Jet Offensive

Collegiate Football => The NFL Draft => Topic started by: SixFeetDeep on October 08, 2016, 10:08:06 AM

Title: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 08, 2016, 10:08:06 AM
McShay's current QB rankings:

1) DeShone Kizer (ND)
2) Deshaun Watson (Clemson)
3) Brad Kaaya (Miami)
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 08, 2016, 10:09:04 AM
inB4 "mcshay sux" post

Yeah, yeah, I know
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on October 08, 2016, 11:02:57 AM
We need Adoree' Jackson
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Jumbo on October 08, 2016, 11:20:40 AM
Does it matter in what order they're ranked if all of them are excrement?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on October 08, 2016, 11:25:37 AM
Mason Rudolph might be a better prospect than all of them.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on October 08, 2016, 12:50:45 PM
#nominorityquarterbacks
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 20, 2016, 08:12:25 PM

Cam Robinson or Mike McGlinchey would be the starting point of an offensive rebuild.  It starts with the OL.


Bumping this post
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on October 20, 2016, 08:14:06 PM
McGlinchey 2017
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on October 20, 2016, 08:24:32 PM
McShay's current QB rankings:

1) DeShone Kizer (ND)
2) Deshaun Watson (Clemson)
3) Brad Kaaya (Miami)

Don't really love any of these guys. Who else is out there?

Heismanberg mentioned Mason Rudolph (OK State). His stock is shooting up.

Chad Kelly (Ole Miss) and Mitch Trubisky (UNC) are potential 2nd/3rd round prospects.

Baker Mayfield (OU) as a late round or UDFA dart throw
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on October 20, 2016, 09:13:38 PM
Don't really love any of these guys. Who else is out there?

Heismanberg mentioned Mason Rudolph (OK State). His stock is shooting up.

Chad Kelly (Ole Miss) and Mitch Trubisky (UNC) are potential 2nd/3rd round prospects.

Baker Mayfield (OU) as a late round or UDFA dart throw

I like Mason Rudolph a lot, but I'm also a fan of Taysom Hill, Davis Webb, and Brady Gustafson.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on October 20, 2016, 09:58:58 PM
I wouldn't touch Chad Kelly.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on October 20, 2016, 10:15:36 PM
I wouldn't touch Chad Kelly.

SBTG
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on October 20, 2016, 10:33:38 PM
SBTG
Gonna have to update this to SBTF
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Jumbo on October 21, 2016, 12:21:04 PM
I like Mason Rudolph a lot, but I'm also a fan of Taysom Hill, Davis Webb, and Brady Gustafson.


Taysom Hill looked awful yesterday
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on October 21, 2016, 05:48:44 PM
Taysom Hill looked awful yesterday
Not a big Taysom Hill fan when it comes to the NFL. He's 26 years old, has had major injuries that ended his season each of the last two seasons, and he hasn't played well enough for me to overlook his age and his injuries. He's older than Geno Smith who has been in the NFL four years already.

If we're going QB, and we're not going in round 1, I'd much prefer Webb or Rudolph. But Webb comes from Texas Tech/Cal - he'd be another guy we'd have to sit on the bench while he gets used to the NFL.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on October 21, 2016, 05:55:29 PM
McGlinchey 2017

I prefer Robinson  but I'd take either in a heartbeat

OR a trade down for McCaffery or Cook then draft a ton of OL and a ILB if the value is right
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on October 21, 2016, 05:56:22 PM
Then again McGlinchey can still tack on another 20 or25 lbs

Like I said , either would be glorious
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on October 21, 2016, 10:46:47 PM
Not a big Taysom Hill fan when it comes to the NFL. He's 26 years old, has had major injuries that ended his season each of the last two seasons, and he hasn't played well enough for me to overlook his age and his injuries. He's older than Geno Smith who has been in the NFL four years already.

I didn't say I liked him with a high draft pick.  I just prefer him over extremely overrated prospects like Watson and Kaaya. 

Geno Smith hasn't learned excrement in the NFL, so who cares how long he's been in the league?  He's excrement. 

Quote
But Webb comes from Texas Tech/Cal - he'd be another guy we'd have to sit on the bench while he gets used to the NFL.

I don't think that really matters in certain schemes.  Gailey is running a true spread offense.  Obviously, I'd want any rookie to sit for a while, but Webb and Rudolph are great fits in this current offense.

Not sure how long Gailey will be around if this keeps up though. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 07, 2016, 10:22:48 AM
I wouldn't touch Chad Kelly.

Torn ACL
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 07, 2016, 10:24:26 AM
Charlie Campbell (retard) just mocked Mitch Trubisky to us at #6.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 07, 2016, 10:41:01 AM
....and Christian McCaffery to New England at 32.

DIAFF
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: AlioTheFool on November 07, 2016, 11:04:24 AM
Charlie Campbell (retard) just mocked Mitch Trubisky to us at #6.

Not knowing anything about him, I just read this: http://www.scout.com/college/north-carolina/story/1724202-trubisky-raising-the-standard (http://www.scout.com/college/north-carolina/story/1724202-trubisky-raising-the-standard).

Is he really that good? If so, why would he last to the 6th pick? Also, I'm starting to wonder if the Jets are even going to pick as low as 6.

Here's the current order for teams with the same number of wins or less:

#    Team                    Rec.    Rec. %    SoS %
1    Cleveland Browns    0-9    0.000    0.531
2    San Francisco 49ers    1-7    0.125    0.508
3    Chicago Bears            2-6    0.250    0.511
4    Jacksonville Jaguars    2-6    0.250    0.537
5    New York Jets            3-6    0.333    0.492
6    LA Rams (Titans pick)    3-5    0.375    0.480
7    Tampa Bay Buccaneers    3-5    0.375    0.531
8    Carolina Panthers    3-5    0.375    0.535
9    Arizona Cardinals    3-4-1    0.429    0.472
10    Cincinnati Bengals    3-4-1    0.429    0.496
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on November 07, 2016, 05:42:38 PM
Charlie Campbell (retard) just mocked Mitch Trubisky to us at #6.

probably the best QB in the draft right now
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: mj2sexay on November 08, 2016, 12:39:02 AM
probably the best QB in the draft right now

Without a doubt, but he's still a late first/early second type prospect in a normal draft imho. Need and position will put him in the top 10.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on November 08, 2016, 05:28:46 AM
Without a doubt, but he's still a late first/early second type prospect in a normal draft imho. Need and position will put him in the top 10.

We don't know that yet.  Trubisky just didn't have the hype at the beginning of the year because this is his first year as a starter.

He has a cannon and he's smart with the football.  The rise is going to happen partially because the QB class isn't very strong, but also because he's the best draft eligible prospect at the position in the college football right now.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on November 08, 2016, 05:15:51 PM
We don't know that yet.  Trubisky just didn't have the hype at the beginning of the year because this is his first year as a starter.

He has a cannon and he's smart with the football.  The rise is going to happen partially because the QB class isn't very strong, but also because he's the best draft eligible prospect at the position in the college football right now.

I was about to start rallying for the kid after last week. Not much to add , this sums it up perfectly .

I love how he sees the field and his decisiveness with throws . Great arm too. I've seen him throw into some tight windows and hit people in stride routinely .

Likely the only guy I'd cate to see them take at QB.

I would've been happy with Prescott in the 4th . Not going to act like I thought he'd be this good out the gate though

Passing on Carr is cry worthy at this stage . Again , a guy I'd have been happy with in the 1st , but not like I campaigned for him .

Good call
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on November 10, 2016, 04:32:49 PM
FIU's Jonnu Smith, a decent mid-late round tight end prospect with some athleticism, is out for the season after his pregnant girlfriend poured boiling water on him.
http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/college/conference-usa/florida-international-university/article113860813.html
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Libero_2 on November 25, 2016, 05:43:10 PM
Who the hell is this Hunt kid at HB for Toledo? Dude is just carrying Western Michigan people all over the field tonight.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Johnny English on November 25, 2016, 06:24:01 PM
I watched Trubisky for the first time today and was pretty unimpressed. Granted it's only one game but some of his throws were really wayward under little or no pressure.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 25, 2016, 08:52:28 PM
I watched Trubisky for the first time today and was pretty unimpressed. Granted it's only one game but some of his throws were really wayward under little or no pressure.
I came away with the same impresssion today.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on November 25, 2016, 10:32:54 PM
I watched Trubisky for the first time today and was pretty unimpressed. Granted it's only one game but some of his throws were really wayward under little or no pressure.

That's just how bad this QB class is.  He's a first year starter with a lot of talent and pro potential. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on November 26, 2016, 08:28:27 AM
That's just how bad this QB class is.  He's a first year starter with a lot of talent and pro potential.
load up on oline talent next year...tank for Lamar in 2018.

bam. profit.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on November 26, 2016, 09:03:16 AM
load up on oline talent next year...tank for Lamar in 2018.

bam. profit.

2018's QB class is gonna be nice

Sam Darnold Da Goat
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on November 28, 2016, 03:10:23 PM
Can't wait to get super excited about the draft only for it to somehow turn out worse than the regular season
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: JFIF on November 28, 2016, 04:50:30 PM
And what do you know? A bunch of great defensive lineman at the top of the draft.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: JFIF on November 28, 2016, 04:56:36 PM
Dalvin Cook is going to be a great pro.  I wouldn't mind if we went cornerback though. Quincy Wilson or Teez Tabor are both really good.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on November 28, 2016, 06:18:51 PM
Can't wait to get super excited about the draft only for it to somehow turn out worse than the regular season

Diaf

And what do you know? A bunch of great defensive lineman at the top of the draft.

You as well

Dalvin Cook is going to be a great pro.  I wouldn't mind if we went cornerback though. Quincy Wilson or Teez Tabor are both really good.

Ok have an extinguisher handy, you redeemed yourself a tad. lol
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: casman02 on November 28, 2016, 08:31:37 PM
Tim May ‏@TIM_MAYsports  6h6 hours ago
Ohio State pick-six king @MalikHooker24 tells me he's "100 percent sure" he'll be back next year. https://shar.es/18q5aG

Number one safety, but plenty of time for him to change his mind
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on November 29, 2016, 06:15:45 AM
Dalvin Cook is going to be a great pro.  I wouldn't mind if we went cornerback though. Quincy Wilson or Teez Tabor are both really good.

I want Dalvin Cook or Adoree' Jackson

It's a great year for running backs and corners, so hopefully we land some talent. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on November 29, 2016, 06:24:42 AM
I don't know if we're bad enough to land Mitch Trubisky, but he's #1 on my list for this team right now. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on November 29, 2016, 07:53:53 AM
I want Cook. I'd be fine with Trubisky or Jackson, but I truly want Cook. I had him rated higher than Zeke and Fournette . Kid is going to be special . We need CB and LT most, but Cook will make some team very happy. 

My guess is Trubisky ends up going to CLE.

Best RB FSU has ever produced .
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on November 29, 2016, 08:18:37 AM
I don't have him over Zeke.  Zeke is one of the best RB prospects of all time. 

I do have him over Leonard Fournette though.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on November 29, 2016, 08:30:23 AM
I have Cook rated as a better prospect than Blair Thomas if the Jets take him, if another team takes him, he's rated higher than Barry Sanders.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on November 29, 2016, 08:35:21 AM
#McGlincheyTrain2017


Maybe Puck can convince him to enter the draft with a schmoke and a pancake. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on November 29, 2016, 08:40:32 AM
#McGlincheyTrain2017


Maybe Puck can convince him to enter the draft with a schmoke and a pancake. 

I am too busy trying to convince Derek Carr to enter the draft.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: JFIF on November 29, 2016, 03:00:16 PM
I don't know if we're bad enough to land Mitch Trubisky, but he's #1 on my list for this team right now. 

I would be really happy with this, alone for the fact that I think drafting as many good QB prospects as possible is worth it even it fails as long as you continue to try and get that QB and don't meander too long on trying to make a QB work. Maybe it's a little Sixer-ish, but it works better in football because of how important the QB has become.

I guess I'm just sick of teams getting franchise QBs why we always have false hope and spare parts. Might as well fail until we get it right without making Browns like bad decisions.

I really like Trubisky too but part of me thinks it might be too early. What's the precedent for 1 year starters getting drafted and then playing well? I don't know the answer to that.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on November 29, 2016, 03:34:47 PM


I really like Trubisky too but part of me thinks it might be too early. What's the precedent for 1 year starters getting drafted and then playing well? I don't know the answer to that.

I'm sure it's not great, but most QB success rates are gonna look pretty shitty unless you add a ton of qualifiers.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on November 29, 2016, 05:26:19 PM
Trade back, draft all the offensive linemen ever.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: d sw0rdz on November 29, 2016, 05:46:22 PM
I really like Trubisky too but part of me thinks it might be too early. What's the precedent for 1 year starters getting drafted and then playing well? I don't know the answer to that.

wasn't sanchez a 1 year starter at USC before being drafted
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on November 30, 2016, 12:37:42 AM
wasn't sanchez a 1 year starter at USC before being drafted

Yes
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on November 30, 2016, 06:46:47 AM
Cam Newton only had one year of starting experience in college as well. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: JFIF on November 30, 2016, 08:17:21 AM
I knew Cam was, but I didn't include him because he's an outlier due to being the most physically gifted QB prospect we've ever seen.

If we're in a position to get Trubisky I say do it, but with tempered expectations. From what I've seen I really like his accuracy, but I haven't watched enough of him to comment on much else. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on November 30, 2016, 09:38:10 AM
I don't have him over Zeke.  Zeke is one of the best RB prospects of all time. 

I do have him over Leonard Fournette though.

I have him over Zeke but barely . I think Zeke might be more complete by proxy of size alone. I think Cook is the most dynamic though .

He's supposedly up to 215 now , but no telling if he will show up to the combine and carry that weight through a season

You know I wanted him bad last year , I just want a bona-fide playmaker for once.  Cook is exactly that.  He won't be afforded the luxury of the DAL OL though lol.

Cook and Zeke over Fournette for sure .

McCaffery needs to be utilized a la Westbrook in limiting his total carries yet utilizing him in the passing game . He's still a stud though.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on November 30, 2016, 09:42:36 AM
I knew Cam was, but I didn't include him because he's an outlier due to being the most physically gifted QB prospect we've ever seen.

If we're in a position to get Trubisky I say do it, but with tempered expectations. From what I've seen I really like his accuracy, but I haven't watched enough of him to comment on much else.

His arm is strong . He used to just hit guys in stride on short to intrrmilediate , but now as more experience gets under his belt, he's proving he's got the arm to make every possible throw.

There was a game where he hits a WR on a corner route in the back of an end zone.  The DB turned his head in time but he got the ball there so fast where only the WR could get it there was nothing he could've done  he drove it 25 or 30 in the air with just enough air , and still a high velocity throw


Granted he is a Lil late to sense pressure at times , but he's a first year starter.  He's not awe inspiring , but he's as solid as solid gets with a good arm and vision. Most of his negatives are things that usually fix with more experience
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on November 30, 2016, 09:43:27 AM
Point in case , Hackenberg n petty are not reason enough to scoff at Trubisky if he's on the board
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on November 30, 2016, 11:54:28 AM
Trubisky is such a bust name though
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on November 30, 2016, 12:30:25 PM
Trubisky is such a bust name though
Trubustsky
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: steves850 on November 30, 2016, 01:38:22 PM
Trubustsky

freak IT! He already has the nickname, he's DOOMED!
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on November 30, 2016, 01:47:11 PM
I'm still anti-running back in the 1st round, but this is one hell of a running back class. I want Adoree.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on November 30, 2016, 02:04:56 PM
I'm still anti-running back in the 1st round, but this is one hell of a running back class. I want Adoree.

I want to see what we get for Sheldon in a trade

I want Adoree too but Dalvin Cook would be fun.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on November 30, 2016, 03:02:12 PM
We have too many holes to fill for me to worry about which position gets taken where. Right now Duff (or a future replacement) needs to draft BPA and hit on at least 3 or 4 starters for the next few drafts.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: JFIF on November 30, 2016, 03:15:55 PM
Trubisky is such a bust name though

Gronkowski has kind of ruined that paradigm.

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: JFIF on November 30, 2016, 03:16:19 PM
We have too many holes to fill for me to worry about which position gets taken where. Right now Duff (or a future replacement) needs to draft BPA and hit on at least 3 or 4 starters for the next few drafts.

What if the BPA is a defensive tackle or defensive lineman?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: JFIF on November 30, 2016, 03:16:42 PM
At some point you have to go BPA not a defensive lineman

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on November 30, 2016, 03:21:12 PM
Gronkowski has kind of ruined that paradigm.
Yeah but he's a TE. Mitch Trubisky sounds like a LB from the 50s.
What if the BPA is a defensive tackle or defensive lineman?
I mean, within reason. BPA with an eye for need but don't force a pick because it's your biggest hole on the roster. That's how we end up with guys like Hackenberg (jew) or Milliner
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Dreamers on November 30, 2016, 06:57:50 PM
I still stand by my ratings of 2 months ago.  Only 5 guys worth talking about as even 2nd rounder and Im not sure any of them declare. 

Brad Kaaya - May not be a blue chip guy but IMO has still shown more pro ability and upside then any of the top 5.
Mitch Trubisky - Yeah Im still not impressed but he does look the roll of a 1st round starter.
Deshaun Watson  - Honestly I feel he just lacks high end upside.  Physically and technically he just doesnt blow me away in any area really.  Has a an all star cast around him so I think using the numbers argument isnt a strong one.  He is a 1st rounder but IMO smells of bust. 
DeShone Kizer -  Clausen 2.0 IMO.  Has all the tools I question his attitude.  Needs to show he can lead a team to a win 1st.  Kiper hyped that derriere douche as a 1st rounder and I see the same happening here.  He is 2nd round talent.   I actually like Wilton Speight more who isnt getting any talk.   
Mason Rudolph - I can see him getting a surge still but I would like to see him get anther year in college.
Kelly, Lunt, Webb, Russell, and who ever else from the jr class that declares falls short. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: JFIF on November 30, 2016, 07:03:06 PM
Dreamers likes Brad Kaaya. That's all I need to know that my existing opinion about Kaaya is correct.

Thoroughly mediocre quarterback with a good arm and nothing more. Holds on to the ball too long, has no signature wins at Miami despite having pros at the skill positions. His offensive line has stunk but he hasn't shown that he can be a great college quarterback even when playing against subpar teams. He's not going to be a good pro. He's lucky to even be compared to Stephen Morris at this point.

That's Brock Osweiler "he looks the part" type nonsense.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: JFIF on November 30, 2016, 07:06:51 PM
I'm really intrigued by Corey Davis.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on November 30, 2016, 07:17:34 PM
I'm really intrigued by Corey Davis.

He can really play. 

Mike Williams from Clemson would be an awesome player to develop behind Brandon Marshall.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on December 01, 2016, 08:48:58 AM
He can really play. 

Mike Williams from Clemson would be an awesome player to develop behind Brandon Marshall.

Boatload of potential. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 01, 2016, 12:21:12 PM
but this is one hell of a running back class.

This is why I'm anti RB. Not in the top 5. If we somehow slide back to somewhere  around 15-20 and take Cook/Fournette I'm fine with that.

We could potentially get McCaffery/Foreman/Chubb/Perine/Gallman/Freeman in the 2nd.

Then again, so far there isn't a single prospect in this draft that I would be mad at passing over at 5 for Dalvin Cook.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 01, 2016, 12:27:16 PM
We could potentially get McCaffery/Foreman/Chubb/Perine/Gallman/Freeman in the 2nd.

Hopefully we can get at least a second for Sheldon Richardson. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on December 01, 2016, 01:14:33 PM
This is why I'm anti RB. Not in the top 5. If we somehow slide back to somewhere  around 15-20 and take Cook/Fournette I'm fine with that.

We could potentially get McCaffery/Foreman/Chubb/Perine/Gallman/Freeman in the 2nd.

Then again, so far there isn't a single prospect in this draft that I would be mad at passing over at 5 for Dalvin Cook.
That's my thing. We can get a quality RB after Day 1, and this should be a deep class. I still think Nick Chubb can be a great back. I like Alvin Kamara a lot. Kareem Hunt could be a steal, too.

I totally understand people who look at our offense and that we haven't drafted offense in Round 1 in years and want an RB. But unless we're taking QB or OL, I'm completely fine waiting on offense. And QB and OL don't look like great positions right now. I'm not against a WR, but I like some of our young guys we currently have.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 01, 2016, 01:16:22 PM
That's my thing. We can get a quality RB after Day 1, and this should be a deep class. I still think Nick Chubb can be a great back. I like Alvin Kamara a lot. Kareem Hunt could be a steal, too.

If Kamara enters the draft, he's my #3 RB. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on December 01, 2016, 02:32:03 PM
Hopefully we can get at least a second for Sheldon Richardson. 

What if they trade Mo?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: steves850 on December 01, 2016, 02:41:35 PM
Gronkowski has kind of ruined that paradigm.



You post this, one day later Gronk is having back surgery...
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on December 01, 2016, 07:38:07 PM
This is why I'm anti RB. Not in the top 5. If we somehow slide back to somewhere  around 15-20 and take Cook/Fournette I'm fine with that.

We could potentially get McCaffery/Foreman/Chubb/Perine/Gallman/Freeman in the 2nd.

Then again, so far there isn't a single prospect in this draft that I would be mad at passing over at 5 for Dalvin Cook.

Perine has an awful sounding name, I'll pass.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 01, 2016, 09:15:17 PM
Perine has an awful sounding name, I'll pass.

Perine Train '16
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Dreamers on December 02, 2016, 12:11:22 AM
Dreamers likes Brad Kaaya. That's all I need to know that my existing opinion about Kaaya is correct.

Thoroughly mediocre quarterback with a good arm and nothing more. Holds on to the ball too long, has no signature wins at Miami despite having pros at the skill positions. His offensive line has stunk but he hasn't shown that he can be a great college quarterback even when playing against subpar teams. He's not going to be a good pro. He's lucky to even be compared to Stephen Morris at this point.

That's Brock Osweiler "he looks the part" type nonsense.

It just isnt a good class IMO.  Trubisky is #1 IMO only because he is the only 4th year of the top 5.  He looks better because he has had more time to absorb it.  I dont get Kizer at all but he is getting more overall talk then anyone because he "looks the part".  Brock never looked the part FYI.  Every scout seems to think Watson is a 2nd rounder and Im hard pressed to disagree.  Kaaya and Rudolph are simply the safe picks.  Rudolph is more the Brock/Flacco tank guy thou late 1st at best.  Kaaya just looks like the a school QB.  He doesnt have a lot around him but is very accurate and makes good reads.  Yeah nothing sexy about his game at all I agree but he gets it done and has some good training already.  The only difference in those guys and your next 5 Webb, Kelly, Russell, Beathard, and Lunt is they have a higher ceiling.  Reality is current talent wise there isnt a huge separation.   I hope we dont jump on a early guy this one.  Id rather see what Hack has who would likely be the 1st or 2nd guy here if he had stayed.    If they can hype Kizer, Hack is right in there. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on December 02, 2016, 11:43:39 AM
2 or 3 more back surgeries and Gronk will be a Jet.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: d sw0rdz on December 02, 2016, 03:43:10 PM
2 or 3 more back surgeries and Gronk will be a Jet.

or a new york met
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Dreamers on December 02, 2016, 08:39:33 PM
2 or 3 more back surgeries and Gronk will be a Jet.
Would still be the best TE we have had in over a decade.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Tommy on December 02, 2016, 09:10:30 PM

Would still be the best TE we have had in over a decade.

Anthony Becht?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on December 02, 2016, 09:31:02 PM
Anthony Becht?

Doug Jolley
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Sir on December 03, 2016, 10:54:03 AM
Our draft position is interesting at the moment.  We should really be looking at QB or offensive line; but more than likely the top QBs will be gone and I don't really feel comfortable with any O-lineman in the top 10 at the moment.  In addition, Tim Williams is interesting as that dynamic pass rusher we have been looking for since 'Nam but those off the field issues make him a bit risky.

That leaves the 2 RBs (Cook and Fournette) and Peppers if we're looking at 5.  Honestly, it's about damn time we add a dynamic playmaker to our offense via the draft and either of those 2 would definitely do it.  But on the other hand I'm a huge Peppers fan and will be pissed if we pass on him and he ends up as a defensive all over the field dynamo for the next 10-12 years.  Tough call.

I don't like any of the top CBs enough to draft in the top 7-8 picks.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 03, 2016, 12:49:05 PM
Our draft position is interesting at the moment.  We should really be looking at QB or offensive line; but more than likely the top QBs will be gone and I don't really feel comfortable with any O-lineman in the top 10 at the moment.  In addition, Tim Williams is interesting as that dynamic pass rusher we have been looking for since 'Nam but those off the field issues make him a bit risky.

That leaves the 2 RBs (Cook and Fournette) and Peppers if we're looking at 5.  Honestly, it's about damn time we add a dynamic playmaker to our offense via the draft and either of those 2 would definitely do it.  But on the other hand I'm a huge Peppers fan and will be pissed if we pass on him and he ends up as a defensive all over the field dynamo for the next 10-12 years.  Tough call.

I don't like any of the top CBs enough to draft in the top 7-8 picks.

Peppers, Lee, and Pryor would be fun to watch.  They'd be flying all over the place.

I think this is the year to load up on DBs and RBs.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on December 03, 2016, 02:50:03 PM
Peppers, Lee, and Pryor would be fun to watch.  They'd be flying all over the place.

I think this is the year to load up on DBs and RBs.
I agree. Gotta go with the strength of this class, especially since we need both.

Joe Mixon might not be a good person, but he's one hell of a running back prospect.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 03, 2016, 08:10:58 PM
We need Jordan Leggett or Mike Williams or both
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on December 03, 2016, 08:21:58 PM
saquon Barkley time
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on December 03, 2016, 08:33:05 PM
might be Desmond King time
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 03, 2016, 08:42:56 PM
Terrell Edmunds is a savage.  I don't think he'll enter this draft, but if he does, he needs to be New York Jet.

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on December 03, 2016, 08:51:03 PM
I'm wary about taking a running back in the top 5 if we're rebuilding. Shelf life on running backs is generally not great, I feel like that's a move you make when your roster is more complete. 2nd round or later is fine
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Tommy on December 03, 2016, 10:44:33 PM
We should draft Morgan Williams somewhere in the 4th, if the falls that far.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 05, 2016, 10:53:40 PM
Sooooo DL? Cause our DL kinda sucks rn tbh
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on December 05, 2016, 10:59:29 PM
Sooooo DL? Cause our DL kinda sucks rn tbh
we need everything
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on December 05, 2016, 11:05:27 PM
Punter in 1st, kicker in 2nd, long snapper in the 3rd.  Ditka the rest for a TE.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: AlioTheFool on December 06, 2016, 09:19:59 AM
Manish was tweeting his article repeatedly all day yesterday that the only untouchable player on the roster is Williams.

I hate when Manish is right.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 06, 2016, 10:21:00 AM
Manish was tweeting his article repeatedly all day yesterday that the only untouchable player on the roster is Williams.

I hate when Manish is right.

I'm interested to see what happens with Wilkerson.  I wonder if we'll try to unload him...

Ready for Sheldon Richardson to go more than ever after last night. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on December 06, 2016, 10:21:25 AM
Manish was tweeting his article repeatedly all day yesterday that the only untouchable player on the roster is Williams.

I hate when Manish is right.
I would add Enunwa, Lee, and Jenkins
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: AlioTheFool on December 06, 2016, 11:27:34 AM
I'm interested to see what happens with Wilkerson.  I wonder if we'll try to unload him...

Ready for Sheldon Richardson to go more than ever after last night. 

I'd love to see Wilkerson traded. I don't think anyone's going to take his contract on now though. Not when he's mailing it in like everyone he's calling out.

Even though I'd already accepted Sheldon being gone weeks ago, I never was looking forward to it until last night.

I would add Enunwa, Lee, and Jenkins

I definitely agree on Enunwa and Lee. I haven't noticed Jenkins enough to care one way or the other.

Other guys I'd keep:
Winters
McClendon
Carpenter

Only trade if I get something reasonably good in return:
Decker
Marshall

Ask to take a paycut but keep:
Mangold

I'd keep Pryor, Wes Johnson, Powell, and Forte too but if anyone asks for any of them, I'd pack their bags.

Off the top of my head there isn't another player I'd be unhappy to see go.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on December 06, 2016, 04:17:17 PM
I still wonder if Wilkerson hasn't fully healed from the broken leg/ankle.  Sheldon has no excuse.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 07, 2016, 09:33:48 AM
A player that not a lot of people are talking about for us is Jamal Adams at LSU.

Safety isn't a huge concern, but he's one of the best players in this draft and he's the kind of player you can build around. 

If Bowles is still here, he loves LSU DBs. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on December 07, 2016, 10:10:58 AM
This team is gonna be turned over almost entirely minus a handful of players so I don't mind going BPA outright. Obviously I'd prefer it to not be a DL or SS but if the opportunity presents itself so be it.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: JFIF on December 07, 2016, 01:21:12 PM
This team is gonna be turned over almost entirely minus a handful of players so I don't mind going BPA outright. Obviously I'd prefer it to not be a DL or SS but if the opportunity presents itself so be it.

The best BPA at 4 or 5 is very likely going to be a DT or DE.

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 07, 2016, 01:24:16 PM
The best BPA at 4 or 5 is very likely going to be a DT or DE.



Jabrill Peppers and Jamal Adams could be BPA if Garrett and Allen are gone.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on December 07, 2016, 04:43:44 PM
Jabrill Peppers and Jamal Adams could be BPA if Garrett and Allen are gone.

Peppers , Lee, Pryor ?

Very freaking tempting
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: AlioTheFool on December 08, 2016, 03:22:40 PM
As much as it sucks, we're kind of in the market for a safety. We can certainly improve from Gilchrist and while Pryor is one of the few guys on this team I still like, he's on what, his third concussion in as many years? His career is going to be unfortunately short.

There really isn't a position on this team that would be a bad draft. It should be straight-up BPA with every pick.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: casman02 on December 11, 2016, 11:46:11 AM
I do not think I have a preference yet. Just too many personnel decisions between now and April and a decent amount question marks that hopefully get answered. I am assuming we will be picking in the top 7 and I would make the folliwng decisions:
Cuts: Clady, Breno, Henderson, Folk, Gilchrist
Trade: Richardson
That would leave us with about 30 million in cap room and we obviously have other moves that can be made
My position by position thoughts on the draft right now.

QB: Unless they love a prospect, I am totally okay with them not drafting a QB this year. I am curious what Petty and Hackenberg can become and am not of the mindset that you need to take a QB every year. I also like the QB class of 2018 a lot more than 2017 so if we miss out this year, we can grab one early the following year.

RB: I like both Fournette and Cook, but we will have both Powell and Forte back next year. Plus there is some pretty solid talent in the middle/late rounds that may be a better value.

WR: One of 2 positions I do not want us to take. Even if we lose Decker or Marshall, I imagine we can still go into next year with one of them, Quincy, Anderson, and 2 of Peake/J Marshall/Smith (If he shows anything in the next four weeks). I think it would still be a solid receiving corps.

TE: We need one. Hopefully won't take one in the top 10, but I think I want one somewhere.

OL: I really wish there was an elite tackle or two in the draft as I really want us to go OT. Sadly there may not be one worth the value. Maybe McGlinchey will declare and show some athleticism. I would like to go OT in rounds 2-4 if we do not take one in the first. We can go into next year with Shell/Ijalana at RT and a draft pick at LT, but that is not comforting. I think we should resign Winters and Guard will be okay with him and Carpenter. Who knows what happens with Mangold. We can release him and save nearly 10 million with no dead money, but I do like the player and think he can contribute. He may not be worth the price tag, but I would like him back at less cost.

DL: Other position I do not want us to draft. Even with trading Richardson, we are still okay here.

ILB: Lee will be here for a few years and is solid. Harris is okay and may worth it to bring back on the 6.5 million. Maybe find a project here later in the draft who can learn behind Harris for a year and take his job next year.

OLB: Pass rusher desperately still needed. Neither Jenkins or Mauldin can be that guy so I would be okay with finding an edge rusher early. I do not think we will get Garret, but Williams and Barnett may be possibilities in the top 10 and there are some talented guys in round 2 that pique my interest. This may be the year we take a pass rusher early(?)

Secondary: The most interesting position to me because it has been so bad this year. Will Revis be back at corner? Moved to safety (IMO eliminating both Adams and Peppers as potential picks)? Cut? Will Juston Burris show anything or even play in the final four weeks? No matter what I think we need a change next to Pryor and at least to draft one CB in the top 4 rounds.

Other Positions: Nah


I think I have us using too many draft picks, but what the hell. It is still early so lets see how the next 4 games go..... (I imagine not well)
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on December 11, 2016, 12:11:13 PM
A lot will change between now and draft day, so there isn't too much point in getting specific other than just needs in general.

I'm interested to see if they keep Decker instead of Marshall.  That is assuming he can heal up and play next year.  I'm thinking Enunwa is the future here at WR (hopefully).  I feel like Decker would be a better pairing with him than Marshall.  We've seen life without Decker this year.  He opens up a lot of the other guys as well as getting open himself.  Marshall does also.  Decker is a little younger and under contract for 2017 and 2018 if he's worth it. 

I'm fine with either one, but I almost don't want to keep both because it will stunt the youth movement at WR and create a backlog there.

As far as the draft, I'm sure we will find a way to win a game or 2 of the last 4 and slip out of the top 5.  Someone valuable will be around at our pick when you have as many holes as we do.  Also, the ever-elusive trade down may be an option too.  We probably should.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Sir on December 11, 2016, 12:28:35 PM
Adding one of Rueben Foster/Jabrill Peppers/Takkarist Mckinley/Teez Tabor I suppose wouldn't be the worst thing in the world...just disappointing that we're gonna actually be up in the top 5 in a year with no stud O-Linemen/QBs....
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 11, 2016, 03:25:51 PM
Adding one of Rueben Foster/Jabrill Peppers/Takkarist Mckinley/Teez Tabor I suppose wouldn't be the worst thing in the world...just disappointing that we're gonna actually be up in the top 5 in a year with no stud O-Linemen/QBs....

Peppers and Foster are players you can build a defense around. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on December 12, 2016, 03:50:24 PM
Peppers and Foster are players you can build a defense around.

Do you play peppers at FS? I think SS is his best fit , but he's fast enough to play FS next to Pryor

McGlinchey is no 1 on my list if he declares (looking less likely) then Cook. With the injury to Gilchrist though , Peppers becomes almost a no Brainer if he's available
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 12, 2016, 04:01:42 PM
Do you play peppers at FS? I think SS is his best fit , but he's fast enough to play FS next to Pryor

I think he has to be used to Honey Badger - free, strong, nickel
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on December 12, 2016, 04:07:24 PM
I think he has to be used to Honey Badger - free, strong, nickel

Makes sense.  I bet he comes to the combine at 5 ft 11, 195

I think he's 6 ft 1 205 listed at Michigan.  But he definitely reminds me of Mathieu
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on December 12, 2016, 04:12:22 PM
Really would hate to pass on cook though.  I know I'll get slack as An FSU fan. I just think he's special.

Guy is by far the best RB to come out of FSU.

You had him right behind Elliot I have him barely above


Like I said , elliot is likely more complete by proxy of size alone

I told my Falcons fan friend Freeman would be a steal for them .

Watching him fulfill his potential in the NFL makes me drool at what Cook can do for a franchise.

It'll be hard for us to not come away with a good player . I just know Cook will make some team extremely happy .

Do you think McCaffery or Fournette hit the early 2nd Rd


I could see McCaffery definitely being there .

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 16, 2016, 08:55:58 PM
James Madison RB Khalid Abdullah is a great player.  Another name to add to the loaded position group. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on December 22, 2016, 11:35:38 PM
Cook is a better prospect than Fournette, but I still prefer to wait at RB. Give me a defensive back or a pass rusher.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 23, 2016, 07:35:58 AM
Cook is a better prospect than Fournette, but I still prefer to wait at RB. Give me a defensive back or a pass rusher.

Tim Williams will most likely be BPA when we're up.  I think DB and RB are the deepest groups, so we can afford to wait for both.

D'Onta Foreman would be awesome in the second round.  He'd compliment Powell well. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MexJetinBcn on December 23, 2016, 07:51:04 AM
I found this today and I remember having read it a couple of years back, it's very interesting.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/no-team-can-beat-the-draft/
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Johnny English on December 23, 2016, 12:09:05 PM
I found this today and I remember having read it a couple of years back, it's very interesting.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/no-team-can-beat-the-draft/
It's interesting but it appears to contain a fundamental flaw, which is that ot assumes that a player's performance is solely a function of his skill level and ignores the impact that coaching has on getting them to play up to their abilities.

Teams like Green Bay and Pittsburgh don't just consistently draft well, they also make the most of what they draft.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on December 23, 2016, 12:37:52 PM
It's interesting but it appears to contain a fundamental flaw, which is that ot assumes that a player's performance is solely a function of his skill level and ignores the impact that coaching has on getting them to play up to their abilities.

Teams like Green Bay and Pittsburgh don't just consistently draft well, they also make the most of what they draft.

You could probably add Seattle to that list, they have had a bunch of really good drafts.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 23, 2016, 01:02:03 PM
Look at our drafts starting in 2000.

They are disgusting. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MexJetinBcn on December 23, 2016, 01:30:35 PM
I also think teams that have a system in place for years know much better the kind of players they need to draft. All Pittsburgh, Green Bay and Seattle have enjoyed a great deal of continuity. Belichick whiffs on a lot of players but most of his true stars have been either drafted by him or acquired when they were very young.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on December 23, 2016, 03:29:52 PM
Look at our drafts starting in 2000.

They are disgusting. 

Come on man every GM has a bust draft look at Tannenbaum 2/3rds of his were busts, so that makes him an awesome GM.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Dreamers on December 24, 2016, 04:39:03 PM
Look at our drafts starting in 2000.

They are disgusting.

Compare to teams like Philly or Cleveland our drafts look fantastic.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: casman02 on December 24, 2016, 09:47:37 PM
I am leaning Safety/CB in the first 2 rounds. Adams/Peppers and whatever CB falls to the second (I mean all of Humphrey, Tabor, Wilson, King, Jackson, Tankersley, Jones, probably a few that I am missing can't all go in the top 37ish picks, can they?)
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 25, 2016, 07:02:22 AM
I am leaning Safety/CB in the first 2 rounds. Adams/Peppers and whatever CB falls to the second (I mean all of Humphrey, Tabor, Wilson, King, Jackson, Tankersley, Jones, probably a few that I am missing can't all go in the top 37ish picks, can they?)

Hopefully we'll have another second after trading Richardson
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: casman02 on December 25, 2016, 07:26:45 AM
Hopefully we'll have another second after trading Richardson

I was thinking a third at best maybe even a four. I go ot and te in that order with the next two picks (ideally)
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on December 25, 2016, 11:45:36 AM
Tim Williams will most likely be BPA when we're up.  I think DB and RB are the deepest groups, so we can afford to wait for both.

D'Onta Foreman would be awesome in the second round.  He'd compliment Powell well. 
If we go...

1. Tim Williams
2. Best available DB
3. Best available OT
4. Best available RB

I'll be completely on board, and I think it would match up with value (maybe flip 3 and 4).
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 26, 2016, 04:24:52 PM
If we go...

1. Tim Williams
2. Best available DB
3. Best available OT
4. Best available RB

I'll be completely on board, and I think it would match up with value (maybe flip 3 and 4).

RB class just got a little better today with Brian Hill and Jeremy McNichols declaring early.

Throwing money at Eric Berry would be interesting and it would fix our safety issue. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 27, 2016, 09:17:56 AM
Need to draft another QB this year. Petty is a dart throw at best and none of the veterans on the market do anything for us.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on December 27, 2016, 09:35:42 AM
RB class just got a little better today with Brian Hill and Jeremy McNichols declaring early.

Throwing money at Eric Berry would be interesting and it would fix our safety issue. 
It would also help solve a leadership and a defensive playmaking issue. It's hard to imagine him leaving KC, but it would be great to get him.

I like McNichols. Hill was a really nice college RB, but I didn't watch him closely enough to see how he'd translate to the NFL. I have a soft spot for Hill because he's won me money on several occasions in fantasy/gambling.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 27, 2016, 10:56:17 AM
I like McNichols. Hill was a really nice college RB, but I didn't watch him closely enough to see how he'd translate to the NFL. I have a soft spot for Hill because he's won me money on several occasions in fantasy/gambling.

Hill reminds me a lot of Jay Ajayi.  He could be a steal in the middle rounds.  I have him rated as a top five prospect at his position right now.

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 27, 2016, 10:59:14 AM
OT prospect to watch:  Martinas Rankin from Mississippi State

Great athlete and a borderline elite run blocker.  Might be more of a guard in the NFL though...
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: AlioTheFool on December 27, 2016, 11:33:13 AM
I no longer care what position we take in any round. As long as it's truly BPA when we pick. There isn't a single position on the team that can't be improved (I'm even including the supposedly "deep" positions of WR and DL).

Whether it's Maccagnan or someone else, the GM this spring has his hands full.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on December 27, 2016, 12:12:45 PM
I no longer care what position we take in any round. As long as it's truly BPA when we pick. There isn't a single position on the team that can't be improved (I'm even including the supposedly "deep" positions of WR and DL).

Whether it's Maccagnan or someone else, the GM this spring has his hands full.
Jabrill Peppers or bust.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on December 27, 2016, 12:22:57 PM
Jabrill Peppers or bust.
Gerbil peppers?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on December 27, 2016, 01:16:30 PM
Derrius Guice in 2018 please.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: casman02 on December 27, 2016, 07:14:01 PM
Any thoughts on Kendell Beckwith, LB, LSU? Looking at him, he was probably a day two prospect but tore his ACL late in the year. I would like to pick him up on day 3, let him sit a year recovering and learning from Harris and then teaming up with Lee in the middle in 2018 and beyond
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Shellder Richardson on December 28, 2016, 03:23:03 AM
Beckwith reminds me a lot of DH, bigger guys in the middle.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: insanity on December 28, 2016, 10:53:22 AM
Compare to teams like Philly or Cleveland our drafts look fantastic.
Bilal Powell
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on December 28, 2016, 12:07:34 PM
Gerbil peppers?
Brian Peppers
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 28, 2016, 09:12:25 PM
Jordan Willis might be a real possibility for us at 6
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Sir on December 29, 2016, 09:58:31 AM
Malik Hooker would be one of, if not the best defensive player in the draft if he decided to declare.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 29, 2016, 10:17:26 AM
Malik Hooker would be one of, if not the best defensive player in the draft if he decided to declare.

Even if he doesn't, this is still a loaded DB class. 

Jamal Adams might even be better than Hooker.  Bowles really needs to rebuild the secondary in this draft.  I actually like a lot of what I've seen from Juston Burris.  He should be able to help us for the next few years...hopefully longer. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: AlioTheFool on December 29, 2016, 10:30:01 AM
Even if he doesn't, this is still a loaded DB class. 

Jamal Adams might even be better than Hooker.  Bowles really needs to rebuild the secondary in this draft.  I actually like a lot of what I've seen from Juston Burris.  He should be able to help us for the next few years...hopefully longer. 

What's your take on Burris?

I've seen him make some good plays and I've seen some real head scratchers. For a while I thought he was just a streaky player, but I'm starting to think some of his problems were actually a product of the so-called "miscommunications" in the secondary.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on December 29, 2016, 10:31:37 AM
Malik Whore.  Draft him.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 29, 2016, 10:33:42 AM
What's your take on Burris?

I've seen him make some good plays and I've seen some real head scratchers. For a while I thought he was just a streaky player, but I'm starting to think some of his problems were actually a product of the so-called "miscommunications" in the secondary.

He's physical and he does a nice job tracking the football in the air.  His issue is that he isn't that fast, so he needs some help down the field.  But like I said, he's physical and a strong, which allows him to press well. 

I think he has the ability to be a #2 corner in this league but right now he's a rotational player there.  I'd take him over Buster Skrine every day of the week though. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: AlioTheFool on December 29, 2016, 10:42:40 AM
He's physical and he does a nice job tracking the football in the air.  His issue is that he isn't that fast, so he needs some help down the field.  But like I said, he's physical and a strong, which allows him to press well. 

I think he has the ability to be a #2 corner in this league but right now he's a rotational player there.  I'd take him over Buster Skrine every day of the week though. 

So then it is "miscommunications" that have been the problem. That makes me feel better about him.

Skrine is a huge disappointment. I'm not even sure he'd be good in the nickel anymore. He looks completely lost.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 29, 2016, 11:02:36 AM
I'm not even sure he'd be good in the nickel anymore. He looks completely lost.

He isn't a good nickel corner anymore.  He isn't even a good dime.  He interferes or holds on almost every target his way.  There's mind-numbingly stupid play from him in almost every game.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on December 29, 2016, 11:06:55 AM
Burris looks like he has potential to be a future starter but he needs to freak off with some of his celebrations
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on December 29, 2016, 12:41:42 PM
Burris looks like he has potential to be a future starter but he needs to freak off with some of his celebrations
Honestly, I don't care so much about celebrations, at least when you're a rookie. It's his first NFL playing time. "Act like you've been there before" doesn't really apply, since he hasn't been there before.

However, if he's Kyle Wilson fingerwagging after a QB overthrows a wide open receiver by 20 yards, then I'll be annoyed.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on December 29, 2016, 12:42:48 PM
Honestly, I don't care so much about celebrations, at least when you're a rookie. It's his first NFL playing time. "Act like you've been there before" doesn't really apply, since he hasn't been there before.

However, if he's Kyle Wilson fingerwagging after a QB overthrows a wide open receiver by 20 yards, then I'll be annoyed.
Yeah but when you're getting destroyed it's stupid to watch these guys dancing on the field for causing an incompletion
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: AlioTheFool on December 29, 2016, 12:51:06 PM
In most cases I agree to stop the worthless celebrations while getting your derriere kicked. In this season, it at least tells me a guy cares enough to put the effort into making a play.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on December 29, 2016, 12:55:54 PM
Yeah but when you're getting destroyed it's stupid to watch these guys dancing on the field for causing an incompletion
I don't know if I've seen a single corner in the league make a remotely decent play and not celebrate.  Every time.  It would refreshing to see someone make a play and do a quick, understated fistpump like a respectable white person.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: WW85 on December 29, 2016, 02:22:29 PM
He isn't a good nickel corner anymore.  He isn't even a good dime.  He interferes or holds on almost every target his way.  There's mind-numbingly stupid play from him in almost every game.

Jourdan Lewis, with our second rd pick, would a good candidate for Nickel.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 31, 2016, 02:00:04 PM
It would be nice to come out of this draft with one of Jake Butt, OJ Howard, Bucky Hodges, Evan Engram, Jordan Leggett.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 31, 2016, 02:05:15 PM
It would be nice to come out of this draft with one of Jake Butt, OJ Howard, Bucky Hodges, Evan Engram, Jordan Leggett.

or David Njoku from Miami

sounds like Jake Butt suffered a serious knee injury last night...sucks
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on January 07, 2017, 10:48:38 AM
The Jets need to go get Ben Boulware in the late rounds. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Libero_2 on January 07, 2017, 12:29:15 PM
The Jets need to go get Ben Boulware in the late rounds. 

I hate that mother fucker. He's a cheap shoting bastard on the field and I despise how he plays.

He's the kind of guy that you love if he's on your side, and you hate with a vengeance if he's on the other.

I hope he gets drafted to Seattle so we never have to deal with him
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on January 07, 2017, 01:59:52 PM
I hate that mother fucker. He's a cheap shoting bastard on the field and I despise how he plays.

He's the kind of guy that you love if he's on your side, and you hate with a vengeance if he's on the other.

I hope he gets drafted to Seattle so we never have to deal with him

I hope we draft him and he ends Brady's career
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on January 07, 2017, 03:39:03 PM
I hope we draft him and he ends Brady's career

Only after they trade Crappolo
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Shellder Richardson on January 08, 2017, 02:35:16 PM
The Jets need to go get Ben Boulware in the late rounds.

He and Wilkins really know how to get their hands dirty...
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on January 08, 2017, 02:37:58 PM
He and Wilkins really know how to get their hands dirty...

Jalen Hurts better keep 'em cliched tomorrow night
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on January 17, 2017, 12:50:18 PM
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000775479/article/daniel-jeremiahs-top-50-prospects-for-2017-nfl-draft

Probably a good starting point for everyone.  He loves him some Hooker.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on January 18, 2017, 08:50:28 AM
Jabrill Peppers at 33 on that big board. The more I think about it, the less I would want to consider him at 6. Too much risk when there are other elite prospects out there.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on January 18, 2017, 09:43:39 AM
Jabrill Peppers at 33 on that big board. The more I think about it, the less I would want to consider him at 6. Too much risk when there are other elite prospects out there.

Peppers would be a poor choice at 6 IMO, especially if Jamal Adams and Malik Hooker are on the board.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Sir on January 18, 2017, 10:35:03 AM
Peppers would be a poor choice at 6 IMO, especially if Jamal Adams and Malik Hooker are on the board.

The exciting thing about this dratt is that we should end up with a true game changing talent in one of Adams, hooker, foster or Barnett  [my favorite edge guy depending on his 40 and 3 cone besides Garrett of course).

The disappointing thong is that none of them know how to throw a god damn football.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on January 21, 2017, 10:10:51 AM
The exciting thing about this dratt is that we should end up with a true game changing talent in one of Adams, hooker, foster or Barnett  [my favorite edge guy depending on his 40 and 3 cone besides Garrett of course).

The disappointing thong is that none of them know how to throw a god damn football.

Barnett is a bad man.  He would be an awesome pick for us. 

Reuben Foster will become a huge possibility if we move on from David Harris.

Hooker is #1 on my board for us.  That kid has the ability to be the best free safety in the NFL. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Dreamers on January 21, 2017, 03:20:26 PM
Barnett is a bad man.  He would be an awesome pick for us. 

Reuben Foster will become a huge possibility if we move on from David Harris.

Hooker is #1 on my board for us.  That kid has the ability to be the best free safety in the NFL.

This is the reason I can see us finding someone willing to trade back.  The top 4 DEs are amazing here and Im not even sure any of them will be on the board at 6.  You have Carolina 2 spots back that have a HUGE need and know their options will be limited if they stay where they are.  Id love to move back add anther 2nd and draft Williams.  The more I look at this draft the more I love Williams as our pick.  Even if SD takes Williams Id still love our options at 8 between the DB RB and OLB depth in this draft.  Im not big on taking ILBs in the 1st anymore.  Seems like the best ones are always had in mid rounds because they are rarely the guys who impress at the combine.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on January 21, 2017, 04:02:17 PM
This is the reason I can see us finding someone willing to trade back.  The top 4 DEs are amazing here and Im not even sure any of them will be on the board at 6.  You have Carolina 2 spots back that have a HUGE need and know their options will be limited if they stay where they are.  Id love to move back add anther 2nd and draft Williams.  The more I look at this draft the more I love Williams as our pick.  Even if SD takes Williams Id still love our options at 8 between the DB RB and OLB depth in this draft.  Im not big on taking ILBs in the 1st anymore.  Seems like the best ones are always had in mid rounds because they are rarely the guys who impress at the combine.
Minor point, but you'd probably only get a 3rd moving back 2 spots.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Laxin on January 21, 2017, 09:48:15 PM
Minor point, but you'd probably only get a 3rd moving back 2 spots.

Which for the Jets is better than a 2nd since those seem just about useless.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on January 22, 2017, 02:55:56 AM
I will take a 3rd any day of the week to move back 2 spots. Imagine if they get rid of Richardson for a 3rd, They would have 3 3rds. Seriously I hope they get that done, get the youngsters in here and competing for spots. 5 picks in the top 3 rounds, you best believe they should get at worst 2-3 starters.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on January 22, 2017, 07:42:44 AM
I will take a 3rd any day of the week to move back 2 spots. Imagine if they get rid of Richardson for a 3rd, They would have 3 3rds. Seriously I hope they get that done, get the youngsters in here and competing for spots. 5 picks in the top 3 rounds, you best believe they should get at worst 2-3 starters.
Yep.  That would be nice.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Jumbo on February 01, 2017, 01:03:02 AM
Malik Hooker will miss 4-6 months with an injury
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Sir on February 01, 2017, 08:22:56 AM
Malik Hooker will miss 4-6 months with an injury

Great....Gonna be real fun when one of the same bullshit teams who pick up steals like this (I'm looking at you Baltimore) in the middle of the first takes him and he becomes an All-Pro.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on February 01, 2017, 08:35:51 AM
Great....Gonna be real fun when one of the same bullshit teams who pick up steals like this (I'm looking at you Baltimore) in the middle of the first takes him and he becomes an All-Pro.

I wouldn't be angry if we still drafted Hooker at 6.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on February 01, 2017, 08:52:03 AM
Great....Gonna be real fun when one of the same bullshit teams who pick up steals like this (I'm looking at you Baltimore) in the middle of the first takes him and he becomes an All-Pro.

Maybe we can find a video of him smoking pot and get him in the 2nd round.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on February 01, 2017, 09:22:56 AM
Maybe we can find a video of him smoking pot and get him in the 2nd round.
I'm gonna bring a blunt to his campus and flirt my way into smoking with him
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: steves850 on February 01, 2017, 09:41:54 AM
I'm gonna bring a blunt to his campus and flirt my way into smoking with him

We're counting on you Pope, don't freak this up.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 02, 2017, 05:04:34 PM
I just had a daydream of the Jets trading down from the 6th pick and me running around my living room screaming like we won the Super Bowl
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 02, 2017, 05:07:19 PM
I'm gonna bring a blunt to his campus and flirt my way into smoking with him

Malik Hooker - S - Ohio State

2nd Round

All pro talent, next level coverage ability and ball skills. Coming off injury. Character concerns - gave a guy an OTPHJ prior to combine. Also smoked weed.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on February 02, 2017, 05:07:45 PM
Cardinals need to trade up with us for DeShaun Watson
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Laxin on February 02, 2017, 07:03:10 PM
Cardinals need to trade up with us for DeShaun Watson

Got that Bowles - Cardinals connection working for us
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on February 03, 2017, 12:11:05 PM
Joe Mixon was not invited to the NFL Combine.

Hopefully he goes undrafted and disappears forever.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: mj2sexay on February 03, 2017, 12:13:48 PM
Cardinals need to trade up with us for DeShaun Watson

Yesssss. We need to also not even think about taking DeShaun Watson.

The 13th and and 45th gets it done Arizona.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Sir on February 03, 2017, 04:02:24 PM
Would any pick improve the CURRENT talent at a given position on this team more than Howard would at the TE position?  Not necessarily advocating for a TE at 6, just something to think about.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on February 03, 2017, 04:24:18 PM
Would any pick improve the CURRENT talent at a given position on this team more than Howard would at the TE position?  Not necessarily advocating for a TE at 6, just something to think about.

Probably not the current talent.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on February 03, 2017, 05:05:33 PM
Would any pick improve the CURRENT talent at a given position on this team more than Howard would at the TE position?  Not necessarily advocating for a TE at 6, just something to think about.

David Njoku would
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on February 03, 2017, 05:36:46 PM
Joe Mixon was not invited to the NFL Combine.

Hopefully he goes undrafted and disappears forever.
Pats will class him up.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Laxin on February 04, 2017, 11:19:05 AM
Yesssss. We need to also not even think about taking DeShaun Watson.

The 13th and and 45th gets it done Arizona.

I may be more inclined to go for their 2018 first round pick instead of the 2nd... If this season plays out like many think it will, that extra first would be huge if we needed to move up in the draft to grab a QB.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: mj2sexay on February 06, 2017, 11:56:10 AM
I may be more inclined to go for their 2018 first round pick instead of the 2nd... If this season plays out like many think it will, that extra first would be huge if we needed to move up in the draft to grab a QB.

Unfortunately, we'll be having to kick in extra picks if we want a first to move down 7 spots.

I bring up the 6th for 13th and 45th only because according to the draftchart, its actually a perfect match in value.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Sir on February 06, 2017, 04:26:33 PM
David Njoku would

Also gonna be pretty fun when the Pats trade Garappolo to the Browns for #12 and draft Njoku.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 06, 2017, 05:21:02 PM
Also gonna be pretty fun when the Pats trade Garappolo to the Browns for #12 and draft Njoku.

I would be ok with this
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 08, 2017, 02:11:20 PM
If you're Cleveland or San Fran would you rather trade the #1/2 pick to NE for Garappolo or draft Trubisky/Watson?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on February 08, 2017, 02:18:58 PM
If you're Cleveland or San Fran would you rather trade the #1/2 pick to NE for Garappolo or draft Trubisky/Watson?

Not to mention, they'd probably have to sign Garopollo to a fairly sizeable deal since they aren't going to give up that high of a pick for one year on the cheap.  If I were those teams, I'd avoid both options and wait until next year to get a QB.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: AlioTheFool on February 08, 2017, 03:18:40 PM
I'd trade for Garopollo. I don't know I'd do a top-2 pick for Garopollo straight-up. Maybe Garopollo and a day 2 pick?

The guy has spent years learning from Brady and McDaniels. He's also shown he can win real games. That's better than any QB you're going to draft. Could he bust? Sure. But I'd take that risk.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on February 08, 2017, 05:08:23 PM
Garopollo will suck derriere on another team
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on February 08, 2017, 06:46:20 PM



The guy has spent years learning from Brady and McDaniels.

I wish this line of thinking would die. Some examples:

Brock Osweiler
Brian Hoyer
Ryan Mallett
Matt Cassell
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on February 08, 2017, 07:22:47 PM

I wish this line of thinking would die. Some examples:

Brock Osweiler
Brian Hoyer
Ryan Mallett
Matt Cassell


Aaron Rawdjiz doe
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Pope on February 08, 2017, 07:33:08 PM
Aaron Rawdjiz doe
I stand corrected

SAD!
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on February 08, 2017, 09:33:42 PM
If you're Cleveland or San Fran would you rather trade the #1/2 pick to NE for Garappolo or draft Trubisky/Watson?

yes
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 22, 2017, 03:26:21 PM
"The NFL Network's Charley Casserley polled the personnel of 22 NFL teams regarding their preferred quarterback, with Clemson's Deshaun Watson receiving the most votes with nine.

Watson led the field in Casserley's informal poll, followed up closely by North Carolina QB Mitchell Trubisky. Trubisky received eight votes. Of the remaining five votes, Texas Tech's Pat Mahomes drew two while the remaining three clubs polled checked in undecided. That is bad juju for Notre Dame QB DeShone Kizer, who received no votes at all."
Source: NFL.com Mar 21 - 9:58 PM
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 22, 2017, 03:27:21 PM
Mahomes over Kizer all day long
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: steves850 on March 22, 2017, 09:57:02 PM
"The NFL Network's Charley Casserley polled the personnel of 22 NFL teams regarding their preferred quarterback, with Clemson's Deshaun Watson receiving the most votes with nine.

Watson led the field in Casserley's informal poll, followed up closely by North Carolina QB Mitchell Trubisky. Trubisky received eight votes. Of the remaining five votes, Texas Tech's Pat Mahomes drew two while the remaining three clubs polled checked in undecided. That is bad juju for Notre Dame QB DeShone Kizer, who received no votes at all."
Source: NFL.com Mar 21 - 9:58 PM

PRRRRRRRRRTTTTT

Don't give a freak - this doesn't mean a damn thing. NFL offseason is full of this crap.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Laxin on March 23, 2017, 06:29:22 AM

I wish this line of thinking would die. Some examples:

Brock Osweiler
Brian Hoyer
Ryan Mallett
Matt Cassell

I thank you for this post.

Garoppolo isn't worth more than a late 2nd IMO. The idea of a high first is absurd.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on March 23, 2017, 08:38:43 AM
Garoppolo isn't worth more than a late 2nd IMO. The idea of a high first is absurd.

I disagree with this a little bit. 

Garoppolo was a second round pick.  He's had a few seasons to develop in the NFL and he has some starting experience.  He's better than any QB in this draft class.

To me, that means his stock rises to at least an early second to a late first rounder.  If he wasn't on the Patriots, people wouldn't care as much about what he's going to be traded for.  They just always do this bullshit. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: steves850 on March 23, 2017, 09:05:24 AM
I disagree with this a little bit. 

Garoppolo was a second round pick.  He's had a few seasons to develop in the NFL and he has some starting experience.  He's better than any QB in this draft class.

To me, that means his stock rises to at least an early second to a late first rounder.  If he wasn't on the Patriots, people wouldn't care as much about what he's going to be traded for.  They just always do this bullshit. 

Where they were selected does not equate to their value. Geno Smith was a 2nd round pick as well.

I think Garoppolo will have a decent NFL career but I am cautious that he's been over valued. I can see the Pats fleecing another team and Garoppolo being out of the league in three years.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on March 23, 2017, 09:10:51 AM


Where they were selected does not equate to their value. Geno Smith was a 2nd round pick as well.

Maybe not, but it is a good starting point.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on March 23, 2017, 09:12:21 AM
Where they were selected does not equate to their value.

You don't get what I'm saying. 

He's proven that he was worth that pick, in my opinion.  He fell further than he should have.  His value has risen.

Smith's value took a hit.  Had he come in and performed well, his value obviously would be different. 

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: steves850 on March 23, 2017, 09:41:54 AM
You don't get what I'm saying. 

He's proven that he was worth that pick, in my opinion.  He fell further than he should have.  His value has risen.

Smith's value took a hit.  Had he come in and performed well, his value obviously would be different. 



I get what you're saying, I just don't buy into Garoppolo's inflated value. Maybe I just don't want to believe Pats have developed another damn franchise QB.

Anyway I decided to compare Garp's stats to Cassel's during his season with New England:

(http://i.imgur.com/nPsEZ8Z.png)
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on March 23, 2017, 10:52:00 AM
Bowles and Maccagnan are at the Ohio State Pro Day
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on March 23, 2017, 10:57:11 AM
Saw the Jets met with Nathan Peterman from Pitt.  Might fit the "draft a QB every year" mid round pick mold.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on March 23, 2017, 10:58:37 AM
Saw the Jets met with Nathan Peterman from Pitt.  Might fit the "draft a QB every year" mid round pick mold.

3rd round

They also met with Patrick Towles, a QB that is absolutely terrible...
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on March 23, 2017, 11:00:24 AM
3rd round


We have two 3rds now.

Pro style experience.  NFL.com comparison is Derek Carr.  I don't read anything into that, but a certain someone got a reflex boner just now
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on March 23, 2017, 11:02:16 AM

 Pro style experience.  NFL.com comparison is Derek Carr.  I don't read anything into that, but a certain someone got a reflex boner just now


I don't see how he compares to Derek Carr - I saw NFL.com compare the two and it was a head scratcher.  They have different styles and Carr came out of a version of the air raid offense, he was just very strong with protections and reads because he made almost all of his own play calls.

Peterman reminds me of Kirk Cousins. 

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on March 23, 2017, 11:09:27 AM
I don't see how he compares to Derek Carr - I saw NFL.com compare the two and it was a head scratcher.  They have different styles and Carr came out of a version of the air raid offense, he was just very strong with protections and reads because he made almost all of his own play calls.

Peterman reminds me of Kirk Cousins.
I haven't seen him play at all, just doing some reading.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Jumbo on March 23, 2017, 01:18:32 PM
Peterman isn't good
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on March 23, 2017, 01:39:59 PM
Peterman isn't good

(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/61/1e/4a/611e4acad895cc3e207e31e3740c2da4.jpg)
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Jumbo on March 23, 2017, 02:28:59 PM
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/61/1e/4a/611e4acad895cc3e207e31e3740c2da4.jpg)

(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/61/1e/4a/611e4acad895cc3e207e31e3740c2da4.jpg)
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 27, 2017, 10:24:29 AM
PRRRRRRRRRTTTTT

Don't give a freak - this doesn't mean a damn thing. NFL offseason is full of this crap.

"Cal QB Davis Webb told CBS Sports' Sean Wagner-McGough that "numerous" teams have been telling him that he is a first-round talent."
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on March 27, 2017, 10:27:07 AM
"Cal QB Davis Webb told CBS Sports' Sean Wagner-McGough that "numerous" teams have been telling him that he is a first-round talent."
Hope not the Jets.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on March 27, 2017, 12:06:19 PM
...smokescreen!
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 27, 2017, 12:14:04 PM
...smokescreen!

You notice how nobody is talking about DeShone Kizer right now? Pencil him in as the #1.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on March 29, 2017, 08:43:54 PM
I was mostly anti-Deshaun Watson before, but the more I watch, the more I read, and the more I think about the position, the more he intrigues me.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: steves850 on March 29, 2017, 08:51:30 PM
I was mostly anti-Deshaun Watson before, but the more I watch, the more I read, and the more I think about the position, the more he intrigues me.

Why? I think he has the ceiling of Geno Smith....
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on March 29, 2017, 08:53:53 PM
I don't see how he compares to Derek Carr - I saw NFL.com compare the two and it was a head scratcher.  They have different styles and Carr came out of a version of the air raid offense, he was just very strong with protections and reads because he made almost all of his own play calls.

Peterman reminds me of Kirk Cousins. 


I agree. Kirk Cousins is the comparison for Peterman. There were times I'd watch Peterman at Pittsburgh where he was extremely impressive, looking like an NFL quarterback. He comes from more of a pro-style offense than most of the others in this draft. He's not an elite athlete, but he's good enough.

People say that Bryce Petty's upside is a backup quarterback. I never really agreed with that - he had the tools to be a starter, but I never thought he'd get there because I thought he was too far away. Peterman is more of that guy who projects to be a good backup or an average starter - kind of like I thought Kirk Cousins would be coming out.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on March 29, 2017, 09:06:46 PM
Why? I think he has the ceiling of Geno Smith....

WBTG
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on March 29, 2017, 09:07:09 PM
Why? I think he has the ceiling of Geno Smith....
My issues with Geno coming out of college - did his teammates like him? Did he have the ability to be a leader in the locker room? Can he raise the play of his teammates? I never wanted him in the 1st round for those reasons. I sold myself on him in the 2nd round because we needed a QB, and the value wasn't terrible. I thought Geno was a guy we needed to develop for a few years and see what we had in him. Instead, we did the exact opposite, though part of it was due to injuries, both to Geno and to Sanchez.

Athletically, Watson is actually pretty similar to Geno. If you look at Geno Smith's MockDraftable measurables, his 2nd-closest athletic comparison is Deshaun Watson. Both also come from offenses that don't exactly prepare you for the pros, and both had great weapons that made them look better.

But that's where the comparisons stop. Watson is a proven leader who has played his best football in the biggest games. Geno sulked on the sideline when things went wrong.

I have concerns about Watson's accuracy, but it reminds me a bit of how I felt about Marcus Mariota coming out. Mariota started a couple years, so I started to nitpick his flaws. Same with Watson - he's played for a couple years, so as a result, he has some bad tape. Kizer and Trubisky didn't play that much, so there's less bad tape (at least for Trubisky).

I don't want Watson at 6, but I think when all is said and done, he might end up being my #1 QB in this draft, though Mahomes and Kizer intrigue me as well. Trubisky would be #4 for me. I'm going to dive into some DraftBreakdown tapes once college basketball season ends and I have more time. That's when I'll make my final judgments on these guys.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on March 29, 2017, 09:36:10 PM
the more I read

At least you can do that because Watson sure can't
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on March 29, 2017, 10:46:06 PM
At least you can do that because Watson sure can't

That's racist.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Dreamers on March 30, 2017, 10:41:32 AM
My issues with Geno coming out of college - did his teammates like him? Did he have the ability to be a leader in the locker room? Can he raise the play of his teammates? I never wanted him in the 1st round for those reasons. I sold myself on him in the 2nd round because we needed a QB, and the value wasn't terrible. I thought Geno was a guy we needed to develop for a few years and see what we had in him. Instead, we did the exact opposite, though part of it was due to injuries, both to Geno and to Sanchez.

Athletically, Watson is actually pretty similar to Geno. If you look at Geno Smith's MockDraftable measurables, his 2nd-closest athletic comparison is Deshaun Watson. Both also come from offenses that don't exactly prepare you for the pros, and both had great weapons that made them look better.

But that's where the comparisons stop. Watson is a proven leader who has played his best football in the biggest games. Geno sulked on the sideline when things went wrong.

I have concerns about Watson's accuracy, but it reminds me a bit of how I felt about Marcus Mariota coming out. Mariota started a couple years, so I started to nitpick his flaws. Same with Watson - he's played for a couple years, so as a result, he has some bad tape. Kizer and Trubisky didn't play that much, so there's less bad tape (at least for Trubisky).

I don't want Watson at 6, but I think when all is said and done, he might end up being my #1 QB in this draft, though Mahomes and Kizer intrigue me as well. Trubisky would be #4 for me. I'm going to dive into some DraftBreakdown tapes once college basketball season ends and I have more time. That's when I'll make my final judgments on these guys.

I dont see Watson as a proven leader at all.  Watson came up short in most of his big games his team just made up for it in other areas most of the time.  He had Bamas number twice for sure but those where the only games he stepped up his game in.  Watching that Ohio State and that Oklahoma game he did not look good in any way.  His week 1 vs Auburn was just horrid and it wasnt great play vs FSU, Pitts, or Louisville.  He had an all star team around him and he just ended up with great stats anyway.  He has great talent but still needs to prove he can lead a team IMO.   
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: mj2sexay on March 30, 2017, 01:42:23 PM
I'm not saying I don't think Watson can develop into an above average QB, I'm saying its going to take time and excellent coaching. Neither of which imho are luxuries we can currently afford a young QB.

Best case scenario for him is that the rumors of Arians having affinity for the kid are true and he can go sit in the desert under Carson for at least a year.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on March 30, 2017, 02:41:54 PM
I'm not saying I don't think Watson can develop into an above average QB, I'm saying its going to take time and excellent coaching. Neither of which imho are luxuries we can currently afford a young QB.

Best case scenario for him is that the rumors of Arians having affinity for the kid are true and he can go sit in the desert under Carson for at least a year.
What QB in this draft doesn't need time? Kizer and Tribisky are relatively inexperienced. Mahomes and Webb come from air raid offenses and have a ton to learn.

Like I said, I will watch more of these guys when my work schedule clears up next week but I am more open to Watson being a late 1st now than I was before.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Fenwyr on March 31, 2017, 12:33:40 AM
Why? I think he has the ceiling of Geno Smith....
That is entirely unfair.  You can say that they came out of hand holding offenses.  Apparently that's a big negative for both.

They both have big arms and can make all the throws.  That's a positve for both.

As far as making something happen with his legs when things go south?  Watson by a mile.

As far as leadership?  Watson by a light year.

Geno is hot garbage with a NFL arm poking out.

Watson will win with some NFL team, and he will win alot.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Fenwyr on March 31, 2017, 12:38:14 AM
I dont see Watson as a proven leader at all.  Watson came up short in most of his big games his team just made up for it in other areas most of the time.  He had Bamas number twice for sure but those where the only games he stepped up his game in.  Watching that Ohio State and that Oklahoma game he did not look good in any way.  His week 1 vs Auburn was just horrid and it wasnt great play vs FSU, Pitts, or Louisville.  He had an all star team around him and he just ended up with great stats anyway.  He has great talent but still needs to prove he can lead a team IMO.   
If he came up short in most of his big games they wouldn't have made back to back champioships.  He also wouldn't have come in second in Heisman voting to a guy that made zero.  That is a pretty absurd statement.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Fenwyr on March 31, 2017, 12:43:04 AM
At least you can do that because Watson sure can't
He graduated with a year and a half left of eligibility.  I know you were talking reading coverages, but lets not confuse the fact that he was a good student.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on March 31, 2017, 09:47:41 AM
He graduated with a year and a half left of eligibility.  I know you were talking reading coverages, but lets not confuse the fact that he was a good student.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk



But how did he take exams with you riding his dick?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Fenwyr on March 31, 2017, 10:07:58 AM
But how did he take exams with you riding his dick?
He's a multi tasker.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: steves850 on March 31, 2017, 11:21:20 AM
But how did he take exams with you riding his dick?

(http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/HahaNice.gif)
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 31, 2017, 07:21:14 PM
That's racist.

Ok so can Geno Smith read?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on March 31, 2017, 07:22:36 PM
RGIII was 10x the prospect Watson is. RGIII sucks.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Fenwyr on April 01, 2017, 03:05:17 PM
RGIII was 10x the prospect Watson is. RGIII sucks.
In fairness, RG3 was a franchise guy up until his 753rd injury.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: insanity on April 02, 2017, 03:50:09 PM
In fairness, RG3 was a franchise guy up until his 753rd injury.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Yeah thats false.  RG3's success was predicated on the system that he was in. Year 2 he got eaten alive because people caught onto the offense and understood all he did was throw screens and to his first read.  Dude's average for yards per pass past the line of scrimmage was the lowest in the league
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Jumbo on April 02, 2017, 03:53:58 PM
Yeah thats false.  RG3's success was predicated on the system that he was in. Year 2 he got eaten alive because people caught onto the offense and understood all he did was throw screens and to his first read.  Dude's average for yards per pass past the line of scrimmage was the lowest in the league

Yeah, and just by coincidence in between his first and second season his athleticism magically went away, meaning teams didn't have to respect the running threat anymore
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 02, 2017, 07:49:25 PM
How would you guys feel if we traded back into the first for Patrick Mahomes?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 02, 2017, 07:51:27 PM
How would you guys feel if we traded back into the first for Patrick Mahomes?
I don't know enough about him to judge, but I'd be quite happy not to draft a QB at all this year unless they plan to bail on Petty.  Too many projects in the oven. Let alone giving up picks when we should be aquiring them.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 02, 2017, 08:01:46 PM
I don't know enough about him to judge, but I'd be quite happy not to draft a QB at all this year unless they plan to bail on Petty.  Too many projects in the oven. Let alone giving up picks when we should be aquiring them.

The only way I'd be OK with it is if we paired Christian Hackenberg with our second and sent that package to Houston for 25.  It's highly unlikely they'd take that, but that's just the only scenario I'd be OK with.

It's too soon to give up on Hackenberg.  If we were to take another QB, especially one in the first round, Maccagnan would basically be admitting to missing on a very important pick.

If Mahomes falls to our pick in the second round, then that's an entirely different story...
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 02, 2017, 08:10:20 PM
What's so special about Mahomes?  Legit question. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Libero_2 on April 02, 2017, 08:36:23 PM
The only way I'd be OK with it is if we paired Christian Hackenberg with our second and sent that package to Houston for 25.  It's highly unlikely they'd take that, but that's just the only scenario I'd be OK with.

It's too soon to give up on Hackenberg.  If we were to take another QB, especially one in the first round, Maccagnan would basically be admitting to missing on a very important pick.

If Mahomes falls to our pick in the second round, then that's an entirely different story...

That scenario would make me happier than just drafting Mahomes. We can't have 3 project guys on the roster. To my eye, Petty looked like a guy who can be an NFL backup and hold the fort for a couple of weeks if he has a solid team of playmakers around him. So I wouldn't want to get rid of him for nothing. Hack or Mahomes is kind of the same thing at this point IMO. Exceptional arm talent and coming from a excrement offense, but Mahomes has some serious swagger and belief in himself. Thats roughly the equivalent IMO of Hack +1 year of NFL experience, as a guy with exceptional art talent coming from a pro-style offense, but with a broken clock due to that shitty Penn State OL, who is now on his 3rd system in 3 years.

What I am terrified of is repeating the Geno Smith mistake. Taking a QB in a bad year for QBs that leads to us not taking a QB in a stronger QB class the following year because "we haven't had enough time to evaluate if X player can be the guy or not." Then we are waiting even longer for a real crack at a franchise guy. 

What I want more than anything is to just stand pat at QB in 2017, suck if we are going to suck, and build this teams foundations so that in 2018 we can go all in for one of these potentially elite QBs. I would also like to build up 2018 assets if possible to make it easier to trade up for a QB if we need to, and if we are in a position to grab one on our own, we can use those assets to build around the new kid.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on April 02, 2017, 09:06:46 PM
How would you guys feel if we traded back into the first for Patrick Mahomes?

Not terrible.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Laxin on April 02, 2017, 09:20:46 PM
How would you guys feel if we traded back into the first for Patrick Mahomes?

Cool with it. Mahomes is my #2 QB right now.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 02, 2017, 09:29:16 PM
What's so special about Mahomes?  Legit question. 

canon arm and he's an elite athlete for the position
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 02, 2017, 11:18:07 PM
canon arm and he's an elite athlete for the position
kyle boller?

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 02, 2017, 11:21:18 PM
kyle boller?

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk



Kyle Boller couldn't run like Mahomes
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on April 03, 2017, 08:16:17 AM
How would you guys feel if we traded back into the first for Patrick Mahomes?

Depends who's left on the board and what we gave up


His footwork is pretty ugly , that system leaves Morton work cut out for him transitioning Mahommes to WCO

The kid has a ton of talent though. 

If rather have him than freaking Kizer, that's for sure
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: AlioTheFool on April 03, 2017, 10:30:02 AM
Knowing nothing about Mahomes whatsoever, here's my opinion: I'm okay drafting a QB every year until we find "the one." If the staff feels confident enough in their evaluation of a player, pull the trigger, even if you have to trade up to do it.

The reason to me that Geno was a mistake isn't as simple as "he wasn't good." The problem was two-fold:

1) The way Idzik wrecked both his and Sanchez's careers with one stupid directive in a meaningless game.
2) The decision that they wouldn't then take another QB the next year regardless of who was on the roster the following year.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Fenwyr on April 03, 2017, 11:51:26 AM
Petty is the epitome of a backup QB.  And that is totally OK.  Treat him as such, and I hope he is here for 10 years.

Duff already said he'd keep 4 QBs if necessary, and has said he has no problem drafting a QB every year.

Translation...  He will be drafting a QB at some point.  Until we find the one, there is no reason not to carry a vet, a backup, and two kids.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Libero_2 on April 03, 2017, 12:42:06 PM
Depends who's left on the board and what we gave up


His footwork is pretty ugly , that system leaves Morton work cut out for him transitioning Mahommes to WCO

The kid has a ton of talent though. 

If rather have him than freaking Kizer, that's for sure

The more i think about Kizer the more I think hes Logan Thomas.  All the tools none of the brains/work ethic to make it big. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Libero_2 on April 03, 2017, 12:43:47 PM
Petty is the epitome of a backup QB.  And that is totally OK.  Treat him as such, and I hope he is here for 10 years.

Duff already said he'd keep 4 QBs if necessary, and has said he has no problem drafting a QB every year.

Translation...  He will be drafting a QB at some point.  Until we find the one, there is no reason not to carry a vet, a backup, and two kids.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk


But do you want 3 kids and McCown ? Two second rounders?  How can he justify taking a 1st round QB in 2018 if he trades up for Mahommes in 2017?

I just wanna stay out of it in 2017, build the rest of the squad and then go get our guy in 2018 paying whatever we have to pay to do it. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 04, 2017, 09:19:00 AM
Charles Harris needs to be a Jet
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 04, 2017, 09:23:33 AM
Charles Harris needs to be a Jet

he tweeted yesterday that the Jets are one of the teams he's in constant contact with.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Fenwyr on April 04, 2017, 09:38:33 AM
But do you want 3 kids and McCown ? Two second rounders?  How can he justify taking a 1st round QB in 2018 if he trades up for Mahommes in 2017?

I just wanna stay out of it in 2017, build the rest of the squad and then go get our guy in 2018 paying whatever we have to pay to do it.
Petty is the backup in my equation.  Need another kid to round out a stable of 4.  If a guy like Mahones is staring at you at the top of round 3, no reason not to take a chance.  Top of round 2 or a trade back into round 2, hell no.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Fenwyr on April 04, 2017, 09:41:32 AM
Charles Harris needs to be a Jet
He's listed as a DE, but definately built like an OLB.  Never seen him play.  How is he without his hand in the dirt?

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 04, 2017, 09:50:36 AM
If a guy like Mahones is staring at you at the top of round 3, no reason not to take a chance.

Patrick Mahomes is probably going in the first round.  If he makes it out of the first, he'll go near the top of the second.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 04, 2017, 09:51:42 AM
He's listed as a DE, but definately built like an OLB.  Never seen him play.  How is he without his hand in the dirt?

Great first step, has a dominant spin move.  Besides Myles Garrett, I think he's the most athletic pass rusher in this class.

If we move back, I'd like the Jets to consider Harris, Haason Reddick, or Jabrill Peppers.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Laxin on April 05, 2017, 07:24:35 AM
Great first step, has a dominant spin move.  Besides Myles Garrett, I think he's the most athletic pass rusher in this class.

If we move back, I'd like the Jets to consider Harris, Haason Reddick, or Jabrill Peppers.

Think Harris will be long gone by the 2nd round?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Laxin on April 05, 2017, 07:27:47 AM
Odd question, but do you guys think McCaffery would be a top 10 pick if he wasn't white?

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 05, 2017, 07:42:05 AM
Odd question, but do you guys think McCaffery would be a top 10 pick if the Pats had a top 10 pick?

Yes
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 05, 2017, 08:42:06 AM
Odd question, but do you guys think McCaffery would be a top 10 pick if he wasn't white?

I'm almost positive he would be
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Fenwyr on April 05, 2017, 09:50:33 AM
Patrick Mahomes is probably going in the first round.  If he makes it out of the first, he'll go near the top of the second.
Would be weird taking a QB at the top of the 2nd, but I wouldn't complain at all.  As long as we get an immediate starter in the 1st.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 05, 2017, 09:52:26 AM
Would be weird taking a QB at the top of the 2nd, but I wouldn't complain at all.

Considering he's not ready to play at all, it would be.  That would be back to back seconds used on QBs that aren't ready to contribute right away. 

It'd be nice if we could finally strike gold in the second round for once. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 05, 2017, 10:41:03 AM
Jamal Adams just ran a 4.38 at this pro day...
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 05, 2017, 10:47:43 AM
Jamal Adams just ran a 4.38 at this pro day...

Even aside from that, I don't see him making it to 6 unless 2 QBs go before us.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 05, 2017, 10:50:03 AM
Even aside from that, I don't see him making it to 6 unless 2 QBs go before us.

I think he goes in the top four
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 05, 2017, 12:47:36 PM
Think Harris will be long gone by the 2nd round?
I think he could be. Myles Garrett, Jonathan Allen, Thomas Solomon are top 10 picks. Derek Barnett, Haason Reddick, Tim Williams and Takkarist McKinley are all surefire first rounders. If guys like Carl Lawson and Taco Charlton go in the 1st, then I could see Harris being there in the 2nd.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on April 05, 2017, 12:58:02 PM
How would you guys feel if we traded back into the first for Patrick Mahomes?
I'm pretty sure Mahomes will finish as my favorite QB in this draft. That's weird for me to say, since I hate QBs from Texas Tech. But he's got so much talent. His footwork isn't great, but his feet are also extremely quick for a QB, so he has high upside there if he figures it out. He can make every throw, he's got great confidence, he can make plays on the move, he's got a great pump fake and he's a great competitor. I think he's got a chance to be a special QB.

I still might change my mind 100 more times since April is when I really start to have time to watch tape from an NFL Draft perspective. But unless I sell myself on Watson or Kizer being a star, I don't think anyone has the abilities Mahomes has.

And given the outlandishness of the quarterback market in recent years, drafting a QB in the 1st round gives you a cost-controlled player for 5 years at a position that you normally have to spend a ton of money for.   
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 05, 2017, 01:36:48 PM
If we take a QB this year, I hope it's Mahomes or Peterman
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 05, 2017, 02:18:46 PM
we can forget about Jamal Adams, he's lighting it up at his Pro Day.  I doubt he'll be there at 6.


Bowles is in attendance at least.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on April 05, 2017, 02:33:32 PM
It'd be nice if we could finally strike gold in the second round for once. 

They need to big time.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 05, 2017, 03:00:47 PM
we can forget about Jamal Adams, he's lighting it up at his Pro Day.  I doubt he'll be there at 6.


Bowles is in attendance at least.

You never know.  Also,

(https://digbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Fournette_Freak-Show-Jump.jpg)
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 05, 2017, 03:24:26 PM
You never know.  Also,

(https://digbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Fournette_Freak-Show-Jump.jpg)

Fournette is on top of my wish list.  But I'm wondering if he gets past Jacksonville.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 05, 2017, 03:33:54 PM
Fournette is on top of my wish list.  But I'm wondering if he gets past Jacksonville.

I feel like one of 2 good things will happen for the Jets.  Either someone we want/need like Hooker, Adams, or Fournette will fall to us at 6 or all 3 will be gone and we'll be getting calls for a trade for one of the D-linemen left at 6.  Even better- a QB goes before 6.

Here's what will happen.  Jets are on the clock at 6.  Hooker still available along with Jonathan Allen. Maccagnan rejects all trade back calls from multiple teams and selects.....Trubisky.  Ugh.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on April 05, 2017, 11:47:34 PM
I'd rather take Pat Mahomes at 6 than Leonard Fournette.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 05, 2017, 11:48:10 PM
I'd rather take Pat Mahomes at 6 than Leonard Fournette.

kill yourself
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 06, 2017, 06:08:14 AM
I'd rather take Pat Mahomes at 6 than Leonard Fournette.
i was like wtf when i read this...then i realized it was Geno's biggest fan that posted it.

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on April 06, 2017, 08:02:27 AM
kill yourself
I knew this was coming
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on April 06, 2017, 01:22:00 PM
That's more of a statement about how little I want a running back at 6 than how much I want a QB in that spot. Mahomes isn't in my top 6, but he's probably my favorite QB in this draft.     
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 06, 2017, 01:48:58 PM
I don't want RB so let's massively reach for a project QB
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 06, 2017, 01:55:19 PM
I don't want RB so let's massively reach for a project QB

this

c'mon Mack.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 06, 2017, 02:50:30 PM
Quote
Ian Rapoport

#Jets have a bunch of big-time defensive draft prospects in for visits today & tomorrow: #OhioSt S Malik Hooker & #Mizzou DE Charles Harris.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 06, 2017, 02:52:07 PM


yeah boi
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 06, 2017, 02:54:50 PM
yeah boi

....with the number 6 pick of the 2017 NFL draft, the Jets select......Deshone Kizer.  (JO closes site)
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 06, 2017, 03:25:04 PM
....with the number 6 pick of the 2017 NFL draft, the Jets select......Deshone Kizer.  (JO closes site)

*Winnipeg, MB randomly burns to the ground*
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 06, 2017, 03:44:30 PM
Kristian Dyer‏ @KristianRDyer · 9m9 minutes ago 

Source: #Giants, #Jets send scouts to check in on Baylor WR K.D. Cannon http://www.metro.us/Giants-Jets-Scouting-Baylor-WR-Cannon#.WOalh2B2D3s.twitter … via @Metro_US



Kraft Dinner Cannon is a great name for a WR
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 06, 2017, 03:47:34 PM
Kristian Dyer‏ @KristianRDyer · 9m9 minutes ago 

Source: #Giants, #Jets send scouts to check in on Baylor WR K.D. Cannon http://www.metro.us/Giants-Jets-Scouting-Baylor-WR-Cannon#.WOalh2B2D3s.twitter … via @Metro_US



Kraft Dinner Cannon is a great name for a WR

Killer Duff Cannon
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: casman02 on April 06, 2017, 08:30:30 PM
If the Jets don't go Hooker or Adams at 6, thoughts on Marcus Williams int the third round? I like my ballhawking safeties even if he has less than ideal weight
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 08, 2017, 10:51:19 AM
How high would you take Sidney Jones and just stash him until next year?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Libero_2 on April 08, 2017, 11:54:41 AM
How high would you take Sidney Jones and just stash him until next year?
This is a good question. We aren't in a position to compete this year. So a guy that can redshirt, learn an NFL system and has tons of talent that can contribute next year should be very attractive to us.

There are really only two types of teams that can afford to take Jones before the third round, 1. Teams already fully loaded and won't need rookie contributions to compete this year. 2. Teams that won't be super competitive anyways, so getting top talent later in the draft than usual is paramount, even if it takes a year or two to see dividends.

In my eyes we fall into category 2, which is very unenviable and annoying, but that's where we are as a franchise. So I think we could take Jones in the third, or even trade down in the 2nd and do it.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 08, 2017, 12:00:46 PM
This is a good question. We aren't in a position to compete this year. So a guy that can redshirt, learn an NFL system and has tons of talent that can contribute next year should be very attractive to us.

There are really only two types of teams that can afford to take Jones before the third round, 1. Teams already fully loaded and won't need rookie contributions to compete this year. 2. Teams that won't be super competitive anyways, so getting top talent later in the draft than usual is paramount, even if it takes a year or two to see dividends.

In my eyes we fall into category 2, which is very unenviable and annoying, but that's where we are as a franchise. So I think we could take Jones in the third, or even trade down in the 2nd and do it.

I doubt he'll make it to the 3rd.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 08, 2017, 12:25:34 PM
How high would you take Sidney Jones and just stash him until next year?

We need players that can play and develop now.  I wouldn't be mad if we took Jones, but this is such a deep DB group that I'd worry about wasting a pick on a player that may never return to form.

Grab a kid that can play now. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 08, 2017, 12:26:19 PM
How high would you take Sidney Jones and just stash him until next year?
I wouldn't spend a 2 on him. Ours is practically a 1.

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 08, 2017, 12:29:24 PM
I wouldn't spend a 2 on him. Ours is practically a 1.

I wouldn't even want to spend our first third rounder on him. 

Look at all of the talented DBs that could be available in the second and third rounds:  Kevin King, Adoree Jackson, Fabian Moreau, Cordrea Tankersley, Teez Tabor, Chidobe Awuzie, Quincy Wilson...that's just corners.

Teez Tabor is a baller.  The 40 time is going to push him down a little bit - someone is going to get a steal.  I hope it's the Jets.



Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on April 10, 2017, 02:47:15 PM
I wouldn't even want to spend our first third rounder on him. 

Look at all of the talented DBs that could be available in the second and third rounds:  Kevin King, Adoree Jackson, Fabian Moreau, Cordrea Tankersley, Teez Tabor, Chidobe Awuzie, Quincy Wilson...that's just corners.

Teez Tabor is a baller.  The 40 time is going to push him down a little bit - someone is going to get a steal.  I hope it's the Jets.

I agree about Tabor. I thought he was overrated when people thought he was going to be a top 10-15 pick, but after the poor 40 time, he'd be a steal in the 2nd or 3rd round.

That's a big reason I can't get behind Lattimore or any CB at 6. Why take Lattimore at 6 when you can get King or Tankersley or Adoree or Conley or someone else in the 2nd round?     
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Libero_2 on April 10, 2017, 04:26:14 PM
I agree about Tabor. I thought he was overrated when people thought he was going to be a top 10-15 pick, but after the poor 40 time, he'd be a steal in the 2nd or 3rd round.

That's a big reason I can't get behind Lattimore or any CB at 6. Why take Lattimore at 6 when you can get King or Tankersley or Adoree or Conley or someone else in the 2nd round?     

Thoughts about doubling up in the secondary in rounds 1 and 2 with some combo of Adams/Hooker and Jackson/King/Tabor?

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 10, 2017, 06:19:03 PM
Shuld the Jet's "Double down"?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 10, 2017, 07:28:42 PM
Shuld the Jet's "Double down"?
Should the Jets double penetrate the first round?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 11, 2017, 11:42:33 PM
Nathan Peterman said he listens to worship music before games...

#NotMyQuarterback
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 12, 2017, 08:56:30 AM
Nathan Peterman said he listens to worship music before games...

#NotMyQuarterback

Nathan Peterman sounds like a tax attorney.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: insanity on April 12, 2017, 10:32:17 PM
Nathan Peterman sounds like a tax attorney.

Nathan Peterman sounds like a taxidermist
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 13, 2017, 09:52:22 PM
There's some dumbass skills competition on on ESPN2. Lot of talent, Mahomes, Delvin Cook, Haason Reddick
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: dcm1602 on April 14, 2017, 12:23:44 PM
What's the thoughts on Howard in the first?

I'm sure it's been discussed to death, and I'd imagine that everybody us against it
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: AlioTheFool on April 14, 2017, 12:30:20 PM
What's the thoughts on Howard in the first?

I'm sure it's been discussed to death, and I'd imagine that everybody us against it

I said earlier today that he's the way I'm currently leaning.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Laxin on April 14, 2017, 01:45:15 PM
What's the thoughts on Howard in the first?

I'm sure it's been discussed to death, and I'd imagine that everybody us against it

I wouldn't hate it, but he wouldnt be on my list of preferred picks.

I would much rather trade back (yes, I know, you need a partner...) and draft Njoku. I think he may end up being a better player of the two.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on April 14, 2017, 02:49:53 PM
I don't want a freaking tight end at #6. That's just not a smart pick in my opinion. That's looking at the entire history of the NFL unless you think the Jets are going to buck that trend over the last 50 years of pro football. There aren't any trends the Jets buck. No TE's at 6.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 14, 2017, 03:04:30 PM
I don't want a freaking tight end at #6. That's just not a smart pick in my opinion. That's looking at the entire history of the NFL unless you think the Jets are going to buck that trend over the last 50 years of pro football. There aren't any trends the Jets buck. No TE's at 6.
i hope we draft a TE at 6...and then trade  back into the 1st round to take another TE.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 14, 2017, 03:13:35 PM
i hope trade up to #1 for a TE.  A TE that abhors discussing shoes on the internet.

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on April 14, 2017, 04:00:34 PM
I just took him for the Buccaneers in the mock, but one of my favorite sleeper WRs is Josh Reynolds of Texas A&M. He might not be a good fit for the Jets, since he's basically a slightly better Robby Anderson, but I think he'll make an impact somewhere.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on April 14, 2017, 04:06:53 PM
i hope we draft a TE at 6...and then trade  back into the 1st round to take another TE.

You two are just mad Chick Fil-A doesn't serve your kind, bundles of sticks.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 14, 2017, 04:20:48 PM
You two are just mad Chick Fil-A doesn't serve your kind, bundles of sticks.
veto
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on April 14, 2017, 09:56:33 PM
What's the thoughts on Howard in the first?

I'm sure it's been discussed to death, and I'd imagine that everybody us against it

Sure, he's a first round talent, but we should be able to land a better player at 6.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on April 15, 2017, 03:00:22 AM
While I'd be fine with Howard at 6, this is also the best tight end class that has been produced in several years. I could see Howard, Njoku, Hodges, Engram, and Cethan Carter are all guys I like a lot, and I hope we end up with one of them.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 15, 2017, 08:42:24 AM
While I'd be fine with Howard at 6, this is also the best tight end class that has been produced in several years. I could see Howard, Njoku, Hodges, Engram, and Cethan Carter are all guys I like a lot, and I hope we end up with one of them.

(http://cdn.playbuzz.com/cdn/727a81a8-375e-4673-8c8e-e6f4db753837/70c4e019-60ff-45d2-847b-85b4c20d3bc0.jpg)

Cethan Carter
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 15, 2017, 08:50:23 AM
Lol
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 18, 2017, 01:20:06 AM
If we take a quarterback this year, I hope that it's Davis Webb.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 18, 2017, 01:12:47 PM
If we take a quarterback this year, I hope that it's Davis Webb.

how come?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on April 18, 2017, 01:30:59 PM
If we take a quarterback this year, I hope that it's Davis Webb.

The guy from the Leprechaun movies?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 19, 2017, 12:59:38 AM
how come?

Prototypical size, highly intelligent, deceptively strong arm, and he throws a nice deep ball...plus, he won't cost us a first round pick.  He played in two very unconventional offenses in college, but he has a skillset that fits the NFL QB mold.

Elected a captain by teammates at two different schools, so he's obviously well liked and respected by the guys playing with him.  I just like his game and the way that carries himself.  Reminds me a lot of Derek Carr, especially as a touch passer. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 19, 2017, 12:20:58 PM
"The Sporting News' Eric Galko passes along that Missouri edge rusher Charles Harris has received "multiple" top-10 grades.

Galko, himself, expects Harris to be drafted within the first 15 picks. The analyst pegs his draft ceiling as high as the No. 6 pick to the Jets and does not believe that the 6-foot-3, 260-pounder will fall further than the Colts at No. 15. Not everybody sees matters so ebulliently. Draft Analyst's Tony Pauline, for one, did not have Harris sliding off the board until pick No. 58 (to the Seahawks) in his most recent four-round mock draft. We would tend more toward Galko's assessment of Harris as a potential top-15 pick than we would Pauline's more conservative second-round evaluation."
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on April 19, 2017, 12:50:21 PM
lol Tony Pauline
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: insanity on April 20, 2017, 09:45:08 AM
I've been listening to alot of draft podcasts and people keep complaining about Mike Williams route running which makes sense given the offense Clemson runs. 

Do you guys think this is a real risk?  Past Clemson wide recievers have been fine thus far, but I'm not sure Williams is as talented as Nuk, Bryant, Watkins
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 20, 2017, 10:33:51 AM
I've been listening to alot of draft podcasts and people keep complaining about Mike Williams route running which makes sense given the offense Clemson runs. 

Do you guys think this is a real risk?  Past Clemson wide recievers have been fine thus far, but I'm not sure Williams is as talented as Nuk, Bryant, Watkins

Martavis Bryant can only run one route.

Mike Williams has tons of talent - his route running is fine and he is dominant as a possession receiver.  If he didn't get hurt in 2015, he'd be considered a Top 5 pick right now. 

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 20, 2017, 10:35:12 AM
lol Tony Pauline

such a hack
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Gorilla on April 20, 2017, 02:06:20 PM
Martavis Bryant can only run one route.

Mike Williams has tons of talent - his route running is fine and he is dominant as a possession receiver.  If he didn't get hurt in 2015, he'd be considered a Top 5 pick right now.

I definitely agree that Williams is a far superior prospect than MBryant was.
IMO, Watkins and Nuk were better draft prospects (esp Watkins). I think Williams has Dez Bryant-type best-case-scenario upside, but I'm not blown away enough to be super excited with taking him at 6.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 20, 2017, 04:12:29 PM
Alabama ILB Reuben Foster failed his Combine drug test.

Foster's sample was diluted, which counts as a failed test. He's now in the league's substance-abuse program. Foster claims he failed the test because he was extremely ill and taking in an exceptional amount of fluids. This adds to a nightmare Combine for Foster, who was sent home after getting into an altercation with a hospital worker. Foster is recovering from shoulder surgery. Foster is an elite talent, but could fall to Day 2 because of his growing off-the-field concerns.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 20, 2017, 04:13:55 PM
Alabama ILB Reuben Foster failed his Combine drug test.

Foster's sample was diluted, which counts as a failed test. He's now in the league's substance-abuse program. Foster claims he failed the test because he was extremely ill and taking in an exceptional amount of fluids. This adds to a nightmare Combine for Foster, who was sent home after getting into an altercation with a hospital worker. Foster is recovering from shoulder surgery. Foster is an elite talent, but could fall to Day 2 because of his growing off-the-field concerns.

Come to Duff in the second......
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 20, 2017, 08:42:32 PM
"NFL.com draft analyst Lance Zierlein reports there is "buzz" Leonard Fournette and Christian McCaffrey will be the only running backs selected in the first round.

That would mean Dalvin Cook, Alvin Kamara, and Joe Mixon all falling out of the first round. Kamara has production questions and Mixon has serious off-field concerns, so it will not be a surprise if they fall. However, Cook lasting until the second day would be a shock. Zierlein writes Cook is "clearly a first-rounder based on talent alone," but some teams have "concerns surrounding durability and character" while others are worried about his testing numbers. Cook tested as a ninth-percentile SPARQ athlete at the Combine."
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 20, 2017, 09:07:48 PM
"Florida State's Dalvin Cook and LSU's Leonard Fournette reportedly scored a 12 on the Wonderlic test, which is given at the NFL combine each year to draft prospects. Oklahoma's Joe Mixon and NC State's Matt Dayes each had 12s.

The Wonderlic scores were reported by the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel as part of its pre-draft running back analysis. Not all of the running backs' Wonderlic results were posted. Some others: Tennessee's Alvin Kamara had a 24, while Stanford's Christian McCaffrey had a 21."
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 21, 2017, 10:12:58 AM
Mel Kiper's 3 round mock has Dalvin Cook at 49 to the redskins
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 21, 2017, 10:24:23 AM
Mel Kiper's 3 round mock has Dalvin Cook at 49 to the redskins

I think there's a very realistic chance that he could fall, especially if Christian McCaffrey comes off the board first.

Even with what Zeke did this year, the position is still undervalued and his off the field stuff probably has him down on a lot of boards.

I'll take him in the second...
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 21, 2017, 10:28:49 AM
I think there's a very realistic chance that he could fall, especially if Christian McCaffrey comes off the board first.

Even with what Zeke did this year, the position is still undervalued and his off the field stuff probably has him down on a lot of boards.

I'll take him in the second...

I don't think it's a stretch that McCaffery comes off the board first, I just find it hard to think that he makes it back to our pick. Please happen
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 21, 2017, 10:29:15 AM
I don't think it's a stretch that McCaffery comes off the board first, I just find it hard to think that he makes it back to our pick. Please happen

We'll probably pass on him for a QB and I will kill myself
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 21, 2017, 10:32:02 AM
We'll probably pass on him for a QB and I will kill myself

I would be ok with it for Mahomes but he's not making it out of the 1st so it would be for Kizer or Watson so yes I would kill myself
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 21, 2017, 10:39:27 AM
"Florida State's Dalvin Cook and LSU's Leonard Fournette reportedly scored a 12 on the Wonderlic test, which is given at the NFL combine each year to draft prospects. Oklahoma's Joe Mixon and NC State's Matt Dayes each had 12s.

The Wonderlic scores were reported by the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel as part of its pre-draft running back analysis. Not all of the running backs' Wonderlic results were posted. Some others: Tennessee's Alvin Kamara had a 24, while Stanford's Christian McCaffrey had a 21."

RB isn't a position I particularly care too much how smart a player is, even if those numbers are accurate or even reflect their intelligence at all.  Just hand big dummy the ball and let his instincts take over.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: AlioTheFool on April 21, 2017, 10:52:35 AM
We'll probably pass on him for a QB and I will kill myself

There are a growing number of scenarios that end in your suicide with this draft.

RB isn't a position I particularly care too much how smart a player is, even if those numbers are accurate or even reflect their intelligence at all.  Just hand big dummy the ball and let his instincts take over.

Yeah, I really don't see the point of having a particularly brilliant RB. "Take ball, avoid tackles." What else does he need to think about?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 21, 2017, 11:14:38 AM
Chris Johnson is the dumbest man alive and look what he did in the NFL.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on April 21, 2017, 11:19:11 AM
I think there's a very realistic chance that he could fall, especially if Christian McCaffrey comes off the board first.

Even with what Zeke did this year, the position is still undervalued and his off the field stuff probably has him down on a lot of boards.

I'll take him in the second...
If be kinda pissed if we pass on him with our 2nd unless someone unbelievable is still around.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 21, 2017, 02:23:21 PM
Article on Lattimore and his hamstrings

http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/eagles/nfl_draft/420012263.html

I wonder where Lattimore would stand draftwise if he had no hamstring issues historically?

Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 21, 2017, 03:35:04 PM
Article on Lattimore and his hamstrings

http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/eagles/nfl_draft/420012263.html

I wonder where Lattimore would stand draftwise if he had no hamstring issues historically?




Top 3
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Libero_2 on April 21, 2017, 03:44:03 PM
Chris Johnson is the dumbest man alive and look what he did in the NFL.

Are we sure he's smarter than emmitt smith?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on April 21, 2017, 05:54:50 PM
I would never take Dalvin Cook at 6, or at 12, but with our 2nd-round pick, sign me up.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 21, 2017, 07:03:44 PM
I would never take Dalvin Cook at 6, or at 12, but with our 2nd-round pick, sign me up.

I would take him at 6 if we are considering Fournette there, and I think if we go back a few months you would remember that this board was pretty close to a 50/50 split between Cook and Fournette. The combine killed his stock.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: d sw0rdz on April 21, 2017, 07:13:06 PM
if he falls to us in the 2nd he will break our 2nd round curse
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 21, 2017, 07:14:36 PM
The Jets will take Fournette at 6 and Darvoid Cook in the second round because Jets.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on April 21, 2017, 07:44:53 PM
The Jets will take Fournette at 6 and Darvoid Cook in the second round because Jets.


Would I be cool with this? As retarded as it would be, I think I would be cool with this.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Laxin on April 21, 2017, 07:58:40 PM
Would I be cool with this? As retarded as it would be, I think I would be cool with this.

We would have the most talented RB duo... pretty much ever
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on April 21, 2017, 09:35:56 PM
We would have the most talented RB duo... pretty much ever

Oklahoma State says no way.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Dreamers on April 22, 2017, 01:33:35 PM
We would have the most talented RB duo... pretty much ever

LT and Turner.  Johnson and White.  McAlester and Bush. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on April 22, 2017, 02:16:13 PM
LT and Turner.  Johnson and White.  McAlester and Bush. 

Douche McAlester...
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Derek Smalls on April 22, 2017, 04:46:39 PM
I would take him at 6 if we are considering Fournette there, and I think if we go back a few months you would remember that this board was pretty close to a 50/50 split between Cook and Fournette. The combine killed his stock.
I think Cook is better than Fournette. I've just made my stance on early RBs abundantly clear.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on April 23, 2017, 09:32:24 AM
if Dalvin Cook fell to our 2nd round pick and we passed on him. Duff can go to freaking hell.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 23, 2017, 11:13:26 AM
I'll jump on the Nate Peterman train in the 3rd or 4th if we move around picks.  Intelligent, pro-style system, won't require a high pick, tortures Heismanberg with daily prayers.  What's not to like?  I don't think he'll make it to the 4th.  I'd rather have him in the 3rd than any qb in the first.  He'll probably go to a team with an established QB and be something decent in a couple of years.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: bojanglesman on April 23, 2017, 03:28:48 PM
Idiot.

Quote
Rapsheet: 5 days pre-draft, #Florida DT prospect Caleb Brantley was charged in a 4/13 incident with misdemeanor assault, knocking a woman's tooth out.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on April 24, 2017, 10:16:54 AM
Idiot.

from 2nd round to the 5th-6th
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 07, 2017, 03:31:27 PM
49ers waived WR KD Cannon.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on May 07, 2017, 07:44:20 PM
49ers waived WR KD Cannon.

That was quick.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on May 08, 2017, 11:58:56 AM
49ers waived WR KD Cannon.


Grand opening, grand closing
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 19, 2017, 11:08:39 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/NFL_Draft/comments/6c43gj/kipers_waytooearly_2018_rankings_top_draft/?st=J2WR4X45&sh=12ceb12e

This is a mix of seniors and underclassmen, but early on, I separate the two so you'll see more senior players, who are certain to be in the draft. By "underclassmen," I mean players who technically could return to school for another season. Those are true juniors and third-year sophomores. I've denoted the third-year sophomores with asterisks.

One more note: I'm still waiting to see how a few big-name quarterback transfers fare at their new schools, and so they're not included. Underclassmen Will Grier, Kyle Allen, Jarrett Stidham and Blake Barnett are prospects to keep an eye on.

On to the position rankings:

Quarterbacks Seniors

Mason Rudolph, Oklahoma State
Luke Falk, Washington State
Baker Mayfield, Oklahoma
Matt Linehan, Idaho
Mike White, Western Kentucky
Underclassmen

*Sam Darnold, USC
Josh Allen, Wyoming
Josh Rosen, UCLA
Lamar Jackson, Louisville
Clayton Thorson, Northwestern
Darnold (6-4, 225), Allen (6-5, 216) and Rosen (6-4, 210) were in the top seven in my way-too-early Big Board. Reigning Heisman Trophy winner Jackson (6-3, 196) is a supreme athlete but a work-in-progress as a quarterback. He needs to show major improvement as a passer in 2017. It will be fun to watch Rudolph (6-4, 217) and Mayfield (6-1, 220) duel for the Big 12 title.

Running backs Seniors

Nick Chubb, Georgia
Royce Freeman, Oregon
Akrum Wadley, Iowa
Sony Michel, Georgia
Ralph Webb, Vanderbilt
Underclassmen

Saquon Barkley, Penn State
Derrius Guice, LSU
Bo Scarbrough, Alabama
Kamryn Pettway, Auburn
Damien Harris, Alabama
Chubb (5-10, 228) was actually on my way-too-early Big Board last year, and so I'd like to see him get back to his form from 2015, when he averaged 8.1 yards per carry. The Bulldogs also have Michel (5-11, 208), who has 48 catches over the past two seasons. Scarbrough (6-2, 240) broke out in the Peach Bowl and is a physical specimen, but Harris (5-11, 205) had the better all-around season.

Fullbacks Seniors

Jaylen Samuels, NC State
Khalid Hill, Michigan
Austin Ramesh, Wisconsin
Dimitri Flowers, Oklahoma
J.D. Moore, LSU
Underclassmen

Winston Dimel, Kansas State
George Aston, Pitt
Chandler Cox, Auburn
Alec Ingold, Wisconsin
Ryan Nall, Oregon State
Samuels has 120 catches the past two seasons as a tight end for the Wolfpack, but at 5-11, 240, he'll have to move to a fullback/H-back role to make it in the NFL. Hill (6-2, 255) is more of a traditional fullback.

Wide receivers Seniors

James Washington, Oklahoma State
D.J. Chark, LSU
Darren Carrington, Oregon
Dante Pettis, Washington
Jester Weah, Pitt
Underclassmen

Christian Kirk, Texas A&M
Calvin Ridley, Alabama
Antonio Callaway, Florida
Courtland Sutton, SMU
Deon Cain, Clemson
Pettis (6-0, 177) had 15 touchdown catches last season. Sutton (6-3, 200) had 76 catches and 10 touchdowns last season and played some basketball at SMU as a freshman.

Tight ends Seniors

Mike Gesicki, Penn State
Troy Fumagalli, Wisconsin
DeAndre Goolsby, Florida
Marcus Baugh, Ohio State
Dallas Goedert, South Dakota State
Underclassmen

Mark Andrews, Oklahoma
C.J. Conrad, Kentucky
Ryan Izzo, Florida State
Dalton Schultz, Stanford
Hayden Hurst, South Carolina
Fumagalli (6-5, 233) could have a big 2017 after having only two touchdown grabs last season. Andrews (6-6, 247) has 14 career touchdowns on only 50 catches.

Offensive tackles Seniors

Mike McGlinchey, Notre Dame
Jamarco Jones, Ohio State
Mason Cole, Michigan
Chukwuma Okorafor, Western Michigan
Tyrell Crosby, Oregon
Underclassmen

Trey Adams, Washington
Orlando Brown, Oklahoma
Mitch Hyatt, Clemson
Brian O'Neill, Pitt
Dalton Risner, Kansas State
At 6-8, 355, Brown is massive. Hyatt (6-6, 274) is a former five-star recruit who has started at left tackle for the Tigers since Week 1 of his freshman year. Okorafor (6-5, 275) started at left tackle for the Broncos while 2016 second-round pick Taylor Moton played right tackle.

Guards Seniors

Billy Price, Ohio State
Will Hernandez, UTEP
Cody O'Connell, Washington State
Braden Smith, Auburn
Scott Quessenberry, UCLA
Underclassmen

Quenton Nelson, Notre Dame
Martez Ivey, Florida
William Clapp, LSU
Ross Pierschbacher, Alabama
Beau Benzschawel, Wisconsin
Nelson (6-5, 325) was on my preseason Big Board last year. He's incredibly powerful. Price (6-4, 305) has already started three seasons for the Buckeyes.

Scraped at insider2text.xyz, brought to you by HeheStreams — No ads, No Bullshit Live & On-Demand NBA, NFL, MLB, and NHL Streaming

Centers Seniors

Martinas Rankin, Mississippi State
Frank Ragnow, Arkansas
Bradley Bozeman, Alabama
Coleman Shelton, Washington
Brian Allen, Michigan State
Underclassmen

Brendan Moore, Maryland
James Daniels, Iowa
Drew Kyser, Memphis
Alec Eberle, Florida State
Michael Deiter, Wisconsin
Rankin (6-5, 307) showed some athleticism while playing left tackle last season, but he could move to center in 2017. I'm projecting him as a center in the NFL. Ragnow (6-5, 312) is a two-year starter.

Defensive ends Seniors

Bradley Chubb, NC State
Da'Shawn Hand, Alabama
Tyquan Lewis, Ohio State
Duke Ejiofor, Wake Forest
KJ Smith, Baylor
Underclassmen

Clelin Ferrell, Clemson
Sam Hubbard, Ohio State
Josh Sweat, Florida State
Porter Gustin, USC
Jaylon Ferguson, Louisiana Tech
A former five-star recruit, Hand (6-4, 273) goes unnoticed sometimes among Alabama's talent, but he has first-round ability. Gustin (6-5, 250) has 11 sacks and 19.5 tackles for loss in two seasons. Ferguson (6-5, 256) had 14.5 sacks in 2016.

Defensive tackles 1. Maurice Hurst, Michigan 2. Derrick Nnadi, Florida State 3. Lowell Lotulelei, Utah 4. Andrew Brown, Virginia 5. James Looney, California

Underclassmen

Christian Wilkins, Clemson
Vita Vea, Washington
Da'Ron Payne, Alabama
Trenton Thompson, Georgia
Harrison Phillips, Stanford
At 6-5, 340, Vea is a mountain, but he did have five sacks last season. Phillips (6-4, 258) is likely to be a 3-technique in the NFL. He had 7.5 sacks last season.

Inside linebackers Seniors

Azeem Victor, Washington
Shaun Dion Hamilton, Alabama
Micah Kiser, Virginia
Rashaan Evans, Alabama
Josey Jewell, Iowa
Underclassmen

Cameron Smith, USC
T.J. Edwards, Wisconsin
Kendall Joseph, Clemson
Andre Smith, North Carolina
Jahlani Tavai, Hawaii
Dion Hamilton (6-0, 233) is coming off an ACL tear suffered late in the season. Cameron Smith (6-2, 245) started as a freshman for the Trojans. Kiser (6-2, 235) had 6.5 sacks and 10 tackles for loss in 2016.

Outside linebackers Seniors

Harold Landry, Boston College
Ogbonnia Okoronkwo, Oklahoma
Marquis Haynes, Mississippi
Matthew Thomas, Florida State
Mike McCray, Michigan
Underclassmen

Arden Key, LSU
Malik Jefferson, Texas
Jerome Baker, Ohio State
Denzil Ware, Kentucky
Tremaine Edmunds, Virginia Tech
Okoronkwo (6-1, 240) had nine sacks last season and will probably play defensive end in 2017. Ware (6-2, 255) had 5.5 sacks and 12.5 tackles for loss in 2016.

Cornerbacks Seniors

Jordan Thomas, Oklahoma
Anthony Averett, Alabama
Greg Stroman, Virginia Tech
Donovan Wilson, Texas A&M
Deion Harris, North Dakota
Underclassmen

Minkah Fitzpatrick, Alabama
Tarvarus McFadden, Florida State
Jaire Alexander, Louisville
Iman Marshall, USC
Denzel Ward, Ohio State
Thomas had an up-and-down season in 2016 but finished with two interceptions after having five in 2015. Marshall (6-2, 200), another former five-star prospect, has six interceptions in two seasons.

Safeties Seniors

Quin Blanding, Virginia
Marcus Allen, Penn State
Godwin Igwebuike, Northwestern
Damon Webb, Ohio State
Kieron Williams, Nebraska
Underclassmen

*Derwin James, Florida State
Ronnie Harrison, Alabama
Chase Hansen, Utah
Jordan Whitehead, Pitt
Terrell Edmunds, Virginia Tech
I'd like to see Blanding (6-4, 210) make more plays. He has six interceptions and only 5.5 tackles for loss in three seasons. Hansen (6-3, 216), who has also played quarterback for the Utes, had three interceptions, including a pick-six, in 2016.

Kickers Seniors

Daniel Carlson, Auburn
Jonathan Barnes, Louisiana Tech
Gary Wunderlich, Mississippi
Drew Brown, Nebraska
Jason Sanders, New Mexico
Underclassmen

*Eddy Pineiro, Florida
Emmit Carpenter, Minnesota
John Baron II, San Diego State
Parker Shaunfield, So. Mississippi
Matthew Wright, Central Florida
Wunderlich (6-0, 175) led the country in field goal percentage (95.7), missing only a 55-yard kick.

Punters Seniors

JK Scott, Alabama
Johnny Townsend, Florida
Trevor Daniel, Tennessee
Austin Barnes, Eastern Michigan
Joe Davidson, Bowling Green
Underclassmen

Michael Dickson, Texas
Jake Bailey, Stanford
Mitch Wishnowsky, Utah
Dylan Klumph, California
*Mason King, Louisville
Scott (6-4, 185) averaged 47.2 yards per kick last season.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on May 19, 2017, 11:12:59 PM
Should be a good QB/OT/RB class for us, but, as always it's far away and who knows.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on May 20, 2017, 12:36:51 AM
Should be a good QB/OT/RB class for us, but, as always it's far away and who knows.

This class might have some of the best pass rushing talent in a long, long time if Key comes back strong. 

Key, Chubb, Ferrell, Sweat, Landry, and Jefferson...ballers

Could be a really good WR class too
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on May 21, 2017, 06:10:00 PM
Oregon State RB Ryan Nall is an interesting prospect.

6'2 240+ converted H-Back that has deceptive breakaway speed.  He'll be compared to Mike Alstott every game because he's white. 
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Libero_2 on May 21, 2017, 07:43:28 PM
Oregon State RB Ryan Nall is an interesting prospect.

6'2 240+ converted H-Back that has deceptive breakaway speed.  He'll be compared to Mike Alstott every game because he's white. 

Does he also run over everybody and is he destined for the only 99 rating ever for a FB in Madden?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Coach K on June 13, 2017, 09:55:00 AM
Oregon State RB Ryan Nall is an interesting prospect.

6'2 240+ converted H-Back that has deceptive breakaway speed.  He'll be compared to Mike Alstott every game because he's white.

lol

his hips and plant and cut ability are way better than Alstott's. id have to see more of him but the kid could very well rack up a huge season this year and find himself in rd 3 by the end of the school year, unless he stays senior year. still a ton to prove. but like you said. very intriguing prospect

big if, but i wouldnt be shocked. i like what ive seen, albeit only portions of his soph year.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on August 07, 2017, 11:18:48 PM
Don't really love any of these guys. Who else is out there?

Heismanberg mentioned Mason Rudolph (OK State). His stock is shooting up.

Chad Kelly (Ole Miss) and Mitch Trubisky (UNC) are potential 2nd/3rd round prospects.

Baker Mayfield (OU) as a late round or UDFA dart throw

Lol @ trubisky in the 2nd and at the time that was a realistic statement

Also lol chad kelly
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on December 08, 2017, 06:03:00 AM
Marshon Lattimore looks like a lock for DROY. We were pretty low on him collectively, myself included.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Laxin on December 10, 2017, 05:17:54 PM
Marshon Lattimore looks like a lock for DROY. We were pretty low on him collectively, myself included.

To be fair, I think many were concerned about his injury history, especially after the Dee Milliner fiasco.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: insanity on December 10, 2017, 07:03:22 PM
if Dalvin Cook fell to our 2nd round pick and we passed on him. Duff can go to freaking hell.

Lulz
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on December 10, 2017, 07:12:44 PM
Lulz
Cook is a stud
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on December 10, 2017, 08:43:36 PM
Cook is a stud

Yeah how can you tell
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on December 10, 2017, 08:51:39 PM
Yeah how can you tell
should I whiteboard this for you too?
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on December 10, 2017, 09:38:19 PM
should I whiteboard this for you too?

Go right ahead, Mr Beans and Broken Dreams.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: MBGreen on December 10, 2017, 09:41:31 PM
Go right ahead, Mr Beans and Broken Dreams.
go get your crayons then
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Miamipuck on December 10, 2017, 10:12:27 PM
go get your crayons then

That was my dinner, so sketch it up Leonardo.

 Yep I called you a Ginny Homo from the 14th century.
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Badger on December 10, 2017, 11:02:56 PM
Ginny

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20171211/6e680b478d4a5b72cd5b339d704f9b46.jpeg)
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: Heismanberg on December 10, 2017, 11:15:37 PM
hahahahahaha
Title: Re: 2017 NFL Draft Prospect Discussion
Post by: SixFeetDeep on September 15, 2019, 06:12:27 PM
if Dalvin Cook fell to our 2nd round pick and we passed on him. Duff can go to freaking hell.

sigh