Putting aside the constitutionality of overriding hundreds of years of judicial independence that is expressly packing the Court with those of a specific ideology so that you can get what you want in a move that DIRECTLY violates the notion of an independent judicial branch.
Yeah, again, I didn't make an argument for or against, I was just correcting you when you said it wouldn't be "directly in line with the Constitution." Figured you ought to be precise with your language regarding the Constitution, given your admiration for originalists.
My favorite Supreme Court plan I recall reading, which I think was either Beto's or Buttigieg's (?) was a fifteen person supreme court, with five justices nominated by each party, and then five decided upon by the previous ten. Deemphasis on individual justices, nominations are inherently less partisan, some semblance of cooperation is built into the system.
I wouldn't be opposed to term limits on the Supreme Court, either, because it seems a little morbid to consistently be picking young ideologues instead of possibly more qualified older nominees - I'd prefer them to Senate term limits, at least Senators
can be voted out.