Also, here is why it's frustrating to talk about this stuff with you guys:
I get the feeling you're seeing what you want to see and not getting where I'm coming from.
you're continually stating that martin attacked him as the aggressor and claiming it to be fact. this is blatantly false and now indefensible after martin was murdered but you willingly choose to believe this is how things went to fit the narrative you would like to believe. you do not see this. you made a claim that martin was bigger than zimmerman to defend zimmerman's actions which is of course anything but fact, but keep claiming that you're stating the facts. i'm not going to break down the rest of your posts but they're all filled with your own takes of martin, assuming the worst of him and in a negative light, while claiming you're just here reporting facts. but i'm the one seeing what i want to see.
if i happen to have a gun on me and pick a fight with someone for no reason only to end up getting my derriere kicked, is it morally just of me to then shoot and kill that person? is that a morally just occurrence? are you really defending this?
i'd be lying if i said i couldn't believe that you're minimizing what happened to martin as a 'dumb kid who did something dumb and ended up paying the price for it' while doing all you can to absolve and give a POS like zimmerman the benefit of the doubt for needlessly taking the life of somebody who had done nothing but buy some candy. but i CAN believe it; you've only ever been interested in your own incorrect views and perspective on things, even going so far as completely dismissing an entire life's worth of a black person's viewpoints and experiences simply because you choose not to believe such things exist.
we're seeing what you want to see, we get where you're coming from, you're not seeing or getting where you're coming from.