dick
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 16, 2022, 06:25:20 AM
 


(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220516/c11381b07dfa59d1880b0a56b1a77b2e.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220516/e4ca5cac4dd7ebc2d38df6a5c01cb8f9.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 16, 2022, 06:59:18 AM
Look, I get you get your history from movies and pop culture, but it's widely accepted by historians that the practice never existed you absolute dumb freak.

Lol, love that, a constant reminder of how you shoot your freaking mouth off with absolutely no regard for the facts at hand.

As a reminder; Kyle Acquittenhouse did nothing wrong.

And let me make this perfectly clear. Say what you want about me, whatever "hur durr ReTaRd" and dumb short jokes you can come up with while I'm going to have to assume you haven't seen your own johnson past your protruding gut since the last time a Canadian hockey team won a cup. Do not bring my wife or any member of my family into this.

I heard your parents are big racists.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 16, 2022, 07:02:23 AM
Also...I don't give a excrement about the personal attacks, MJ.  Everyone here knows what a freaking rube you are, so keep spewing them.  It's hilarious and all you have.


You certainly don't have any sound arguments. 


And you don't have to worry about me staying away from you at the tailgate....i'll make sure to keep an eye out for the dwarf running around with the swastika tattoo on his forehead.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 16, 2022, 09:41:38 AM
Also...I don't give a excrement about the personal attacks, MJ.  Everyone here knows what a freaking rube you are, so keep spewing them.  It's hilarious and all you have.


You certainly don't have any sound arguments. 


And you don't have to worry about me staying away from you at the tailgate....i'll make sure to keep an eye out for the dwarf running around with the swastika tattoo on his forehead.

Here's the thing stupid, I don't come with the personal attacks until you go there. And even then, I keep it based on you, no need to go after your freaking wife or your family.

And you go there because you're an unbelievably fragile human being with absolutely no ability to do anything besides act on emotion or impulse, which is what makes that bit of "all you have" projection so laughable. It also explains why your arguments are always wrong from even a factual point of view, and also definitely explains why you're fat with no friends to the point I'm reasonably certain this board is all you have.

freak off and get a clue. And as far as that dig on my parents, they've done more in one day then you've done in your miserable, piece of excrement insignificant little life.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Gorilla on May 16, 2022, 09:49:42 AM
Haha, thanks for the entertainment, gents.

Mufukkas debating Prima Nocta lolz.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 16, 2022, 10:28:05 AM
Apparently the Buffalo shooter was from Conklin, NY. So while I was in college this little excrement was in kindergarten just a few miles down the road. Weird to think about.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 16, 2022, 10:31:43 AM
Apparently the Buffalo shooter was from Conklin, NY. So while I was in college this little excrement was in kindergarten just a few miles down the road. Weird to think about.

So you're saying you had the opportunity to prevent this whole thing from happening
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 16, 2022, 10:37:19 AM
So you're saying you had the opportunity to prevent this whole thing from happening
I don't subscribe to the Baby Hitler strategy.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on May 16, 2022, 10:43:30 AM
2. Read up on what happens to unarmed populaces.

qft

Reading materials:

Quote
Japan, a country of 127 million people and yearly gun deaths rarely totaling more than 10, is one such country...

If Japanese people want to own a gun, they must attend an all-day class, pass a written test, and achieve at least 95% accuracy during a shooting-range test. Then they have to pass a mental-health evaluation, which takes place at a hospital, and pass a background check, in which the government digs into their criminal record and interviews friends and family. They can only buy shotguns and air rifles — no handguns — and every three years they must retake the class and initial exam.


Quote
Japan has the 15th highest level of social mobility in the world, according to a report by the World Economic Forum published Monday

Quote
Japan ranks second in the world for life expectancy, with the average Japanese citizen living to 85.0 years

Quote
Japan’s HDI value for 2019 is 0.919— which put the country in the very high human development category—
positioning it at 19 out of 189 countries and territories

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1004936/japan-case-firearm-harm/

https://www.businessinsider.com/gun-control-how-japan-has-almost-completely-eliminated-gun-deaths-2017-10

https://borgenproject.org/life-expectancy-in-japan/

https://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/Country-Profiles/JPN.pdf


I’ll bring the straw

Cheese dust szn
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 16, 2022, 10:49:50 AM
That's because in Japan theyd rather kill themselves.

Maybe if we encouraged more of our mentally ill people to shoot themselves they'd stop shooting other people
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 16, 2022, 10:58:14 AM
That's because in Japan theyd rather kill themselves.

Maybe if we encouraged more of our mentally ill people to shoot themselves they'd stop shooting other people
Aren't we #1 in gun suicides already?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 16, 2022, 11:02:46 AM
Aren't we #1 in gun suicides already?

With their superior brain power the Japanese are far better at becoming creative with their methods.

They're still far better at having their mentally ill community self regulate
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 16, 2022, 11:18:06 AM
Here's the thing stupid, I don't come with the personal attacks until you go there. And even then, I keep it based on you, no need to go after your freaking wife or your family.

And you go there because you're an unbelievably fragile human being with absolutely no ability to do anything besides act on emotion or impulse, which is what makes that bit of "all you have" projection so laughable. It also explains why your arguments are always wrong from even a factual point of view, and also definitely explains why you're fat with no friends to the point I'm reasonably certain this board is all you have.

freak off and get a clue. And as far as that dig on my parents, they've done more in one day then you've done in your miserable, piece of excrement insignificant little life.



I could empty half the JO database just on your personal attacks alone, MJ.  Thanks for proving my point.

And i'd rather have zero friends than knowing my family came from a long line of slave owners.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 16, 2022, 11:27:49 AM
Aren't we #1 in gun suicides already?

Yes.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 16, 2022, 11:40:11 AM
I could empty half the JO database just on your personal attacks alone, MJ.  Thanks for proving my point.

Again, I defy you to show an instance where I start with the personal attacks. You don't get to get personal and then whine like a freaking bitch when I respond in kind. I don't go there until there's provocation, and I've still yet to say excrement about anyone in your family, or your significant other. So freak off.

You do this all the time, you literally made fun of someone because of their second job totally freaking unprovoked like the lady garden you are.

And i'd rather have zero friends than knowing my family came from a long line of slave owners.

LMAO, I'm ethnically italian you jerkoff, we had nothing to do with slavery. More history brought to you by MBShitbag.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 16, 2022, 11:48:45 AM
Again, I defy you to show an instance where I start with the personal attacks. You don't get to get personal and then whine like a freaking bitch when I respond in kind. I don't go there until there's provocation, and I've still yet to say excrement about anyone in your family, or your significant other. So freak off.

You do this all the time, you literally made fun of someone because of their second job totally freaking unprovoked like the lady garden you are.

LMAO, I'm ethnically italian you jerkoff, we had nothing to do with slavery. More history brought to you by MBShitbag.
I didn't bother reading your response.

All I know is this your final warning. You're a bigger scumbag than Tommy, so tread lightly going forward...

Don't bother responding because nobody cares or wants to read your bullshit justifications. 

Thanks.

If you need to say something constructive (I know it's a long shot), you can PM me.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 16, 2022, 01:56:44 PM
Have we ever considered renaming this board Get Offensive and dedicate it to calling each other Cunts the whole time?

I think this may be an effective strategy to get this board above like 6 active users
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 16, 2022, 02:00:01 PM
Have we ever considered renaming this board Get Offensive and dedicate it to calling each other Cunts the whole time?

I think this may be an effective strategy to get this board above like 6 active users

Just be a decent human, and you'll prosper here. 


Everyone stopped worrying about the size of our user base years ago.  If we have to close up shop because of it, then so be it. For now, we're in a good spot.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 16, 2022, 03:29:40 PM
So, chicken or the egg - who started with the personal attacks.  Let's go to the videotape in sequence....  (Canada = red; USA = blue)

Quote from: mj2sexay
You're not the one to dictate what people need or don't need in their lives

It's codified in the most sacred document we have as a nation, so I guess that's just too bad.


Quote from: MBGreen
Lol...if you're going to continue to be a tone deaf retard, you can refrain from responding.  We know wheee you stand.

Btw, your sacred document is seriously flawed.

Judges??....


Quote from: mj2sexay
Hahahahahahaha.  Considering what a freaking gigantic sloppy fat of a boors head you have its amazing there's not one synapse of worth that fires off.[/color] 

Imagine being that freaking stupid.
 
Point deduction mj: too wordy



Quote from: MBGreen
Hopefully the local English Brit in your neighborhood fucked your wife on your wedding night. You wouldn't want to break the ancient law of Prima Nocta.  #SacredPaperSZN

Point deduction MB for 'English  Brit'


Quote from: mj2sexay
LOL @ bringing my wife into this, just the absolute mark of a fat sack of excrement loser.

Here's hoping that next Arby's order ends in angina.

Insouciance should be the rule of thumb here.  Airily reply  "let's lay off the wives....pregnant pause....I just got off yours,"



Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 17, 2022, 08:48:12 PM
Just be a decent human, and you'll prosper here. 

What about being a decent human being is stating that you hope my wife gets fucked by a neighbor and calling my parents slave owners?

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 17, 2022, 09:09:22 PM
What about being a decent human being is stating that you hope my wife gets fucked by a neighbor and calling my parents slave owners?



I'm not a bastion of knowledge.

I've learned long ago, what's the point in arguing? I'm not saying don't be annoyed or anything as I'm not a fan of the personal excrement.

Like at this point what's responding going to do? He's going to say more excrement, you're going to respond with even more excrement and you'll both end up aggravated and cranky dragging out this argument even longer

It is what it is, settle the rest at Applebee's
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 18, 2022, 09:55:07 AM
Moron

https://twitter.com/ZachReports/status/1526934213152448512?t=fXNZe95okmzFpL3bpLxvmQ&s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 18, 2022, 10:30:27 AM
Moron

https://twitter.com/ZachReports/status/1526934213152448512?t=fXNZe95okmzFpL3bpLxvmQ&s=19

Did you read this part?

https://mobile.twitter.com/ZachReports/status/1526942612455837696/photo/1

I could be misunderstanding but it sounds like he's referring to to this guy getting detained in the past and basically being allowed to walk free and keep/acquire his guns.

Is that not a fair statement that that is a problem?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 18, 2022, 03:33:26 PM
Did you read this part?

https://mobile.twitter.com/ZachReports/status/1526942612455837696/photo/1

I could be misunderstanding but it sounds like he's referring to to this guy getting detained in the past and basically being allowed to walk free and keep/acquire his guns.

Is that not a fair statement that that is a problem?

Do I think bail reform went too far? In some aspects, yes.

Do I think something drastic was necessary because judges and prosecutors were keeping people in as a tactic to get them to take really shitty plea deals and eat convictions that they otherwise should've been able to defend from the outside? Also yes. Especially considering the whole system is built around the idea that anyone charged is innocent until proven guilty.

And it's easy to say, "well if they didn't do it, they shouldn't plead!" Well, if I was sitting in a jail cell and I knew the only way to get out was to eat the misdemeanor-I'd eat the misdemeanor. "MaYbE jAiL iS tHe BeSt PlAcE fOr ThEm" when it comes to people committing non-violent offenses is archaic bullshit.

What's not being focused on enough is the fact that this piece of excrement was known to local and State law enforcement well before this, but I guess Leticia James is too busy having her office try and bring up charges on Trump to actually investigate such things.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 18, 2022, 03:56:35 PM
Do I think bail reform went too far? In some aspects, yes.

Do I think something drastic was necessary because judges and prosecutors were keeping people in as a tactic to get them to take really shitty plea deals and eat convictions that they otherwise should've been able to defend from the outside? Also yes. Especially considering the whole system is built around the idea that anyone charged is innocent until proven guilty.

And it's easy to say, "well if they didn't do it, they shouldn't plead!" Well, if I was sitting in a jail cell and I knew the only way to get out was to eat the misdemeanor-I'd eat the misdemeanor. "MaYbE jAiL iS tHe BeSt PlAcE fOr ThEm" when it comes to people committing non-violent offenses is archaic bullshit.

What's not being focused on enough is the fact that this piece of excrement was known to local and State law enforcement well before this, but I guess Leticia James is too busy having her office try and bring up charges on Trump to actually investigate such things.

I think criminal justice will always bounce between being too harsh, and too inefficient. And culture has certainly shifted in the direction of lawlessness in recent years. I don't think it'll ever be perfect

But I think serial repeat offenders essentially walking free on the daily and or being allowed to own/purchase firearms is a huge problem.

If you look at the vast majority of high-profile cases almost all of them have insanely long rapsheets. This doesn't mean the inevitable outcomes are warranted or justified, just that we're doing an absolute excrement job at figuring out what to do when bad guys are caught.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 01:12:16 PM
Active shooter at a Texas elementary school

 https://abcnews.go.com/US/texas-elementary-school-reports-active-shooter-campus/story?id=84940951 (https://abcnews.go.com/US/texas-elementary-school-reports-active-shooter-campus/story?id=84940951)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 24, 2022, 03:27:18 PM
Active shooter at a Texas elementary school

 https://abcnews.go.com/US/texas-elementary-school-reports-active-shooter-campus/story?id=84940951 (https://abcnews.go.com/US/texas-elementary-school-reports-active-shooter-campus/story?id=84940951)

Just saw a report saying at least 14 are dead. 

The last day of school in most Texas counties is this Thursday.  This excrement makes me sick. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 24, 2022, 03:27:52 PM
Just saw a report saying at least 14 are dead. 

The last day of school in most Texas counties is this Thursday.  This excrement makes me sick. 

Damn..
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 24, 2022, 03:36:19 PM
https://twitter.com/shannonrwatts/status/1529197482701230080?s=20&t=gODZAsWntTM_9P0XDykBaQ

freak Ted Cruz
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 03:42:22 PM
Every report im seeing says 2 dead, one of which is a child.

While lot of people are gonna be severely fucked up regardless, but you hope it's not like the Connecticut situation

Not a whole lot of details coming out yet
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 24, 2022, 03:47:13 PM
Every report im seeing says 2 dead, one of which is a child.

While lot of people are gonna be severely fucked up regardless, but you hope it's not like the Connecticut situation

Not a whole lot of details coming out yet

https://abc13.com/uvalde-texas-robb-elementary-school-active-shooter-district-lockdown/11889693/

14 students killed, 1 teacher dead in elementary school shooting, Texas governor says.

18 year old gunman


Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 03:47:35 PM
Every report im seeing says 2 dead, one of which is a child.

While lot of people are gonna be severely fucked up regardless, but you hope it's not like the Connecticut situation

Not a whole lot of details coming out yet

Updated headline from the link I posted:

Multiple fatalities, including several children

Seems like a lot more than just two.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 24, 2022, 03:49:14 PM
Salvadore Ramos, 18, Uvalde HS student

Removed*
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 03:52:26 PM
Salvadore Ramos, 18, Uvalde HS student

This whole thing here is highly disturbing and I don't think is appropriate

(obviously the whole situation is severely fucked up)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 04:04:51 PM
freaking closing schools for covid was the best thing that could have happened
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 04:09:53 PM
I've always poopooed at gun control (despite not giving a excrement about guns at all)

But this mentally deranged freaking lunatic excrement has just made it impossible to defend.

I don't think gun control is the solution, as it'll take decades to filter out the 400 million guns in this country.

But it likely will prevent some of these pointless freaking killings.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on May 24, 2022, 04:16:33 PM
I've always poopooed at gun control (despite not giving a excrement about guns at all)

But this mentally deranged freaking lunatic excrement has just made it impossible to defend.

I don't think gun control is the solution, as it'll take decades to filter out the 400 million guns in this country.

But it likely will prevent some of these pointless freaking killings.
Gun control is absolutely part of the solution. There's never going to be one solution to fix everything, but making guns harder to access for people is at least a start. Obviously, gun control isn't going to fix everything, but it certainly can't hurt.

Of course, some people think everyone should have a gun and that would fix everything, as if that wouldn't lead to countless more issues.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 04:18:53 PM
Gun control is absolutely part of the solution. There's never going to be one solution to fix everything, but making guns harder to access for people is at least a start. Obviously, gun control isn't going to fix everything, but it certainly can't hurt.

Of course, some people think everyone should have a gun and that would fix everything, as if that wouldn't lead to countless more issues.

Oh I agree its part of the solution. I just think it's a part of the solution that might take 10-20 years before it makes a huge difference.

It doesn't mean we shouldn't do it now (we should) rather we need something that'll get much more immediate results while waiting

And on a more realistic note, I don't think meaningful gun control is a realistic possibility. I think it's way too ingrained into the culture of the right, that they would never let it happen.

And I don't forsee the left having the power to do anything about it for at minimum 4 more years. And quite frankly with the rights control of the Supreme Court, I feel like they could rule a lot of gun control laws unconstitutional.

Meaning I'd hey healthcare reform happens before a meaningful gun control ever does
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 24, 2022, 04:23:22 PM
This is freaking awful.

I dont want to comment any further because I don't feel like getting the 2nd amendment thrown in my face again.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 24, 2022, 04:28:36 PM
This whole thing here is highly disturbing and I don't think is appropriate

(obviously the whole situation is severely fucked up)
I don't think Ramos' blowing away scores of innocent lives was appropriate.  Should I have waited until next of kin was notified?  Guy was a monster - freak him.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 04:29:42 PM
Salvadore Ramos, 18, Uvalde HS student

Removed*


I'm not sure what the point of this was aside from getting the person who posted it clicks.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 04:33:13 PM
I don't think Ramos' blowing away scores of innocent lives was appropriate.  Should I have waited until next of kin was notified?  Guy was a monster - freak him.

I agree but what was the purpose of this video?

To show mobs of angry people a single picture of some weird looking mother fucker then to show all the pictures and names of people he follows on Instagram?

Mentally ill deranged lunatics are a problem, to me this just inspires more of them
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 04:34:30 PM
I wonder how many times The Onion will have to use this headline.

https://www.theonion.com/no-way-to-prevent-this-says-only-nation-where-this-r-1848930767 (https://www.theonion.com/no-way-to-prevent-this-says-only-nation-where-this-r-1848930767)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 24, 2022, 04:41:56 PM
Maybe this is why conservatives are so obsessed with making abortion illegal, because they know they need to keep replacing the children getting killed as a result of the guns they're obsessed with putting in the hands of nutcases.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 04:45:26 PM
Maybe this is why conservatives are so obsessed with making abortion illegal, because they know they need to keep replacing the children getting killed as a result of the guns they're obsessed with putting in the hands of nutcases.

These are horrible events,more so because it involves young children that certainly show why gun control is necessary.

But historically there's between 50-300 deaths a year from mass shootings  in the United States.

This doesn't make the events any less tragic. But it does show the extremely powerful influence of the media in how people think and feel
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 24, 2022, 04:49:36 PM
These are horrible events,more so because it involves young children that certainly show why gun control is necessary.

But historically there's between 50-300 deaths a year from mass shootings  in the United States.

This doesn't make the events any less tragic. But it does show the extremely powerful influence of the media in how people think and feel

There are 45,000 firearm deaths a year in the US. I don't think we should just dismiss individual deaths as a statistic irrelevance, I don't think that 14 ten year olds killed in one go is any more or less tragic than if they were all individually shot and killed, is it?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 24, 2022, 04:51:40 PM


Meaning I'd hey healthcare reform happens before a meaningful gun control ever does

And we're gonna need it for all the bullet wounds.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 04:54:57 PM
There are 45,000 firearm deaths a year in the US. I don't think we should just dismiss individual deaths as a statistic irrelevance, I don't think that 14 ten year olds killed in one go is any more or less tragic than if they were all individually shot and killed, is it?

No, but I think different problems behave different solutions.

Mass shootings is one thing. Suicide is another (the vast majority of gun deaths), gang violence, and spousal violence etc.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 24, 2022, 04:58:33 PM
No, but I think different problems behave different solutions.

Mass shootings is one thing. Suicide is another (the vast majority of gun deaths), gang violence, and spousal violence etc.

Not having guns within arm's reach of a plurality of people would probably help alleviate all of those issues to varying degrees.

Imagine that. Having multiple problems, all with the same answer. But still, guess you all have to make sure you're ready in case British warships suddenly reappear in Chesapeake Bay. Can't be too careful, eh?

(Not aiming this at you dcm, I know you're not being a 2A defender. Just mocking the people that are.)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 24, 2022, 05:00:18 PM
Not having guns within arm's reach of a plurality of people would probably help alleviate all of those issues to varying degrees.

Imagine that. Having multiple problems, all with the same answer. But still, guess you all have to make sure you're ready in case British warships suddenly reappear in Chesapeake Bay. Can't be too careful, eh?

(Not aiming this at you dcm, I know you're not being a 2A defender. Just mocking the people that are.)

These mass shootings are necessary for the protection of small businesses
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 05:02:18 PM
No, but I think different problems behave different solutions.

Mass shootings is one thing. Suicide is another (the vast majority of gun deaths), gang violence, and spousal violence etc.

Limiting access to guns in each of the over-arching cases you mentioned absolutely lowers the chances of them occurring.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 24, 2022, 05:05:03 PM
These mass shootings are necessary for the protection of small businesses

One of those children could have grown up to become a leftie protester. Can't take the chance.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 24, 2022, 05:07:27 PM
These mass shootings are necessary for the protection of small businesses
What's the proper ratio of dead children:roof Koreans?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 05:10:17 PM
Limiting access to guns in each of the over-arching cases you mentioned absolutely lowers the chances of them occurring.

I agree, and no questions asked I support significant gun control if not the outright banning of them (despite this not being feasible and probably never happening in my lifetime)

But you will also get countless people outraged over the deaths of guns (which is a serious issue) but then they'll completely ignore or even sympathize on the issues of drug control/criminalization despite the fact that overdoses kill people at rates of 2-3 times of that of guns.

I absolutely get that some piece of excrement psychopath shooting kids is very different than kids overdosing on crack. But it seems like the issues have become politicized over helping people

Put differently

How many people on both the left and the right would support a bipartisan bill severely restricting/criminalizing both guns and drugs?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 24, 2022, 05:14:48 PM
I agree, and no questions asked I support significant gun control if not the outright banning of them (despite this not being feasible and probably never happening in my lifetime)

But you will also get countless people outraged over the deaths of guns (which is a serious issue) but then they'll completely ignore or even sympathize on the issues of drug control/criminalization despite the fact that overdoses kill people at rates of 2-3 times of that of guns.

I absolutely get that some piece of excrement psychopath shooting kids is very different than kids overdosing on crack. But it seems like the issues have become politicized over helping people

Put differently

How many people on both the left and the right would support a bipartisan bill severely restricting/criminalizing both guns and drugs?

OK, but you're basically saying "I know what the right thing to do is but it's really hard so it's probably not worth trying to do".

Do you not think that, given the abject failure of the current Democratic party, the moral vacuum of the current Republican party, and the absolute disingenuous cynicism of both, that it's time to start supporting voices who want something radically different? (And I don't mean Bernie Sanders.)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 05:17:16 PM
I agree, and no questions asked I support significant gun control if not the outright banning of them (despite this not being feasible and probably never happening in my lifetime)

But you will also get countless people outraged over the deaths of guns (which is a serious issue) but then they'll completely ignore or even sympathize on the issues of drug control/criminalization despite the fact that overdoses kill people at rates of 2-3 times of that of guns.

I absolutely get that some piece of excrement psychopath shooting kids is very different than kids overdosing on crack. But it seems like the issues have become politicized over helping people

Put differently

How many people on both the left and the right would support a bipartisan bill severely restricting/criminalizing guns and drugs?

I'm not going to go any further in a tangent conversation than saying that historically, outright prohibition of any substance has only led to proliferation of use and a stigmatization of those using said substances and suffering from the addictive affects thereof, where as decriminalization or outright legalization of those same substances has historically reduced the number of addiction-related deaths.

Drugs, despite their lethality, are not the same issue and should not be approached with the same mindset. This is the last point I am going to make on this topic in this thread.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 24, 2022, 05:31:42 PM


OK, but you're basically saying "I know what the right thing to do is but it's really hard so it's probably not worth trying to do".

Do you not think that, given the abject failure of the current Democratic party, the moral vacuum of the current Republican party, and the absolute disingenuous cynicism of both, that it's time to start supporting voices who want something radically different? (And I don't mean Bernie Sanders.)

"Everything is terrible but nothing should change"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 24, 2022, 05:34:06 PM

"Everything is terrible but nothing should change"

Not the same thing as "this specific thing is terrible but it's too difficult to change it". But in the same universe, I'll grant you.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 05:47:28 PM

"Everything is terrible but nothing should change"

My thinking was more along the lines of its more feasible for us to create a vaccine for Covid-19 than to eradicate the disease.

Banning guns has been mainstream by the left for what 40-50 years?

How close are we?

When the left gets a super majority I absolutely think and hope they make guns disappear. But until they have that, it's not the path to victory.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on May 24, 2022, 05:56:26 PM
My thinking was more along the lines of its more feasible for us to create a vaccine for Covid-19 than to eradicate the disease.

Banning guns has been mainstream by the left for what 40-50 years?

How close are we?

When the left gets a super majority I absolutely think and hope they make guns disappear. But until they have that, it's not the path to victory.
Just makes no sense how this can't be non-partisan. Crazy to me that abortion and gun control have both completely fallen on partisan lines. You would think those types of issues would have a variety of opinions.

It shouldn't take a left supermajority to get stuff done. And as we saw with Roe, all it takes is one partisan Supreme Court to undo years of progress.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 24, 2022, 06:01:41 PM


When the left gets a super majority I absolutely think and hope they make guns disappear. But until they have that, it's not the path to victory.

Unfortunately it's impossible to advocate for such a thing, since "both sides are bad."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 06:07:04 PM

Unfortunately it's impossible to advocate for such a thing, since "both sides are bad."

Bad people can do good things.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 24, 2022, 06:13:50 PM
Bad people can do good things.
Like Razor Ramon?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 24, 2022, 06:28:42 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/otEMJpT.png)

BUT THE BRITISH MIGHT COME BACK AND BURN THE WHITE HOUSE AGAIN IF WE DON'T HAVE THEM
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 24, 2022, 06:29:07 PM
Like Razor Ramon?
Bad times don't last, but bad guys do.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 24, 2022, 06:29:24 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/otEMJpT.png)

BUT THE BRITISH MIGHT COME BACK AND BURN THE WHITE HOUSE AGAIN IF WE DON'T HAVE THEM
We won!

Weird that Russia has like 4 guns apparently and all the mass shooters (except USA)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 24, 2022, 06:32:55 PM
We won!

Weird that Russia has like 4 guns apparently and all the mass shooters (except USA)


TBF Russia probably has way more guns than anyone knows about, and I'm guessing quite a few more mass shootings as well. But I don't think "hey, Russia's like us too" is a particularly compelling argument.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 24, 2022, 06:41:57 PM
I'd imagine there's a few million Soviet AK's floating around the Russian black market.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 24, 2022, 06:45:35 PM
THANK YOU GOVERNOR ABBOTT FOR KEEPING OUR CHILDREN SAFE*

*from learning about racism

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220524/75bc0ed5aa2a8d1e9cf85dd50700907a.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220524/f1e1a74e12a0bb01e9946b03b64eff98.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 06:46:04 PM
Re: Russia

There's also this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/b08crz/the_guy_has_balls_made_out_of_adamantium_but_its/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share (https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/b08crz/the_guy_has_balls_made_out_of_adamantium_but_its/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 06:55:23 PM
Seeing reports that the death toll increased to 21, including 18 children.
 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 24, 2022, 07:20:29 PM
Nightmare fuel

https://twitter.com/MaggieAstor/status/1529217248698806277?t=vu_tetv4UZv_CYI5hJGVVw&s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 24, 2022, 07:36:22 PM
Quote from: delavan
Salvadore Ramos, 18, Uvalde HS student

Removed*
Quote from: CatoTheElder
I'm not sure what the point of this was aside from getting the person who posted it clicks.
To present the murderer in an unflattering light.  But not to worry, it's been 'cancelled' (i.e. removed*)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 24, 2022, 08:00:08 PM
This could have been avoided if they built a wall around the school

https://twitter.com/NikkiMcR/status/1529244586341711874?t=TNy-dOenONxX7dFkiGvHCg&s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 08:27:57 PM
Steve Kerr not pleased

https://twitter.com/MikeSilver/status/1529245225654226945?t=WqAeNuO5y_mPQLGPmvU46w&s=19 (https://twitter.com/MikeSilver/status/1529245225654226945?t=WqAeNuO5y_mPQLGPmvU46w&s=19)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 08:36:29 PM
This could have been avoided if they built a wall around the school

https://twitter.com/NikkiMcR/status/1529244586341711874?t=TNy-dOenONxX7dFkiGvHCg&s=19

I can understand the narrative of  supporting having armed guards at schools.

But the context and narrative of this conversation is absolutely freaking mental, especially at this time and under these circumstances. Plus the fence excrement?

That's absolutely freaking retarded. They'd be better off saying just build a freaking wall at the border because this guy had a Hispanic name and this was right at the border (no I don't think either of these are pertinent factors, but it's less retarded than talking about the schools freaking fence)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 24, 2022, 08:49:16 PM
I can understand the narrative of  supporting having armed guards at schools.

But the context and narrative of this conversation is absolutely freaking mental, especially at this time and under these circumstances. Plus the fence excrement?

That's absolutely freaking retarded. They'd be better off saying just build a freaking wall at the border because this guy had a Hispanic name and this was right at the border (no I don't think either of these are pertinent factors, but it's less retarded than talking about the schools freaking fence)

All three schools I worked in had armed police officers and all three SROs got their asses kicked by kids during fights.  One of them would actively avoid showing up to fights on time, leaving us to break them up.  They don’t do a damn thing.

Waffle House-esque security guards aren’t going to make a difference
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 24, 2022, 08:56:49 PM
All three schools I worked in had armed police officers and all three SROs got their asses kicked by kids during fights.  One of them would actively avoid showing up to fights on time, leaving us to break them up.  They don’t do a damn thing.

Waffle House-esque security guards aren’t going to make a difference
Neither will cops, apparently

https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1529255082914725888?t=yBkxzh-T8mTXeWgV-SqGAg&s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 24, 2022, 09:01:14 PM
I suppose if you don't like it you could just move somewhere safer like, say, Somalia:

(https://i.imgur.com/97CSBA8.png)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 09:02:07 PM
All three schools I worked in had armed police officers and all three SROs got their asses kicked by kids during fights.  One of them would actively avoid showing up to fights on time, leaving us to break them up.  They don’t do a damn thing.

Waffle House-esque security guards aren’t going to make a difference

The SRO at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School stood outside while Nikolas Cruz was murdering kids. The evidence on hand for how useful those dudes are in this specific setting is not great.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 09:04:13 PM
Neither will cops, apparently

https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1529255082914725888?t=yBkxzh-T8mTXeWgV-SqGAg&s=19

What the freak? What in the actual freak?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 09:37:08 PM
Nightmare fuel

https://twitter.com/MaggieAstor/status/1529217248698806277?t=vu_tetv4UZv_CYI5hJGVVw&s=19

Even more horrifying context:

https://twitter.com/juliettekayyem/status/1529253998418599941?s=20&t=RntG46Q_vPy_q2WcDVSVIA (https://twitter.com/juliettekayyem/status/1529253998418599941?s=20&t=RntG46Q_vPy_q2WcDVSVIA)

https://twitter.com/AnayeliNews/status/1529276451152969733?s=20&t=RntG46Q_vPy_q2WcDVSVIA (https://twitter.com/AnayeliNews/status/1529276451152969733?s=20&t=RntG46Q_vPy_q2WcDVSVIA)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 09:38:46 PM
What the freak? What in the actual freak?

It doesn't exactly state who engaged him.

This guy is a spokesman for the department of public safety, which there's not a lot about online. But it sounds like they offer drivers licenses
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 24, 2022, 09:58:41 PM
It doesn't exactly state who engaged him.

This guy is a spokesman for the department of public safety, which there's not a lot about online. But it sounds like they offer drivers licenses

From Wikipedia:

Quote
The DPS is responsible for statewide law enforcement...

DPS is divided into multiple divisions:

Criminal Investigations
Cyber Security
Driver License
Executive Protection Bureau
Finance
Texas Highway Patrol (State Police)
Information Technology
Infrastructure Operations
Intelligence and Counterterrorism
Law Enforcement Support
Regulatory Services Division
Texas Ranger Division
Training Operations Division

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Department_of_Public_Safety (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Department_of_Public_Safety)

You work in a freaking medical field. You cannot - CANNOT - be this bad at research. They control the highway patrol AND the Texas Rangers. JFC, dude. Do you really think it was the IT or Finance division just hanging out there?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 24, 2022, 10:15:07 PM
From Wikipedia:

You work in a freaking medical field. You cannot - CANNOT - be this bad at research. They control the highway patrol AND the Texas Rangers. JFC, dude. Do you really think it was the IT or Finance division just hanging out there?

Yes I saw that, and I figured if it was a Texas ranger or something they'd have mentioned that.

Plus this is their website

https://www.dps.texas.gov/

I find it phenomenally hard to imagine it was someone armed and trained who engaged him

I imagine it was likely something akin to a freaking crossing guard or a meter maid.

Do you think a ranger or a state police officer would just let an arm dude in body armor walk into an elementary school?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 24, 2022, 10:18:55 PM
This guy should definitely DIAF

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220525/0afc5ecc470045ebcaa5a9916a8f48dd.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 24, 2022, 10:55:46 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/otEMJpT.png)

BUT THE BRITISH MIGHT COME BACK AND BURN THE WHITE HOUSE AGAIN IF WE DON'T HAVE THEM

I don’t care what the laws are in this country or what they were, I don’t care what your political affiliation is-

You are not a smart person if you can’t interpret this data and the root cause of this issue.

So go ahead and argue muh guns, as long as you do it consciously knowing that’s more important to you than the lives of innocent little kids.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 24, 2022, 11:01:54 PM
Do you think a ranger or a state police officer would just let an arm dude in body armor walk into an elementary school?

I wouldn't be surprised
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 24, 2022, 11:02:47 PM
Even more horrifying context:

https://twitter.com/juliettekayyem/status/1529253998418599941?s=20&t=RntG46Q_vPy_q2WcDVSVIA (https://twitter.com/juliettekayyem/status/1529253998418599941?s=20&t=RntG46Q_vPy_q2WcDVSVIA)

https://twitter.com/AnayeliNews/status/1529276451152969733?s=20&t=RntG46Q_vPy_q2WcDVSVIA (https://twitter.com/AnayeliNews/status/1529276451152969733?s=20&t=RntG46Q_vPy_q2WcDVSVIA)

There is no argument for a civilian needing to own an AR15
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 24, 2022, 11:25:38 PM
https://twitter.com/tom_winter/status/1529297405363073025?s=21&t=ICQUa3k-S1QLU8thluHYYA

Yeah, they couldn’t stop him.  He was too heavily armed and armored to stop, so they pulled back and waited for a tactical unit to get there.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 25, 2022, 05:44:53 AM
I can't imagine being those parents.  Nothing worse.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 25, 2022, 06:13:53 AM
https://twitter.com/tom_winter/status/1529297405363073025?s=21&t=ICQUa3k-S1QLU8thluHYYA

Yeah, they couldn’t stop him.  He was too heavily armed and armored to stop, so they pulled back and waited for a tactical unit to get there.
Don't worry - if we increase their funding by a few billion more they'll do better next time.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 25, 2022, 07:39:04 AM
Do you think a ranger or a state police officer would just let an arm dude in body armor walk into an elementary school?

That's exactly what I figured. And:

https://twitter.com/tom_winter/status/1529297405363073025?s=21&t=ICQUa3k-S1QLU8thluHYYA

Yeah, they couldn’t stop him.  He was too heavily armed and armored to stop, so they pulled back and waited for a tactical unit to get there.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 25, 2022, 07:41:36 AM
Quote
The New York Times
@nytimes
·
1h
After a mass shooting left 51 dead in 2019, New Zealand sprang to action, quickly banning most semi-automatic weapons and launching a buyback scheme.

Jacinda Ardern, the country’s prime minister, said the response was “pragmatic.”
https://nyti.ms/3lHVC9m


For dcm's benefit....since he doesn't think this is feasible.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 25, 2022, 07:47:37 AM

For dcm's benefit....since he doesn't think this is feasible.

In b4 scaling argument.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 25, 2022, 07:51:43 AM
Need a better source, but it sounds like he was wearing one of those tac vests but there was no armor in it.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FTlJgCsUcAEJVVT?format=jpg&name=medium)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 25, 2022, 07:57:00 AM
Aaron Hoyland
@aaronhoyland
·
14h
On December 19, 1988, the US Product Safety Commission permanently banned the sale of metal-tipped lawn darts after they were responsible for the deaths of three children. Three.



I guess the founding fathers forgot to include lawn darts in the 2nd amendment.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 25, 2022, 07:57:11 AM

For dcm's benefit....since he doesn't think this is feasible.

For starters this isn't an outright gun ban. Your words is banning semi automatic weapons, and only "most" of those. This doesn't address rifles handguns shotguns etc.

If you said is a semi automatic gun ban relatively feasible sure. Except I'm pretty sure anyone can Google how to convert a gun in 10 minutes.

I do think it's plausible that after this you may get a handful of Republicans willing  to vote for something which potentially bans some limited aspect of arms

And yes the scaling issue is blatantly freaking obvious too,
 
New Zealand has 1.5 million guns, America has over 400 million
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 25, 2022, 08:00:03 AM
For starters this isn't an outright gun ban. Your words is banning semi automatic weapons, and only "most" of those. This doesn't address rifles handguns shotguns etc.

If you said is a semi automatic gun ban relatively feasible sure. Except I'm pretty sure anyone can Google how to convert a gun in 10 minutes.

And yes the scaling issue is blatantly freaking obvious too,

New Zealand has 1.5 million guns, America has over 400 million

You should head over to Uvalde to explain this to all the grieving parents, i'm sure they're going to be interested in your take. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 25, 2022, 08:01:23 AM


I do think it's plausible that after this you may get a handful of Republicans willing  to vote for something which potentially bans some limited aspect of arms

I don't.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 25, 2022, 08:04:03 AM

I don't.
Yep.  Nothing will happen. Time heals all shooting outrage.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 25, 2022, 08:06:14 AM
They want more guns, not less.

Arm the teachers.  That will fix everything.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 25, 2022, 08:06:54 AM
Need a better source, but it sounds like he was wearing one of those tac vests but there was no armor in it.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FTlJgCsUcAEJVVT?format=jpg&name=medium)

So the police are full of excrement?  Sounds about right.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 25, 2022, 08:10:23 AM
Yep.  Nothing will happen. Time heals all shooting outrage.
Sandy Hook was the litmus test, when nothing happened after that it was pretty clear what the deal is.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 25, 2022, 08:11:26 AM
So the police are full of excrement?  Sounds about right.
They took cover and let him pass.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 25, 2022, 08:13:14 AM
They took cover and let him pass.

The RCMP would've stomped him with their horses.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 25, 2022, 08:14:30 AM
They took cover and let him pass.

Because they assumed he was wearing body armor

Good guys with guns!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 25, 2022, 08:17:25 AM
Sandy Hook was the litmus test, when nothing happened after that it was pretty clear what the deal is.

Yeah.  If Sandy Hook wasn't the catalyst, nothing ever will be. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 25, 2022, 08:40:46 AM
Because they assumed he was wearing body armor

Good guys with guns!

Looks like this will be difficult. Time to let the kids handle it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 25, 2022, 08:43:36 AM
You should head over to Uvalde to explain this to all the grieving parents, i'm sure they're going to be interested in your take. 

I bet you if they ban semi automatic weapons tomorrow the parents grief will be completely relieved.


This looks pretty freaking awful for the police.

I was giving them benefit of the doubt. But if this is true, this completely cripples every argument from the right about MORE GUNS ever. Not that that has ever been supported anyway
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 25, 2022, 09:24:47 AM
Yeah.  If Sandy Hook wasn't the catalyst, nothing ever will be. 

Only thing I could imagine that might make a difference is if one of these NRA-supporting senators has their kids/grandkids shot.  It'll never happen though because they are likely in private schools.  Even then, a little time will go by and the outrage will subside until it happens again.  It's the ultimate wash, rinse, repeat cycle except nothing ever gets washed or rinsed.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 25, 2022, 09:46:45 AM
Apparently Trump, Cruz, and Crenshaw were (are still as of now?) scheduled to speak at an NRA conference in Texas on Friday.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 25, 2022, 10:11:00 AM
The whole site:

(https://i.ibb.co/qsCmdfw/onion.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 25, 2022, 10:25:43 AM
The whole site:

(https://i.ibb.co/qsCmdfw/onion.jpg)

I don't get it
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Gorilla on May 25, 2022, 10:41:21 AM
I don't get it

"I'm a freaking retard. A willfully ignorant, willfully obtuse freaking retard. A lil' help here?"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 25, 2022, 10:56:14 AM
Apparently Trump, Cruz, and Crenshaw were (are still as of now?) scheduled to speak at an NRA conference in Texas on Friday.



Crenshaw is in the Ukraine. John Cornyn is citing personal reasons. Based on Cruz's current comments he's still going and will probably say something about how this shouldn't ruin it for law abiding gun owners.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 25, 2022, 10:56:46 AM
I don't get it

The Onion runs the same article after every mass shooting.  This time, they made it every article. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Gorilla on May 25, 2022, 11:38:35 AM
The Onion runs the same article after every mass shooting.  This time, they made it every article.

You are a more patient, nicer person than I am....at least sometimes on a Jets internet forum.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 25, 2022, 11:41:10 AM
Crenshaw is in the Ukraine. John Cornyn is citing personal reasons. Based on Cruz's current comments he's still going and will probably say something about how this shouldn't ruin it for law abiding gun owners.

Pretty sure Abbott is supposed to be speaking there as well.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 25, 2022, 11:44:08 AM
The Onion runs the same article after every mass shooting.  This time, they made it every article. 

Oh I meant I literally didn't get it

It was just a big blank X

Now it works
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 25, 2022, 11:45:46 AM
Pretty sure Abbott is supposed to be speaking there as well.

Haven't seen his name reported either way but I wouldn't be shocked.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 25, 2022, 11:57:44 AM
What law or policy position aside from a total confiscation of firearms (which is a non starter) would have prevented this? I'm genuinely asking this, I'm not trying to be a smartass or insensitive, but given recent discussions in this thread, unfortunately feel as though I have to qualify that question.

You have an 18 year old who illegally purchased about 3 to 5k worth of firearms and accessories which alone is mind blowing.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 25, 2022, 12:04:33 PM
What law or policy position aside from a total confiscation of firearms (which is a non starter) would have prevented this? I'm genuinely asking this, I'm not trying to be a smartass or insensitive, but given recent discussions in this thread, unfortunately feel as though I have to qualify that question.

You have an 18 year old who illegally purchased about 3 to 5k worth of firearms and accessories which alone is mind blowing.



Everything I see said he legally purchased them.

https://abc7.com/elementary-school-shooting-texas-shooter-salvador-ramos-uvalde-tx/11893076/

Quote
The suspect purchased two AR-15-style rifles on May 22, two days before the massacre and six days after his birthday, multiple law enforcement officials told ABC News. They were legal purchases.

https://www.texastribune.org/2022/05/25/uvalde-shooter-bought-gun-legally/

Quote
The gunman in the deadliest school shooting in Texas history bought two AR-style rifles legally just after his 18th birthday — days before his assault on Robb Elementary School in Uvalde.

He legally purchased two AR platform rifles from a federally licensed gun store on two days: May 17 — just a day after his birthday — and May 20, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said, according to a briefing that state Sen. John Whitmire, chair of the Senate Criminal Justice Committee, received from state authorities late Tuesday. The gunman bought 375 rounds of 5.56-caliber ammunition on May 18.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 25, 2022, 12:26:23 PM
I don't have any data in front of me, but are the vast majority of mass shooters not kids/teenagers?

Hell you need to legally be 21 to buy a freaking hand gun, why the hell can you buy an assault rifle at 18?

Raise the age to own a gun up to freaking 30 and you'll probably get the best results possible short of an outright ban on guns.

Background checks will be a whole lot more useful on people who you know, have an actual freaking background

I don't think you need a scientific study to know that young men are violent freaking retards.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 25, 2022, 12:28:58 PM
I don't have any data in front of me, but are the vast majority of mass shooters not kids/teenagers?

Hell you need to legally be 21 to buy a freaking hand gun, why the hell can you buy an assault rifle at 18?

Raise the age to own a gun up to freaking 30 and you'll probably get the best results possible short of an outright ban on guns.

I don't think you need a scientific study to know that young men are violent freaking retards.

Stephen Paddock was 64.


Age is completely irrelevant.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 25, 2022, 12:31:49 PM
Stephen Paddock was 64.


Age is completely irrelevant.

Ok and I'm sure there's some women out there who have committed rape. It doesn't change the fact that there are demographics and characteristics that are much more likely to commit these crimes.

I'd be willing to bet the vast majority of mass shootings have been committed by men between the ages of 15-30

Would an outright ban on guns be the best thing? Absolutely.

But there's a 0% chance of it happening in the near future, so it's worth discussing what's the next best thing
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 25, 2022, 12:33:03 PM
Ok and I'm sure there's some women out there who have committed rape. It doesn't change the fact that there are demographics and characteristics that are much more likely to commit these crimes.

I'd be willing to bet the vast majority of mass shootings have been committed by men between the ages of 15-30

you need to stop
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 25, 2022, 12:38:24 PM
82% of mass shooters are younger than 45, 98% are male. 60% happen exclusively in the home.

Tell me why statistics don't matter?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 25, 2022, 12:38:37 PM
I'll admit...using age demographics as an argument to increase the firearms purchasing limit to 30 years old, i didn't have that on my dumbfuckery bingo card. 

You never cease to disappoint, dcm.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 25, 2022, 12:40:50 PM
You're right. If they can't outright ban guns they should all just sit around and masturbate while doing nothing instead.

I appreciate your words of wisdom
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on May 25, 2022, 12:42:32 PM
It makes no sense that you can buy a gun at 18 but you can't drink until 21. If anything, it should be the opposite.

30 is unreasonable and stupid and doesn't help anything or anyone.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 25, 2022, 12:43:47 PM
You're right. If they can't outright ban guns they should all just sit around and masturbate while doing nothing instead.

I appreciate your words of wisdom
It makes no sense that you can buy a gun at 18 but you can't drink until 21. If anything, it should be the opposite.

30 is unreasonable and stupid and doesn't help anything or anyone.

this is called "common sense", dcm....as demonstrated by our peer Derek Smalls.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 25, 2022, 12:47:58 PM
I don't understand how banning guns outright is completely reasonable.

But increasing the age to 30 (an arbitrary number I've pulled out of my derriere) is completely unreasonable.

The main "safe guard" for guns is criminal background checks. If you have 18-21 year olds buying guns odds are they won't have much of a criminal history. As they've barely been adults for a freaking minute, and presumably childhood records would be sealed or non existent.

By having the number be higher, you'd likely know who is a homicidal criminal psychopath, thus making background checks more effective.

The reality is every freaking number is arbitrary
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 25, 2022, 01:04:54 PM
Absolutely no one should own military grade rifles.

Just to reiterate the destructive power of these weapons, the parents have to get DNA swabbed because the bullets completely obliterated the childrens' bodies, making visual identification impossible. I cannot begin to imagine sending your child off to school in the morning only to have to have your mouth swabbed so the authorities can determine which dead, misshapen pile of flesh and sinew only barely recognizable as a human goes in the box they give back to you.

All assault weapons should be banned and the US should institute a by-back program.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 25, 2022, 01:06:18 PM
Absolutely no one should own military grade rifles.

Just to reiterate the destructive power of these weapons, the parents have to get DNA swabbed because the bullets completely obliterated the childrens' bodies, making visual identification impossible. I cannot begin to imagine sending your child off to school in the morning only to have to have your mouth swabbed so the authorities can determine which dead, misshapen pile of flesh and sinew only barely recognizable as a human goes in the box they give back to you.

All assault weapons should be banned and the US should institute a by-back program.

"Think of the 30+ year olds who need Uzis, you cruel bastard"

-dcm
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 25, 2022, 01:11:04 PM
What law or policy position aside from a total confiscation of firearms (which is a non starter) would have prevented this? I'm genuinely asking this, I'm not trying to be a smartass or insensitive, but given recent discussions in this thread, unfortunately feel as though I have to qualify that question.

You have an 18 year old who illegally purchased about 3 to 5k worth of firearms and accessories which alone is mind blowing.



I believe I have provided a workable solution to this on more than one occasion on here, each time after another of these incidents.

Put simply, in my brave new world the only firearms that may be kept in the house are single shot rifles and shotguns, for hunting and pest control and protection from big animals with teeth and antlers i.e. bear and moose. The concept of keeping a firearm in your house for protection against the boogeyman is a massive marketing exercise that the firearms industry has perpetuated for decades and it is long since proven to be garbage. It is now illegal.

The only people permitted to carry a firearm on their person, other than when in the act of hunting, are LEOs and licensed security officers.

There will be an amnesty and/or buyback of all privately owned firearms that are not the aforementioned hunting weapons. However, for those people who wish to continue using their collections for sport shooting, an entirely legitimate use, they will be required to join a licensed shooting club. That shooting club will keep all personally owned firearms at all times in their secured, licensed, insured, and regularly inspected facility. At no time will any individual be allowed to remove a firearm from the facility, if they want to shoot their guns they must go to the club and go make blasty holes in bits of paper at the club range.

In addition, the club will be responsible for ensuring that all members hold an up to date license. This will need to be inspected every year. Should someone's license lapse they will be given 30 days to sell their firearms via the club to another licensed member, or they will be surrendered for destruction. All purchases of new firearms and of ammunition will be conducted through these clubs, it will no longer be possible to make such purchases at Wal-Mart or at gun shows or on the internet. The club will be responsible for ensuring that the correct registration process is followed for all transactions, and correctly reported to the authorities to ensure that title to each firearm in existence is correctly recorded.

This is a lot of change. A lot of people won't like it, for all sorts of reasons. But it does some of what everyone wants:

- keeps firearms out of the hands of nutcases, both directly and indirectly
- massively reduces the illegal trade of firearms
- takes some firearms out of circulation
- allows people to retain ownership to and use of property that they legally purchased and owned
- ensures that people who actually need firearms for specific purposes continue to be able to own and use them
- keeps legitimate sport shooters able to pursue their sport with minimal disruption
- allows the multi billion dollar firearm industry to continue to be a multi billion dollar industry, all be it with some significant changes (I'm about to make ranges and clubs a massive multi billion dollar industry)

People who won't like it:

- the NRA
- politicians in the pay of the NRA
- people who feel naked without a metal crotch extension in their pocket

People who will (or should) like it:

- Schoolchildren who are now not dead
- Parents of schoolchildren who are now not dead
- Doctors who have to try and stop schoolchildren becoming dead in their ERs
- Cops
- Insurance companies
- People who own gun clubs and ranges
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 25, 2022, 01:12:18 PM
I've never liked Beto before.

https://twitter.com/JamaalBowmanNY/status/1529525056212172801?t=iap-UC66SP31CsDeQ5iBvg&s=19 (https://twitter.com/JamaalBowmanNY/status/1529525056212172801?t=iap-UC66SP31CsDeQ5iBvg&s=19)

Even if this does nothing I like it better than Schumer's "Oh well, guess we got to vote in November."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on May 25, 2022, 01:45:48 PM
The dumbest solution is the one Republicans talk about training teachers with guns. Really? You're going to pay teachers such poor salaries that they often need to get second jobs or rich spouses to support them. There are teacher shortages all over the country in large part because of that.

Now you're going to give them guns and train them to be the "good guy with a gun?" First, not all of them are good guys. Second, this isn't what they signed up for. You think they'll know exactly what to do in a situation like this? What if they have a quick trigger or are falsely alarmed? What if they can't aim? What if a crazy student knows the teachers have guns and find a way to take them first?

A trained police officer couldn't stop this kid. Now we're trusting a teacher? Good luck with that.

Or, yanno, we could just try some form of gun control. I get the MJ answer of "would it have prevented this?" Some laws definitely would make it harder for people to acquire these weapons, and it sounds like Ramos legally acquired his. But even if they don't, not doing anything is a definition of insanity. So is arming the teachers.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 25, 2022, 01:52:43 PM
Quote
Peter Frampton
@peterframpton
·
19h
26 years ago, a gunman entered
Dunblane Primary School in Scotland,
killing 16 kids and a teacher. The UK
govt responded by enacting tight gun
control legislation. In the 9400+ days
since, there have been a total of O
school shootings in the UK. #Uvalde


this isn't rocket science. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on May 25, 2022, 02:11:03 PM
In b4 scaling argument.
I'm pro gun control, but there is definitely a scaling issue with the US.

The us has more unregistered guns than people.
Think about that for a second 350 million guns
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on May 25, 2022, 02:14:16 PM
For starters this isn't an outright gun ban. Your words is banning semi automatic weapons, and only "most" of those. This doesn't address rifles handguns shotguns etc.
The majority of funs are semi automatic....
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 25, 2022, 02:14:16 PM
Eliminate the AR-15 which is the preferred firearm of mass shooters
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 25, 2022, 02:23:36 PM
Eliminate the AR-15 which is the preferred firearm of mass shooters

Targeting specific models is an exercise in futile legislation.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 25, 2022, 02:37:55 PM
Onion:

Quote
FAIRFAX, VA—National Rifle Association Executive Vice President and CEO Wayne LaPierre said Monday that somewhere around 1,000 kids would have to die in a school shooting in order for the organization to reconsider their longstanding opposition to gun control.

“Yeah, that’s probably the only way we’d reassess much of anything at this point: 1,000 dead kids, shot up pretty good, lying face down in the school auditorium or something like that,” LaPierre said, noting that anything less than 1,000 dead kids would not be enough for the NRA to stop urging Congress to pass pro-gun legislation. “I mean, that’s just a ballpark number, but I imagine seeing 1,000 or so body bags being wheeled out of a school and a whole town of crying parents would probably make us reflect on our values for at least a little bit.”

“So yeah, more or less 1,000 dead kids,” LaPierre added. “Something around there. And teachers don’t count.”

In his 21st year leading the right-wing lobbying group, LaPierre reiterated that “350 or 470 dead kids or some low number like that” would have no impact on the NRA’s belief that there should be more firearms on college campuses or that concealed carry laws should be more lax.

In order to reconsider their position on the Brady Bill, this amount of kids multiplied by 200 would have to be shot to death in school.
In addition, LaPierre added that while 800 dead kids in one school shooting would “certainly be a little closer to the number we’re talking about here,” ultimately that amount would, according to the NRA, constitute more of a society issue than a gun issue.

“For us to come anywhere close to reassessing our beliefs, it’s gotta be one of those deals where a ton of kids get their heads blown off in school and there is one of those big, town-wide memorial services where they read off all the names of all the dead kids and you feel like, wow, that has to be somewhere around 1,000 names,” said LaPierre, adding that seeing pictures of all the dead kids in front of the “pastor or whoever is doing the eulogies or whatever” might be a sobering enough visual for the NRA to reconsider whether it should be harder, not easier, to acquire firearms. “And I think the shooter would also have to use around 30 different types of guns in the shooting in order for us to rethink what the Founding Fathers intended when they wrote the Second Amendment.”

The former member of the American Conservative Union’s board of directors further qualified his statement, adding that the NRA’s response to 1,000 or so kids being mowed down by a school shooter would more than likely vary based on the age of the students, the school’s demographics, and the extenuating circumstances of the situation as a whole.

Though he didn’t offer a reason why, LaPierre said 1,000 dead 14-year-olds is “not even close to the same thing” as 1,000 dead 18-year-olds.

“If we’re talking about one of those big high schools with 4,000 students then 1,000 dead ones aren’t really even a drop in the bucket, you know?” LaPierre said, explaining that if an uzi-carrying 16-year-old only kills 45 percent of a school’s total population, the NRA would still be more inclined to blame the shooting on poor parenting, and wouldn’t consider soft gun laws to be part of the problem. “Oh, and of course, if it’s a giant state university or something like that then I’d imagine we’d need to see numbers closer to 8,000 dead kids before we really even begin to talk about potentially having a conversation about changing our philosophy.”

“And for argument’s sake, let’s say it’s a situation where 999 people die and the 1,000th person is just the school shooter blowing his brains out,” LaPierre continued. “Do you honestly expect me to take that seriously? To me, that seems more like an isolated incident that shouldn’t really impact everyone’s rights, you know?”

While some believed that LaPierre’s remarks finally indicated a slight loosening of the NRA’s pro-gun stance, LaPierre was forced to clarify his comments after his membership criticized him for introducing the idea that a playground full of bullet-riddled dead kids might cause the NRA to reconsider their position on gun control if even for a second.

“At the end of the day, I want to make it very clear that the NRA is in absolutely no rush to change anything,” LaPierre later said in a written statement. “One thousand dead kids would have very little impact on us. Now if 50,000 kids died in a school shooting that might be a different story. Something around 50,000 to 80,000 dead kids. You know what, forget that. Maybe something closer to 250,000. Yeah, 250,000 dead kids.”
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 25, 2022, 05:00:56 PM
Targeting specific models is an exercise in fusile legislation.

Hehe
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 25, 2022, 05:52:01 PM
I believe I have provided a workable solution to this on more than one occasion on here, each time after another of these incidents.

Put simply, in my brave new world the only firearms that may be kept in the house are single shot rifles and shotguns, for hunting and pest control and protection from big animals with teeth and antlers i.e. bear and moose. The concept of keeping a firearm in your house for protection against the boogeyman is a massive marketing exercise that the firearms industry has perpetuated for decades and it is long since proven to be garbage. It is now illegal.

The only people permitted to carry a firearm on their person, other than when in the act of hunting, are LEOs and licensed security officers.

There will be an amnesty and/or buyback of all privately owned firearms that are not the aforementioned hunting weapons. However, for those people who wish to continue using their collections for sport shooting, an entirely legitimate use, they will be required to join a licensed shooting club. That shooting club will keep all personally owned firearms at all times in their secured, licensed, insured, and regularly inspected facility. At no time will any individual be allowed to remove a firearm from the facility, if they want to shoot their guns they must go to the club and go make blasty holes in bits of paper at the club range.

In addition, the club will be responsible for ensuring that all members hold an up to date license. This will need to be inspected every year. Should someone's license lapse they will be given 30 days to sell their firearms via the club to another licensed member, or they will be surrendered for destruction. All purchases of new firearms and of ammunition will be conducted through these clubs, it will no longer be possible to make such purchases at Wal-Mart or at gun shows or on the internet. The club will be responsible for ensuring that the correct registration process is followed for all transactions, and correctly reported to the authorities to ensure that title to each firearm in existence is correctly recorded.

This is a lot of change. A lot of people won't like it, for all sorts of reasons. But it does some of what everyone wants:

- keeps firearms out of the hands of nutcases, both directly and indirectly
- massively reduces the illegal trade of firearms
- takes some firearms out of circulation
- allows people to retain ownership to and use of property that they legally purchased and owned
- ensures that people who actually need firearms for specific purposes continue to be able to own and use them
- keeps legitimate sport shooters able to pursue their sport with minimal disruption
- allows the multi billion dollar firearm industry to continue to be a multi billion dollar industry, all be it with some significant changes (I'm about to make ranges and clubs a massive multi billion dollar industry)

People who won't like it:

- the NRA
- politicians in the pay of the NRA
- people who feel naked without a metal crotch extension in their pocket

People who will (or should) like it:

- Schoolchildren who are now not dead
- Parents of schoolchildren who are now not dead
- Doctors who have to try and stop schoolchildren becoming dead in their ERs
- Cops
- Insurance companies
- People who own gun clubs and ranges

It took me freaking ages to type this, so I will take the complete lack of response to it as you all sitting there thinking JE4Prez.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 25, 2022, 06:22:56 PM
https://twitter.com/CalltoActivism/status/1529581012631658498?t=l9QsFPRZY8R3FzETtc5G2w&s=19

https://twitter.com/CalltoActivism/status/1529581012631658498?t=l9QsFPRZY8R3FzETtc5G2w&s=19 (https://twitter.com/CalltoActivism/status/1529581012631658498?t=l9QsFPRZY8R3FzETtc5G2w&s=19)

Texas is a crisis.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on May 25, 2022, 07:41:42 PM
It took me freaking ages to type this, so I will take the complete lack of response to it as you all sitting there thinking JE4Prez.

I think it's well thought out. I personally love Japan as a model for gun safety, just because it's what I'm familiar with, and personally the peace of mind when spending significant time there compared to growing up in a neighborhood that had real issues with gun violence was so incredibly stark.

I do think that there are more realistic gun control options for the US, something akin to Sweden's regulations (year long class+totally clean criminal record before being allowed to own guns)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 25, 2022, 08:02:14 PM
This once was included in America's pastime and on the MLB level no less

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/03/Al_Spangler_1963.jpg)(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/Bob_Aspromonte.JPG)

Today you wouldn't even think of adorning a baseball jersey/hat with a .45 cal. revolver let alone a non-civilian class of weapon

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/АК-47.jpg/320px-АК-47.jpg)


Obviously a cultural reboot will need to take place.  Years ago (at the pharmacy counter) it was "A pack of Marlboro's"...and then quietly...."er, and a pack of Trojans."  Nowadays it's the opposite.  Cigarette culture's changed.  I know cigs & guns are apples & oranges, my point being that revamping the landscape will take time and be painful but can and will eventually come to fruition.  TL:DR here....but the question is: are you prepared to put up with the pratfalls including the 'accidental (disarming) shootings' that will assuredly occur over the course of this societal transformation?  Food for thought for chewing the fat on Oct. 9th at MetLife...again, "TL; DR" for here & now.  That said two observations:

- Greg Abbot (donning a dark blue 'cop shirt') looked like some cheeseball P.D. Chief out of a 70's cop show.  F U gov.

- Beto O'Rourke's Helen of Troy grandstanding had zero chance of moving any needles.  Real change will go through different channels, not tv-friendly #outrage displays.. 

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 25, 2022, 08:04:46 PM
This once was included in America's pastime and on the MLB level no less

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/03/Al_Spangler_1963.jpg)(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/Bob_Aspromonte.JPG)

Today you wouldn't even think of adorning a baseball jersey/hat with a .45 cal. revolver let alone a non-civilian class of weapon

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/АК-47.jpg/320px-АК-47.jpg)


Obviously a cultural reboot will need to take place.  Years ago (at the pharmacy counter) it was "A pack of Marlboro's"...and then quietly...."er, and a pack of Trojans."  Nowadays it's the opposite.  Cigarette culture's changed.  I know cigs & guns are apples & oranges, my point being that revamping the landscape will take time and be painful but can and will eventually come to fruition.  TL:DR here....but the question is: are you prepared to put up with the pratfalls including the 'accidental (disarming) shootings' that will assuredly occur over the course of this societal transformation?  Food for thought for chewing the fat on Oct. 9th at MetLife...again, "TL; DR" for here & now.  That said two observations:

- Greg Abbot (donning a dark blue 'cop shirt') looked like some cheeseball P.D. Chief out of a 70's cop show.  F U gov.

- Beto O'Rourke's Helen of Troy grandstanding had zero chance of moving any needles.  Real change will go through different channels, not tv-friendly #outrage displays..
Richmond Rubbers would be a hell of a team name.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 06:34:46 AM
https://apnews.com/article/uvalde-texas-school-shooting-44a7cfb990feaa6ffe482483df6e4683 (https://apnews.com/article/uvalde-texas-school-shooting-44a7cfb990feaa6ffe482483df6e4683)

I'm laughing because otherwise I'd be screaming.

freaking useless.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 26, 2022, 08:21:12 AM
Normally I'm not one to criticize how people express their grief, but this ain't it Barry.

https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/1529555038246428672?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 26, 2022, 08:51:54 AM
https://apnews.com/article/uvalde-texas-school-shooting-44a7cfb990feaa6ffe482483df6e4683 (https://apnews.com/article/uvalde-texas-school-shooting-44a7cfb990feaa6ffe482483df6e4683)

I'm laughing because otherwise I'd be screaming.

freaking useless.


https://twitter.com/paleofuture/status/1529652093354536961?s=21&t=bOv8E0l5FjRFrqMuIXUogw

Sickening
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 26, 2022, 09:07:34 AM
https://twitter.com/paleofuture/status/1529652093354536961?s=21&t=bOv8E0l5FjRFrqMuIXUogw

Sickening

Look at all that tac gear.  Crucial equipment when you need to take out a desperate parent. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 26, 2022, 09:12:17 AM
Look at all that tac gear.  Crucial equipment when you need to take out a desperate parent. 

Those pussies should have handed their gear off to the parents if they’re too scared to do their jobs. Tough guys when it’s an unarmed black kid or chasing someone down to issue a traffic citation.

The shooter was in the school for over an hour before he was confronted and shot, again I am sick.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 09:14:00 AM
Drawing freaking tasers on the parents while their kids are getting shot inside.

I can listen to about 10 seconds of audio before it becomes overwhelming so I have no idea what is being said, but all of those cops are wearing Kevlar vests, looks like without ceramic plating (can't tell whether the ones wrestling with not the shooter on the ground have plates or not), and all carrying M4/M16 rifles. They have more than enough man power to enter the school and sweep it for the shooter. If this wasn't sickening it'd be laughable.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 26, 2022, 09:18:25 AM
Drawing freaking tasers on the parents while their kids are getting shot inside.

America is bizarro world.  Jesus.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 26, 2022, 09:18:39 AM
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1529817124256026624?s=21&t=4z5VKg6MCciRv3MkV-NtYQ

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 26, 2022, 09:20:55 AM
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1529817124256026624?s=21&t=4z5VKg6MCciRv3MkV-NtYQ

what
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 26, 2022, 09:24:11 AM
what

My reaction when I learned he’s running for Senate
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 26, 2022, 09:26:27 AM
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1529817124256026624?s=21&t=4z5VKg6MCciRv3MkV-NtYQ



 dissociative identity disorder is srs bizness
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 09:38:21 AM
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1529817124256026624?s=21&t=4z5VKg6MCciRv3MkV-NtYQ



My reaction when I learned he’s running for Senate

This is something Mitch and Trump agreed on.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 10:05:28 AM
https://twitter.com/RealCedricDark/status/1529630100299337730?s=20&t=Ny-PDvqXA8CR51BQ2H3crA (https://twitter.com/RealCedricDark/status/1529630100299337730?s=20&t=Ny-PDvqXA8CR51BQ2H3crA)

Greg Abbot keeps doing this to his own people and they don't freaking deserve to have to suffer these consequences.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 26, 2022, 10:16:50 AM
what

cainkillabel
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 26, 2022, 10:22:34 AM
I Hurshul and I gonna say a bunch a words that I heard somewhere in a big ol jumble and you just hear that I talk for a minute and guns rights.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 26, 2022, 10:25:25 AM
cainkillabel

DJ Bean should run against him
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 26, 2022, 10:46:18 AM
https://twitter.com/Alyssa_Milano/status/1529842630594416640?s=20&t=FdzxDAtiytRQI8Gm-V6qmQ


Ted Cruz got owned here.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 10:50:55 AM
https://twitter.com/Alyssa_Milano/status/1529842630594416640?s=20&t=FdzxDAtiytRQI8Gm-V6qmQ


Ted Cruz got owned here.

I was so frustrated watching this. It's the same "gun bans won't work" bullshit with absolutely no alternatives offered. The GOP policy for gun violence continues to be "blame it on mental health, then do nothing".
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on May 26, 2022, 10:59:53 AM
I was so frustrated watching this. It's the same "gun bans won't work" bullshit with absolutely no alternatives offered. The GOP policy for gun violence continues to be "blame it on mental health, then do nothing".
Blame it on mental health, don't fund mental health.

Blame it on the democrats bad proposals, don't have any counterproposals.

Blame it on politics, when most of the country seems to have a similar viewpoint at least on this topic.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 26, 2022, 11:24:38 AM
These absolute reflex of these guys to say “don’t make it political”

Sorry I don’t think being against elementary student getting slaughtered is political. If you want to be on the “other side of the aisle” for that then enjoy your AIDS
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 11:33:08 AM
These absolute reflex of these guys to say “don’t make it political”

Sorry I don’t think being against elementary student getting slaughtered is political. If you want to be on the “other side of the aisle” for that then enjoy your AIDS

"They're trying to make it political!"

Yes, because nothing else has fixed this.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 26, 2022, 11:39:38 AM
"Politics is just a fun power game we play and real life is something else entirely."
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on May 26, 2022, 12:03:16 PM
These absolute reflex of these guys to say “don’t make it political”

Sorry I don’t think being against elementary student getting slaughtered is political. If you want to be on the “other side of the aisle” for that then enjoy your AIDS
Yep. It's infuriating. Immediately blaming the media and blaming politics. But Ted Cruz is the worst, so there's that.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 26, 2022, 12:16:51 PM
I Hurshul and I gonna say a bunch a words that I heard somewhere in a big ol jumble and you just hear that I talk for a minute and guns rights.

Now why you gotta go be do like that?

GOP fucked up thinking this numbskull's football legacy's gonna carry him what with the shlitload of personal (domestic violence) baggage he himself's carrying.  Dems should take a page out of the NY Rangers fans 'Dennis Potvin' playbook: "beat your wife Potvin, beat your wife!" clap, clap

Ulverde cops should adorn their squad cars with:  "To Serve Sans Conscience and With Cowardice"

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 12:22:15 PM
https://twitter.com/tplohetski/status/1529852949060534273?t=Ej766trnu-_bKcv0oK_Mow&s=19 (https://twitter.com/tplohetski/status/1529852949060534273?t=Ej766trnu-_bKcv0oK_Mow&s=19)

"Authorities" (quotation marks because not specified) will be examining the response of the Uvalde PD during the shooting. This is a normal procedure after any major action but it is going to intensely scrutinized here

All I can say is the response by the public will not be considered "measured" if the whole PD is cleared.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 26, 2022, 12:27:39 PM
Herschel Walker would be the new, undisputed, dumbest member of Congress and it won't be close.  That is saying...a lot, but that dude makes Louie Gohmert look like a Rhodes scholar.  He's too dumb to think. Quite literally mentally challenged.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 26, 2022, 12:43:37 PM
Herschel Walker would be the new, undisputed, dumbest member of Congress and it won't be close.  That is saying...a lot, but that dude makes Louie Gohmert look like a Rhodes scholar.  He's too dumb to think. Quite literally mentally challenged.

With all due respect bomeister as dumb-as-dirt Louie Gohmert surely is, I have to hand the golden horses' butt award to Ga's Hank Johnson who took "the earth is flat" mentality to a whole 'nuther level by suggesting that the island of Guam would capsize:

"My fear is that the whole island will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize,"

Hank's "ship list" hypothesizing should top many a "shlt list"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 26, 2022, 12:48:22 PM
With all due respect bomeister as dumb-as-dirt Louie Gohmert surely is, I have to hand the golden horses' butt award to Ga's Hank Johnson who took "the earth is flat" mentality to a whole 'nuther level by suggesting that the island of Guam would capsize:

"My fear is that the whole island will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize,"

Hank's "ship list" hypothesizing should top many a "shlt list"

Now now, this goes against the larger board ethos of GOP bad. As I said in another post, Sheila Jackson Lee, and it's not even close.

Anyway, having looked at the footage put out by Posobiec of the utter inactivity of the police outside the building as this monster was mowing down schoolchildren,  over the last two years if the cops of this country had a stated goal of pissing everyone off on both sides of the aisle, they're doing great!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on May 26, 2022, 01:23:00 PM
Now now, this goes against the larger board ethos of GOP bad. As I said in another post, Sheila Jackson Lee, and it's not even close.

Anyway, having looked at the footage put out by Posobiec of the utter inactivity of the police outside the building as this monster was mowing down schoolchildren,  over the last two years if the cops of this country had a stated goal of pissing everyone off on both sides of the aisle, they're doing great!
Yep. This country has a policing problem. Both sides can disagree specifically on what the problems are and how to fix them, but they usually aren't effective enough when we need them, and there have always been issues in terms of how they treat minorities.

Obviously, there's a bit of a bias in that we hear more about the times they screw up than the times they do well, but nobody should be happy with the state of policing in this country.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 26, 2022, 01:25:02 PM
https://twitter.com/TheBeaverton/status/1529888842278395904?s=20&t=FdzxDAtiytRQI8Gm-V6qmQ
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on May 26, 2022, 01:30:25 PM
Yep. This country has a policing problem. Both sides can disagree specifically on what the problems are and how to fix them, but they usually aren't effective enough when we need them, and there have always been issues in terms of how they treat minorities.

Obviously, there's a bit of a bias in that we hear more about the times they screw up than the times they do well, but nobody should be happy with the state of policing in this country.
Isnt thay why we want to arm teachers in the classroom?  So they can do a better job?

/s
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on May 26, 2022, 01:31:15 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1529729614309900290?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1529729614309900290%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thedailybeast.com%2Fted-cruz-storms-out-of-british-interview-when-asked-about-gun-violence-after-texas-school-shooting

Gotta love cruz spewing propaganda and then telling the reporter to stop being a propagandaist
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 26, 2022, 01:31:58 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1529729614309900290?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1529729614309900290%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thedailybeast.com%2Fted-cruz-storms-out-of-british-interview-when-asked-about-gun-violence-after-texas-school-shooting

Gotta love cruz spewing propaganda and then telling the reporter to stop being a propagandaist

i posted this 1 page ago
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on May 26, 2022, 01:32:53 PM
Isnt thay why we want to arm teachers in the classroom?  So they can do a better job?

/s
Yep. No better way to help the nationwide teacher shortage than by forcing them to be armed protectors of 3rd graders for $50K a year.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on May 26, 2022, 01:35:04 PM
i posted this 1 page ago
Congrats
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 26, 2022, 01:35:51 PM
Congrats

try to keep up
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on May 26, 2022, 01:35:55 PM
"They're trying to make it political!"

Yes, because nothing else has fixed this.
It's funny because the reporter said nothing about politics.  He didn't mention right or left, but somehow he's making it political
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 26, 2022, 01:37:05 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1529729614309900290?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1529729614309900290%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thedailybeast.com%2Fted-cruz-storms-out-of-british-interview-when-asked-about-gun-violence-after-texas-school-shooting

Gotta love cruz spewing propaganda and then telling the reporter to stop being a propagandaist

Yeah, that's not spewing propaganda.

ArM TeAcHeRs is a strawman. What's not is the reality that there are proposals circulating in which schools would have more of a security presence, but the same people that shipped 40 billion to the Ukraine are crying about expense.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 26, 2022, 01:50:03 PM
Yep. No better way to help the nationwide teacher shortage than by forcing them to be armed protectors of 3rd graders for $50K a year.

Try $32K in most southern school districts for new teachers

It’s around $50K in Austin which seems alright but cost of living here is a goddamn joke
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 26, 2022, 01:54:52 PM
https://twitter.com/patshoppedup/status/1529679077040439297?s=21&t=-qneYFSmzTtIF_Ln25YkDg

They just needed more money

40% of town budget with a population of 16K people
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 26, 2022, 01:59:07 PM
https://twitter.com/ernie_zuniga/status/1529872688939995136?s=21&t=-qneYFSmzTtIF_Ln25YkDg

JFC
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 26, 2022, 02:10:51 PM
https://twitter.com/billfoxla/status/1529895723243909141?s=21&t=-qneYFSmzTtIF_Ln25YkDg

Lol so they freaking lied yesterday?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 26, 2022, 02:11:04 PM
https://twitter.com/ernie_zuniga/status/1529872688939995136?s=21&t=-qneYFSmzTtIF_Ln25YkDg

JFC

If she's as young as she looks, I'd think there would be more to it than just a heart attack
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 26, 2022, 02:17:05 PM
If she's as young as she looks, I'd think there would be more to it than just a heart attack

https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1529897080927531037?s=21&t=tuuZ7yA3MPABdwDKhWFELg

Not sure why your comment was needed but it was certainly on brand
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 26, 2022, 02:19:57 PM
https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1529897080927531037?s=21&t=tuuZ7yA3MPABdwDKhWFELg

Not sure why your comment was needed but it was certainly on brand

I suppose it was the picture of the wife that threw me off.

A woman in her 40s dropping dead of a heart attack is highly unusual.

But it was the husband who died

I clearly wasn't paying close enough attention
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 02:22:55 PM
https://twitter.com/billfoxla/status/1529895723243909141?s=21&t=-qneYFSmzTtIF_Ln25YkDg

Lol so they freaking lied yesterday?

I'm trying hard to understand this.

Scenario 1:
They confused a report they received early on in the call and passed it on to the media.

Scenario 2:
They just assumed there was an SRO there and then assumed that said SRO would do their job without bothering to check.

Scenario 3:
They, bafflingly, thought that making it seem like officers engaged the gunman but were unable to stop him would make the police force look like they were doing something, rather than waiting outside for the SWAT team to show up.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 26, 2022, 02:35:41 PM
Quote
Uvalde SWAT team had done a walkthrough of the school in Feb to prepare for just such a situation

Outside observers saying Uvalde police ignored every lesson learned since Columbine

https://twitter.com/the_cleric/status/1494063483616477185?s=21&t=1QsTQ0gAtwTcZkb4lQDoeQ
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on May 26, 2022, 02:41:10 PM
Yeah, that's not spewing propaganda.

ArM TeAcHeRs is a strawman. What's not is the reality that there are proposals circulating in which schools would have more of a security presence, but the same people that shipped 40 billion to the Ukraine are crying about expense.
1. It's not a strawman when prominent Republicans are suggesting it as a solution. I wish it were a strawman, but this is what prominent members of your party have suggested.

Ken Paxton quote: “We can’t stop bad people from doing bad things. We can potentially arm and prepare and train teachers and other administrators to respond quickly. That, in my opinion, is the best answer,”

2. This school had just spent a lot of money on upgrading its security. They hired a police force. They built a fence. None of it stopped this from happening.
https://twitter.com/SuzyKhimm/status/1529625828895727617
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 26, 2022, 02:47:45 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1529729614309900290?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1529729614309900290%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thedailybeast.com%2Fted-cruz-storms-out-of-british-interview-when-asked-about-gun-violence-after-texas-school-shooting
Quote from: MBGreen
i posted this 1 page ago
Quote from: infinity
Congrats
Quote from: MBGreen
Try to keep up

Here it is, two politically fraternal JO studs who'd normally be deep-Frenching each other but instead choose to get bogged-down in a petty  "I was first, dickbag!" penis swordfight. 

And you wonder why your "bad guys - opposition party" are able to get their foot in the door?  MBG.. you of all people U studboy... :-)

#cumonmyprogressivetits  : -)

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on May 26, 2022, 03:21:14 PM
Blame it on mental health, don't fund mental health.

This is the most infuriating for me. Like, yes, mental health definitely plays a part in these shootings and it is GOOD that prominent members of the GOP identifies it as part of the problem (despite them doing this in an attempt to keep scrutiny away from gun control legislation). But why do they insist over and over across so many parts of the country to cut funding from programs that target mental health interventions in children and teens? There is so, so little money and resources there for people and organizations who want to do good mental health work that might theoretically cut down on the frequency of mass shootings.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 26, 2022, 04:00:50 PM
This is the most infuriating for me. Like, yes, mental health definitely plays a part in these shootings and it is GOOD that prominent members of the GOP identifies it as part of the problem (despite them doing this in an attempt to keep scrutiny away from gun control legislation). But why do they insist over and over across so many parts of the country to cut funding from programs that target mental health interventions in children and teens? There is so, so little money and resources there for people and organizations who want to do good mental health work that might theoretically cut down on the frequency of mass shootings.

I think they see instances such as this as a symptom of the collapse of American family values instead of a symptom of a growing public health crisis.  Can't fix crazy by throwing cash at socialism workers and so on.

At least that's what I think about the ones who genuinely think public mental health is the core problem.  Most are just deflecting until the next news cycle. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 05:42:48 PM
https://twitter.com/MyCancerJourne3/status/1529933108182515713?t=hcrVqkcoJHpDS3tvdS4u0g&s=19 (https://twitter.com/MyCancerJourne3/status/1529933108182515713?t=hcrVqkcoJHpDS3tvdS4u0g&s=19)

I just... I hope he's lying. I honestly hope he's lying because I'd rather live in a world where a grieving family member would try to discredit someone they felt was responsible for the death of a relative rather than a world where a sitting governor would send a representative to try to bribe a grieving family member and then threaten them when they wouldn't play ball.

It would be so much easier to move on from the former than the latter. But I have seen too much from Abbott to be able to dismiss this outright.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on May 26, 2022, 05:49:06 PM
Yeah, that's not spewing propaganda.
Cruz, "why sir do people come to America?  Because it's the freest, safest, most prosperous country in the world."


prop·a·gan·da
/ˌpräpəˈɡandə/
noun
1.information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

That sir, is propaganda.

ArM TeAcHeRs is a strawman.

It is not a strawman it is a talking point that consistently is brought up by the right as a tactic to make schools safe.

but the same people that shipped 40 billion to the Ukraine are crying about expense.
Now this sir is a strawman.  The problem isn't the cost, the problem is paying for something that won't fix the problem.  It's the border wall all over again.  The wall, just like school security is not the root cause of this problem. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 26, 2022, 05:50:58 PM
https://twitter.com/MyCancerJourne3/status/1529933108182515713?t=hcrVqkcoJHpDS3tvdS4u0g&s=19 (https://twitter.com/MyCancerJourne3/status/1529933108182515713?t=hcrVqkcoJHpDS3tvdS4u0g&s=19)

I just... I hope he's lying. I honestly hope he's lying because I'd rather live in a world where a grieving family member would try to discredit someone they felt was responsible for the death of a relative rather than a world where a sitting governor would send a representative to try to bribe a grieving family member and then threaten them when they wouldn't play ball.

It would be so much easier to move on from the former than the latter. But I have seen too much from Abbott to be able to dismiss this outright.

That does seem a little over the top.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 26, 2022, 05:58:04 PM
https://twitter.com/MyCancerJourne3/status/1529933108182515713?t=hcrVqkcoJHpDS3tvdS4u0g&s=19 (https://twitter.com/MyCancerJourne3/status/1529933108182515713?t=hcrVqkcoJHpDS3tvdS4u0g&s=19)

I just... I hope he's lying. I honestly hope he's lying because I'd rather live in a world where a grieving family member would try to discredit someone they felt was responsible for the death of a relative rather than a world where a sitting governor would send a representative to try to bribe a grieving family member and then threaten them when they wouldn't play ball.

It would be so much easier to move on from the former than the latter. But I have seen too much from Abbott to be able to dismiss this outright.
That does seem a little over the top.

It doesn't make sense, not even from a scumbag standpoint more so from a you have 100,000x more to lose than gain.

Best I can tell is according to this poster they had a liver transplant 11 days ago (according to their tweets). And from first hand knowledge extreme delirium is incredibly common after transplants.

To be quite frank I find it somewhat difficult to believe this person has been home for several days after allegedly having a liver transplant 11 days ago.

I don't know what to make of any of this other than it's not even a little bit believable.

I'm sure there will be plenty of scumbag moments from politicians in the immediate aftermath of all of this, this just likely will not be one
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on May 26, 2022, 05:59:25 PM
Here it is, two politically fraternal JO studs who'd normally be deep-Frenching each other but instead choose to get bogged-down in a petty  "I was first, dickbag!" penis swordfight. 

And you wonder why your "bad guys - opposition party" are able to get their foot in the door?  MBG.. you of all people U studboy... :-)

#cumonmyprogressivetits  : -)
I'm not sure what you mean.  I clearly congratulated him... =)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on May 26, 2022, 06:03:17 PM
It doesn't make sense, not even from a scumbag standpoint more so from a you have 100,000x more to lose than gain.

Best I can tell is according to this poster they had a liver transplant 11 days ago (according to their tweets). And from first hand knowledge extreme delirium is incredibly common after transplants.

To be quite frank I find it somewhat difficult to believe this person has been home for several days after allegedly having a liver transplant 11 days ago.

I don't know what to make of any of this other than it's not even a little bit believable.

I'm sure there will be plenty of scumbag moments from politicians in the immediate aftermath of all of this, this just likely will not be one
DCM cap expert as well as Healthcare extraordinaire
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 26, 2022, 06:05:52 PM
DCM cap expert as well as Healthcare extraordinaire

I mean I do work in Healthcare and do transplants so...

But you don't have to be a rocket scientist to know that someone's mind is going to be fucked up after having major surgery, being started on excrement ton of extremely powerful immunosuppressive drugs, and being  started on high dose opiod narcotics
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 06:06:36 PM
https://twitter.com/rachelmillman/status/1529960335549030423?t=Erzs4-5UqHM0kOs6RQO9vw&s=19 (https://twitter.com/rachelmillman/status/1529960335549030423?t=Erzs4-5UqHM0kOs6RQO9vw&s=19)

Yeah, looks like he's lying.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 26, 2022, 06:14:59 PM
Cruz, "why sir do people come to America?  Because it's the freest, safest, most prosperous country in the world."


prop·a·gan·da
/ˌpräpəˈɡandə/
noun
1.information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

That sir, is propaganda.

It is not a strawman it is a talking point that consistently is brought up by the right as a tactic to make schools safe.
Now this sir is a strawman.  The problem isn't the cost, the problem is paying for something that won't fix the problem.  It's the border wall all over again.  The wall, just like school security is not the root cause of this problem.

1. So that's propaganda, but not the blatantly inflated statistics behind mass shootings, police on Black crime, etc etc etc. Just a mere statement about American exceptionalism that I'd expect from any politician. I understand it's en vogue to act like we live in a total backward pooper, but that defies reality.

It's absolutely a strawman, the only politician talking about arming teachers is the Texas attorney general. Ok, I'm sure I can find plenty of politicians on the left spewing inane and ineffective policy points and use them to paint with a broader brush as well.

It's not a strawman, you have no idea whether or not resources devoted to tactical training  vetting of personnel to ensure that people placed with that responsibility don't stand around like total pussies, and further protection would work. I know it's money better spent than shipping it to the Ukraine.

Border wall would've worked by the way in conjunction with beefing up border patrol to mind said border so they can identify and apprehend any tunneling, but whatever, that's neither here nor there.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 26, 2022, 06:50:28 PM
https://twitter.com/rachelmillman/status/1529960335549030423?t=Erzs4-5UqHM0kOs6RQO9vw&s=19 (https://twitter.com/rachelmillman/status/1529960335549030423?t=Erzs4-5UqHM0kOs6RQO9vw&s=19)

Yeah, looks like he's lying.

At least now we know what happened to Green Hornet.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 06:53:32 PM
At least now we know what happened to Green Hornet.

Yeah, thank freak. Reality is bad enough:

https://twitter.com/nczeitgeist/status/1529785171586727936?t=iuOhBdg9-bs9F7v1LJvacw&s=19 (https://twitter.com/nczeitgeist/status/1529785171586727936?t=iuOhBdg9-bs9F7v1LJvacw&s=19)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 26, 2022, 07:09:04 PM
DCM cap expert as well as Healthcare extraordinaire
TBF it's fairly well known that he does actually have some expert knowledge in that field.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 07:42:32 PM
I'm trying hard to understand this.

Scenario 1:
They confused a report they received early on in the call and passed it on to the media.

Scenario 2:
They just assumed there was an SRO there and then assumed that said SRO would do their job without bothering to check.

Scenario 3:
They, bafflingly, thought that making it seem like officers engaged the gunman but were unable to stop him would make the police force look like they were doing something, rather than waiting outside for the SWAT team to show up.

Scenario 4: The cops did engage them and fucked up, and then changed the story so they sound less incompetent.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on May 26, 2022, 07:48:52 PM
1. So that's propaganda, but not the blatantly inflated statistics behind mass shootings, police on Black crime, etc etc etc. Just a mere statement about American exceptionalism that I'd expect from any politician. I understand it's en vogue to act like we live in a total backward pooper, but that defies reality.

It's absolutely a strawman, the only politician talking about arming teachers is the Texas attorney general. Ok, I'm sure I can find plenty of politicians on the left spewing inane and ineffective policy points and use them to paint with a broader brush as well.

It's not a strawman, you have no idea whether or not resources devoted to tactical training  vetting of personnel to ensure that people placed with that responsibility don't stand around like total pussies, and further protection would work. I know it's money better spent than shipping it to the Ukraine.

Border wall would've worked by the way in conjunction with beefing up border patrol to mind said border so they can identify and apprehend any tunneling, but whatever, that's neither here nor there.
Whatever you say
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 26, 2022, 08:38:55 PM
Scenario 4: The cops did engage them and fucked up, and then changed the story so they sound less incompetent.

Presumably this could be corroborated with ballistics?

I can't imagine engaging an armed active shooter and not firing shots

Plus I imagine there's gotta be some communication logs with them calling for backup and everything else
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 26, 2022, 08:45:56 PM
Presumably this could be corroborated with ballistics?

I can't imagine engaging an armed active shooter and not firing shots

Plus I imagine there's gotta be some communication logs with them calling for backup and everything else

I can imagine them being.freaking pussies. See: 60 minutes of.refusimg.to.enter the school but pulling tazers on the parents video.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 26, 2022, 09:04:52 PM
I can imagine them being.freaking pussies. See: 60 minutes of.refusimg.to.enter the school but pulling tazers on the parents video.

Even if that's the case, they absolutely would have called excrement in.

I have no freaking idea whats recorded and what isn't, but there's no freaking way on the planet that there's not some sort of communication logged corroborating or contesting the information.

Hell I'd wager all there's so much excrement on the officers or the vehicle's with GPS we well.

This is going to be intensely reviewed by who the freak knows how many people, surely including the federal government/fbi etc.

I have no doubt that many details will be revealed.

On a side note we have no idea if procedure would reccomend not engaging incase there's multiple shooters / a hostage situation going on.

But from a human perspective it's hard to imagine a person with a gun not willing to run into a building knowing that some psychopath is actively murdering children
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 26, 2022, 09:11:34 PM
(just in case it's clear I'm not defending or condeming the police here. I'm saying with the amount of attention this is going to get, almost surely most details will become known)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 26, 2022, 09:12:04 PM
Stop defending these freaking cops, dcm
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 26, 2022, 09:17:35 PM
Stop defending these freaking cops, dcm

I'm not defending excrement

People are speculating or fantasizing. I'm saying there will very be hard proof to support or disprove
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 26, 2022, 09:28:30 PM
People are speculating or fantasizing.

There's video of these shitheads detaining the parents.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 26, 2022, 09:30:02 PM
There's video of these shitheads detaining the parents.

I didn't comment nor was aware of anything on that part.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 27, 2022, 07:43:17 AM
(https://i.redd.it/690mje49cx191.png)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 27, 2022, 11:41:57 AM
I didn't comment nor was aware of anything on that part.

https://twitter.com/iamamnanawaz/status/1530222852208738305?s=21&t=Ba0nRaiZWZZWE3RxDb_zUA
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 27, 2022, 11:43:08 AM
https://twitter.com/yellowmustarded/status/1530225642788335620?s=21&t=Ba0nRaiZWZZWE3RxDb_zUA

Cowards
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 27, 2022, 11:51:16 AM
https://twitter.com/fourverts/status/1530223958057963522?s=21&t=EUOJIDre81A6oYEagwcgosteCL-nD3W4tviA2gzuQQk

Say what
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 27, 2022, 12:11:02 PM
https://twitter.com/iamamnanawaz/status/1530222852208738305?s=21&t=Ba0nRaiZWZZWE3RxDb_zUA

What the freak?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 27, 2022, 12:14:52 PM
https://twitter.com/screenslaver/status/1530223403268907009?s=21&t=hUZDXrivjio-d9ShLbGKdg

Ughhhhh
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 27, 2022, 12:17:27 PM
So the gunman was in the school from 11:33 to 12:50…

And they were too scared to confront him even though kids were alive in there…


Somebody needs to face serious consequences

That dumb freak Abbott is actually right that it wasn’t a lot worse, but not because of anything these chickenshit cops did
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 27, 2022, 12:27:34 PM
Texas officials pushing single point of entry as if that won't make it easier to kill a lot of people (children).
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 27, 2022, 12:37:15 PM
So the gunman was in the school from 11:33 to 12:50…

And they were too scared to confront him even though kids were alive in there…


Somebody needs to face serious consequences

That dumb freak Abbott is actually right that it wasn’t a lot worse, but not because of anything these chickenshit cops did

Now I really want to know what happened outside the school before he went in. The school was supposed to have a security force there.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 27, 2022, 12:39:11 PM
Blaming the teachers for having a door propped open prior to the gunman getting into the school. JFC.

https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1530219824156139523 (https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1530219824156139523)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 27, 2022, 02:13:50 PM
https://www.theonion.com/tearful-uvalde-residents-thank-police-for-protecting-pa-1848982023

https://www.theonion.com/entire-u-s-police-force-flees-country-after-hearing-gu-1848981784
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Gorilla on May 27, 2022, 02:56:41 PM
https://www.theonion.com/tearful-uvalde-residents-thank-police-for-protecting-pa-1848982023

https://www.theonion.com/entire-u-s-police-force-flees-country-after-hearing-gu-1848981784

Amazing, the Onion never fails.
Have to try and ease the pain with laughter when you can, it's better than crying and screaming into a pillow every night.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 27, 2022, 04:21:42 PM
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8c/Coward_poster.jpg/165px-Coward_poster.jpg)(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0b/The_Fighting_Coward_poster_1.jpg/143px-The_Fighting_Coward_poster_1.jpg)(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f0/Police_in_riot_gear_at_Ferguson_protests.jpg/320px-Police_in_riot_gear_at_Ferguson_protests.jpg)(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/47/Anchorage_chickens.jpg/320px-Anchorage_chickens.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 27, 2022, 07:32:47 PM
19 cops were ordered to stand against 1 untrained 18 year old with an AR-15 because they felt overpowered.

AR-15s shouldn’t be legal for civilian use. There isn’t a single logical argument for it.

We live in a deeply flawed country and I’ve just now been waking up to it because we were brainwashed into thinking this is normal.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 27, 2022, 07:40:07 PM
Uvalde: AR-15
Buffalo: AR-15
Boulder: AR-15
Orlando: AR-15
Parkland: AR-15
Las Vegas: AR-15
Aurora, CO: AR-15
Sandy Hook: AR-15
Waffle House: AR-15
San Bernardino: AR-15
Midland/Odessa: AR-15
Poway synagogue: AR-15
Sutherland Springs: AR-15
Tree of Life Synagogue: AR-15
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 27, 2022, 07:48:24 PM
https://twitter.com/danriffle/status/1530176436073635842?s=21&t=feonAdoEktjnFmAWCKJArQ

I think this was posted already but idc
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 27, 2022, 08:01:46 PM
Uvalde: AR-15
Buffalo: AR-15
Boulder: AR-15
Orlando: AR-15
Parkland: AR-15
Las Vegas: AR-15
Aurora, CO: AR-15
Sandy Hook: AR-15
Waffle House: AR-15
San Bernardino: AR-15
Midland/Odessa: AR-15
Poway synagogue: AR-15
Sutherland Springs: AR-15
Tree of Life Synagogue: AR-15

I'm asking because I genuinely don't know.

Were these all truly AR-15s?

Or is this one of those things where stupid freaking people call every single rifle known to man an AR
-15?

Like how old people will call every smart phone an iPhone or some excrement
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 27, 2022, 08:09:02 PM
I'm asking because I genuinely don't know.

Were these all truly AR-15s?

Or is this one of those things where stupid freaking people call every single rifle known to man an AR
-15?

Like how old people will call every smart phone an iPhone or some excrement

What's weightless, can be seen by the naked eye, and if put in a barrel, will make it lighter?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 27, 2022, 08:12:49 PM
I'm asking because I genuinely don't know.

Were these all truly AR-15s?

Or is this one of those things where stupid freaking people call every single rifle known to man an AR
-15?

Like how old people will call every smart phone an iPhone or some excrement

Do you think a weapon that can massacre 50-60 people in less than an hour is necessary for civilians to have? Does it matter what the name of it is?

But anyways, yes.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 27, 2022, 08:20:43 PM
Do you think a weapon that can massacre 50-60 people in less than an hour is necessary for civilians to have? Does it matter what the name of it is?

But anyways, yes.

I'm not for any assault rifles being legal, I wholeheartedly believe they should all be banned.

I just know there's a freak ton of weapons out there, so it would be peculiar if almost every mass murder was committed with the same one

And if they were all with the same one. Thats something in desperate need of evaluation
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 27, 2022, 08:29:14 PM
I'm not for any assault rifles being legal, I wholeheartedly believe they should all be banned.

I just know there's a freak ton of weapons out there, so it would be peculiar if almost every mass murder was committed with the same one

And if they were all with the same one. Thats something in desperate need of evaluation

AR stands for Armalite Rifle, not assault rifle. It’s a blanket term for a style of rifle that fires massive bullets that come in high capacity magazines that are easy to reload. There’s tons of different manufacturers/brands that make it.

Somehow these 17 year old incels have figured out that it’s the ideal weapon for a mass shooting, but the smart people in charge haven’t.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on May 27, 2022, 08:31:49 PM
I'm asking because I genuinely don't know.

Were these all truly AR-15s?

Or is this one of those things where stupid freaking people call every single rifle known to man an AR
-15?

Like how old people will call every smart phone an iPhone or some excrement
Most of the anti-gun people don't know all the particulars about guns. Pro-gun people use that as a way to say "you don't know what you're talking about," which on the micro level is true. But on the macro level, it's irrelevant bullshit.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 27, 2022, 08:38:24 PM
Pretty sure I read they passed a law in Texas to drop the minimum age to buy an AR-15 in Texas from 21 to 18 over the past year or 2.

This kid was able to buy 2 AR-15s and several hundred rounds of ammunition within weeks of having his 18th birthday, no questions asked.

Can’t drink at 18 in Texas though. Weed still is heavily policed. But 18 year olds need AR-15s.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 27, 2022, 09:00:34 PM
https://twitter.com/jonahtulsnfl/status/1530345029658677250?s=21&t=UaDzuWIAxSpKWWiknfnb0Q

This guy sucked for TDN and I see nothing has changed

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 27, 2022, 09:01:43 PM
Pretty sure I read they passed a law in Texas to drop the minimum age to buy an AR-15 in Texas from 21 to 18 over the past year or 2.

This kid was able to buy 2 AR-15s and several hundred rounds of ammunition within weeks of having his 18th birthday, no questions asked.

Can’t drink at 18 in Texas though. Weed still is heavily policed. But 18 year olds need AR-15s.

https://twitter.com/shannonrwatts/status/1374426623626207236?s=21&t=D16J0clNPDv9jJd_mHG9jg
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 27, 2022, 09:08:33 PM
https://twitter.com/shannonrwatts/status/1374426623626207236?s=21&t=D16J0clNPDv9jJd_mHG9jg

Ted Cruz at today's rally:

Quote
What stops armed bad guys is armed good guys

Holy excrement. Either he and his staff forgot to.edit the speech beforehand.or.they just don't care.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on May 27, 2022, 09:14:33 PM
They aren't lazy, they just don't care.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 27, 2022, 09:20:14 PM
AR stands for Armalite Rifle, not assault rifle. It’s a blanket term for a style of rifle that fires massive bullets that come in high capacity magazines that are easy to reload. There’s tons of different manufacturers/brands that make it.

Somehow these 17 year old incels have figured out that it’s the ideal weapon for a mass shooting, but the smart people in charge haven’t.

Well excrement

I guess I'm just as gun retarded as everybody else who isn't sleeping with their siblings.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 28, 2022, 12:00:28 PM
https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1530591087747862529?s=21&t=VZtNpwbBSHx6wI6EzDrPbQ
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 29, 2022, 12:38:37 AM
Quote from: Gov. Greg Abbott
"As horrible as it was,  it could've been worse."

https://twitter.com/NoLieWithBTC/status/1530198495008854018
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 29, 2022, 08:46:42 AM
Why are 18 year olds without background checks allowed to buy AR 15 military assault rifles which the US military considers to be the most deadly in combat. The manufacturer markets it to young troubled men challenging their manhood and giving out “manhood platinum cards” among other outrageous marketing and advertising.  Freak the right wing psychos, lobbyists, and politicians who think the second amendment gives ALL Americans unfettered access to killing machines.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 29, 2022, 09:12:08 AM
Why are 18 year olds without background checks allowed to buy AR 15 military assault rifles which the US military considers to be the most deadly in combat. The manufacturer markets it to young troubled men challenging their manhood and giving out “manhood platinum cards” among other outrageous marketing and advertising.  Freak the right wing psychos, lobbyists, and politicians who think the second amendment gives ALL Americans unfettered access to killing machines.
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220529/98027c0052ca73f2a73f181331c766b7.jpg)

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220529/cb76dc5463b72ecc5455832772db15de.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 29, 2022, 12:53:13 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/JCquceC.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 29, 2022, 05:58:24 PM
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/J_Cash.jpg)(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/00/Lionel_Trains_01.jpg/640px-Lionel_Trains_01.jpg)


When I was a kid it was "the man in black" urging dads to "get your boy a Lionel train...the big train for small hands"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jf6aQfTTPA


Nowadays, they're pitching along the lines of "the big gun for small hands."  Below: these weasels (Daniel Defense, Ga.) made their twitter account private after catching flak for featuring a very young child cradling one of their assault weapons in an ad.

https://twitter.com/drewharwell/status/1529277794794053640




Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 31, 2022, 11:18:13 AM
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/may/31/lapierre-nra-thoughts-and-prayers-comedian-jason-selvig-edited-?CMP=fb_gu&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1654010882
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 31, 2022, 12:24:53 PM
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/may/31/lapierre-nra-thoughts-and-prayers-comedian-jason-selvig-edited-?CMP=fb_gu&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1654010882

There’s a great video of them trying to exorcise Ted Cruz during one of his appearances.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 31, 2022, 12:42:29 PM
https://twitter.com/mr_jce/status/1531625547104673794?s=21&t=NvjXC43E54IaZWdMoOatQA
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 31, 2022, 12:48:17 PM
https://twitter.com/thegoodliars/status/1531651480180121603?s=21&t=NvjXC43E54IaZWdMoOatQA

Typical NRA convention attendee
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 31, 2022, 12:49:38 PM
https://twitter.com/noliewithbtc/status/1531442031570075649?s=21&t=NvjXC43E54IaZWdMoOatQA

Oh no but now the Canadian government will genocide all the Canadian citizens
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 31, 2022, 12:54:40 PM
https://twitter.com/thegoodliars/status/1531651480180121603?s=21&t=NvjXC43E54IaZWdMoOatQA

Typical NRA convention attendee
I also really hate that argument. "But cars kill more people than guns so why aren't you arguing for cars to be banned?" Because cars are essential and their occasional lethality relative to the number and frequency of use is an unfortunate side effect. The entire purpose of a gun is to end life, so unless you can demonstrate a clear and specific and justifiable need to end life (and "the boogeyman might break in" ain't it) then there is no legitimate argument for you having one on your person or in your home.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 31, 2022, 01:03:36 PM
https://twitter.com/roguesnradvisor/status/1530973184605900800?s=20&t=uX0oILzHDnrrwd96L3qmSQ


this could probably go in the WTF thread also
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 31, 2022, 01:07:14 PM
I also really hate that argument. "But cars kill more people than guns so why aren't you arguing for cars to be banned?" Because cars are essential and their occasional lethality relative to the number and frequency of use is an unfortunate side effect. The entire purpose of a gun is to end life, so unless you can demonstrate a clear and specific and justifiable need to end life (and "the boogeyman might break in" ain't it) then there is no legitimate argument for you having one on your person or in your home.

Cigarettes
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 31, 2022, 01:10:00 PM
https://twitter.com/roguesnradvisor/status/1530973184605900800?s=20&t=uX0oILzHDnrrwd96L3qmSQ


this could probably go in the WTF thread also
It's very obviously fake though.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 31, 2022, 01:11:03 PM
Cigarettes
Except now that pretty much everywhere has banned smoking indoors, the only people being killed by tobacco are the ones using it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 31, 2022, 01:11:50 PM
https://twitter.com/noliewithbtc/status/1531442031570075649?s=21&t=NvjXC43E54IaZWdMoOatQA

Oh no but now the Canadian government will genocide all the Canadian citizens

To me this is an extremely freaking sensible compromise that you should easily be able to get the vast majority of people behind.

All the bullshit excuses about hunting, sport, and self defense are completely managble with magazines of 5 rounds or less.

While this would prevent things like the Las Vegas shooting, I don't think it would make a significant difference in events like Texas. Although it would make it much much easier for law enforcement to overcome a shooter
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 31, 2022, 01:12:24 PM
It's very obviously fake though.

maybe....this is the States we're talking about
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 31, 2022, 01:15:12 PM
when the fvck is this self important, perpetually declarative blowhard gonna buy the farm?

https://twitter.com/DanRather/status/1531387459338051584

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 31, 2022, 01:15:27 PM
Except now that pretty much everywhere has banned smoking indoors, the only people being killed by tobacco are the ones using it.

The same amount of people die in the United States from second hand smoke each a year as they do from guns. If you exclude suicide by guns secondhand smoke blows it out of the water.

Roughly 15% of all deaths in the world are related to tabacco.

I'm not using this as a "don't ban guns cigarettes are worse" argument. I'm using this as a ban guns and cigarettes, but cigarettes are so much freaking deadlier
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 31, 2022, 01:28:13 PM
The same amount of people die in the United States from second hand smoke each a year as they do from guns. If you exclude suicide by guns secondhand smoke blows it out of the water.

Roughly 15% of all deaths in the world are related to tabacco.

I'm not using this as a "don't ban guns cigarettes are worse" argument. I'm using this as a ban guns and cigarettes, but cigarettes are so much freaking deadlier

Heartless as it sounds, smokers have only themselves to blame for their life choices...nobody put a gun to their head so to speak...

Salvadore Ramos and Peyton S. Gendron (Buffalo) and countless other mass murderers otoh looked and went way beyond merely killing themselves.   

What Uvalde school child's life choices were in play here?

edit: second hand smoke?  surprising given today's 'no smoking' zeitgeist
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 31, 2022, 01:28:36 PM
The same amount of people die in the United States from second hand smoke each a year as they do from guns. If you exclude suicide by guns secondhand smoke blows it out of the water.

Roughly 15% of all deaths in the world are related to tabacco.

I'm not using this as a "don't ban guns cigarettes are worse" argument. I'm using this as a ban guns and cigarettes, but cigarettes are so much freaking deadlier
Ok, that surprises me that second hand smoke still kills so many. I'm not for a moment going to defend the sale of tobacco products - I was a pack a day smoker until I was in my late thirties, I'm very glad to be rid of them, and legislation and taxation are both legitimate tools in restricting their use. But I think that banning a product that grows in the ground has long since proven to be a futile exercise, and I don't think it's the same argument as gun control.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 31, 2022, 01:35:59 PM
Heartless as it sounds, smokers have only themselves to blame for their life choices...nobody put a gun to their head so to speak...

Salvadore Ramos and Peyton S. Gendron (Buffalo) and countless other mass murderers otoh looked and went way beyond merely killing themselves.   

What Uvalde school child's life choices were in play here?

edit: second hand smoke?  surprising given today's 'no smoking' zeitgeist

90% of smokers start before 18, and I have no idea how this is a freaking real statistic. But the average smoker starts when they're 15.

I know that the average person to die from smoking is some decripid old person.

But the average person getting addicted is a child
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on May 31, 2022, 01:39:27 PM
Ok, that surprises me that second hand smoke still kills so many. I'm not for a moment going to defend the sale of tobacco products - I was a pack a day smoker until I was in my late thirties, I'm very glad to be rid of them, and legislation and taxation are both legitimate tools in restricting their use. But I think that banning a product that grows in the ground has long since proven to be a futile exercise, and I don't think it's the same argument as gun control.

Is banning cigarettes really the same as prohibition?

And clearly the taxes and levies and excrement don't work.

I think the statistics behind smoking are so widespread that there's no chance that an outright ban wouldn't substantially curb it
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Gorilla on May 31, 2022, 02:17:18 PM
https://twitter.com/thegoodliars/status/1531651480180121603?s=21&t=NvjXC43E54IaZWdMoOatQA

Typical NRA convention attendee

On the plus side, it's nice to see that mj2's dad is alive and relatively well.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 31, 2022, 02:37:09 PM
90% of smokers start before 18, and I have no idea how this is a freaking real statistic. But the average smoker starts when they're 15.

I know that the average person to die from smoking is some decripid old person.

But the average person getting addicted is a child
Fair point - I didn't know the average age was 15.

fyi (speaking as a 'decripid old person') it's spelled decrepit

The average 15 year old 'child' eventually 'comes of age' and (addicted or not) can chose to stop.  Quitting's easy; I know people who've quit hundreds of times...  : )
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 31, 2022, 03:00:51 PM
On the plus side, it's nice to see that mj2's dad is alive and relatively well.

Lol, that guy wishes.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 31, 2022, 04:43:12 PM
And in other news (of a more 'drip...drip...drip' nature):

https://abc7chicago.com/chicago-shootings-shooting-memorial-day-weekend-violence/11911262/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 31, 2022, 06:20:02 PM
What's the threshold for "mass"?

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1531727247459110912?t=CYeo9cgaxG5VDSaCOvSjUQ&s=19 (https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1531727247459110912?t=CYeo9cgaxG5VDSaCOvSjUQ&s=19)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 31, 2022, 07:06:41 PM
https://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/1531747290251247617?s=21&t=cwWo1CmPWjPf0jHAROU38Q
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 01, 2022, 06:18:45 PM
https://twitter.com/AP/status/1532138994548588544?t=mwB95ScZCJhnx7KHKakPlQ&s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on June 01, 2022, 06:26:24 PM
https://ktul.com/news/local/tpd-responds-to-active-shooter-at-warren-clinic
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 01, 2022, 10:05:30 PM
https://twitter.com/breaking911/status/1532193285921456129?s=21&t=dD87Kdh80AwQ1XjXcJh3Bg

lol
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on June 01, 2022, 11:51:00 PM
https://twitter.com/breaking911/status/1532193285921456129?s=21&t=dD87Kdh80AwQ1XjXcJh3Bg

lol

If you want to make the argument thst pots a gateway drug and it leads to crime and blah blah blah, stupid but fine. You can probably throw together a half competent argument.

But to blame weed on a freaking mass murder of children. You better have some severely correlated evidence otherwise you look like an absolute freaking imbecile.

I suppose if your target demo is almost 70 you can get away with that excrement
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 02, 2022, 10:50:50 AM
https://twitter.com/jimsciutto/status/1532346145946615810?s=21&t=nvq-rGAO0WjG78bAKcFjBQ

omg no way
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 02, 2022, 11:06:18 AM
https://twitter.com/jimsciutto/status/1532346145946615810?s=21&t=nvq-rGAO0WjG78bAKcFjBQ

omg no way

If there was only 1 entry door to the gun shop this wouldn't have happened
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on June 02, 2022, 11:32:32 AM
https://twitter.com/jimsciutto/status/1532346145946615810?s=21&t=nvq-rGAO0WjG78bAKcFjBQ

omg no way

The post on there about the Canadian laws for getting a gun, is that real?

Some of the things make a lot of sense, some are freaking weird.

Provide two references, and list all conguical partners of the last two years?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUP9wWCUUAIxtex?format=jpg&name=large)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 02, 2022, 11:44:44 AM
The post on there about the Canadian laws for getting a gun, is that real?

Some of the things make a lot of sense, some are freaking weird.

Provide two references, and list all conguical partners of the last two years?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUP9wWCUUAIxtex?format=jpg&name=large)
Conjugal means related to marriage, not freak buddies in prison.  I'm assuming this is to show that the people closest to you don't think you are a psycho.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 02, 2022, 12:50:43 PM
The Canadian laws are also way, way more restrictive. I'm not an authority but as I understand it:

- You need a PAL (Possession and Acquisition License, the one mentioned in your screenshot) to purchase any firearm
- To get your PAL you must go through a government training course
- Once you have your PAL you may purchase firearms; you may only purchase from licensed merchant, and each firearm must be individually registered
- You can only transport non-restricted firearms (single shot hunting rifles and shotguns) without an additional ticket
- To transport restricted firearms (approved handguns and semi automatic weapons) you need a separate authorisation each time you want to transport them
- You may only carry non restricted weapons on a standard license, and only in the wilderness
- In order to be allowed to carry restricted weapons in the wilderness you must have an additional license endorsement, and to get that you have to be a licensed trapper or prove that you need that type of weapon for protection from wildlife because of your occupation

The list of restricted and prohibited weapons is also pretty extensive, and ever growing.

Canadian gun owners think our laws are too restrictive. Canadian gun haters think they're too permissive. I think they're about right, and as long as both groups are complaining about the same amount then I'm happy.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 02, 2022, 08:31:19 PM
The entire purpose of a gun is to end life, so unless you can demonstrate a clear and specific and justifiable need to end life (and "the boogeyman might break in" ain't it) then there is no legitimate argument for you having one on your person or in your home.

Excuse me sir, my specific and justifiable need is that I fantasize about shooting one of the (((thugs))) that I'm certain is going to break into my home to steal my Black Friday flat screen TV.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on June 03, 2022, 03:12:36 PM
People might feel safer without guns if it wasn't so popular to want to defund the police.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 03, 2022, 03:14:10 PM
People might feel safer without guns if it wasn't so popular to want to defund the police.

Really?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on June 03, 2022, 03:22:05 PM
Really?

Nah, I'm just being obnoxious.

It just annoys me when people are screaming to murder the police for 2 years. And now they're making the argument that you shouldn't need guns to feel safe, despite the significant increase in violent crime.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on June 03, 2022, 03:32:31 PM
People might feel safer without guns if it wasn't so popular to want to defund the police.

Good thing it's literally not popular at all.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 03, 2022, 06:14:28 PM
Good thing it's literally not popular at all.
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220603/f8808d4bd17fecf8efc2bde6452a23c5.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 03, 2022, 06:15:16 PM
Anyway,

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/911-dispatcher-fired-allegedly-hanging-store-employee-buffalo-shooting-rcna31821
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 03, 2022, 09:53:45 PM
https://twitter.com/sxarletred/status/1532853860737372161?s=21&t=InR1lqh-6asdb4P1fIBFjA

Yeah we should def give these assholes more money. Maybe if they had a 2nd SWAT team in town they would have done something. GTFO.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on June 03, 2022, 10:23:29 PM
https://twitter.com/sxarletred/status/1532853860737372161?s=21&t=InR1lqh-6asdb4P1fIBFjA

Yeah we should def give these assholes more money. Maybe if they had a 2nd SWAT team in town they would have done something. GTFO.

Take all of their freaking money. County and State cops could have been 30 minutes late in responding and done a better job.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on June 05, 2022, 09:54:15 AM
https://www.inquirer.com/crime/live/shooting-south-street-4th-street-mutiple-shot-20220605.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 08, 2022, 10:40:13 PM
https://twitter.com/jessicavalenti/status/1534540692659351553?s=21&t=g8YHvEpyUjYIsnX-hPUhyQ
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 09, 2022, 03:22:43 PM
https://twitter.com/austintxerin/status/1534596125382037504?s=21&t=sN1eR7CJMzcI2KtyiQ6LCA
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on June 09, 2022, 03:24:58 PM
https://twitter.com/austintxerin/status/1534596125382037504?s=21&t=sN1eR7CJMzcI2KtyiQ6LCA

It's important that his testimony is published but there has to be a better way than 240 characters at a time.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on June 09, 2022, 09:06:39 PM
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/06/facebook-enforces-ban-on-gun-sales-with-10-strikes-and-youre-out-policy/ (https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/06/facebook-enforces-ban-on-gun-sales-with-10-strikes-and-youre-out-policy/)

Facebook will kick you off of the platform for violating their policy on gun sales/purchases...10 times.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on June 14, 2022, 10:11:57 AM
https://www.insider.com/conspiracy-theorist-proud-harass-sandy-hook-families-children-killed-shootings-2022-6
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on June 14, 2022, 10:20:55 AM
https://www.insider.com/conspiracy-theorist-proud-harass-sandy-hook-families-children-killed-shootings-2022-6

Literally the worst people.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 17, 2022, 12:54:35 PM
https://twitter.com/jason_koebler/status/1537835917452247041?s=21&t=H0p5-lAqNMEjMu6uyNrudw
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on June 17, 2022, 01:57:50 PM
https://twitter.com/jason_koebler/status/1537835917452247041?s=21&t=H0p5-lAqNMEjMu6uyNrudw

So how many kids did the cops shoot?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 17, 2022, 10:45:30 PM
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-off-duty-agent-uvalde-texas-shooting-733659143817
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 21, 2022, 10:55:27 AM
https://twitter.com/tplohetski/status/1539005390108622849?s=21&t=gYx9P0w8HS23RemoXZ2wQQ
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 21, 2022, 11:13:33 AM
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas public safety chief says classroom door in Uvalde school shooting was not locked, even as police waited for key.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on June 21, 2022, 01:01:02 PM
those cops need to hang in the town square.  Olly style.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on June 21, 2022, 01:14:56 PM
I wonder if it was incompetence or fear.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 21, 2022, 02:01:39 PM
I wonder if it was incompetence or fear.

I suspect that one breeds the other.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 22, 2022, 06:54:37 AM
Republicans squeal “it’s a mental health issue!” And then do this

https://twitter.com/mlafferty1/status/1539428442684461061?s=21&t=Du6ExHK8xwrdA7mtcie1XA

They know their voter base isn’t smart enough to notice or care
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 22, 2022, 09:46:17 AM
The Uvalde, Texas, elementary school where a gunman killed 19 students and two teachers last month will be demolished, the city's mayor said.

Speaking during an emotional council meeting with residents Tuesday, Uvalde Mayor Don McLaughlin said he did not believe any child or teacher should be asked to return to Robb Elementary School, where the deadly shooting unfolded May 24.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on June 22, 2022, 10:16:34 AM
The Uvalde, Texas, elementary school where a gunman killed 19 students and two teachers last month will be demolished, the city's mayor said.

Speaking during an emotional council meeting with residents Tuesday, Uvalde Mayor Don McLaughlin said he did not believe any child or teacher should be asked to return to Robb Elementary School, where the deadly shooting unfolded May 24.
The right on racist statues:  stop erasing history
The right on tragic events: let's erase history
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 22, 2022, 10:55:02 AM
https://twitter.com/sawyerhackett/status/1539405926905569284?s=21&t=iAehxHNfBpVmuC0rT_Px4Q
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: d sw0rdz on June 22, 2022, 08:52:22 PM
https://twitter.com/sawyerhackett/status/1539405926905569284?s=21&t=iAehxHNfBpVmuC0rT_Px4Q

just going to sit back and hope this story is a fake, only way i can think of processing such a scenario right now
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 03, 2022, 04:50:23 PM
MDGA?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62030919
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 04, 2022, 01:27:24 PM
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/highland-park-fourth-july-parade-shooting_n_62c311d5e4b0a21d842a2182
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 04, 2022, 01:29:06 PM
On par for the year. freaking awful.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 04, 2022, 02:45:31 PM
I don’t know where Darren Bailey was physically at when this was recorded, but the absolute best thing I can say about this is that gathering a large group of people around you outside to stare into a camera and massively compromise their situational awareness while an armed killer is on the loose is not the wisest choice from a security perspective.

https://twitter.com/ronfilipkowski/status/1544019090737610759?s=21&t=yY4NiqaKbQC0vJpGhprADQ (https://twitter.com/ronfilipkowski/status/1544019090737610759?s=21&t=yY4NiqaKbQC0vJpGhprADQ)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on July 04, 2022, 02:54:48 PM
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/highland-park-fourth-july-parade-shooting_n_62c311d5e4b0a21d842a2182

MOAR GUNZ!!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 04, 2022, 03:50:58 PM
Denmark's July 4, 2022 mass shooting was their first mass shooting since 1994

The July 4, 2022 Highland Park mass shooting was USA's first mass shooting since the July 4, 2022 Richmond mass shooting
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 04, 2022, 05:08:29 PM
Denmark's July 4, 2022 mass shooting was their first mass shooting since 1994

The July 4, 2022 Highland Park mass shooting was USA's first mass shooting since the July 4, 2022 Richmond mass shooting
This is why you have so much freedom, all these well regulated militia ensuring its security. Unlike those poor oppressed Danes.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 04, 2022, 09:29:09 PM
Another one in Philly. View from the Ben Franklin Parkway.

https://twitter.com/alexdzomba/status/1544142236060901378?s=21&t=3C3A6KudMWD3J9GpPE6N7A (https://twitter.com/alexdzomba/status/1544142236060901378?s=21&t=3C3A6KudMWD3J9GpPE6N7A)

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 05, 2022, 09:31:08 AM
Pictured: tact

https://twitter.com/wideofthepost/status/1544307442279923719?s=20&t=TOPZ-6muc2mY80eQhECqDQ (https://twitter.com/wideofthepost/status/1544307442279923719?s=20&t=TOPZ-6muc2mY80eQhECqDQ)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 05, 2022, 09:39:18 AM
Pictured: tact

https://twitter.com/wideofthepost/status/1544307442279923719?s=20&t=TOPZ-6muc2mY80eQhECqDQ (https://twitter.com/wideofthepost/status/1544307442279923719?s=20&t=TOPZ-6muc2mY80eQhECqDQ)

Too soon, not the time, thoughts and prayers, yada yada yada.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 05, 2022, 09:59:03 AM
Too soon, not the time, thoughts and prayers, yada yada yada.
Imagine defending the rhetoric of "Don't like getting shot! Get out and vote!"

Anyway that awful reply plus the guy calling her a crisis actor perfectly encapsulate Ds and Rs right now.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 05, 2022, 10:53:12 AM
MTG getting to the bottom of this

https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1544301643281342466?t=xJV-aTtXaidtdO0MpVjYWQ&s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on July 05, 2022, 10:57:39 AM
MTG getting to the bottom of this

https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1544301643281342466?t=xJV-aTtXaidtdO0MpVjYWQ&s=19


We need to get her into NFTs. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 05, 2022, 11:06:04 AM
“Supposedly this is photoshopped”

Hahahahaha freaking dumbass.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 05, 2022, 12:45:02 PM
Imagine defending the rhetoric of "Don't like getting shot! Get out and vote!"

Anyway that awful reply plus the guy calling her a crisis actor perfectly encapsulate Ds and Rs right now.

She literally said "nothing will change in America". The appropriate response is to tell her how to make it change.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on July 05, 2022, 12:51:59 PM
She would have been fine if she just steered clear of all the people with mental health issues.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 05, 2022, 01:02:48 PM
Another one in Philly. View from the Ben Franklin Parkway.

https://twitter.com/alexdzomba/status/1544142236060901378?s=21&t=3C3A6KudMWD3J9GpPE6N7A (https://twitter.com/alexdzomba/status/1544142236060901378?s=21&t=3C3A6KudMWD3J9GpPE6N7A)

The shooting victims as it turns out were two Philadelphia police officers. 

https://twitter.com/JoeHoldenCBS3/status/1544151150525554691


Meanwhile, in Illinois
Charges are pending against 21-year-old local man after July Fourth shooting.

 https://www.wsj.com/articles/alleged-highland-park-shooter-acquired-gun-legally-officials-say-11657033049
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on July 05, 2022, 07:54:09 PM
https://twitter.com/ap/status/1544437295855665154?s=21&t=CIyZEkA96PKq7qpARxRWNw

Our gun laws freaking suck fam
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on July 05, 2022, 09:13:56 PM
https://twitter.com/monicaeng/status/1544458021484511236?s=21&t=osbnu2xbN2__Dnr5QCkopA
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 06, 2022, 09:14:28 AM
https://twitter.com/monicaeng/status/1544458021484511236?s=21&t=osbnu2xbN2__Dnr5QCkopA
Father of the year
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 06, 2022, 09:34:00 AM
Unclear if this liability continues after the minor turns 18 but the dad really deserves to have his life ruined.(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220706/c329b26cc742e773a3647f682d47fb06.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on July 06, 2022, 09:36:12 AM
Unclear if this liability continues after the mid turns 18 but the dad really deserves to have his life ruined.(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220706/c329b26cc742e773a3647f682d47fb06.jpg)
You know he didn't read any of that.  Doesn't change anything though.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 06, 2022, 12:37:49 PM
Dilbert guy has it all figured out

https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1544679510674587648?t=IHzWBdMX_0no--W0zOFgxQ&s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on July 06, 2022, 02:26:27 PM
Dilbert guy has it all figured out

https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1544679510674587648?t=IHzWBdMX_0no--W0zOFgxQ&s=19


Dilbert guy freaking sucks.

Imagine losing a struggle with drug addiction and your dickhead stepdad equates you to a mass murderer. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on July 06, 2022, 03:02:55 PM
https://twitter.com/tplohetski/status/1544730616431841281?s=21&t=vLo8C6ZTBty4JSbLbAlJNg
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 06, 2022, 03:26:48 PM
Pretty much just crossing guards, right?

Quote
A rifle-armed Uvalde officer sighted in to shoot the Robb Elementary attacker before he entered the school
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 06, 2022, 03:58:24 PM
Dilbert guy freaking sucks.

Imagine losing a struggle with drug addiction and your dickhead stepdad equates you to a mass murderer.

Dilbert guy's clueless but those who knowingly peddle this poison to the addicted are mass murderers imo..

https://twitter.com/DEAHQ/status/1543322676340707331?cxt=HHwWhsC-kYPz_eoqAAAA

https://www.dea.gov/fugitives

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 06, 2022, 04:02:17 PM
I don't understand why manufacturers are lacing drugs with fent. It might be cheaper but you're not getting the repeat business.

It's like Ford shipping their new cars without a braking system, it might make you a bit of margin on the initial sale but they ain't trading it in with you in three years for a new one.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 06, 2022, 04:14:59 PM
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2022/03/07/china-and-synthetic-drugs-geopolitics-trumps-counternarcotics-cooperation/

'n mex-tex's a sieve
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on July 06, 2022, 04:16:18 PM
I don't understand why manufacturers are lacing drugs with fent. It might be cheaper but you're not getting the repeat business.

I understand the logic behind lacing heroin with fentanyl, but why are dealers lacing coke with fentanyl?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on July 06, 2022, 04:21:06 PM
those who knowingly peddle this poison to the addicted are mass murderers imo.

Agreed. 

Better put them on Dilbert Royale Island with the mass shooters and moody teenagers. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 06, 2022, 05:31:41 PM
Better put them on Dilbert Royale Island with the mass shooters and moody teenagers.

Too harsh.  Better to release them on their own recognizance (even if they could be facing 14 years in prison). 

https://www.ktvu.com/news/alleged-drug-traffickers-released-from-california-jail-days-after-caught-with-150k-fentanyl-pills

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 07, 2022, 09:51:43 AM
 https://twitter.com/npr/status/1544819801767419905?s=21&t=lI9dP1NnYzLnqj-SVuynMQ (https://twitter.com/npr/status/1544819801767419905?s=21&t=lI9dP1NnYzLnqj-SVuynMQ)

Interesting headline for a guy who tried to enter a synagogue, failed, and thrn shot up a town with a large jewish population.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on July 12, 2022, 05:02:43 PM
https://twitter.com/yashar/status/1546955421243478016?s=21&t=QGjkFX29hcUx3paMmzfiXg

Ugh

The sad part is I think these cops are scared shitless because they see a kid on the news every other week mowing down a crowd of people.

There is zero reason for a citizen to need an AR-15
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on July 12, 2022, 07:23:21 PM
https://twitter.com/walkerbragman/status/1546992016529170436?s=21&t=xL9sGAMBi5dRYDq_dscs4g
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 12, 2022, 07:44:14 PM
I wonder how many of these podunk police forces are just glorified LARPers.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on July 12, 2022, 08:30:13 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/aEu3CFa.jpg)

Waited for the whole squad to show up.  We can make our move now guys, Flannel Bob found his tac helmet. 

There's about three times this number still outside, roughing up the parents. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 12, 2022, 08:38:01 PM
https://twitter.com/walkerbragman/status/1546992016529170436?s=21&t=xL9sGAMBi5dRYDq_dscs4g

Oh my god. Oh my freaking god.

These assholes never need to work in any type of security again.

That freaking punisher logo should be banned by all DOD and police organizations.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 12, 2022, 08:40:41 PM
https://twitter.com/socialistdogmom/status/1547002301109440512?t=6BmypaS-fUV364JQdTa-nw&s=19 (https://twitter.com/socialistdogmom/status/1547002301109440512?t=6BmypaS-fUV364JQdTa-nw&s=19)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on July 12, 2022, 09:17:11 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXftNFZXoAEp8vO?format=jpg&name=large)

Flannel Bob: "COVID is the real threat!"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 13, 2022, 06:28:40 AM
https://twitter.com/walkerbragman/status/1546992016529170436?s=21&t=xL9sGAMBi5dRYDq_dscs4g
Beyond parody
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 13, 2022, 10:27:36 AM
https://twitter.com/walkerbragman/status/1546992016529170436?s=21&t=xL9sGAMBi5dRYDq_dscs4g
Unconscionable cowardice
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 13, 2022, 12:28:31 PM
https://twitter.com/TizzyEnt/status/1547040763376242688?s=20&t=v-XwwwUX_iYG-1gfVai33A (https://twitter.com/TizzyEnt/status/1547040763376242688?s=20&t=v-XwwwUX_iYG-1gfVai33A)

Play by play dropped.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 13, 2022, 12:37:11 PM
https://twitter.com/LethalityJane/status/1547072764313407489?t=8ydKlIGVDQNaCklfz4Ve_w&s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 13, 2022, 12:40:14 PM
The whole "we thought it was a hostage situation/trapped shooter" argument kind of falls apart when you can hear the mother fucker shooting throughout the entire video. Also, just to reiterate from the video, "the sounds of children screaming have been removed".
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on July 13, 2022, 12:46:18 PM
https://twitter.com/LethalityJane/status/1547072764313407489?t=8ydKlIGVDQNaCklfz4Ve_w&s=19

Even cops think SCAB
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 13, 2022, 12:46:46 PM
Even cops think SCAB
Just a few bad apples.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on July 13, 2022, 12:47:22 PM
Beyond parody

https://twitter.com/socialistdogmom/status/1547036509068562432?s=21&t=u5o76Mko9O4LXz0BgnGYcg

I missed this part
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on July 13, 2022, 12:55:58 PM
(https://preview.redd.it/s82ysrt84ab91.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=f5e98a1b9b10fe92ff98e59c6e73e0d3cd284936)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 13, 2022, 01:01:57 PM
(https://preview.redd.it/s82ysrt84ab91.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=f5e98a1b9b10fe92ff98e59c6e73e0d3cd284936)

freaking terrible human being.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 13, 2022, 01:02:50 PM
It took me a minute to find the objectionable part of the picture
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on July 15, 2022, 10:22:58 AM
Oh my god. Oh my freaking god.

These assholes never need to work in any type of security again.

That freaking punisher logo should be banned by all DOD and police organizations.


Beyond parody

Unconscionable cowardice

Uvalde police officer who drew outrage for checking his phone was waiting to hear from his dying wife during shooting

CBS DFW: Uvalde cop criticized for checking phone was slain teacher Eva Mireles' husband.
https://www.cbsnews.com/dfw/news/uvalde-cop-criticized-checking-phone-eva-mireles-husband/

Uvalde police officer who drew outrage for checking his phone was waiting to hear from his dying wife during shooting
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 15, 2022, 10:46:10 AM

CBS DFW: Uvalde cop criticized for checking phone was slain teacher Eva Mireles' husband.
https://www.cbsnews.com/dfw/news/uvalde-cop-criticized-checking-phone-eva-mireles-husband/

Yea, saw that earlier. Makes sense with that context.

Laughing guy has no excuse.

Also freak Cops/Military using the Punisher logo.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on July 15, 2022, 09:10:19 PM
Would love to know why they went against active shooter protocol and refused to enter the classroom
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on July 17, 2022, 01:38:10 PM
https://twitter.com/phil_lewis_/status/1548731332766961665?s=21&t=NFejuZPyghnQVDtQy3gBSg
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 17, 2022, 10:26:39 PM
The 2A nuts are going to whack themselves siliy to this without seeing a hint of the irony.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/indiana-mall-shooting-food-court_n_62d4af0be4b0116f21bd36e7
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on July 18, 2022, 10:01:35 AM
 https://twitter.com/tracy_walder/status/1548787708797112322?s=21&t=YXShrznptyt_T-VpsTdICw (https://twitter.com/tracy_walder/status/1548787708797112322?s=21&t=YXShrznptyt_T-VpsTdICw)

Somehow the Uvalde CISD keeps looking worse with every day.

It’s like there is no floor.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 19, 2022, 07:04:39 AM
We did it!

https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/18/us/dallas-school-district-requires-clear-backpacks/index.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 19, 2022, 07:47:25 AM
We did it!

https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/18/us/dallas-school-district-requires-clear-backpacks/index.html
Smart. This will prevent 9 year olds from smuggling AR-15s past the security guards on the school entrance door.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 19, 2022, 02:00:45 PM
The 2A nuts are going to whack themselves siliy to this without seeing a hint of the irony.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/indiana-mall-shooting-food-court_n_62d4af0be4b0116f21bd36e7

"many more people would've died"
https://nypost.com/2022/07/19/elisjsha-dicken-killed-indiana-mall-shooter-jonathan-sapirman/

#conflicted
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 19, 2022, 02:04:15 PM
"many more people would've died"
https://nypost.com/2022/07/19/elisjsha-dicken-killed-indiana-mall-shooter-jonathan-sapirman/

#conflicted

Not sure why anyone should be conflicted about this. If no one in that mall on Sunday had access to guns, no people would be dead.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 19, 2022, 03:19:32 PM
Quote
Elisjsha Dicken

gtfo
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on July 19, 2022, 06:16:59 PM
Broken clockspotting

(https://i.redd.it/4r16ht4vdkc91.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 19, 2022, 08:09:10 PM
Not sure why anyone should be conflicted about this. If no one in that mall on Sunday had access to guns, no people would be dead.

No one has access to guns?   Sign me up.  Btw, gangbangers on board?


 
Quote
Elisjsha Dickens]
gtfo

kyle rittenhouse 2.0

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 19, 2022, 09:40:30 PM


No one has access to guns?   Sign me up.  Btw, gangbangers on board?

I don't know why Americans alwsys have to conflate gangs illegally carrying and using guns with why they need to be allowed to carry them legally. First, your legal access to guns is why gangbangers get them so easily. Secondly, every other country has illegally armed gang members. What they don't have is 18 year olds killing schoolchildren in their classrooms.

Stop building straw men.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: insanity on July 20, 2022, 04:10:32 AM

I don't know why Americans alwsys have to conflate gangs illegally carrying and using guns with why they need to be allowed to carry them legally. First, your legal access to guns is why gangbangers get them so easily. Secondly, every other country has illegally armed gang members. What they don't have is 18 year olds killing schoolchildren in their classrooms.

Stop building straw men.
Every other country doesn't have 400 million unregistered guns
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 20, 2022, 07:49:55 AM
Every other country doesn't have 400 million unregistered guns

Which has nothing to do with preventing mass shootings, given they are almost always committed by people using legally owned and registered firearms.

Given your country's history of doing so many impressive things that no one believed possible, it is impressive the lengths that so many Americans will go to to find reasons why you can't do something that pretty much every other Western society has achieved.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 20, 2022, 11:32:33 AM

I don't know why Americans alwsys have to conflate gangs illegally carrying and using guns with why they need to be allowed to carry them legally. First, your legal access to guns is why gangbangers get them so easily. Secondly, every other country has illegally armed gang members.

What they don't have is 18 year olds killing schoolchildren in their classrooms.

Stop building straw men.
Meaning other countries don't have mass shootings?   straw man

Guns are guns are guns.  The crazed 18 year old's background was a screaming red flag that was ignored.  Step one: it should be verrrrry hard to get a gun, i.e the licensing protocol specifically the background check process needs to be completely revamped and almost unrecognizably stringent compared to the present swiss cheese sieve of a system; step two: illegal gun possession = automatic lengthly prison sentences.  Myself, I don't own guns but at the same time I'm not going to take it upon myself to 86 a constitutionally protected right of others (btw, that does not include 'conceal carry' allowances which I view as completely wrong). 

While they're at unacceptable levels, mass shootings actually comprise only a fraction of the overall gun deaths in the United States. In fact, roughly two-thirds of all gun-related deaths in the U.S. are suicides. In 2016, for example, 37,353 gun deaths occurred in the United States. Of these, 22,938 were suicides, and 14,415 were homicides. Within the homicides, 71 were classified as the result of a mass shooting.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on July 20, 2022, 10:16:27 PM
Every other country doesn't have 400 million unregistered guns

Sounds like all of the other counties have their excrement figured out and we have accepted a slow and steady decay of our country because of firearm enthusiasts
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on July 20, 2022, 10:20:10 PM
Which has nothing to do with preventing mass shootings, given they are almost always committed by people using legally owned and registered firearms.

Given your country's history of doing so many impressive things that no one believed possible, it is impressive the lengths that so many Americans will go to to find reasons why you can't do something that pretty much every other Western society has achieved.

Lol if only this wasn’t so easy to prove

Literally every one of these Mass shootings is with a legally obtained AR-15

I’ll say it again: the incels have figured it out but our general population and leaders will probably never get it
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 20, 2022, 11:33:41 PM
Sounds like all of the other counties have their excrement figured out and we have accepted a slow and steady decay of our country because of firearm enthusiasts
*Firearm industry
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 25, 2022, 01:41:23 PM
Hi honey, I'm home....what's for dinner?...

https://twitter.com/SophiaNBC5/status/1551626862316716034
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on July 25, 2022, 02:23:45 PM
You allowed to carry at Airports in Texas or what?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 25, 2022, 03:09:26 PM
https://twitter.com/davenewworld_2/status/1551230484738342913
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 25, 2022, 03:37:57 PM
You allowed to carry at Airports in Texas or what?
Neither carry nor live in TX, don't know.  If she posts bail that guy's a gelding by dinnertime.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 25, 2022, 03:51:42 PM
Neither carry nor live in TX, don't know.  If she posts bail that guy's a gelding by dinnertime.

I'm fairly sure that even in Texas, going all Billy The Kid in an airport is going to make bail a pretty tough ask.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 27, 2022, 07:38:43 AM
Finally they've identified the real cause of the problem.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/uvalde-school-district-suspends-robb-elementary-school-principal/story?id=87400644
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 27, 2022, 09:17:12 AM
Finally they've identified the real cause of the problem.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/uvalde-school-district-suspends-robb-elementary-school-principal/story?id=87400644

In the aftermath we know it was the craven cops.  However in advance of May 24th she didn't act on information she knew so like it or not when it comes to extracting the proverbial pound of flesh even if only for the optics you know who's going to be the first to be made to walk the plank.  Anyway, she's been iced for now 'with pay' so expect her to get her wrists slapped (publicly made an example of) and eventually reinstated.

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5e/Pink_Police_Car_%286704582477%29.jpg/640px-Pink_Police_Car_%286704582477%29.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on August 03, 2022, 10:48:17 AM
https://twitter.com/AP/status/1554855869271138309?t=kqCYE6xCa-qhivg1JlRQOw&s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on August 03, 2022, 12:39:32 PM
https://twitter.com/AP/status/1554855869271138309?t=kqCYE6xCa-qhivg1JlRQOw&s=19

“Show me the Funeral Home receipts or it didn’t happen”

what a pos
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on September 05, 2022, 01:36:02 PM
‘Mass killings’ fit here?  Wasn’t sure if to put in the horrific/depressing thread and certainly unfair  to include in the ‘only in Canada’ thrreas…..sad news

https://leaderpost.com/news/saskatchewan/multiple-stabbings-at-james-smith-cree-nation-rcmp/wcm/1ecddf78-729a-4964-9df7-b5f54865be87
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on September 26, 2022, 05:08:15 AM
Gunman kills 13, injures 21 in Russian school shooting

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63032790.amp
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on October 06, 2022, 03:35:57 AM
Thailand pre-school centre, 31 dead

https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/06/thailand-shooting-attack-at-pre-school-centre
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on October 06, 2022, 06:59:44 AM
Holy excrement.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on October 06, 2022, 08:21:36 AM
god dammit
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on October 06, 2022, 01:38:36 PM
That's some next level mental illness excrement right there.

Mass shootings are horrific enough, but a mass freaking stabbing of sleeping preschoolers? I can't even imagine how much harder it is to stab someone than to shoot someone from a mental standpoint.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Andrew Ryan on October 06, 2022, 07:46:45 PM
Sickening
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on October 12, 2022, 02:59:13 PM
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1580284402328031232?t=dnZeQ2383uapnUEb4fGmWw&s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on October 13, 2022, 08:37:55 PM
Raleigh, NC: 5 dead

https://abcnews.go.com/US/active-shooting-reported-trail-raleigh-north-carolina-police/story?id=91345863
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on October 24, 2022, 12:21:28 PM
https://news.stlpublicradio.org/education/2022-10-24/at-least-three-shot-at-central-visual-performing-arts-high-school-in-south-st-louis (https://news.stlpublicradio.org/education/2022-10-24/at-least-three-shot-at-central-visual-performing-arts-high-school-in-south-st-louis)

American teachers and children continue to pay "the price of freedom".
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on October 24, 2022, 01:18:52 PM
My mom retired from nursing two years ago and stayed retired for like maybe a month before taking a school nurse job.  I told her not to take it because it's dangerous and she thought I was referring to COVID (and other illnesses). 

You just never knew.  I never knew and it stressed me out more than anything.  It's insane that kids, school employees, and parents have to worry about that every single day.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Libero_2 on October 24, 2022, 05:12:47 PM
My mom retired from nursing two years ago and stayed retired for like maybe a month before taking a school nurse job.  I told her not to take it because it's dangerous and she thought I was referring to COVID (and other illnesses). 

You just never knew.  I never knew and it stressed me out more than anything.  It's insane that kids, school employees, and parents have to worry about that every single day.

I still work in a school. We had numerous incidents last school year where we went in lock ins (nearby the school danger) and lock downs, including one time in which a kid sparked to smuggle a gun on site, thankfully they were caught at the doors, but it’s a thing in the back of all minds every day, that’s for sure. I also wouldn’t exactly call my area a place of high risk either
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on November 14, 2022, 08:59:58 AM
https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/13/us/university-of-virginia-shooting/index.html

Apparently it's football related and or exclusively involving players
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 14, 2022, 10:32:30 AM
Suspect in custody
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on November 14, 2022, 10:46:49 AM
https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/13/us/university-of-virginia-shooting/index.html

Apparently it's football related and or exclusively involving players

Happened on a bus returning from an off-campus field trip
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on November 14, 2022, 10:47:32 AM
Suspect in custody

If he says he was bullied...
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on November 14, 2022, 10:49:27 AM
If he says he was bullied...

There was apparently was a hazing investigation at some point

This could be the kind of thing that shuts down a football program for a period of time
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 14, 2022, 10:49:30 AM
WRs Devin Chandler and Lavel Davis Jr and LB D'Sean Perry are confirmed as the fatalities.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on November 14, 2022, 10:53:09 AM
This could be the kind of thing that shuts down a football program for a period of time

Penn State didn't get shut down.  So, highly unlikely.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on November 14, 2022, 10:53:49 AM
WRs Devin Chandler and Lavel Davis Jr and LB D'Sean Perry are confirmed as the fatalities.

good friend of mine coaches at Woodland where Lavel Davis was an absolute star

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Libero_2 on November 14, 2022, 07:31:01 PM
This stuff sucks. Why the freak do we have to keep reliving it? Why do we have to watch families keep burying their kids? What’s it going to take before this country decides to try something, anything to make these things so much harder to pull off?

Politics and all that can go right the freak to hell. We need to stop letting kids die because we don’t want to do something to pee off a group of people.idk what the answer is but we have to at least freaking try something
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 20, 2022, 07:08:04 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63693310
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 20, 2022, 09:29:45 AM
This is the guy they arrested for it.

https://www.koaa.com/news/covering-colorado/residents-evacuated-due-to-law-enforcement-activity-in-lorson-ranch-neighborhood
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 21, 2022, 11:03:01 AM
https://twitter.com/kaylan_tx/status/1594513416827330568?s=46&t=AgkNKeH45oPkTzZ2AmbAxg

JFC
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on November 21, 2022, 11:12:31 AM
Matt Walsh had a predictably awful response to the shooting. Dude just really wants to see queer people dead.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on November 21, 2022, 01:11:37 PM
Matt Walsh had a predictably awful response to the shooting. Dude just really wants to see queer people dead.

Im obviously to the right of center on most issues. I can appreciate listening to people like Ben Shapiro who are very matter of the fact and try to be data driven (despite him also being a crazy religious person on social issues)

But then you have people like Matt Walsh that I absolutely freaking can't stand. To me this guy is straight up the talk radio version of the view.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on November 21, 2022, 01:45:49 PM
I can appreciate listening to people like Ben Shapiro

lol
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on November 21, 2022, 03:50:47 PM
Im obviously to the right of center on most issues. I can appreciate listening to people like Ben Shapiro who are very matter of the fact and try to be data driven (despite him also being a crazy religious person on social issues)

But then you have people like Matt Walsh that I absolutely freaking can't stand. To me this guy is straight up the talk radio version of the view.

As much as I can't stand Walsh for being a theocratic poopchute (and providing the right part of the horseshoe to fit the theory), his reaction wasn't anything crazy, and certainly not tantamount to wanting 'queer people dead"

lol

I know, he should read Aaron "Stolen Valor" Rupar instead LOLOLOLOLOLOL.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on November 21, 2022, 05:42:29 PM
^ Googled "Aaron Rupar+stolen valor" ...is this guy serious?  *press record button*    lol

https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status/1593287496497975296/photo/1


edit: thank goodness for the beefy vet that took Aldridge down as well as the drag queen who stomped him with her heels -
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 21, 2022, 08:23:12 PM
https://twitter.com/iwriteok/status/1594814999138271234?s=46&t=QtiXjd0xbvUsrrDitNerfg
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 21, 2022, 08:38:49 PM


Im obviously to the right of center on most issues. I can appreciate listening to people like Ben Shapiro who are very matter of the fact and try to be data driven (despite him also being a crazy religious person on social issues)

But then you have people like Matt Walsh that I absolutely freaking can't stand. To me this guy is straight up the talk radio version of the view.

Yes, the guy actively fomenting hate is the equal but opposite version of... vapid daytime tv?

Muh both sides
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 21, 2022, 08:42:42 PM
https://twitter.com/molly_knight/status/1594809332230660107?s=46&t=QtiXjd0xbvUsrrDitNerfg

JFC this story and the end
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on November 22, 2022, 01:56:39 AM

Yes, the guy actively fomenting hate is the equal but opposite version of... vapid daytime tv?

Muh both sides

Because denying the holocaust isn't actively fomenting hate, or the countless number of Hollywood elite rapist they've defended. it's just  vapid daytime TV
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 22, 2022, 10:42:15 PM
https://twitter.com/breaking911/status/1595271084575801346?s=46&t=0s57CT9_LLw91EqWkoFNrg

Read comments for AIDS
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 23, 2022, 08:09:19 AM
Because denying the holocaust isn't actively fomenting hate, or the countless number of Hollywood elite rapist they've defended. it's just  vapid daytime TV
Only one of them is advocating for the removal of certain people from existence.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 23, 2022, 01:31:15 PM
https://twitter.com/nojumper/status/1595439304922304512?s=46&t=NJBL81EeZt9lR_5FStt4yg

This is not a normal country btw
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on November 23, 2022, 01:35:05 PM
https://twitter.com/nojumper/status/1595439304922304512?s=46&t=NJBL81EeZt9lR_5FStt4yg

This is not a normal country btw

his reaction to this is kind of sociopathic

"he started dumpin man but i'm whole doe!"

"i was finna get some snacks!"  man what?!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on November 23, 2022, 03:15:38 PM
https://twitter.com/NoLieWithBTC/status/1595519454900805649
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 23, 2022, 03:21:58 PM
Clearly a false flag because there’s no way that guy is real
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on November 23, 2022, 03:23:26 PM
guy looks like Josh Brolin on meth
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Derek Smalls on November 23, 2022, 05:08:58 PM
Clearly a false flag because there’s no way that guy is real
Not only is he real, he lost to Andrei Arlovski at UFC 28 and then became a porn star.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 23, 2022, 05:24:11 PM
Clearly a false flag because there’s no way that guy is real
guy looks like Josh Brolin on meth
Little known fact, Josh Brolin actually got his start as a crisis actor.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on November 23, 2022, 08:07:06 PM
https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1498862838072414208

Noted propagandist piece of excrement Brian Tyler Cohen who I'm sure has had no problem uttering, "not all ________" at any other point in his life wants everyone to know that rambling methhead sack of excrement failure as a father and a man encapsulates all conservative republicans.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 23, 2022, 08:29:07 PM
https://twitter.com/kahtrinuh/status/1595419314290626560?s=46&t=X2FEJAIndIuc_tyw1k3Bkw
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on November 24, 2022, 10:33:46 AM
https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1498862838072414208

Noted propagandist piece of excrement Brian Tyler Cohen who I'm sure has had no problem uttering, "not all ________" at any other point in his life wants everyone to know that rambling methhead sack of excrement failure as a father and a man encapsulates all conservative republicans.
Seems like a solid boomerang for the last couple years of "groomer" discourse.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on November 24, 2022, 12:28:46 PM
Quote from: Badger
Seems like a solid boomerang for the last couple years of "groomer" discourse.


Crooner
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/60/Wim_Hoste_performing_at_Dubai_Expo_2022.jpg/192px-Wim_Hoste_performing_at_Dubai_Expo_2022.jpg)

Groomer
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2e/Monkeys_Grooming.jpg/320px-Monkeys_Grooming.jpg)

Boomer Sooner
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/OklahomaSooners-BoomerSooner-Schooner.jpg/305px-OklahomaSooners-BoomerSooner-Schooner.jpg)

rumor ?
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/The_meeting_of_day_and_night_in_a_mountain_valley_with_invisible_pink_unicorn.jpg/320px-The_meeting_of_day_and_night_in_a_mountain_valley_with_invisible_pink_unicorn.jpg)

or just good humor ?
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Good_Humor_Vendor_1966.jpg/640px-Good_Humor_Vendor_1966.jpg)


I kid,  I kid  ....
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Baby_goats_jan_2007_crop.jpg/320px-Baby_goats_jan_2007_crop.jpg)



....company's coming, adios...........Happy Thanksgiving all!!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 25, 2022, 09:15:31 AM
https://twitter.com/AboutChesapeake/status/1596141677508710403

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 25, 2022, 08:38:44 PM
Equally yoked
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 19, 2022, 07:20:25 AM
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/vaughan-condo-shooting-1.6690582

Not confirmed by police yet, but the story is that it's a 70 year old guy who hunted down and executed several members of his condo board.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on December 19, 2022, 07:32:53 AM
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/vaughan-condo-shooting-1.6690582

Not confirmed by police yet, but the story is that it's a 70 year old guy who hunted down and executed several members of his condo board.

was it Jack Klompus?

(https://preview.redd.it/70c25pdnlnw71.jpg?auto=webp&s=09e4b2ca6ba839f9c4d6de42530a3328241f3e71)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on December 19, 2022, 12:42:53 PM
was it Jack Klompus?

(https://preview.redd.it/70c25pdnlnw71.jpg?auto=webp&s=09e4b2ca6ba839f9c4d6de42530a3328241f3e71)

Actually not a million miles off.

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2022/12/19/man-identified-as-vaughan-mass-killer-targeted-condo-board-in-frivolous-andor-vexatious-lawsuit.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on January 22, 2023, 05:41:42 AM
9 dead - suspect still at large as of 6:45 am EST

Quote
Nine people were killed when a gunman opened fire at a dance studio in Monterey Park on Saturday night, according to law enforcement sources and witnesses.

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-01-22/la-me-monterey-park-mass-shooting

edit: death toll now at 10
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on January 23, 2023, 01:18:20 PM
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna66216
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on January 23, 2023, 01:33:58 PM
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna66216

damn
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on January 23, 2023, 04:12:42 PM
It’s Jan 23 and we’re over 30 mass shootings for 2023.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on January 23, 2023, 09:11:16 PM
Half Moon Bay, Ca. (south of SF), 7 dead, 1 critically injured.  Suspect Zhao Chunli in custody. 

Stayed in HMB just a month ago en route back to SF from Big Sur/Carmel—chilling to see the nearby agricultural nurseries where the shootings too place.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on January 24, 2023, 06:32:47 AM
It’s Jan 23 and we’re over 30 mass shootings for 2023.

(https://media.tenor.com/jGgmfDOxmuMAAAAC/ryan-reynolds-but-why.gif)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on January 24, 2023, 10:19:16 AM
https://nypost.com/2022/12/14/paroled-felon-charged-with-mass-shooting-in-chicago/

https://twitter.com/lennydykstra/status/1617612540971995137?s=46&t=A3c6C6yq2LoNKZMsGvGNeA

^CW: video of shooting
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on January 24, 2023, 10:21:27 AM
https://nypost.com/2022/12/14/paroled-felon-charged-with-mass-shooting-in-chicago/

https://twitter.com/lennydykstra/status/1617612540971995137?s=46&t=A3c6C6yq2LoNKZMsGvGNeA

^CW: video of shooting

damn, he wrecked those guys
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on January 24, 2023, 10:54:43 AM
damn, he wrecked those guys

Not his first rodeo

Quote
The killing spree came less than three months after Parsons-Salas was paroled after a 2014 conviction for an armed home invasion in which two people were shot dead, the Sun-Times said.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on January 24, 2023, 11:25:40 AM
Jfc.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on January 24, 2023, 05:56:20 PM
death du jour  - Yakima, WA

https://www.npr.org/2023/01/24/1151186464/yakima-washington-three-dead-shootings

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on January 24, 2023, 09:42:01 PM
https://nypost.com/2022/12/14/paroled-felon-charged-with-mass-shooting-in-chicago/

https://twitter.com/lennydykstra/status/1617612540971995137?s=46&t=A3c6C6yq2LoNKZMsGvGNeA

^CW: video of shooting

freaking executes a guy without breaking stride, jesus christ
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on January 25, 2023, 06:52:15 PM
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1618365620352950272?s=46&t=XAyxud1XXThDSZAVTtMAnA

Holy excrement
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 25, 2023, 06:58:16 PM
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1618365620352950272?s=46&t=XAyxud1XXThDSZAVTtMAnA

Holy excrement

Counterpoint: that young man just viciously assaulted a senior more than twice his age and stole his personal property that he was entirely legally allowed to possess and carry because the law says so.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on February 13, 2023, 10:48:14 PM
Michigan State Univ., 5 shot, 3 killed, perp still at large

https://twitter.com/msupolice/status/1625348771386204161?

edit-update:
shooter found dead by suicide at an off-campus location.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on February 14, 2023, 06:38:37 AM
Michigan State Univ., 5 shot, 3 killed, perp still at large

https://twitter.com/msupolice/status/1625348771386204161?

edit-update:
shooter found dead by suicide at an off-campus location.


just another day in America.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on February 14, 2023, 07:05:38 AM
just another day in America.
Yep.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on February 14, 2023, 12:26:08 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/comments/1126ali/survivor_of_sandy_hook_school_shooting_10_years/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 (https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/comments/1126ali/survivor_of_sandy_hook_school_shooting_10_years/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on February 14, 2023, 12:42:08 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/comments/1126ali/survivor_of_sandy_hook_school_shooting_10_years/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 (https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/comments/1126ali/survivor_of_sandy_hook_school_shooting_10_years/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
Crisis actor, I saw her in a BK ad /s
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on February 14, 2023, 12:46:57 PM
Crisis actor, I saw her in a BK ad /s

whopper whopper whopper whopper
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on February 14, 2023, 12:49:12 PM
whopper whopper whopper whopper
Chicken Mac?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on February 15, 2023, 08:30:42 PM
Good fuckin grief..

https://twitter.com/elpasotimes/status/1626018791095439361
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 14, 2023, 05:22:52 PM
"In the future we'll have flying cars"

The future: https://twitter.com/GillianBNews/status/1635397817526267904?t=1I3gxJCAt8zok1jhw2-GZw&s=19
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 27, 2023, 12:28:34 PM
https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/nashville-shooting-covenant-school-03-27-23/index.html

6 dead so far including three children. Hopes and prayers, nothing we can do, something something mental health.

Apparently the shooter was a woman, which seems unusual.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on March 27, 2023, 12:33:35 PM
I hate seeing this thread bumped
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 27, 2023, 12:35:44 PM
7 dead including the shooter, who was a teenage girl who had at least three firearms.

Why would God let something like this happen?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on March 27, 2023, 12:42:42 PM
Why would God let something like this happen?

He wants to arm the teachers!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on March 27, 2023, 03:23:56 PM
I'm sick of this country believing that the murder of children is acceptable.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Libero_2 on March 27, 2023, 03:36:43 PM
I'm sick of this country believing that the murder of children is acceptable.

I’m sick of the fact that I am so apathetic every time this thread gets bumped. I hate that the South Park episode they did on school shootings exists and falls more into the “it’s funny because it’s true” category than being extremely over the top satire.

When will it be enough
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on March 27, 2023, 03:41:15 PM
T & P 

https://twitter.com/NashvilleSC/status/1640422106000179218

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on March 27, 2023, 03:47:02 PM
Apparently the shooter was a woman, which seems unusual.

Courageous step forward for the mass murder industry
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on March 27, 2023, 03:59:31 PM
Courageous step forward for the mass murder industry

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Elementary_School_shooting_(San_Diego) (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Elementary_School_shooting_(San_Diego))
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on March 27, 2023, 04:00:21 PM
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Elementary_School_shooting_(San_Diego) (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Elementary_School_shooting_(San_Diego))

Yeah I probably should've guessed that
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on March 27, 2023, 04:00:45 PM
So few frontiers for Big Murder left to conquer
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 27, 2023, 04:42:51 PM
Courageous step forward for the mass murder industry
So few frontiers for Big Murder left to conquer
Glass ceiling absolutely shattered today
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on March 27, 2023, 10:26:22 PM
Didn't think I'd see absolutely no introspection about the rhetoric behind "anti-trans legislation" and how people are idiotically asserting that its a "GeNoCiDe" which unquestionably fueled this evil sack of excrement from killing Christians, and I wasn't disappointed.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 27, 2023, 10:42:20 PM
Didn't think I'd see absolutely no introspection about the rhetoric behind "anti-trans legislation" and how people are idiotically asserting that its a "GeNoCiDe" which unquestionably fueled this evil sack of excrement from killing Christians, and I wasn't disappointed.

Damn, who here said that?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 28, 2023, 07:18:54 AM
https://shatterzone.substack.com/p/the-covenant-school-shooter-and-right
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on March 28, 2023, 08:53:21 AM
Hyper partisans are quick to turn a tragedy into political discourse even before the facts of the situation at hand are known.  Me, I’ll wait for now.

At the same time Fraud’s take on the relationship between guns and masculinity wryly (and ruefully) comes to mind..
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on March 28, 2023, 09:21:43 AM
Imagine being upset that you weren't somehow a victim of a mass shooting.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 28, 2023, 10:54:41 AM
https://twitter.com/claytravis/status/1640723448279228417?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

TW: police bodycam footage of them taking down shooter
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 28, 2023, 11:01:22 AM
https://twitter.com/claytravis/status/1640723448279228417?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

TW: police bodycam footage of them taking down shooter

Uvalde cops would never
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: steves850 on March 28, 2023, 11:03:16 AM
Imagine being upset that you weren't somehow a victim of a mass shooting.

This is the second mass school shooting to happen in my backyard.

I was still living in CT when Sandy Hook happened. My friend's sister was a teacher and her daughter went to that school. Luckily they were OK but it took him hours to reach her.

I have a coworker with a kid attending Covenant. This excrement needs to stop. freak the rhetoric. freak the discourse. Do something or step down and let someone that can actual lead, lead.

freak anyone that thinks their "right to own a gun" is more important than my kid's right to be alive.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 28, 2023, 11:07:32 AM
https://twitter.com/saragonzalestx/status/1640722840319143938?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

Full footage of cops entering school. Incredibly intense excrement.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 28, 2023, 11:07:55 AM
Uvalde cops would never

Literally the first thought I had
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 28, 2023, 11:09:31 AM


This is the second mass school shooting to happen in my backyard.

I was still living in CT when Sandy Hook happened. My friend's sister was a teacher and her daughter went to that school. Luckily they were OK but it took him hours to reach her.

I have a coworker with a kid attending Covenant.

Damn. Closest I ever was to one was the Binghamton Civic Association - I was in my apartment 3 blocks away when it happened.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on March 28, 2023, 11:45:54 AM
https://twitter.com/saragonzalestx/status/1640722840319143938?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

Full footage of cops entering school. Incredibly intense excrement.

All of those guys were incredibly well trained and acted without any hesitation. 

The cop wearing the first bodycam with footage shown in that clip is great at his job and should be asked to consult. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on March 28, 2023, 11:56:20 AM
Imagine being upset that you weren't somehow a victim of a mass shooting.
I'm lost here...honest question, who's the reference to, i.e. who'd feel 'left out' surviving a mass shooting?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on March 28, 2023, 02:30:24 PM
I'm lost here...honest question, who's the reference to, i.e. who'd feel 'left out' surviving a mass shooting?

You can do this. I believe in you.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on March 28, 2023, 05:38:06 PM
You can do this. I believe in you.

I'm clueless

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a2/Spiderweb.jpg/240px-Spiderweb.jpg)(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/14/Chimp_Brain_in_a_jar.jpg/190px-Chimp_Brain_in_a_jar.jpg)(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a2/Spiderweb.jpg/240px-Spiderweb.jpg)

EDIT: thx 4 the (sarcastic) vote of confidence though...  ; )

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhMHPQH4a8g

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on March 28, 2023, 05:46:59 PM
Didn't think I'd see absolutely no introspection and I wasn't disappointed.

I get what you're talking about because you're you but I'm still trying to suss out this triple negative deluxe. 

Aren't you a lawyer? 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on March 28, 2023, 05:51:23 PM
How come there was more than a few not wearing headprotection?

Purely a matter of urgency and not time to properly be equipped?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 30, 2023, 11:18:40 PM
https://twitter.com/cnn/status/1641622311890481152?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

This should fix it
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on March 30, 2023, 11:44:39 PM
https://twitter.com/cnn/status/1641622311890481152?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

This should fix it

#47
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 31, 2023, 12:08:04 AM
https://twitter.com/cnn/status/1641622311890481152?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

This should fix it
I think the one thing that clearly defines shooters in these scenarios is a fear of being killed themselves.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 31, 2023, 07:59:45 AM
The FBI posted about 300 pages of stuff about Stephen Paddock
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on March 31, 2023, 08:33:16 AM
I get that any reporting on this psychos manifesto would be utterly detrimental to the narratives coming out of the white house (the most odious being that the trans community is under attack as christian children were literally mowed down earlier this week), but you'd think someone from our virtuous freedom fighting press core would want to get their hands on it.

I get what you're talking about because you're you 

Aren't you a lawyer? 

Lmao, who gives a freak what you think.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on March 31, 2023, 09:01:19 AM
Lmao, who gives a freak what you think.

I MUST RESPOND
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on March 31, 2023, 09:12:32 AM
I MUST RESPOND

AND SO YOU HAVE
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on March 31, 2023, 09:25:44 AM
AND SO YOU HAVE

how do you feel about your community being under attack?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on March 31, 2023, 09:27:41 AM
mj's community is under attack
how do you feel about your community being under attack?

How do you feel about apparently making light of the fact that someone killed children based on their religious schooling? Is that..what you're doing here? Yikes.

Like freak man, how do you get to be that insanely tribalistic.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on March 31, 2023, 09:41:51 AM
Weird how the right wing narrative after Dylann Roof wasn't that Christians were under attack. Is that because the shooter was right wing or because black Christians don't count?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 31, 2023, 10:00:28 AM
To be fair, if dead children are the unavoidable and acceptable cost of allowing private citizens to own weapons designed for the sole purpose of killing people, it's probably best that it is Christian children on the noisy end of them given it's that brand of religion that's out there actively promoting this insanely anachronistic principle.

Perhaps if more Christian children were getting shot, Christian parents might start thinking a bit harder about supporting preachers and politicians who allow this to happen in the first place.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on March 31, 2023, 10:35:56 AM
How do you feel about apparently making light of the fact that someone killed children based on their religious schooling? Is that..what you're doing here? Yikes.

Like freak man, how do you get to be that insanely tribalistic.

If this person shot up a public school, would you be this upset? 

Also very interesting that you don't give a damn about the black janitor.  On brand. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: d sw0rdz on March 31, 2023, 07:34:16 PM
children being shot up in school is sad, seeing these videos is sad, seeing nothing being done is sad, becoming numb and used to hearing excrement like this is sad

what can you do when there is a large portion of the country that's accepted the shooting of children while they are trying to learn in school as something that is palatable and okay
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on March 31, 2023, 07:51:53 PM
Is that because the shooter was right wing or because black Christians don't count?

Yes.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on March 31, 2023, 07:55:46 PM
Lmao, who gives a freak what you think.

My parents have done more for the greater good in one day then you've done in your miserable, insignificant piece of excrement lowlife existence.

Come to the tailgate this year.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on March 31, 2023, 08:34:04 PM
If this person shot up a public school, would you be this upset? 

Ridiculous question.

If this person shot up a public school, would you be this upset? 

Also very interesting that you don't give a damn about the black janitor. 
On brand. 


On bRaNd. What a dick. You're such a clown.

My parents have done more for the greater good in one day then you've done in your miserable, insignificant piece of excrement lowlife existence.

 :D :D :D :D that's hilarious.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on March 31, 2023, 08:42:41 PM
My parents have done more for the greater good in one day then you've done in your miserable, insignificant piece of excrement lowlife existence.

Come to the tailgate this year.

Denigration SZN
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on April 01, 2023, 09:57:07 AM
My parents have done more for the greater good in one day then you've done

in your miserable, insignificant piece of excrement lowlife existence.

Come to the tailgate this year.
Filial pique, or

statesmanship?



I’d like to suggest tabling this thread for the time being.  The vast majority (not all) of takes here have been unconscionably over the top & out of line not to mention the intellectual and philosophical sloth contained in them, so beyond calling anyone out I’m calling on both “sides” to put a sock in it, at least for now.

’To be fair’  we’re embarrassing ourselves….
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 01, 2023, 02:01:32 PM
My parents have done more for the greater good in one day then you've done in your miserable, insignificant piece of excrement lowlife existence.

Come to the tailgate this year.

Lmfao
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 01, 2023, 02:04:46 PM
https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1498862838072414208

Noted propagandist piece of excrement Brian Tyler Cohen who I'm sure has had no problem uttering, "not all ________" at any other point in his life wants everyone to know that rambling methhead sack of excrement failure as a father and a man encapsulates all conservative republicans.



I know nobody needs any help figuring this out because it’s a little too obvious, but here’s what MJ was worried about last time he posted about a mass shooting
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 02, 2023, 02:42:22 PM
https://twitter.com/qasimrashid/status/1642530329473720323?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 02, 2023, 05:44:47 PM
https://twitter.com/qasimrashid/status/1642530329473720323?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

WHY DO YOU HATE AMERICA AND FREEDOM?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 06, 2023, 11:07:37 PM
https://twitter.com/georebekah/status/1643776088391446528?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

https://twitter.com/maxnordau/status/1644073498812227588?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on April 06, 2023, 11:13:58 PM
https://twitter.com/georebekah/status/1643776088391446528?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

https://twitter.com/maxnordau/status/1644073498812227588?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

There's a lot of stuff DeSantis does that stirs up outrage and can be seen as controversial.

Also somehow doubt that this has anything unique to do with DeSantis

First article I saw detailing the accusations

https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/13-old-son-rebekah-jones-183512058.html

I 100% think it's reasonable and appropriate for this to be investigated. I understand her lawsuit bullshit makes this controversial and seem potentially retaliatory, but it very much should not be.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on April 10, 2023, 12:08:38 PM
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/10/us/louisville-kentucky-shooting.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/10/us/louisville-kentucky-shooting.html)

5:8
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 10, 2023, 12:20:51 PM
Quote
Gov. Andy Beshear of Kentucky traveled to the scene of the shooting and was visibly emotional at the news conference on Monday morning.

“This is awful,” he said. “I have a very close friend that didn’t make it today. And I have another close friend who didn’t, either, and one who is at the hospital that I hope is going to make it through. So when we talk about praying, I hope people will.”

Good. Maybe if the friends, families and children of people in a position to actually freaking do something about America's idiotic gun laws start dying at a good lick they might finally be motivated to do something about it. Or maybe they'll just keep banging on about praying, but at what point do all these idiots start to ask the difficult questions?

"I've been praying for all these shooting victims for years now and yet it keeps happening. What if prayers aren't the right answer? Why isn't he listening when I pray? Why does all my praying fall on deaf ears but those godless foreigners who don't pray worth a excrement don't get their friends and children executed randomly by gunmen on an almost daily basis?"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on April 10, 2023, 12:30:37 PM
Good. Maybe if the friends, families and children of people in a position to actually freaking do something about America's idiotic gun laws start dying at a good lick they might finally be motivated to do something about it. Or maybe they'll just keep banging on about praying, but at what point do all these idiots start to ask the difficult questions?

"I've been praying for all these shooting victims for years now and yet it keeps happening. What if prayers aren't the right answer? Why isn't he listening when I pray? Why does all my praying fall on deaf ears but those godless foreigners who don't pray worth a excrement don't get their friends and children executed randomly by gunmen on an almost daily basis?"

This brings up the interesting point of murder rates, which are all close to identical in all the similar 1st world countries, and still astronomically higher in lower socioeconomic countries

When mass shootings involve kids they're definitely unique,  but otherwise murder is murder. The news just sensationalizes them differently
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 10, 2023, 12:37:09 PM
This brings up the interesting point of murder rates, which are all close to identical in all the similar 1st world countries

Well, that's fundamentally not correct, is it? Let's take the G20: you've got South Africa, Brazil and Mexico as the definitive murder champions, then a clear mid table group of Russia, the US and Argentina, and then everyone else lagging way behind. The US in 5th have a homicide rate per capita three times that of Canada in 7th, four times France, Saudi Arabia and the UK, five times or more that of Germany et al.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on April 10, 2023, 01:46:49 PM
Just another day in paradise - 20 shot….20

https://abc7chicago.com/amp/chicago-weekend-shootings-today-violence-police/13108671/

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on April 10, 2023, 09:03:50 PM
https://twitter.com/MediumSizeMeech/status/1645542393117065218/photo/1

That's now two mass shooters the media are trying to humanize because they share their politics.

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 11, 2023, 09:06:45 AM
https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1498862838072414208

Noted propagandist piece of excrement Brian Tyler Cohen who I'm sure has had no problem uttering, "not all ________" at any other point in his life wants everyone to know that rambling methhead sack of excrement failure as a father and a man encapsulates all conservative republicans.



Bump
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 11, 2023, 09:08:13 AM
Just another day in paradise - 20 shot….20

https://abc7chicago.com/amp/chicago-weekend-shootings-today-violence-police/13108671/



Just a few more guns should fix this
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on April 11, 2023, 02:29:46 PM
https://twitter.com/MediumSizeMeech/status/1645542393117065218/photo/1

That's now two mass shooters the media are trying to humanize because they share their politics.
(https://i.redd.it/yg2zlqv7gbta1.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on April 15, 2023, 11:35:06 PM
Louisville…again…

https://www.wlky.com/amp/article/6-shot-2-dead-in-chickasaw-park-shooting-louisville/43609274


Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on April 16, 2023, 10:03:07 AM
Apparently 20+ shot with at least 6 deaths at a sweet 16 in Alabama

It's starting to seem like there's one everyday
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on April 16, 2023, 10:43:56 AM
Louisville…again…

https://www.wlky.com/amp/article/6-shot-2-dead-in-chickasaw-park-shooting-louisville/43609274


Quote
Mayor Craig Greenberg called for the people to put down their guns saying, "It wasn’t just Monday's shooting. Wasn’t just todays shooting. There were several other shootings in between. We lost more lives in between Monday's mass shooting and tonight’s. Please, put your weapons down. There are so many ways to resolve disputes, to talk to one another. Gun violence is not the solution to anything. Please put your weapons down."

Bold part: isn't this essentially the entire 2A argument? You support 2A if you believe that gun violence is the solution to some things. (I have no idea as to Mayor Greenberg's political leanings or position on firearms.)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 17, 2023, 02:25:10 PM
Apparently 20+ shot with at least 6 deaths at a sweet 16 in Alabama

It's starting to seem like there's one everyday

https://twitter.com/cnn/status/1648034855228174336?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

It’s sad because this really could be avoided if we armed all of the 16 year olds at sweet 16 parties. Other countries already have this figured out
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on April 17, 2023, 02:30:47 PM
https://twitter.com/cnn/status/1648034855228174336?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg

It’s sad because this really could be avoided if we armed all of the 16 year olds at sweet 16 parties. Other countries already have this figured out
Love the guy in the replies being racist about the victims' names.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on April 17, 2023, 03:02:57 PM
Love the guy in the replies being racist about the victims' names.

If we're talking about what I assume is the same poster

It seems like that poster is complaining that CNNs picture was of 4 white kids, while the poster is assuming that the victims were not white because of their names.

Which is all compounded by the caption of the white kids being

Update: All four victims killed at a Sweet 16 birthday party in Alabama have been identified.
 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on April 17, 2023, 04:13:37 PM


If we're talking about what I assume is the same poster

It seems like that poster is complaining that CNNs picture was of 4 white kids, while the poster is assuming that the victims were not white because of their names.

Nah it was a different one.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on April 17, 2023, 04:21:38 PM
Mass shooting?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZPooUHVco4

- or -

political statement?
(Ill. Sen. Rbt. Peters' take)

https://twitter.com/RobertJPeters/status/1647716399928754185

.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on April 18, 2023, 05:41:35 PM
death du jour

https://apnews.com/article/maine-interstate-shooting-3b108fc70e19e325bd0dcf565ab3a4ed
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on April 19, 2023, 12:47:53 PM
 https://abc13.com/woodlands-elite-cheerleaders-shot-shooting-at-heb-in-elgin-texas-payton-washington-pedro-tello-rodriguez-jr-arrested/13150502/ (https://abc13.com/woodlands-elite-cheerleaders-shot-shooting-at-heb-in-elgin-texas-payton-washington-pedro-tello-rodriguez-jr-arrested/13150502/)

Tried to open the a door to the wrong car by accident, got shot.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on April 19, 2023, 01:17:49 PM
I think we're gonna need to subcategorize this thread pretty soon and it makes me want to burn the world. 

Mass Shootings (school)

Mass Shootings (other)

Cluster Shootings (Chicago)

Cluster Shootings (other)

sTaNd YoUr GrOuNd Shootings
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on April 19, 2023, 01:22:04 PM
I think we're gonna need to subcategorize this thread pretty soon and it makes me want to burn the world. 

Mass Shootings (school)

Mass Shootings (other)

Cluster Shootings (Chicago)

Cluster Shootings (other)

sTaNd YoUr GrOuNd Shootings

You guys are bringing back the Old West.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on April 19, 2023, 03:28:57 PM
I think we're gonna need to subcategorize this thread pretty soon and it makes me want to burn the world. 

Mass Shootings (school)

Mass Shootings (other)

Cluster Shootings (Chicago)

Cluster Shootings (other)

sTaNd YoUr GrOuNd Shootings
Maybe just a whole shooting subforum.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on April 19, 2023, 03:51:42 PM
Maybe just a whole shooting subforum.
The Kyle Rittenhouse Firing Range
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on April 19, 2023, 09:04:23 PM
https://sports.yahoo.com/kindergartener-6-shot-while-playing-162216193.html (https://sports.yahoo.com/kindergartener-6-shot-while-playing-162216193.html)

They should remake The Sandlot for modern audiences: instead of The Beast it's just James Earl Jones with an itchy trigger finger. 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on April 19, 2023, 09:14:15 PM
Which one is the good guy with the gun?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on April 20, 2023, 11:54:53 PM
Which one is the good guy with the gun?

https://twitter.com/kenlemonWSOC9/status/1648696296713121792





Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on April 21, 2023, 04:54:29 PM
Apparently 20+ shot with at least 6 deaths at a sweet 16 in Alabama

It's starting to seem like there's one everyday

6th murder suspect arrested - a 15 year old. 

https://www.wsfa.com/2023/04/21/da-says-15-year-old-is-6th-arrest-dadeville-mass-shooting/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 04, 2023, 07:15:42 AM
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1653865894664192000?s=20
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 04, 2023, 07:58:20 AM
It's national disgrace that medical centres in the US don't routinely have armed receptionists.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on May 04, 2023, 08:16:43 AM
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1653865894664192000?s=20

Ugh, I stay off twitter other than when someone here posts a link to something, but I just made the mistake of reading the replies. People are freaking stupid.

I know the answer, but is one side so consumed with proving themselves "not wrong" that they think posting things like "Another white supremacist with an AR-15" or "BLM?" or "Wait, you can mass murder with a handgun" really makes them sound "right"?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 04, 2023, 08:21:20 AM
Ugh, I stay off twitter other than when someone here posts a link to something, but I just made the mistake of reading the replies. People are freaking stupid.

I know the answer, but is one side so consumed with proving themselves "not wrong" that they think posting things like "Another white supremacist with an AR-15" or "BLM?" or "Wait, you can mass murder with a handgun" really makes them sound "right"?

I never thought that mass shootings would happen so often in the US that now each instance would be viewed in a trivial sense.

That 2nd amendment needs to be repealed before you guys revert back to the full blown Wild West era
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on May 04, 2023, 08:53:31 AM
I never thought that mass shootings would happen so often in the US that now each instance would be viewed in a trivial sense.

That 2nd amendment needs to be repealed before you guys revert back to the full blown Wild West era

My wife says it all the time, if we didn't do anything after Sandy Hook, we were never going to do anything.

That said, 2A is fine. I'm fine with people owning firearms. And while I think AR-15s are completely unnecessary, I'm even okay with people owning them.

But they should be locked in a locker at a registered gun range, and only available to use at the gun range. If you need to remove it from the premises, there should be a system in place to do so, with tracking available.

There's a middle ground. The gun lobby isn't interested in it though, so they'll keep pumping out "muh rightz" propaganda to keep "freedom" alive. #profitoverpeople
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 04, 2023, 08:55:56 AM
My wife says it all the time, if we didn't do anything after Sandy Hook, we were never going to do anything.

That said, 2A is fine. I'm fine with people owning firearms. And while I think AR-15s are completely unnecessary, I'm even okay with people owning them.

But they should be locked in a locker at a registered gun range, and only available to use at the gun range. If you need to remove it from the premises, there should be a system in place to do so, with tracking available.

There's a middle ground. The gun lobby isn't interested in it though, so they'll keep pumping out "muh rightz" propaganda to keep "freedom" alive. #profitoverpeople

I disagree.  Unless you're hunting for food, guns aren't required. People don't need to own them.

i've never owned a gun, and my life hasn't been affected negatively.


I'm also aware this debate has been beaten to death....this is just my summarized .02 cents
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on May 04, 2023, 08:58:56 AM
I disagree.  Unless you're hunting for food, guns aren't required. People don't need to own them.

i've never owned a gun, and my life hasn't been affected negatively.

I've never owned one either. And I don't see a reason to own one.

But I'm willing to meet gun owners halfway if it means it's harder for bad actors to acquire them to use against innocent people.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 04, 2023, 09:34:36 AM
Alio's right though. I don't care if you want to own a Gatling gun as long as you only use it to make holes in bits of paper at a secured and licensed range.

The idea of keeping guns at home or on your person for protection is comprehensively proven to be utter idiocy.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 04, 2023, 10:40:05 AM
Quote
Japan boasts a population of more than 127 million people, yet finished 2019 with a gun death rate of only .02 per 100,000 people. One major factor in this success is that Japan has some of the strictest gun control laws in the world. For Japanese citizens to purchase a gun, they must attend an all-day class, pass a written exam, and complete a shooting range test, scoring at least 95% accuracy. Candidates will also receive a mental health evaluation, performed at a hospital, and will have a comprehensive background check done by the government. Only shotguns and rifles can be purchased. The class and exam must be retaken every three years.

Sounds perfectly reasonable, but gun nuts freak out any time the subject of making gun laws better in this country comes up
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 04, 2023, 02:03:36 PM
It's national disgrace that medical centres in the US don't routinely have armed receptionists.
In this wake of a mass shooting in Canada which killed 22 people during an April 18-20, 2020 spree there was no mention of it whatsoever in this very thread covering that time span (page 68)....not even a cheeky swipe like the southerly-directed one above.

And while the PM took action in the aftermath (bully for him) the utter 'home team disregard' at the time was noteworthy...
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 04, 2023, 02:07:28 PM
In this wake of a mass shooting in Canada which killed 22 people during an April 18-20, 2020 spree there was no mention of it whatsoever in this very thread covering that time span (page 68)....not even a cheeky swipe like the southerly-directed one above.

And while the PM took action in the aftermath (bully for him) the utter 'home team disregard' at the time was noteworthy...

shootings in Canada are still met with shock and surprise, because they're a rarity.  It's not a weekly routine like it is in the US.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 04, 2023, 02:36:03 PM
In this wake of a mass shooting in Canada which killed 22 people during an April 18-20, 2020 spree there was no mention of it whatsoever in this very thread covering that time span (page 68)....not even a cheeky swipe like the southerly-directed one above.

And while the PM took action in the aftermath (bully for him) the utter 'home team disregard' at the time was noteworthy...

What are we doing here? Are we actually accusing MB and JE of not caring enough about it happening in their own country?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 04, 2023, 02:37:37 PM
In this wake of a mass shooting in Canada which killed 22 people during an April 18-20, 2020 spree there was no mention of it whatsoever in this very thread covering that time span (page 68)....not even a cheeky swipe like the southerly-directed one above.

And while the PM took action in the aftermath (bully for him) the utter 'home team disregard' at the time was noteworthy...

I'm sorry, what? "Your observation of the absolute epidemic of children and innocents being executed in the US is moot because you failed to comment on JO that one time it happened in Canada (with weapons that were purchased legally in the US)"?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 04, 2023, 02:39:15 PM
We had a shooter prancing around Nova Scotia last month posing as a RCMP officer, and shooting people.

Our prime minister banned assault rifles the next day.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 04, 2023, 03:07:27 PM


That's like a 2 out of 10 on the cheeky scale.  Invalid.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 04, 2023, 05:43:26 PM
shootings in Canada are still met with shock and surprise, because they're a rarity.  It's not a weekly routine like it is in the US.
Point taken and noted MB but my point was that since its "a weekly routine" in the U.S. and a rarity in Canada, all the more reason that a mass murder to the tune of 22 dead would be all the more newsworthy in the unusual "man bites dog" sense.

What are we doing here? Are we actually accusing MB and JE of not caring enough about it happening in their own country?
No and I did not mean to imply so Cato (more re: that down below).


I'm sorry, what? "Your observation of the absolute epidemic of children and innocents being executed in the US is moot because you failed to comment on JO that one time it happened in Canada (with weapons that were purchased legally in the US)"?
Hardly my point JE; it was more the uppity flippant "It's national disgrace that medical centres in the US don't routinely have armed receptionists" swipe.



We had a shooter prancing around Nova Scotia LAST MONTH posing as a RCMP officer, and shooting people.

Our prime minister banned assault rifles the next day.

That SFD was my point; a double deuce killing didn't even make 'that day's news'?


Statistics: obviously the US leads in mass-shootings by a country mile.  At the same time, statistics are like trick ponies, i.e.
Q: what's 1 + 1 equal?
A: what do you want it to equal?

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/mass-shootings-by-country

to all: I just returned this afternoon from an extended vacay in Paris to hear yet another disheartening story (Atlanta) along with other dispiriting general news both locally and nationally.  Over 'there' this past Monday there were a shitload of violent May Day protests and while our hotel (le Bristol) was not near ground zero, the street it was on (Rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré) was closed and had machine gun-toting uniformed hommes (and femmes-often hot 'tttt') stationed on each corner and all about (Macron's residence was fairly down the road).  That said, my point is it appears that quite often one man's news is another man's non-story to use the old adage "one man's trash is another man's treasure."  That is what I suppose I was trying to point out was that a killing's a killing no matter where it is and to dismiss or not to cover it because it doesn't fit a particular target audience narrative isn't exactly kosher.  Freak the Pauline Hanson's (One Nation) of the world but at the same time, take note no matter where or when or who it involves.

TL;DR: freak it
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 04, 2023, 06:32:48 PM
Hardly my point JE; it was more the uppity flippant "It's national disgrace that medical centres in the US don't routinely have armed receptionists" swipe.

Is that not a logical conclusion based on the solutions offered thus far by your elected representatives?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 04, 2023, 08:11:20 PM
https://www.dw.com/en/serbia-tightens-gun-control-after-deadly-school-shooting/a-65516729 (https://www.dw.com/en/serbia-tightens-gun-control-after-deadly-school-shooting/a-65516729)

What a novel approach. I wonder if anyone else tried it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 06, 2023, 06:58:08 PM
https://www.fox4news.com/news/allen-premium-outlets-shooting.amp (https://www.fox4news.com/news/allen-premium-outlets-shooting.amp)

Another day in Texas.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 06, 2023, 07:33:41 PM
INB4 “The shooters race/sexual orientation/religion is the cause of this!”
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 06, 2023, 09:40:23 PM
INB4 “The shooters race/sexual orientation/religion is the cause of this!”

Shooter is supposedly Hispanic.  If Biden didn’t steal the election, this wouldn’t have happened!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 06, 2023, 09:46:32 PM
If only someone put a wall around the shopping center.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 06, 2023, 10:19:20 PM
If only someone put a wall around the shopping center.
They had too many doors.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 06, 2023, 11:53:46 PM
https://www.cbsnews.com/texas/news/man-witnessed-allen-outlet-mall-shooting/

this is so fucked
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 07, 2023, 01:05:06 AM
"I lost three people."

JFC, imagine having to say that as a civilian.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 07, 2023, 06:02:50 AM
By comparison, over 500,000 took part in May Day protests (and violent rioting in spots with black-clad anarchists) in France this padt week with over 500 arrests and over 200 cops and gendarmes injured.  And in the midst of this: O  DEATHS.

Enough already.  Gun possession = mandatory hoosegow,
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 07, 2023, 07:55:38 AM
“At least we’re not Chicago” might be one of the worst post shooting responses we’ve seen yet
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Libero_2 on May 07, 2023, 08:18:09 AM
I ask again… how many people have to die before we decide enough is enough?

A little girl in a bush with her face blown off? The child nearly drowning in his mothers blood?

I just want to know why the pro gun people feel we couldn’t replicate what other countries have accomplished? Why can it just “not work here” I’m serious, why is it impossible to find a solution? I hear nonsense about “first they will take your guns” and then they will storm into your house and we can’t revolt or whatever as the reason. But why haven’t governments in other countries down this if it’s inevitable if their citizens aren’t armed?

And if you think the government is so corrupt they’ll come for you, why in the holy freak do we keep re-electing these damn people anyways? I mean Jesus Christ
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 07, 2023, 09:36:23 AM
I ask again… how many people have to die before we decide enough is enough?

At least a couple more.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 07, 2023, 09:44:35 AM
At least a couple more.


dcm mode engaged

If the state of New York can abstain from shooting each other, maybe we'll attract more NFL free agents.


dcm mode disengaged
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 07, 2023, 10:17:23 PM
The ole 2nd amendment scoreboard for tyrannical governments overthrown vs. innocent children slaughtered is starting to get awful lopsided
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 07, 2023, 11:27:06 PM
The ole 2nd amendment scoreboard for tyrannical governments overthrown vs. innocent children slaughtered is starting to get awful lopsided
Maybe the only reason they haven't gone all Kim Jong on your derriere is Bubba and his $600 Wal-Mart Armalite.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 08, 2023, 06:27:53 PM
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/live-blog/texas-mall-shooting-live-updates-rcna83297#rcrd12984

freak
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 08, 2023, 07:57:09 PM
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/live-blog/texas-mall-shooting-live-updates-rcna83297#rcrd12984

freak
sHaLl NoT bE iNfRiNgEd
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 08, 2023, 09:08:21 PM
(https://i.redd.it/fj6vofsg2pya1.jpg)

Yeah this checks out.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 08, 2023, 09:34:13 PM
(https://i.redd.it/fj6vofsg2pya1.jpg)

Yeah this checks out.

Is he trans? What is his immigration status?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 08, 2023, 11:06:25 PM
(https://i.redd.it/fj6vofsg2pya1.jpg)

Yeah this checks out.
The SS stands for Super Socialist
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on May 09, 2023, 07:16:50 AM
(https://i.redd.it/fj6vofsg2pya1.jpg)

Yeah this checks out.

Damn you, Ed Norton.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on May 09, 2023, 08:05:15 AM
Republicans: the problem isn't guns, it's mental illness!

Also Republicans: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/28/517799119/trump-repeals-rule-designed-to-block-gun-sales-to-certain-mentally-ill-people
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 09, 2023, 10:14:09 PM
https://twitter.com/arictoler/status/1655954771533082629?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 09, 2023, 10:40:05 PM
Shooter is supposedly Hispanic.  If Biden didn’t steal the election, this wouldn’t have happened!

Shooter is supposedly Hispanic, yet that hasn't stopped certain accounts which this place gets their shitty derriere talking points from, from declaring HuWyTe SuPrEmAcy.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 09, 2023, 10:53:29 PM
Shooter is supposedly Hispanic, yet that hasn't stopped certain accounts which this place gets their shitty derriere talking points from, from declaring HuWyTe SuPrEmAcy.

Build that wall
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 09, 2023, 11:05:09 PM
Didn't think I'd see absolutely no introspection about the rhetoric behind "anti-Nazi legislation" and how people are idiotically asserting that its a "GeNoCiDe" which unquestionably fueled this evil sack of excrement from killing huwytes, and I wasn't disappointed.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: mj2sexay on May 09, 2023, 11:15:13 PM

Build that wall

Just out of curiosity, what do I have to say to get you to wish death on 60 million plus again? I'd like to know so I can repeat it over and over again.

Didn't think I'd see absolutely no introspection about the rhetoric behind "anti-Nazi legislation" and how people are idiotically asserting that its a "GeNoCiDe" which unquestionably fueled this evil sack of excrement from killing huwytes, and I wasn't disappointed.

Nice attempt at a gotcha. I'd ask about the leaps of logic inherent in that post, but it's just the equivalent of a fat drunk flailing to get his grip on the stair bannister.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 10, 2023, 04:35:39 PM
Just out of curiosity, what do I have to say to get you to wish death on 60 million plus again? I'd like to know so I can repeat it over and over again.

Nice attempt at a gotcha. I'd ask about the leaps of logic inherent in that post, but it's just the equivalent of a fat drunk flailing to get his grip on the stair bannister.

(https://media1.giphy.com/media/u4BlZ7lIyCFpu/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on May 10, 2023, 10:42:13 PM
Just out of curiosity, what do I have to say to get you to wish death on 60 million plus again? I'd like to know so I can repeat it over and over again.

Do you like Imagine Dragons? 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on May 10, 2023, 10:45:36 PM
I've come to a conclusion that.the only reason that I would.read any of MJ's posts is due to a weird fetish so I'm just going to lean into that hard from now on.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on May 11, 2023, 10:28:06 AM
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0d/Logical_fallacy.svg/320px-Logical_fallacy.svg.png)(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2d/Cancel_Culture.jpg/185px-Cancel_Culture.jpg)
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: reuben on May 25, 2023, 09:45:50 PM
(https://i.redd.it/r9r4oo9gy12b1.png)

Merch.

MERCH.

I hate it here.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on May 25, 2023, 10:27:59 PM
(https://i.redd.it/r9r4oo9gy12b1.png)

Merch.

MERCH.

I hate it here.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biore-school-shooting-cecilee-max-brown-apology-ad-influencer/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on June 13, 2023, 10:01:13 AM
Very normal way to celebrate your success.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65888631
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on June 14, 2023, 10:34:50 PM
https://www.denverpost.com/2023/06/13/mass-shooting-downtown-denver-nuggets-championship/
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on June 28, 2023, 11:56:41 PM
https://twitter.com/sarahiscensored/status/1674140649120038913?s=46&t=e6vm1ybQ4I7pEpNpNEkBkg
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 02, 2023, 06:31:14 AM
Baltimore
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna92223

Wichita
https://www.nbc15.com/2023/07/02/7-wounded-2-trampled-shooting-kansas-bar-police-say/

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 04, 2023, 06:56:09 AM
Philly:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/03/us/philadelphia-shooting-kingsessing.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 05, 2023, 08:53:27 PM
This screwball would rationalize combating rape with a dick

https://www.inquirer.com/news/philadelphia-mass-shooting-kimbrady-carriker-motive-murder-20230705.html?outputType=amp


Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on July 05, 2023, 09:24:13 PM
This screwball would rationalize combating rape with a dick

https://www.inquirer.com/news/philadelphia-mass-shooting-kimbrady-carriker-motive-murder-20230705.html?outputType=amp

Hang on, isn't "more guns" the default right wing answer to gun violence? I thought the reason this kept happening was because not enough people are packing?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on July 20, 2023, 06:46:56 AM
Auckland, NZ

https://amp.dw.com/en/new-zealand-3-dead-after-auckland-shooting/a-66290895


Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on August 27, 2023, 12:27:11 PM
 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/jacksonville-shooting-latest-spasm-violence-driven-racist-hatred-rcna102017 (https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/jacksonville-shooting-latest-spasm-violence-driven-racist-hatred-rcna102017)

Jacksonville. 3 dead at dollar general, plus shooter.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on August 28, 2023, 09:28:24 AM
wtf…
https://www.wlwt.com/amp/article/charges-dropped-against-juvenile-suspect-drive-otr-shooting/44914452

more wtf…
https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/crime/2023/08/27/one-dead-one-hurt-shooting-easton-town-center-columbus-ohio-police-active-shooter-mall/70696458007/

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on August 29, 2023, 09:32:41 AM
wtf…
https://www.wlwt.com/amp/article/charges-dropped-against-juvenile-suspect-drive-otr-shooting/44914452

more wtf…
https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/crime/2023/08/27/one-dead-one-hurt-shooting-easton-town-center-columbus-ohio-police-active-shooter-mall/70696458007/



Kids on trial for partaking in a freaking murder with an ankle bracelet on and he's allowed to go to public school while awaiting trial
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Heismanberg on August 29, 2023, 10:16:42 AM
Kids on trial for partaking in a freaking murder with an ankle bracelet on and he's allowed to go to public school while awaiting trial

Every season I had MULTIPLE students come to summer practice with ankle monitors. 

Public school employees are babysitters. 

The no social media rule was in place then too.  That'll stop 'em! 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: delavan on August 29, 2023, 01:14:27 PM
Whack job had entire Tar Heel nation at UNC on lockdown

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/29/us/unc-chapel-hill-shooting-gunman-charges.html

Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on August 29, 2023, 03:05:37 PM
Every season I had MULTIPLE students come to summer practice with ankle monitors. 

Public school employees are babysitters. 

The no social media rule was in place then too.  That'll stop 'em! 

I can get the ankle bracelet thing to an extent, especially if it's not particularly serious. But whnn you're involved in a freaking murder, that's nuts
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on October 25, 2023, 07:52:49 PM
Reports up here in Maine saying ongoing active shooter scenes - dozens of casualties - multiple locations - unclear how many shooters. Town hour north of me, I've spent a lot of time there. Horrific.



My apartment looks out on the helipad of the only level 1 trauma center in Maine. I was out until a few minutes ago but have already heard multiple helicopters land.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on October 25, 2023, 07:57:58 PM
Reports up here in Maine saying ongoing active shooter scenes - dozens of casualties - multiple locations - unclear how many shooters. Town hour north of me, I've spent a lot of time there. Horrific.
Looks like it's the same shooter. At the very least I hope you remain safe.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 27, 2023, 11:14:55 AM
Very cool very normal country we live in
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: MBGreen on October 27, 2023, 11:49:02 AM
Very cool very normal country we live in
Sir...this is an Arbys.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 28, 2023, 10:17:55 PM
Politicians: we should continue to do nothing

What the freak are the point of these people
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 29, 2023, 09:06:39 AM
Politicians: we should continue to do nothing

What the freak are the point of these people

They represent what the people in general want.  They suck because we as a mass unit suck.  Plus money and stuff.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on October 29, 2023, 09:16:23 AM
Maybe make it slightly less convenient to purchase a high powered and high capacity firearm.

Gun owners: This is worse than that german guy!!1!1!21!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on October 29, 2023, 09:47:36 AM
Maybe make it slightly less convenient to purchase a high powered and high capacity firearm.

Gun owners: This is worse than that german guy!!1!1!21!

I still don't understand how this is even a conversation

There are certainly people who are fully of the opinion that zero firearms should be in the hands of non-military, but most folks just want some common sense laws on the books. It doesn't get simpler than "nobody needs semi/automatic weapons or high capacity rounds--other than the military."

But gun manufacturers are the OG "incite the masses for our own benefit" crowd.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 30, 2023, 12:41:20 PM
How am I gonna stop da currupt gobernent in da next revolutionary war without my AR15
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on October 31, 2023, 10:51:25 AM
Insane details about this case. Dude was an army reservist for over 20 years. His command knew he was armed and potentially violent, and he was committed for weeks over the summer for a mental health 'eval'. His family (in May!) and the army (seems like initially in July, again in September) both contacted local law enforcement, who went on to try to find him in September. His ex-wife also reported he had taken possession of 10-15 guns from his family earlier in the summer.

A local sheriff has stated he circulated out an all-state, all-law enforcement bulletin because the guy was known to be armed and suspected of planning a mass shooting. Literally other army reservists told local sheriffs that they thought he was going to commit a mass shooting. Law enforcement was in touch with both his reservist command and his family, who all said he was armed and dangerous and needed to be treated for an acute, dangerous mental health situation. They reportedly had him surrounded at his home in September, but he didn't open the door, so they left without making contact. They cancelled the bulletin looking for him around ten days ago.

He also bought the gun used for this shooting in legally this summer, and apparently legally purchased more guns "days" before the shooting. Over the summer he was denied purchasing a suppressor because he self-reported he'd been recently hospitalized for a mental health episode, in one of the only situations in which some institution actually placed any limit on his access to weapons.

Just an absurd systemic failure of the combination of mental healthcare policies, law enforcement, and gun control measures resulting in devastating consequences.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on October 31, 2023, 11:25:56 AM
They represent what the people in general want.  They suck because we as a mass unit suck.  Plus money and stuff.

The politicians we have now absolutely do not represent what most people in this country want. Most people do not want bipartisan bickering, stalled initiatives, stupid immigration policies,  ignorant economic theories, drunk sailor spending. They suck because we used to have abject retards in politics,  now we have old out of touch and young out of touch retards in office that wouldn't know educated compromise if it smacked them in the face.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on October 31, 2023, 11:49:57 AM
Insane details about this case. Dude was an army reservist for over 20 years. His command knew he was armed and potentially violent, and he was committed for weeks over the summer for a mental health 'eval'. His family (in May!) and the army (seems like initially in July, again in September) both contacted local law enforcement, who went on to try to find him in September. His ex-wife also reported he had taken possession of 10-15 guns from his family earlier in the summer.

A local sheriff has stated he circulated out an all-state, all-law enforcement bulletin because the guy was known to be armed and suspected of planning a mass shooting. Literally other army reservists told local sheriffs that they thought he was going to commit a mass shooting. Law enforcement was in touch with both his reservist command and his family, who all said he was armed and dangerous and needed to be treated for an acute, dangerous mental health situation. They reportedly had him surrounded at his home in September, but he didn't open the door, so they left without making contact. They cancelled the bulletin looking for him around ten days ago.

He also bought the gun used for this shooting in legally this summer, and apparently legally purchased more guns "days" before the shooting. Over the summer he was denied purchasing a suppressor because he self-reported he'd been recently hospitalized for a mental health episode, in one of the only situations in which some institution actually placed any limit on his access to weapons.

Just an absurd systemic failure of the combination of mental healthcare policies, law enforcement, and gun control measures resulting in devastating consequences.

“Well he’s not answering the door so I guess we can stop looking altogether,” is just insane.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on October 31, 2023, 11:54:16 AM
“Well he’s not answering the door so I guess we can stop looking altogether,” is just insane.

My Halloween policy.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 31, 2023, 11:58:03 AM
The politicians we have now absolutely do not represent what most people in this country want. Most people do not want bipartisan bickering, stalled initiatives, stupid immigration policies,  ignorant economic theories, drunk sailor spending. They suck because we used to have abject retards in politics,  now we have old out of touch and young out of touch retards in office that wouldn't know educated compromise if it smacked them in the face.
if they didn't represent what their voters wanted, they wouldn't get elected.  I'm not talking individual issues, I'm talking in general.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on October 31, 2023, 12:05:21 PM
if they didn't represent what their voters wanted, they wouldn't get elected.  I'm not talking individual issues, I'm talking in general.

That's not true.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 31, 2023, 12:10:43 PM
That's not true.

"You know, I don't like much this poopchute has to say.  I think he's wrong on most things.  He's got my vote!"
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on October 31, 2023, 12:13:15 PM
I'll admit, I should have said voters initially instead of people.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: steves850 on October 31, 2023, 12:33:38 PM
if they didn't represent what their voters wanted, they wouldn't get elected.  I'm not talking individual issues, I'm talking in general.

This is not true. People vote along party lines because they want to say their side "won." They rarely actually look into the politics or platform of the person. They only look at whether there's a big D or R next to their name.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Miamipuck on October 31, 2023, 12:49:55 PM
"You know, I don't like much this poopchute has to say.  I think he's wrong on most things.  He's got my vote!"

The average person has given up. So what you said above isn't wrong.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: ons on October 31, 2023, 12:50:21 PM
“Well he’s not answering the door so I guess we can stop looking altogether,” is just insane.

I believe they were just afraid of getting into a shoot out with a psycho with high powered weapons and extensive weapons training.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: steves850 on October 31, 2023, 12:53:23 PM
I believe they were just afraid of getting into a shoot out with a psycho with high powered weapons and extensive weapons training.

These are the same bootlickers that were afraid to stop a school shooting, right?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on October 31, 2023, 12:53:23 PM
I believe they were just afraid of getting into a shoot out with a psycho with high powered weapons and extensive weapons training.

But they are psychos with high powered weapons and extensive weapons training.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 31, 2023, 11:05:37 PM
Insane details about this case. Dude was an army reservist for over 20 years. His command knew he was armed and potentially violent, and he was committed for weeks over the summer for a mental health 'eval'. His family (in May!) and the army (seems like initially in July, again in September) both contacted local law enforcement, who went on to try to find him in September. His ex-wife also reported he had taken possession of 10-15 guns from his family earlier in the summer.

A local sheriff has stated he circulated out an all-state, all-law enforcement bulletin because the guy was known to be armed and suspected of planning a mass shooting. Literally other army reservists told local sheriffs that they thought he was going to commit a mass shooting. Law enforcement was in touch with both his reservist command and his family, who all said he was armed and dangerous and needed to be treated for an acute, dangerous mental health situation. They reportedly had him surrounded at his home in September, but he didn't open the door, so they left without making contact. They cancelled the bulletin looking for him around ten days ago.

He also bought the gun used for this shooting in legally this summer, and apparently legally purchased more guns "days" before the shooting. Over the summer he was denied purchasing a suppressor because he self-reported he'd been recently hospitalized for a mental health episode, in one of the only situations in which some institution actually placed any limit on his access to weapons.

Just an absurd systemic failure of the combination of mental healthcare policies, law enforcement, and gun control measures resulting in devastating consequences.

I’m not a financial advisor but surely if everyone had a few more guns this situation would have resolved itself
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 31, 2023, 11:08:27 PM
The politicians we have now absolutely do not represent what most people in this country want. Most people do not want bipartisan bickering, stalled initiatives, stupid immigration policies,  ignorant economic theories, drunk sailor spending. They suck because we used to have abject retards in politics,  now we have old out of touch and young out of touch retards in office that wouldn't know educated compromise if it smacked them in the face.

I mean, I don’t disagree with anything you said there, but these people get voted for and elected. By dumbasses. We are a country of dumbasses. We just lected Donald Trump and Joe Biden back to back. That’s a bad movie script. We aren’t sending our best.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 31, 2023, 11:10:09 PM
This is not true. People vote along party lines because they want to say their side "won." They rarely actually look into the politics or platform of the person. They only look at whether there's a big D or R next to their name.

Sinema says hai
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 31, 2023, 11:12:23 PM
I believe they were just afraid of getting into a shoot out with a psycho with high powered weapons and extensive weapons training.

Cops weren’t 2nd amendmenting hard enough, pathetic

Idk what evidence more you need after excrement like Uvalde and this. You can’t make these freaking weapons available to every psychopath off the street. To the point where law enforcement is too scared to engage with them
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 31, 2023, 11:14:53 PM
It honestly feels like the guns peoples solution to this is “everyone should carry an AR15 on them at all times in case the most deranged person on earth comes at you with a legally bought Rambo arsenal”
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 31, 2023, 11:15:25 PM
“Also kids should stay strapped JIC”
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on November 01, 2023, 03:36:48 AM
Finding out exactly what kind of cynic people are in this thread.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on November 01, 2023, 07:21:28 AM
Why are the guns not allowed to have guns? 
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on November 01, 2023, 12:41:41 PM
I mean, I don’t disagree with anything you said there, but these people get voted for and elected. By dumbasses. We are a country of dumbasses. We just lected Donald Trump and Joe Biden back to back. That’s a bad movie script. We aren’t sending our best.

I've avoided any of the politics for a while now, but the answer to this is to enact meaningful campaign finance reform.

Corporations, PACs, and any other non-human entity should be unable to contribute to a politician's campaign and should be unable to produce advertisements for a candidate.

It's not the general public's fault that we're consistently presented with our choice of two mediocre options. It's simply that in most cases, the people who raise the most money get to appear on ballots. As long as there is no outside control over where that money comes from, we'll continue to have two candidates on every ballot that are beholden to someone/something. Like the NRA.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on November 01, 2023, 12:44:18 PM
I've avoided any of the politics for a while now, but the answer to this is to enact meaningful campaign finance reform.

Corporations, PACs, and any other non-human entity should be unable to contribute to a politician's campaign and should be unable to produce advertisements for a candidate.

It's not the general public's fault that we're consistently presented with our choice of two mediocre options. It's simply that in most cases, the people who raise the most money get to appear on ballots. As long as there is no outside control over where that money comes from, we'll continue to have two candidates on every ballot that are beholden to someone/something. Like the NRA.

The NRA is in deep excrement. Their membership dues have plummeted and their legal costs are through the roof.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on November 01, 2023, 01:13:53 PM
The NRA is in deep excrement. Their membership dues have plummeted and their legal costs are through the roof.

As long as there are gun manufacturers, there will be an NRA. It might have a different name, but it'll still exist.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: steves850 on November 01, 2023, 04:03:00 PM
Finding out exactly what kind of cynic people are in this thread.

This thread is about mass shootings, the fact it gets bumped every few weeks, the shootings are all located in the only country with this problem, the only thing our elected officials want to do is pray on, you are shocked that everyone is cynical?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on November 01, 2023, 05:14:44 PM
This thread is about mass shootings, the fact it gets bumped every few weeks, the shootings are all located in the only country with this problem, the only thing our elected officials want to do is pray on, you are shocked that everyone is cynical?

You're really taking the wrong lesson away from that one, there.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: steves850 on November 01, 2023, 05:17:16 PM
You're really taking the wrong lesson away from that one, there.
Enlighten me. Not being combative, I’m willing to try a different perspective but I don’t believe there’s anything other than “get the weapons solely designed for mass destruction out of the hands of psychopaths” being the answer here.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on November 01, 2023, 05:28:31 PM
Enlighten me. Not being combative, I’m willing to try a different perspective but I don’t believe there’s anything other than “get the weapons solely designed for mass destruction out of the hands of psychopaths” being the answer here.

Different kinds of cynics.

Just read the sentence instead of reading into it.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: AlioTheFool on November 01, 2023, 05:31:02 PM
Different kinds of cynics.

Just read the sentence instead of reading into it.

I'll admit, I interpreted it the same as Steve.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: steves850 on November 01, 2023, 05:40:01 PM
Different kinds of cynics.

Just read the sentence instead of reading into it.
Ah, that’s my bad. It can be difficult to not have an emotional reaction with this topic.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on November 01, 2023, 05:48:23 PM
Ah, that’s my bad. It can be difficult to not have an emotional reaction with this topic.

All good.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 02, 2023, 11:10:09 AM
All good.

Still plodding away with that schtick huh. God forbid I show up to a tailgate and you insist on calling me that to my face.

I will leave in a cop car. And you will have to suck cheese dust through a straw. Fair trade. And no I'm not freaking with you.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on November 02, 2023, 11:12:18 AM
Still plodding away with that schtick huh. God forbid I show up to a tailgate and you insist on calling me that to my face.

I will leave in a cop car. And you will have to suck cheese dust through a straw. Fair trade. And no I'm not freaking with you.

You'd be mad if I said you were good?
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on November 02, 2023, 11:27:48 AM
freak. I completely forgot about this bit

Still plodding away with that schtick huh. God forbid I show up to a tailgate and you insist on calling me that to my face.

I will leave in a cop car. And you will have to suck Cinnadust™ through a straw. Fair trade. And no I'm not freaking with you.

Also pictured in the quoted thread: me completely forgetting that this copypasta existed.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: CatoTheElder on December 06, 2023, 03:02:34 PM
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/rcna128283

https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-responding-active-shooter-university-nevada-las-vegas/story?id=105433557
Three cities in two days.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on January 04, 2024, 04:32:50 PM
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/04/us/perry-iowa-school-shooting.html
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Badger on January 05, 2024, 10:07:26 AM
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/04/us/perry-iowa-school-shooting.html
I can't tell if it's on me for not knowing about this already or if 1 dead kid isn't enough to break into the top of the news anymore.
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: Johnny English on March 22, 2024, 03:14:14 PM
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/22/world/moscow-shooting
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: bojanglesman on March 22, 2024, 06:08:42 PM
Hey it's not here this time!
Title: Re: Mass shootings
Post by: dcm1602 on March 22, 2024, 06:54:56 PM
The most messed up part of this is both the US and UK literally told Russia to watch our for a mass causality event in the near coming weeks, especially at large gatherings including concerts

It also makes you wonder how many of these type things our government has actually stopped here, and simply just not told us about